NR-U LBT MAC procedures
In NR-U, when LBT failures occur existing MAC procedures may take inappropriate actions resulting in unintended consequences. Methods, apparatuses, and systems associated with existing MAC procedures that help maintain proper operation and performance of MAC procedures when operating in unlicensed spectrum.
1. An apparatus comprising:
a processor; and
memory coupled with the processor, the memory storing executable instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to effectuate operations comprising:
determining that one or more listen-before-talk (LBT) failures have occurred;
attempting to transmit
a random access preamble based on determining that the one or more LBT failures have occurred;
determining that there was a LBT failure for the random access preamble transmission;
determining not to increment a preamble transmission counter and not to increment a preamble power ramping counter based on determining that there was an LBT failure for the random access preamble transmission;
determining that a LBT failure counter has reached a configured number of failure indications within a sliding time window;
based on determining that the LBT failure counter has reached the configured number of failure indications within the sliding time window, switching from a first bandwidth part (BWP) to a second BWP; and
transmitting a LBT report medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) to a base station, wherein the LBT report MAC CE indicates LBT failure information detected by the apparatus.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the sliding time window corresponds to a period of time that is extended based on detecting an LBT failure.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the LBT report MAC CE is transmitted to the base station using available uplink shared channel (UL-SCH) resources.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise resetting the LBT failure counter to zero.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the failure indications that occurred within the sliding time window are associated with at least one uplink failure and at least one downlink failure.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise cancelling a triggered consistent LBT failure.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein determining that one or more LBT failures have occurred is based on a physical layer indication.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein determining that there was a failure for the random access preamble transmission is based on a physical layer indication.
9. A method comprising:
determining that one or more listen-before-talk (LBT) failures have occurred;
attempting to transmit
a random access preamble based on determining that the one or more LBT failures have occurred;
determining that there was a LBT failure for the random access preamble transmission;
determining not to increment a preamble transmission counter and not to increment a preamble power ramping counter based on determining that there was an LBT failure for the random access preamble transmission;
determining that a LBT failure counter has reached a configured number of failure indications within a sliding time window;
based on determining that the LBT failure counter has reached the configured number of failure indications within the sliding time window, switching from a first bandwidth part (BWP) to a second BWP; and
transmitting a LBT report medium access control (MAC) control element (CE) to a base station, wherein the LBT report MAC CE indicates LBT failure information detected by the apparatus.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the sliding time window corresponds to a period of time that is extended based on detecting an LBT failure.
11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the LBT report MAC CE is transmitted to the base station using available uplink shared channel (UL-SCH) resources.
12. The method of claim 9 , further comprising resetting the LBT failure counter to zero.
13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the failure indications that occurred within the sliding time window are associated with at least one uplink failure and at least one downlink failure.
14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising cancelling a triggered consistent LBT failure.
15. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining that one or more LBT failures have occurred is based on a physical layer indication.
16. The method of claim 9 , wherein determining that there was a failure for the random access preamble transmission is based on a physical layer indication.