IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,902,313
Granted Patent B2
US 11,902,313 · App. 17/321,185 · Granted Feb 13, 2024

Dynamic hierarchical tagging system and method

Inventors: Sean M. Molloy (Parker, CO); Terry Ramos (Vacaville, CA); Sumedh Shrinand Thakar (San Jose, CA)
Assignee: Qualys, Inc.
H04L63/1433G06Q10/087H04L67/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,902,313
App. No.
17/321,185
Granted
Feb 13, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A dynamical hierarchical tagging system connected to a user site through a remote communications network. The system may comprise a master controller, a job management server connected to the master controller, one or more scanners in communication with the job management server, wherein the one or more scanners are configured to scan for one or more user assets located at the user site, resulting in scan results, a scan logic processor connected to the master controller, wherein the scan logic processor is configured to store the scan results in a user database, a tagging logic engine connected to the master controller, wherein the tagging logic engine is configured to tag the scan results stored in the user database, and an indexing logic processor connected to the master controller, wherein the indexing logic processor is configured to search and index the tagged scan results stored in the user database.

Claims (56)

1. A computing apparatus comprising:

at least one memory comprising instructions; and

at least one processing device configured for executing the instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processing device to perform the operations of:

receiving raw scan data in response to conducting a scan of an enterprise network;

identifying a plurality of assets in communication with the enterprise network using the raw scan data;

determining whether a previous scan of the enterprise network was a first authenticated scan or a first non-authenticated scan, wherein the previous scan was executed before the scan;

determining whether the scan of the enterprise network is a second authenticated scan or a second non-authenticated scan;

determining a first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network;

determining a second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

formatting the raw scan data, based on comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network, wherein the formatting the raw scan data comprises modifying the raw scan data;

evaluating the formatted scan data to determine that a tag applies to an asset comprised in the plurality of assets, wherein the tag is assigned to the asset in the at least one memory; and

generating a target list of assets to be scanned in a subsequent scan of the enterprise network, wherein the target list of assets is a subset of the plurality of assets, wherein the computing apparatus is at least partially controlled using a web application.

2. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the computing apparatus is comprised in a cloud server.

3. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed, further cause the at least one processing device to perform the operations of:

detecting a vulnerability of the asset based on analyzing at least one of the raw scan data and the formatted scan data.

4. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the evaluating the formatted scan data comprises using a plug-in, and wherein the plug-in comprises customizable rules for determining whether the tag applies to the asset based on evaluating the formatted scan data.

5. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein each asset in the target list of assets is associated with the tag in the at least one memory.

6. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein each asset in the target list of assets is scanned during the subsequent scan to determine whether the tag applies to each asset in the target list of assets.

7. The computing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein modifying the raw scan data comprises at least one of:

overwriting the raw scan data; and

modifying the raw scan data based on whether the scan of the enterprise network is the second authenticated scan or the second non-authenticated scan, and whether the previous scan of the enterprise network was the first authenticated scan or the first non-authenticated scan.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising code, wherein the code, when executed by at least one processing device of a computing apparatus, causes the at least one processing device to perform the operations of:

receiving raw scan data in response to conducting a scan of an enterprise network;

identifying a plurality of assets in communication with the enterprise network using the raw scan data;

determining whether a previous scan of the enterprise network was a first authenticated scan or a first non-authenticated scan, wherein the previous scan was executed before the scan;

determining whether the scan of the enterprise network is a second authenticated scan or a second non-authenticated scan;

determining a first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network;

determining a second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

formatting the raw scan data, based on comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network, wherein the formatting the raw scan data comprises modifying the raw scan data;

evaluating the formatted scan data to determine that a tag applies to an asset comprised in the plurality of assets; and

assigning the tag to the asset in at least one memory.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the computing apparatus is comprised in a cloud server.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the computing apparatus is at least partially controlled using a web application.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the code, when executed, further causes the at least one processing device to perform the operations of:

detecting a vulnerability of the asset based on analyzing at least one of the raw scan data and the formatted scan data.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the evaluating the formatted scan data comprises using a plug-in, and wherein the plug-in comprises customizable rules for determining whether the tag applies to the asset based on evaluating the formatted scan data.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 8 , wherein each asset in a target list of assets is associated with the tag in the at least one memory.

14. A method comprising:

receiving, by at least one processing device of a computing apparatus, raw scan data in response to conducting a scan of an enterprise network;

identifying, by the at least one processing device, a plurality of assets in communication with the enterprise network using the raw scan data;

determining, by the at least one processing device, whether a previous scan of the enterprise network was a first authenticated scan or a first non-authenticated scan, wherein the previous scan was executed before the scan;

determining, by the at least one processing device, whether the scan of the enterprise network is a second authenticated scan or a second non-authenticated scan;

determining a first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network;

determining a second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

determining whether to format the raw scan data, based on comparing the first scan authoritativeness of the scan of the enterprise network with the second scan authoritativeness of the previous scan of the enterprise network;

evaluating, by the at least one processing device, the raw scan data to determine that a tag applies to an asset comprised in the plurality of assets; and

assigning, by the at least one processing device, the tag to the asset in at least one memory of the computing apparatus.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the computing apparatus is comprised in a cloud server.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the computing apparatus is at least partially controlled using a web application.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising:

detecting, by the at least one processing device, a vulnerability of the asset based on analyzing at least one of the raw scan data and formatted scan data.

18. The method of claim 14 , wherein the evaluating the raw scan data comprises using a plug-in, and wherein the plug-in comprises customizable rules for determining whether the tag applies to the asset based on evaluating the raw scan data.

19. The method of claim 14 , wherein each asset in a target list of assets is associated with the tag in the at least one memory.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 15, 2022
From: MOLLOY, SEAN; RAMOS, TERRY; THAKAR, SUMEDH
To: QUALYS, INC.
Reel/Frame 061104/0168 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15478096 · Apr 3, 2017
Continuation 13272189 · Oct 12, 2011
Provisional Application 61392324 · Oct 12, 2010
Related Publication 20210273972A1 · Sep 2, 2021
Cited By (1)
US 12,250,242