IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,633,411
Granted Patent B2
US 12,633,411 · App. 17/310,933 · Granted May 19, 2026

Data analytics for predictive modeling of surgical outcomes

Inventors: Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen (Baltimore, MD); Nicholas Theodore (Ruxton, MD); Tharindu De Silva (Baltimore, MD); Satyanarayana S. Vedula (Baltimore, MD)
Assignee: The Johns Hopkins University
G16H50/20G16H20/40G16H30/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,633,411
App. No.
17/310,933
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A device may receive a set of perioperative images including a set of pre-operative images depicting one or more anatomical structures of a surgical candidate. The set of pre-operative images may be processed using image analysis techniques to determine a first set of quantitative measures related to the anatomical structure(s) of the surgical candidate. The device may use a data model that has been trained based on perioperative data associated with a patient cohort sharing clinical characteristics with the surgical candidate to predict outcomes from one or more therapeutic options for the surgical candidate based on the first set of quantitative measures and a second set of quantitative measures related to a profile associated with the surgical candidate. Based on the predicted outcomes, the device may provide, to a client device, a recommendation relating to the therapeutic options for the surgical candidate and information to support the recommendation.

Claims (94)

1 . A method, comprising:

receiving, at a device and from a medical imaging device, a set of perioperative images depicting one or more anatomical regions of a surgical candidate,

wherein the set of perioperative images depicting the one or more anatomical regions of the surgical candidate includes a set of pre-operative images depicting the one or more anatomical regions of the surgical candidate;

processing, by the device, the set of pre-operative images to determine a first set of quantitative measures related to one or more structures in the one or more anatomical regions of the surgical candidate, wherein processing the set of pre-operative images includes:

extracting a set of features from the set of pre-operative images using one or more image analysis techniques; and

analyzing the set of features extracted from the set of pre-operative images to determine the first set of quantitative measures;

receiving, at the device, a second set of quantitative measures related to a clinical profile associated with the surgical candidate;

identifying, by the device and based on a data model that has been trained based on a minimum feature set created from at least one of pre-processing or dimensionality reduction of perioperative data associated with a patient cohort sharing one or more clinical characteristics with the surgical candidate, one or more image features that are to be used in forming one or more predictions that relate to patient outcomes from one or more therapeutic options for the surgical candidate,

wherein the device further utilizes a recursive feature elimination procedure to split data of the minimum feature set into at least one or more partitions or branches, in order to reduce utilization of computing resources;

generating, by the device, the one or more predictions based on the first set of quantitative measures, the second set of quantitative measures, and based on the identified one or more image features,

wherein the one or more predictions are generated using the data model,

wherein the perioperative data associated with the patient cohort includes image analytic features extracted from a set of perioperative images associated with the patient cohort and metrics related to the patient outcomes from the one or more therapeutic options;

providing, by the device, decision support information for the surgical candidate to a client device based on the one or more predictions,

wherein the decision support information includes a recommendation relating to the one or more therapeutic options for the surgical candidate;

updating, by the device, the data model based on one or more patient outcome metrics;

receiving a set of intra-operative data from a data storage device and a set of post-operative data obtained from a personal wearable electronic device of the surgical candidate,

wherein the set of intra-operative data is captured during treatment of the one or more therapeutic options to ensure that an intended operation is executed properly and the set of intra-operative data is stored in the data storage device, and

wherein the personal wearable electronic device of the surgical candidate obtains the set of post-operative data from the surgical candidate after the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options;

processing the set of intra-operative data and the post-operative data to determine a third set of quantitative measures;

generating, based on the data model, and based on comparing the first set of quantitative measures and the third set of quantitative measures, an output evaluating an outcome from the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options; and

updating the data model to take a deviation value into account, when the deviation value satisfies a threshold value, or updating the data model to reinforce mapping between data associated with the data model, when the deviation value is within the threshold value,

wherein the deviation value is related to deviation between patient outcome metrics and an outcome predicted for the patient.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more therapeutic options include one or more of surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment, delayed treatment, or no treatment.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the one or more anatomical regions depicted in the set of perioperative images depicting the one or more anatomical regions of the surgical candidate relate to a spinal morphology of the surgical candidate, and

the first set of quantitative measures include one or more of a vertebral endplate angle, a vertebra local curvature, a lumbar lordosis, or an inter-vertebrae distance.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein:

the set of pre-operative images further depict one or more medical devices implanted in the surgical candidate, and

the first set of quantitative measures further include a quantity of vertebral levels treated by the one or more medical devices and a length of the one or more medical devices.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the second set of quantitative measures related to the clinical profile include one or more of an age, a sex, a body mass index, a smoking status, a diabetes status, a hypertension status, a bone pathology, an albumin level, or a prior spinal surgery status for the surgical candidate.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the second set of quantitative measures include one or more of health data or activity data obtained from one or more wearable devices including the personal wearable device.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving one or more metrics relating to an outcome of a surgical treatment; and

updating the data model based on the one or more metrics.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of post-operative data depicts the one or more anatomical regions of the surgical candidate after the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options.

9 . A device, comprising:

one or more memories; and

one or more processors, communicatively coupled to the one or more memories, configured to:

receive, from a medical imaging device, a set of perioperative images depicting one or more anatomical regions,

wherein the set of perioperative images includes a set of pre-operative images depicting the one or more anatomical regions;

process the set of pre-operative images to determine a first set of quantitative measures related to the one or more anatomical regions based on a set of features extracted from the set of pre-operative images using one or more image analysis techniques;

identify, based on a data model that has been trained based on a minimum feature set created from at least one of pre-processing or dimensionality reduction of perioperative data associated with a patient cohort sharing one or more clinical characteristics with a patient, one or more image features that are to be used in forming one or more predictions that relate to patient outcomes from one or more therapeutic options for treating the one or more anatomical regions,

wherein the device further utilizes a recursive feature elimination procedure to split data of the minimum feature set into at least one or more partitions or branches, in order to reduce utilization of computing resources;

generate the one or more predictions based on the first set of quantitative measures and based on the identified one or more image features,

wherein the one or more predictions indicate whether the patient associated with the set of pre-operative images is a candidate for surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment, or no treatment, and

wherein the one or more predictions are to be generated using the data model;

provide, to a client device, a recommendation relating to the one or more therapeutic options for treating the one or more anatomical regions based on the one or more predictions,

wherein the recommendation and information supporting the recommendation indicates whether surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment, or no treatment is more likely to lead to a target outcome for the patient;

update the data model based on one or more patient outcome metrics;

receive a set of intra-operative data from a data storage device and a set of post-operative data obtained from a personal wearable electronic device of the candidate,

wherein the set of intra-operative data is captured during treatment of the one or more therapeutic options to ensure that an intended operation is executed properly and the set of intra-operative data is stored in the data storage device, and

wherein the personal wearable electronic device of the candidate obtains the set of post-operative data from the candidate after the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options;

process the set of intra-operative data and the post-operative data to determine a second set of quantitative measures;

generate, based on the data model, and based on comparing the first set of quantitative measure and the second set of quantitative measures, an output evaluating an outcome from the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options; and

update the data model to take a deviation value into account, when the deviation value satisfies a threshold value, or update the data model to reinforce mapping between data associated with the data model, when the deviation value is within the threshold value,

wherein the deviation value is related to deviation between patient outcome metrics and an outcome predicted for the patient.

10 . The device of claim 9 , wherein:

the set of pre-operative images further depict one or more medical devices implanted in the patient, and

the first set of quantitative measures relate to one or more of dimensions or a placement of the one or more medical devices within the patient.

11 . The device of claim 9 , wherein:

the recommendation further indicates a plan for implanting a medical device in the patient based on the surgical treatment being more likely to lead to the target outcome, and

the output indicates a deviation of the medical device implanted in the patient during the surgical treatment relative to a placement of the medical device indicated in the plan.

12 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

receive one or more metrics relating to an outcome of a treatment plan that was selected for the patient based on one or more of the recommendation or the information supporting the recommendation; and

update the data model based on the one or more metrics.

13 . The device of claim 9 , wherein the set of post-operative data depicts the one or more anatomical regions of the candidate after the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options.

14 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions, the instructions comprising:

one or more instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:

receive, from a medical imaging device, a set of images depicting one or more structures in an anatomical region of a patient;

perform an image processing technique on the set of images to extract a set of features from the set of images and to determine a first set of quantitative measures related to the one or more structures in the anatomical region of the patient based on the set of features;

identify, based on a data model that has been trained based on a minimum feature set created from at least one of pre-processing or dimensionality reduction of perioperative data associated with a patient cohort sharing one or more clinical characteristics with the patient, one or more image features that are to be used in forming one or more predictions that relate to patient outcomes from one or more therapeutic options for the patient,

wherein the device further utilizes a recursive feature elimination procedure to split data of the minimum feature set into at least one or more partitions or branches, in order to reduce utilization of computing resources;

generate the one or more predictions based on the first set of quantitative measures and based on the identified one or more image features,

wherein the one or more predictions are to be generated using the data model, and

wherein the perioperative data associated with the patient cohort includes image analytic features extracted from a set of perioperative images associated with the patient cohort and metrics related to the patient outcomes from the one or more therapeutic options;

provide, to a client device, decision support information relating to the one or more therapeutic options for the patient based on the one or more predictions;

update the data model based on one or more patient outcome metrics;

receive a set of intra-operative data from a data storage device and a set of post-operative data obtained from a personal wearable electronic device of the patient,

wherein the set of intra-operative data is captured during treatment of the one or more therapeutic options to ensure that an intended operation is executed properly and the set of intra-operative data is stored in the data storage device, and

wherein the personal wearable electronic device of the patient obtains the set of post-operative data from the patient after the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options;

process the set of intra-operative data and the post-operative data to determine a second set of quantitative measures;

generate, based on the data model, and based on comparing the first set of quantitative measures and the second set of quantitative measures, an output evaluating an outcome from the treatment of the one or more therapeutic options; and

update the data model to take a deviation value into account, when the deviation value satisfies a threshold value, or updating the data model to reinforce mapping between data associated with the data model, when the deviation value is within the threshold value,

wherein the deviation value is related to deviation between patient outcome metrics and an outcome predicted for the patient.

15 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the one or more therapeutic options include one or more of surgical treatment, non-surgical treatment, delayed treatment, or no treatment.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein:

the one or more structures depicted in the set of images relate to a spinal morphology of the patient, and

the set of quantitative measures include one or more of a vertebral endplate angle, a vertebra local curvature, a lumbar lordosis, or an inter-vertebrae distance.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the first set of quantitative measures is further related to one or more pathologies depicted in the set of images.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the one or more predictions that relate to the patient outcomes from the one or more therapeutic options are further based on a profile including one or more of demographic data, clinical data, or wearable device data associated with the patient obtained from one or more wearable device including the persona wearable device.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the data model is a Boosted Decision Tree classifier.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the one or more instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to:

identify a set of predictor variables based on the image analytic features extracted from the set of perioperative images associated with the patient cohort; and

train the data model to identify one or more statistical patterns mapping the set of predictor variables to the patient outcomes from the one or more therapeutic options.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2025
From: SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H.; THEODORE, NICHOLAS; DE SILVA, THARINDU; VEDULA, SATYANARAYANA S.
To: THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 070199/0395 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62812691 · Mar 1, 2019
Related Publication 20220157459A1 · May 19, 2022
References Cited (31)
US 9547940B1 · Sun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9646423B1 · Sun et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9788786B2 · Pfrengle et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11278413B1 · Lang · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20170319165A1 · Averbuch · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170340755A1 · Maiocchi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180344308A1 · Nawana · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200268457A1 · Wolf · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20765793.3, mailed on Oct. 21, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2020/019946, mailed on Jun. 11, 2020, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2020/019946—ISA/RU—Jun. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
De Silva et al., “3D-2D image registration for target localization in spine surgery: investigation of similarity metrics providing robustness to content mismatch,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, Apr. 21, 2016, vol. 61, … [cited by applicant]
Otake et al., “3D-2D registration in mobile radiographs: algorithm development and preliminary clinical evaluation,” Physics in Medicine & Biology, 2015, vol. 60, No. 5, pp. 2075-2090. [cited by applicant]
Staartjes et al., “Deep learning-based preoperative predictive analytics for patient-reported outcomes following umbar diskectomy: feasibility of center-specific modeling,” The Spine Journal, Nov. 16, 2018, vol. 19, Iss… [cited by applicant]
Khor et al., “Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery,” JAMA Surgery, Mar. 7, 2018, vol. 153, Issue 7, pp. 634-642. [cited by applicant]
Steinmetz et al., “Value of Adding Predictive Clinical Decision Tools to Spine Surgery,” JAMA Surgery, Jul. 2018, vol. 153, Issue 7, p. 643. [cited by applicant]
Dietz et al., “Variability in the utility of predictive models in predicting patient reported outcomes following spine surgery for degenerative conditions: a systematic review,” Neurosurgical Focus, Nov. 2018, vol. 45, … [cited by applicant]
Brusko et al., “Machine-Learning Models: The Future of Predictive Analytics in Neurosurgery,” Neurosurgery, Jul. 2018, vol. 83, Issue 1, pp. E3-E4. [cited by applicant]
Spratt et al., “A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis,” European Spine Journal, Feb. 2004, vol. 13, No. 1, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Försth et al., “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Apr. 14, 2016, vol. 374, No. 15, pp. 1413-1423. [cited by applicant]
Desai et al., “Outcome Variation Across Centers After Surgery for Lumbar Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The SPORT Experience,” Spine, Apr. 15, 2013, vol. 38, Issue 8, pp. 678-691. [cited by applicant]
Kao et al., “Short-term and long-term revision rates after lumbar spine discectomy versus laminectomy: a population-based cohort study,” BMJ Open, 2018, vol. 8, No. 7, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Baber et al., “Failed back surgery syndrome: current perspectives,” Journal of Pain Research, 2016, vol. 9, pp. 979-987. [cited by applicant]
Drazin et al., “Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review,” Cureus, May 23, 2016, vol. 8, No. 5, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Fritzell et al., “2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar Fusion Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain,” Spine, 2001, vol. 26, No. 23, pp. 2521-2534. [cited by applicant]
Ghogawala et al., “Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, Apr. 14, 2016, vol. 374, No. 15, pp. 1424-1434. [cited by applicant]
Christensen, “Lumbar spinal fusion. Outcome in relation to surgical methods, choice of implant and postoperative rehabilitation,” ACTA Orthopaedica Scandinavica Supplementum 2004, vol. 75, No. 313, 48 pages. [cited by applicant]
Patnaik, “Imaging features of primary tumors of the spine: A pictorial essay,” Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, May 2016, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 279-289. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Magnetic Resonance T2 Image Signal Intensity Ratio and Clinical Manifestation Predict Prognosis After Surgical Intervention for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy,” Spine, 2010, vol. 35, No. 10, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tetreault et al., “The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale: establishing criteria for mild, moderate and severe impairment in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy,” European Spine Journal, Jan. 201… [cited by applicant]
Revanappa et al., “Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy,” European Spine Journal, Sep. 2011, vol… [cited by applicant]