IP Library Granted Patent US 11,734,140
Granted Patent B2
US 11,734,140 · App. 17/305,018 · Granted Aug 22, 2023

Method and apparatus for system protection maintenance analysis

Inventors: Raymond Hicks (Chicago, IL); Ryan Michael Pisani (Burlington, WI); Thomas James McNeela (Streamwood, IL)
Assignee: UncommonX Inc.
G06F11/26G06F11/076G06F11/079G06F11/0709G06F11/0793G06F11/3006G06F11/3409G06F11/3476G06F11/3495G06F11/3668G06F16/2379G06F21/577G06Q10/06393H04L63/1416H04L63/1425H04L63/1433H04L63/20G06F2221/034
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,734,140
App. No.
17/305,018
Granted
Aug 22, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes determining, by an analysis system, a system aspect of a system for a protection evaluation. The method further includes determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the protection evaluation on the system aspect. The method further includes determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the protection analysis on the system aspect. The method further includes obtaining, by the analysis system, protection data regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint. The method further includes calculating, by the analysis system, a protection rating as a measure of protection maturity for the system aspect based on the protection data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric.

Claims (151)

1. A method comprises:

determining, by an analysis system that includes one or more computing entities, a system aspect of an enterprise system for protection maintenance evaluation;

determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the protection maintenance evaluation;

determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the protection maintenance evaluation;

obtaining, by the analysis system, protection maintenance data in accordance with the system aspect, the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint by:

determining data gathering parameters regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric;

identifying system elements of the system aspect based on the data gathering parameters;

obtaining protection maintenance information from the system elements in accordance with the data gathering parameters; and

recording the protection maintenance information from the system elements to produce the protection maintenance data; and

calculating, by the analysis system, a protection maintenance rating regarding the protection maintenance for the system aspect based on the protection maintenance data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and the at least one evaluation rating metric.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining, by the analysis system, the protection maintenance data in accordance with the system aspect, the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint includes:

gathering protection maintenance information; and

processing the protection maintenance information to produce the protection maintenance data.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the protection maintenance information includes at least one of:

information representative of an organization's understanding of the enterprise system, or portion thereof, with respect to system maintenance and repair and/or remote maintenance of organizational assets programs of the enterprise system; or

discovered data regarding the enterprise system, or portion thereof, with respect to system maintenance and repair and/or remote maintenance of organizational assets programs of the enterprise system.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the protection maintenance information is gathered by at least one of:

obtaining the protection maintenance information from a system administration computing entity; or

obtaining the protection maintenance information from one or more computing entities of the enterprise system.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the protection maintenance information includes at least one of:

protection maintenance processes;

protection maintenance policies;

protection maintenance documentation; or

protection maintenance automation.

6. The method of claim 2 , further comprising calculating a second protection maintenance rating regarding a desired level of protection maintenance of the enterprise system, or portion thereof, based on the protection maintenance information, the protection maintenance data, desired protection maintenance data, protection maintenance processes, protection maintenance policies, protection maintenance documentation, and/or protection maintenance automation.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the protection maintenance rating is indicative of a system operator's:

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to system functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the system functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the system functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof; or

operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the protection maintenance rating is based on a comparison of desired data with disclosed data and/or discovered data.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the protection maintenance evaluation includes evaluating the enterprise system's maintenance and repair of organizational assets programs and remote maintenance of organizational assets.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluation perspective includes one or more of:

an understanding perspective;

an implementation perspective;

an operation perspective; or

a self-analysis perspective.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluation viewpoint includes one or more of:

a disclosed viewpoint;

a discovered viewpoint; or

a desired viewpoint.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evaluation rating metric is at least one of:

a process rating metric;

a policy rating metric;

a procedure rating metric;

a certification rating;

a documentation rating metric; or

an automation rating metric.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the system aspect of the enterprise system comprises:

determining at least one system element of the enterprise system;

determining at least one system criteria of the enterprise system;

determining at least one system mode of the enterprise system; and

determining the system aspect based on the at least one system element, the at least one system criteria, and the at least one system mode.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein an evaluation perspective of the at least one evaluation perspective comprises at least one of:

an understanding perspective;

an implementation perspective;

an operation perspective; or

a self-analysis perspective.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evaluation viewpoint comprises at least one of:

a disclosed viewpoint;

a discovered viewpoint; or

a desired viewpoint.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evaluation rating metric comprises at least one of:

a process rating metric;

a policy rating metric;

a procedure rating metric;

a certification rating;

a documentation rating metric; or

an automation rating metric.

17. An analysis system comprises:

one or more computing entities configured to include:

a system user interface module configured to interface with a user to receive one or more inputs regarding evaluation of an enterprise system for protection maintenance;

a control module configured to:

determine a system aspect of the enterprise system for the protection maintenance evaluation based upon the one or more inputs;

determine at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the protection maintenance evaluation based on the one or more inputs; and

determine at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the protection maintenance evaluation of the system aspect based on the one or more inputs;

a data input module configured to obtain protection maintenance data in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint by:

determining data gathering parameters regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric;

identifying system elements of the system aspect based on the data gathering parameters;

obtaining protection maintenance information from the system elements in accordance with the data gathering parameters; and

recording the protection maintenance information from the system elements to produce the protection maintenance data; and

a data analysis module configured to calculate a protection maintenance rating regarding the protection maintenance for the system aspect based on the protection maintenance data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and the at least one evaluation rating metric.

18. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the data input module is configured to obtain the protection maintenance data by:

gathering protection maintenance information; and

processing the protection maintenance information to produce the protection maintenance data.

19. The analysis system of claim 18 , wherein the protection maintenance information includes at least one of:

information representative of an organization's understanding of the enterprise system, or portion thereof, with respect to system maintenance and repair and/or remote maintenance of organizational assets programs of the enterprise system; or

discovered data regarding the enterprise system, or portion thereof, with respect to system maintenance and repair and/or remote maintenance of organizational assets programs of the enterprise system.

20. The analysis system of claim 18 , wherein the protection maintenance information is gathered by at least one of:

obtaining the protection maintenance information from a system administration computing entity; or

obtaining the protection maintenance information from one or more computing entities of the enterprise system.

21. The analysis system of claim 18 , wherein the protection maintenance information includes at least one of:

protection maintenance processes;

protection maintenance policies;

protection maintenance documentation; or

protection maintenance automation.

22. The analysis system of claim 18 , wherein the data analysis module is further configured to calculate a second protection maintenance rating regarding a desired level of protection maintenance of the enterprise system, or portion thereof, based on the protection maintenance information, the protection maintenance data, desired protection maintenance data, protection maintenance processes, protection maintenance policies, protection maintenance documentation, and/or protection maintenance automation.

23. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the protection maintenance rating is indicative of a system operator's:

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to system functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

understanding of the protection maintenance with respect to security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the assets of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the system functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the system functions of enterprise system, or portion thereof;

intended implementation of the protection maintenance with respect to the security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof; or

operation of the protection maintenance with respect to the security functions of the enterprise system, or portion thereof.

24. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the protection maintenance rating is based on a comparison of desired data with disclosed data and/or discovered data.

25. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the protection maintenance evaluation includes the one or more computing entities evaluating the enterprise system's maintenance and repair of organizational assets programs and remote maintenance of organizational assets.

26. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the evaluation perspective includes one or more of:

an understanding perspective;

an implementation perspective;

an operation perspective; or

a self-analysis perspective.

27. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the evaluation viewpoint includes one or more of:

a disclosed viewpoint;

a discovered viewpoint; or

a desired viewpoint.

28. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the at least one evaluation rating metric is at least one of:

a process rating metric;

a policy rating metric;

a procedure rating metric;

a certification rating;

a documentation rating metric; or

an automation rating metric.

29. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the control module is configured to determine the system aspect of the enterprise system by:

determining at least one system element of the enterprise system;

determining at least one system criteria of the enterprise system;

determining at least one system mode of the enterprise system; and

determining the system aspect based on the at least one system element, the at least one system criteria, and the at least one system mode.

30. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein an evaluation perspective of the at least one evaluation perspective comprises at least one of:

an understanding perspective;

an implementation perspective;

an operation perspective; or

a self-analysis perspective.

31. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the at least one evaluation viewpoint comprises at least one of:

a disclosed viewpoint;

a discovered viewpoint; or

a desired viewpoint.

32. The analysis system of claim 17 , wherein the at least one evaluation rating metric comprises at least one of:

a process rating metric;

a policy rating metric;

a procedure rating metric;

a certification rating;

a documentation rating metric; or

an automation rating metric.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2026
From: SW7, LLC
To: UNCOMMONX INC.
Reel/Frame 074208/0453 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 27, 2026
From: RN COLUMN INVESTORS LLC
To: UNCOMMONX INC.
Reel/Frame 074208/0338 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 9, 2026
From: UNCOMMONX INC.
To: CBG CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 073416/0993 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 22, 2023
From: UNCOMMONX INC.
To: SW7, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064659/0492 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 14, 2023
From: UNCOMMONX INC.
To: RN COLUMN INVESTORS LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 064576/0516 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 4, 2023
From: 5THCOLUMN INC.
To: UNCOMMONX INC.
Reel/Frame 062267/0546 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 3, 2023
From: 5THCOLUMN INC.
To: UNCOMMONX INC.
Reel/Frame 062266/0364 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 3, 2023
From: 5THCOLUMN LLC
To: 5C PARTNERS LLC
Reel/Frame 062261/0809 →
CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 3, 2023
From: 5C PARTNERS LLC
To: 5THCOLUMN INC.
Reel/Frame 062266/0269 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2021
From: HICKS, RAYMOND; PISANI, RYAN MICHAEL; MCNEELA, THOMAS JAMES
To: 5THCOLUMN LLC
Reel/Frame 056716/0704 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 17247705 · Dec 21, 2020
Provisional Application 62992661 · Mar 20, 2020
Related Publication 20210326448A1 · Oct 21, 2021