IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,390,653
Granted Patent B2
US 12,390,653 · App. 17/277,616 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Spreading depolarization and repolarization as biomarkers of neurological recovery after cardiac arrest

Inventors: Yama Akbari (Irvine, CA); Robert H. Wilson (Irvine, CA); Christian Crouzet (Irvine, CA); Bernard Choi (Irvine, CA); Bruce J. Tromberg (Irvine, CA)
Assignee: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
A61N1/39044A61B5/37A61B5/4839A61H31/005A61B5/0261A61H2201/5094A61H2230/085A61H2230/105A61H2230/255
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,390,653
App. No.
17/277,616
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Electrophysiologic biomarkers for prognostication of neurological outcome are described herein. An inverse correlation was found between timing of a cortical spreading depolarization (SD) wave and neurological outcome as tested at 24 hours post-CPR. Additionally, a minor image of this SD was identified as a “repolarization (RP) wave.” Quantifying features of SD and RP during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provide important metrics for diagnosis and prognosis of neurological injury from hypoxia-ischemia and can serve as an early prognostication tool for predicting outcome at subsequent days after successful CPR. This discovery may also allow for novel therapeutic interventions to improve neurological recovery after hypoxia-ischemia insults.

Claims (18)

1. A method of improving a neurological outcome in a subject during cardiac arrest, comprising:

a. detecting spreading depolarization (SD), or a lack or delay of the SD, in a brain of the subject post cardiac arrest to generate SD data;

b. resuscitating the subject;

c. detecting repolarization (RP), or a lack or delay of the RP, in the brain of the subject post resuscitation to generate RP data;

d. comparing the SD and RP data to one or more metrics to determine a neurological outcome score;

e. identifying a neurological condition of the brain based on the neurological outcome score;

f. administering a treatment to the subject to improve the neurological condition of the brain; and

g. determining severity and prognosticating the neurological outcome of the neurological condition using the neurological outcome score;

wherein the SD is a biomarker for the neurological outcome of the brain post-cardiac arrest, wherein the RP is a biomarker for the neurological outcome of the brain post-resuscitation, and wherein prognosticating the neurological outcome of the neurological condition of the brain is determined in real-time.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment comprises therapeutically administering a drug, electrical stimulation, magnetic stimulation, optical stimulation, soundwave-induced stimulation, or a combination thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

a. measuring one or more of cerebral blood flow (CBF), tissue oxygenation, and tissue scattering in the brain;

b. determining one or more of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) from the measurements of the CBF and the tissue oxygenation, and scattering change onset, duration, and magnitude of the scattering change; and

c. comparing one or more of the CMRO2, the scattering change onset, the duration of scattering change, the magnitude of scattering change, the CBF measurements, and the tissue oxygenation measurements to one or more metrics to determine the neurological outcome score.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein one or more of the CBF, tissue oxygenation, and tissue scattering are measured by one or more optical measurement devices comprising point measurement devices, diffuse optical measurement devices, or optical measurement devices capable of measuring one or more of the CBF, tissue oxygenation, and tissue scattering through intact human skull.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the SD and RP are detected by an electroencephalogram (EEG), an electrocorticograph (ECoG), one or more optical measurement devices, or a combination thereof.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising inducing the SD in the brain during or immediately after the cardiac arrest.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising inducing the RP in the brain during or immediately after the resuscitation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2021
From: AKBARI, YAMA; WILSON, ROBERT H.; CROUZET, CHRISTIAN; CHOI, BERNARD; TROMBERG, BRUCE J.
To: THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Reel/Frame 058375/0134 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62734417 · Sep 21, 2018
Related Publication 20220032074A1 · Feb 3, 2022
References Cited (51)
US 4709702A · Sherwin · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US D739122S · Aimone et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9730649B1 · Jepsen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10009644B2 · Aimone et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10321842B2 · Garten et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20040068199A1 · Echauz et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050143589A1 · Donoghue et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060281983A1 · Al-Ali et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070191689A1 · Elitok · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080177572A1 · Fuhrman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080243022A1 · Donnett · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080249430A1 · John · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090118622A1 · Durkin et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100241100A1 · Blumenfeld et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110105912A1 · Widman et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120143020A1 · Bordoley et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130261183A1 · Bhagat · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140018649A1 · Jespersen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140088996A1 · Damani · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150051521A1 · Woerlee et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150257674A1 · Jordan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160317385A1 · Salcido et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160345880A1 · Nakaji et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170135594A1 · Hartings et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170224246A1 · Jiang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180044278A1 · Bazan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180085047A1 · Hartings et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180246570A1 · Coleman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180308390A1 · Moser et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190053721A1 · Boas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190113973A1 · Coleman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190117500A1 · Shaw et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190159675A1 · Sengupta et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190306438A1 · Regan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190306439A1 · Morales Delgado et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190384392A1 · Aimone et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200019243A1 · Aimone et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 10153360A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
EP 3020333A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2008109699A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016164891A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020243658A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
H. Adrian Puttgen and Romergryko Geocadin, “Predicting neurological outcome following cardiac arrest”, Journal of the Neurological Sciences 261 (2007) pp. 108-117 (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
Andy Temple, Richard Porter, Predicting neurological outcome and survival after cardiac arrest, Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain, vol. 12, Issue 6, Dec. 2012, pp. 283-287 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Jens P. Dreier, Coline L. Lemale, Vasilis Kola, Alon Friedman, Karl Schoknecht, Spreading depolarization is not an epiphenomenon but the principal mechanism of the cytotoxic edema in various gray matter structures of th… [cited by examiner]
Nicolas Lellouche, Frederic Sacher, Pierre Jorrot, Alain Cariou, Christian Spaulding, et al.. Sudden Cardiac Arrest: ECG Repolarization After Resuscitation . . . Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2011, 22 (2)… [cited by examiner]
Salvo et al. A 3D printed dry electrode for ECG/EEG recording, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Dec. 8, 2011, p. 96-102, Elsevie B.V. [cited by applicant]
Wiebe et al. EEG-PEN for Medical Emergencies, Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik Oct. 23, 2009, vol. 47, Issue s1a, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bmte.2002.47.s1a.308. [cited by applicant]
Krachunov et al. 3D Printed Dry Electrodes, Sensors Journal, 1635, pp. 1-18, Oct. 2, 2016 doi:10.3390/s16101635. [cited by applicant]
Cuccia et al. “Quantitation and mapping of tissue optical properties using modulated imaging.” Journal of biomedical optics 14.2 (2009): 024012. [cited by applicant]
Dreier et al. “Spreading depolarization is not an epiphenomenon but the principal mechanism of the cytotoxic edema in various gray matter structures of the brain during stroke.” Neuropharmacology 134 (2018): 189-207. [cited by applicant]