IP Library Granted Patent US 12,211,618
Granted Patent B2
US 12,211,618 · App. 17/292,109 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Methods and systems for treating cancer based on response prediction using light scattering technology

Inventors: Robert Lawrence Hill (Rochester, NY); Edward Bernard Brown (Rochester, NY); David Hicks (Rochester, NY); Brandon Buscaglia (Rochester, NY); Bradley Turner (Rochester, NY); Danielle Desa (Rochester, NY)
Assignees: THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER; HARMONIGENIC CORPORATION
G16H50/20A61B5/4842G01N21/636G01N33/4833G16H10/40G16H20/40G16H30/40G16H50/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,211,618
App. No.
17/292,109
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are methods and systems that make use of light scattering techniques, such as the use of a multiphoton laser-scanning microscope, to quantify the scattering directionality of second harmonic generation (SHG) from biopsy samples of cancer in order to predict efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Claims (24)

1. A method of treating a subject with cancer, the method comprising:

a. obtaining a sample from cancerous tissue of the subject;

b. preparing the sample for a light scattering test;

c. applying second harmonic generation (SHG) two photon scattering measurements from the sample to determine directionality of scattered photons;

d. obtaining a signature score using selected data from SHG data;

e. determining if the signature score falls above or below a reference level, wherein if the signature score is above the reference level, the subject is treated with neoadjuvant therapy, and if the signature score is below the reference level, the subject is subjected to surgical treatment.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample is a needle biopsy sample.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the needle biopsy sample is a core needle biopsy sample.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer is breast cancer, prostate cancer, or thyroid cancer.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the breast cancer is HER2+ and ER+ breast cancer.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject was diagnosed with cancer before the method of claim 1 is carried out.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is diagnosed with cancer after the sample is obtained and prepared.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein SHG is carried out at the tumor-host interface in collagen rich tumor stroma next to tumor bulk containing more cancer cells than stroma.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample of step b) is prepared by:

i. sectioning the sample;

ii. mounting the sample on a slide; and

iii. staining the slide with hematoxylin and eosin (H+E).

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein SHG is used to determine forwards-to-backwards (F/B) scattering ratio.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein SHG is carried out using a multiphoton laser-scanning microscope.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject who undergoes neoadjuvant chemotherapy later undergoes surgery as well.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the signature score is also calculated based on the age, sex, race, family history, and/or lifestyle of the subject.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the signature score is also calculated based on genetic markers of the subject.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein said reference levels are determined using samples from previously assayed subjects who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the reference levels are determined by comparing samples of subjects who were effectively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus those who were not.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jan 6, 2022
From: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
To: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
Reel/Frame 058660/0988 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2021
From: BROWN, EDWARD BERNARD; HICKS, DAVID; BUSCAGLIA, BRANDON; TURNER, BRADLEY; DESA, DANIELLE
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Reel/Frame 057864/0781 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2021
From: HILL, ROBERT LAWRENCE
To: HARMONIGENIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 057864/0839 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62795828 · Jan 23, 2019
Provisional Application 62758408 · Nov 9, 2018
Related Publication 20210398673A1 · Dec 23, 2021
References Cited (15)
US 20080015448A1 · Keely · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20170020462A1 · Brown, III · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Wu et al., Quantitative evaluation of redox ratio and collagen characteristics during breast cancer chemotherapy using two-photon intrinsic imaging, Biomedical Optics Express, vol. 9, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2018, pp. 1-14 (Year… [cited by examiner]
Campagnola, Paul; Second Harmonic Generation Imaging Microscopy: Applications to Diseases Diagnostics, Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 83, pp. 3224-3231. (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Li et al., Monitoring neoadjuvant therapy responses in rectal cancer using multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy, Oncotarget, 2017, vol. 8, No. 63, pp. 107323-107333. (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Communication under Rule 71(3) received in related EP Application No. 19836 084.4 dated May 9, 2023. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2019/060422, dated Apr. 20, 2020, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lian-Huang Li et al: “Monitoring neoadjuvant therapy responses in rectal cancer using multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy”, Oncotarget, vol. 8, No. 63, Dec. 5, 2017, pp. 107323-107333. [cited by applicant]
Lian-Huang Li: “Multiphoton microscopy for tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal carcinoma”, World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, No. 14, Jan. 1, 2015, p. 4210. [cited by applicant]
Jason Z. Cui et al: “Quantification of aortic and cutaneous elastin and collagen morphology in Marfan syndrome by multiphoton microscopy”, Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 187, No. 3, Sep. 1, 2014, pp. 242-253. [cited by applicant]
Pantazis P, Maloney J, Wu D, Fraser SE. Second harmonic generating (SHG) nanoprobes for in vivo imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010; 107(33):14535-14540. doi:10… [cited by applicant]
Han X, Burke RM, Zettel ML, Tang P, Brown EB. Second harmonic properties of tumor collagen: determining the structural relationship between reactive stroma and healthy stroma. Opt Express. 2008;16(3):1846-59. PubMed PMI… [cited by applicant]
Williams RM, Zipfel WR, Webb WW. Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys J. 2005;88(2):1377-86. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047308. PubMed PMID: 15533922; PMCID: PMC1305140. [cited by applicant]
Burke K, Smid M, Dawes RP, et al. Using second harmonic generation to predict patient outcome in solid tumors. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:929. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1911-8. [cited by applicant]
Sage, D. OrientationJ: A series of ImageJ plugins for directional image analysis. Biomedical Image Group at EPFL, Switzerland. [cited by applicant]