IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,692,546
Granted Patent B2
US 12,692,546 · App. 17/314,958 · Granted Jul 28, 2026

Personalized ctDNA disease monitoring via representative DNA sequencing

Inventors: Nelson R. Alexander (Marana, AZ); Kevin Richard Litchfield (London, GB); Stacey Stanislaw (Tucson, AZ); Samra Turajlic (London, GB)
Assignees: Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.; The Francis Crick Institute Limited; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
C12Q1/6886C12Q1/6869C12Q1/6883C12Q2600/106C12Q2600/156C12Q2600/158
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,692,546
App. No.
17/314,958
Filed
May 7, 2021
Granted
Jul 28, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
1682
USPC
435/6.1
Abstract

Disclosed herein is a method of deriving a plurality of genetic variants from a homogenized input sample. Also disclosed herein are methods of identifying a plurality of genetic variants in a sample comprising: homogenizing one or more input samples to provide a homogenized sample; preparing genomic material isolated from the homogenized input sample for sequencing; and identifying the plurality of genetic variants within sequencing data derived after sequencing the prepared genomic material.

Claims (29)

1 . A method comprising:

(a) homogenizing a fixed tumor sample from a patient diagnosed with cancer to provide a homogenized sample, wherein the fixed tumor sample is residual tumor tissue, wherein any aliquot removed from the homogenized sample comprises a plurality of genetic mutations at a proportion at which they existed within the residual tumor tissue;

(b) sequencing genomic material derived from the homogenized sample to obtain a sequencing data set for the homogenized sample;

(c) identifying the plurality of genetic mutations within the obtained sequencing data set,

(d) identifying one or more common genetic mutations of the plurality of genetic mutations that are present in all cells in the homogenized sample;

(e) identifying one or more specific genetic mutations of the plurality of genetic mutations that are present in one or more subpopulations of cells within the homogenized sample but not in all cells in the homogenized sample;

(f) preparing a ctDNA monitoring panel specific for the patient diagnosed with cancer and based on (i) the identified one or more common genetic mutations present in all cells in the homogenized sample, and (ii) the identified one or more specific genetic mutations present in the one or more subpopulations of cells within the homogenized sample but not in all cells in the homogenized sample; and

(g) using the prepared ctDNA monitoring panel, repeatedly determining in one or more ctDNA samples obtained from the patient diagnosed with cancer which of the identified one or more specific genetic mutations present in the one or more subpopulations of cells has recurred or is resistant to therapy.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a response to therapy.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising predicting a response to a future therapeutic strategy.

4 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising ascertaining a presence or absence of cancer in a patient during or following therapy.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting a minimal residual disease following surgical removal of a primary tumor.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting a minimal residual disease following surgical removal of a metastatic tumor.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the homogenized sample includes genetic mutations from multiple residual tumor tissues from a single patient.

8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising computing a clonal structure based on the identified plurality of genetic mutations, wherein the computing of the clonal structure comprises (i) calculating cancer cell fraction estimates for each of the plurality of identified genetic mutations; and (ii) grouping the calculated cancer cell fraction estimates into mutational clusters.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising sorting cellular particles within the homogenized sample prior to the sequencing of the genomic material.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the sorting of the cellular particles is based on size.

11 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the sorting of the cellular particles is based on a presence of one or more biomarkers.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a therapeutic strategy based on the identification of the one or more specific genetic mutations of the plurality of genetic mutations that are present in the one or more subpopulations of cells within the homogenized sample but not in all the cells in the homogenized sample.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sequencing with the sequencing comprises whole genome sequencing (WGS), whole exome sequencing (WES), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis, deep sequencing, targeted gene sequencing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or any combination thereof.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the residual tumor tissue is homogenized with a mechanical shearing apparatus.

15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the mechanical shearing apparatus is an ultra sonicator.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the mechanical shearing apparatus is a blender.

17 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the residual tumor tissue is mechanically sheared in the blender for about 2 minutes.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the residual tumor tissue is mechanically sheared in the blender at about 15,000 rpm.

19 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the residual tumor tissue is mechanically sheared for a time period and at an energy based on the collagen content of the residual tumor tissue.

20 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising dissociating the homogenized sample to provide dissociated cells nuclei, and/or small tissue aggregates.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein the dissociation comprises mechanical dissociation, chemical dissociation, or enzymatic dissociation.

22 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising filtering the homogenized sample.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2022
From: LITCHFIELD, KEVIN RICHARD
To: THE FRANCIS CRICK INSTITUTE LIMITED
Reel/Frame 060023/0239 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2022
From: ALEXANDER, NELSON R.; STANISLAW, STACEY
To: VENTANA MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 059986/0420 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2022
From: TARJELIC, SAMRA, DR.
To: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
Reel/Frame 060379/0019 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2019062857 · Nov 22, 2019
Provisional Application 62772650 · Nov 29, 2018
Related Publication 20220064733A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (62)
US 11959838B2 · Alexander · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20090246788A1 · Albert et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20150178445A1 · Cibulskis et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170275689A1 · Maguire · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180320229A1 · Alexander et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013068528A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014106076A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014144478A2 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015058093A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017007976A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017085307A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017079763A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2017123316A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2018189040A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Liang et al PLoS ONE. Oct. 2012. 7(1): e43192, p. 1-20 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Yates et al. Nature Medicine. Jun. 22, 2015. 21(7): 751-759 and “Online Methods”, 13 pages (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Bai et al Nature Genetics. Published online Nov. 2015. 48(1): 59, p. 1-11 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Patel et al J. vis. Exp. 114, e54299, 10 pages (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Computational methods for discovering structural variation with next-generation sequencing, Nature Methods Supplement, vol. 6, No. 11, Nov. 2009 pp. 13-20. [cited by applicant]
Gerlinger, et al., Intratumor Heterogeneity, and Branched Evolution Revealed by Multiregion Sequencing, Sep. 6, 2012, vol. 366, pp. 883-892, The New England Journal of Medicine. [cited by applicant]
Hyman, Edward David, A New Method of Sequencing DNA, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 174, pp. 423-436, 1988. [cited by applicant]
Rhonaghi et al., A Sequencing Method Based on Real-Time Pyrophosphate, Jul. 17, 1998, vol. 281, No. 375, pp. 363-365, Science, USA. [cited by applicant]
TissueLyser Handbook_For High-throughput disruption of biological samples_Second Edition_October 2010. [cited by applicant]
Xie, et. al., CNV-seq, a new method to detect copy number variation using high-throughput sequencing, Mar. 6, 2009, 10:80, BMC Bioinformatics, USA, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Yachida et al., Distant metastasis occurs late during the genetic evolution of pancreatic cancer, Oct. 28, 2010, vol. 467(7319), pp. 1114-1117, Nature , USA. [cited by applicant]
Yoon, et al., Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage, Aug. 5, 2009, 19(9), pp. 1586-1592, Genome Research, USA. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/062857 dated Apr. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Steffen Dietz et al., “Low Input Whole-Exome Sequencing to Determine the Representation of the Tumor Exome in Circulating DNA of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients”, PLOS ONE, vol. 11, No. 8, Aug. 16, 2016 (Aug. 16, 20… [cited by applicant]
Angel E. Dago et al., “Rapid Phenotypic and Genomic Change in Response to Therapeutic Pressure in Prostate Cancer Inferred by High Content Analysis of Single Circulating Tumor Cells”, Plos One, vol. 9, No. 8, Aug. 1, 20… [cited by applicant]
Christopher Abbosh et al., “Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution”, Nature, vol. 545, No. 7655, Apr. 26, 2017 (Apr. 26, 2017), p. 446-451. [cited by applicant]
Mariam Jamal-Hanjani et al., “Tracking the Evolution of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer”, The New England Journal of Medicine,—NEJM—, vol. 376, No. 22, Jun. 1, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Sahin et. al., “Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer,” Nature, vol. 000, 00 Month 2017, doi:10.1038/nature23003. [cited by applicant]
Ott et. al. “An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma,” Nature, vol. 000, 00 Month 2017, doi:10.1038/nature22991. [cited by applicant]
Roth, A. et al. PyClone: statistical inference of clonal population structure in cancer. Nat Methods 11, 396-398 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Wong, S.Q et al. Sequence artefacts in a prospective series of formalin-fixed tumors tested for mutations in hotspot regions by massively parallel sequencing. BMC medical genomics 7, 23 (2014). [cited by applicant]
Rosenthal, R., McGranahan, N., Herrero, J., Taylor, B.S. & Swanton, C. DeconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution. Genome… [cited by applicant]
Andreatta, M. & Nielsen, M. Gapped sequence alignment using artificial neural networks: application to the MHC class I system. Bioinformatics 32, 511-517 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Shukla, S.A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of cancer-associated somatic mutations in class I HLA genes. Nature biotechnology 33, 1152-1158 (2015). [cited by applicant]
Carter, S.L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat Biotechnol 30, 413-421 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Nilsen, G. et al. Copynumber: Efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation. Bmc Genomics 13 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Talevich, E., Shain, A.H., Botton, T. & Bastian, B.C. CNVkit: Genome-Wide Copy Number Detection and Visualization from Targeted DNA Sequencing. Plos Comput Biol 12 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Wang, K., Li, M.Y. & Hakonarson, H. Annovar: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 38 (2010). [cited by applicant]
Gerstung, M. et al. Reliable detection of subclonal single-nucleotide variants in tumor cell populations. Nature communications 3, 811 (2012). [cited by applicant]
Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: modeling sequencing errors in Unique Molecular Identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome research 27, 491-499 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Koboldt, D.C. et al. VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples. Bioinformatics 25, 2283-2285 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Fang, H. et al. Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel. Nat Protoc 11, 2529-2548 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat Biotechnol 31, 213-219 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754-1760 (2009). [cited by applicant]
Faustino-Rocha, A. et al. Estimation of rat mammary tumor vol. using caliper and ultrasonography measurements. Lab animal 42, 217-224 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Hedley, D.W., Friedlander, M.L., Taylor, I.W., Rugg, C.A. & Musgrove, E.A. Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. The journal of histochemistry and c… [cited by applicant]
Abbosh, C. et al. Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature 545, 446-451 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Mcgranahan, N. et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science 351, 1463-1469 (2016). [cited by applicant]
Miao, D. et al. Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint blockade in microsatellite-stable solid tumors. Nature genetics 50, 1271-1281 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Consortium, A.P.G. AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine Through an International Consortium. Cancer discovery (2017). [cited by applicant]
Warrick, J.I. et al. Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Bladder Cancer by Molecular Subtypes and Histologic Variants. European urology (2018). [cited by applicant]
Jamal-Hanjani, M. et al. Tracking the Evolution of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. The New England journal of medicine 376, 2109-2121 (2017). [cited by applicant]
Turajlic, S. et al. Deterministic Evolutionary Trajectories Influence Primary Tumor Growth: TRACERx Renal. Cell 173, 595-610 e511 (2018). [cited by applicant]
David, M. Handbook of Applied Advanced Geostatistical Ore Reserve Estimation. Elsevier: Amsterdam (1988). [cited by applicant]
Crespi, I. Pre-Election Polling: Sources of Accuracy and Error. (1988). [cited by applicant]
Rohde, A. Sampling and Homogenization Strategies Significantly Influence the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens in Meat. BioMed Research International (2015). [cited by applicant]
Gy, P. Heterogeneite, Echantillonnage, Homogeneisation (Heterogeneity, Sampling, Homogenizing). xiv+607 p (Masson: Paris) (1988). [cited by applicant]
Medvedev, et al., Computational methods for discovering structural variation with next-generation sequencing, nature methods Supplement, vol. 6 No. 11s, Nov. 2009, S13. [cited by applicant]