IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,247,082
Granted Patent B2
US 12,247,082 · App. 17/276,276 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Highly efficient anti-TFPI antibody composition

Inventors: Min Jung Kim (Yongin-si, KR); Geun Hye Yeo (Yongin-si, KR); Haeng Eun Song (Yongin-si, KR); Ji Yoon Park (Yongin-si, KR); Yuna Kim (Yongin-si, KR)
Assignee: GREEN CROSS CORPORATION
C07K16/38C07K1/165C07K1/22C07K1/34C07K1/36C07K2317/10C07K2317/92
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,247,082
App. No.
17/276,276
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to a pharmaceutical highly efficient anti-TFPI antibody composition including an anti-TFPI antibody for treating hemophilia, in which the content of HCP in a drug substance is less than 10.0 ng/mg, and the content of LPA in the drug substance or the drug product is less than 1.0 ng/mg. According to the present disclosure, a highly efficient anti-TFPI antibody composition having very low contents of HCP and LPA may be provided by providing a separation/purification process capable of minimizing anti-TFPI antibody polymer generation, and may be effectively used for the treatment of antibody-induced hemophilia patients and for the prevention of blood coagulation disease.

Claims (20)

1. A method of preparing a pharmaceutical composition comprising a purified anti-tissue factor pathway inhibitor (anti-TFPI) antibody, wherein a content of host cell protein (HCP) in the composition is less than 10.0 ng/mg, and a content of leachable protein A (LPA) in the composition is less than 1.0 ng/mg,

wherein the anti-TFPI antibody is an IgG4 antibody,

the method comprising

(a) a step of clarifying a culture containing the anti-TFPI antibody to obtain a clarified culture, wherein the clarified culture is subjected to following (b)-(g), in this order;

(b) an affinity chromatography process at pH of 3.0 to 3.8, which further comprises the steps of:

(b-1) neutralizing an eluate, which passed through an affinity chromatography column, in the range of pH 4.0 to 6.0; and

(b-2) leaving the neutralized eluate obtained in (b-1) to stand at a temperature of 15 to 25° C. for 8 to 16 hours;

(c) a viral inactivation process;

(d) an ultrafiltration and diafiltration process;

(e) a mixed-mode chromatography process;

(f) a nano-filtration process; and

(g) a concentration process,

wherein the mixed-mode chromatography process (e) comprises performing two or more plural mixed-mode chromatography processes using different types of column resin to remove the anti-TFPI antibody in a form of polymer.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein a total content of the HCP and the LPA in the composition is 5 ng/mg or less.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mixed-mode chromatography process (e) removes 98% or more of the anti-TFPI antibody in a form of polymer.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the concentration process comprises a rinse solution circulation/recovery process.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a content of the anti-TFPI antibody in a form of polymer in the composition is less than 5%.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a content of the anti-TFPI antibody in the composition, which is in a form of monomer, is greater than 60% based on a total amount of the anti-TFPI antibody contained in the composition.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the HCP content in a composition obtained after a purification comprising (b)-(g) is at least 50,000-fold lower than the HCP content in the clarified culture obtained in (a) and before the purification.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a relative potency value of the composition is 85% or higher compared to that of the composition in which 100% of the anti-TFPI antibody is in a form of monomer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 15, 2021
From: KIM, MIN JUNG; YEO, GEUN HYE; SONG, HAENG EUN; PARK, JI YOON; KIM, YUNA
To: GREEN CROSS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055591/0705 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2018-0113974 · Sep 21, 2018 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220025067A1 · Jan 27, 2022
References Cited (38)
US 10125189B2 · Teschner · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20080312425A1 · Bonnerjea et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100135987A1 · Hickman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120028901A1 · Dockal et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120108796A1 · Wang · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20160115195A1 · Mendiratta · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160326253A1 · Ueda · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170073428A1 · Pittman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170306036A1 · Vu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
JP 2012506383A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013531623A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015528464A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016519137A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020150027807A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020160102283A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020160103767A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010072691A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011104381A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011146179A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011147921A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014036071A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014180852A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015070068A1 · 2015 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016137108A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017117490A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Renee Boerner et al., “Defining Your Product Profile and Maintaining Control Over It, Part 3”, BioProcess International, Oct. 2005, 3: pp. 50-56. [cited by applicant]
Chris Bailey-Kellogg et al., “CHOPPI: A Web Tool for the Analysis of Immunogenicity Risk from Host Cell Proteins in CHO-Based Protein Production”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Nov. 2014, vol. 111, No. 11, pp. 2170-… [cited by applicant]
Anne S. De Groot et al., “Reducing risk, improving outcomes: bioengineering less immunogenic protein therapeutics”, Clinical Immunology, Mar. 6, 2009, 131(2), pp. 189-201. [cited by applicant]
Peng Wang et al., “A Systematic Assessment of MHC Class II Peptide Binding Predictions and Evaluation of a Consensus Approach”, PLoS Computational Biology, Apr. 4, 2008, e1000048, 11 pages, vol. 4, Issue 4. [cited by applicant]
Robert L. Fahrner et al., “Industrial Purification of Pharmaceutical Antibodies: Development, Operation, and Validation of Chromatography Processes”, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, Jul. 2001, pp. 301-327… [cited by applicant]
Koran Office Action of KR10-2018-0113974 dated Feb. 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Koran Office Action of KR10-2018-0113974 dated Oct. 30, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report of PCT/KR2019/011582 dated Dec. 20, 2019 [PCT/ISA/210]. [cited by applicant]
Pete Gagnon et al., “Transient conformational modification of immunoglobulin G during purification by protein A affinity chromatography”, Journal of Chromatography A, 2015, vol. 1395, pp. 136-142 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Abhinav A. Shukla et al., “Downstream processing of monoclonal antibodies—Application of platform approaches”, Journal of Chromatography B, 2007, vol. 848, pp. 28-39 (12 pages total). [cited by applicant]
Hui F. Liu et al., “Recovery and purification process development for monoclonal antibody production”, MABS, 2010, vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 480-499 (20 pages total). [cited by applicant]
Ida Hilden et al., “Hemostatic effect of a monoclonal antibody mAb 2021 blocking the interaction between FXa and TFPI in a rabbit hemophilia model”, Blood, Jun. 14, 2012, vol. 119, No. 24, pp. 5871-5878 (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Communication dated May 29, 2024, issued in Canadian Application No. 3,111,179. [cited by applicant]