IP Library Granted Patent US 11,878,184
Granted Patent B2
US 11,878,184 · App. 17/322,735 · Granted Jan 23, 2024

Knowledge-based spatial dose metrics and methods to generate beam orientations in radiotherapy

Inventors: Corey Zankowski (San Jose, CA); Janne Nord (Espoo, FI); Maria Isabel Cordero Marcos (Espoo, FI); Joona Hartman (Espoo, FI); Jarkko Peltola (Tuusula, FI); Esa Kuusela (Espoo, FI)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
A61N5/1031
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,878,184
App. No.
17/322,735
Granted
Jan 23, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for estimating a dose from a radiation therapy plan includes a memory that stores machine-readable instructions and a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, the processor operable to execute the instructions to subdivide a representation of a volume of interest into voxels. The processor also determines distances between a planned radiation field origin and each respective voxel. The processor further computes geometry-based expected (GED) metrics based on the distances, a plan parameter, and a field strength parameter. The processor sums the metrics to yield an estimated dose received by the volume of interest from the planned radiation field.

Claims (73)

1. A method for estimating a dose from a radiation therapy plan, the method comprising:

generating a plurality of normal vectors that emanate from a plurality of points on a surface of a representation of a target volume and extend to a body surface;

generating a dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors based on the radiation therapy plan, to produce a plurality of dose fall-off curves;

selecting a subset of the plurality of normal vectors that traverse an organ at risk;

determining a mean dose fall-off curve for the organ at risk based on the subset;

determining a dose-volume histogram for the organ at risk based on the mean dose fall-off curve and a mean distance between the target volume and the organ at risk; and

determining preferred beam orientations based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the generating the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors comprises accessing stored patient results associated with historical therapy plans.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

projecting the dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors along a plane that is orthogonal to the normal vector; and

generating a preference matrix on the surface of a sphere based on the projected dose gradients, the preference matrix including a thermal surface map based on intersections of the projected dose gradients;

wherein the determining the preferred beam orientations is based on the preference matrix.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

defining a boundary around the target volume based on the dose gradients; and

determining a sensitivity of a beam orientation with respect to a target position error.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the boundary is defined based on a distance margin at each location of the normal vectors, wherein the distance margin is indicated by a ratio of a maximum acceptable dose uncertainty to the dose gradient along a respective normal vector of the normal vectors.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a three-dimensional dose for the organ at risk using the mean dose fall-off curve.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining first derivatives of the dose fall-off curves;

determining a second derivative of the mean dose fall-off curve; and

identifying a dose gradient that achieves the radiation therapy plan using the first derivatives and the second derivative.

8. A system for estimating a dose from a radiation therapy plan, the system comprising:

a memory that stores machine-readable instructions; and

a processor communicatively coupled to the memory, wherein the processor is operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to

generate a plurality of normal vectors that emanate from a plurality of points on a surface of a representation of a target volume and extend to a body surface,

quantify a dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors based on the radiation therapy plan, to produce a plurality of dose fall-off curves,

group a subset of the plurality of normal vectors that traverse an organ at risk,

determine a mean dose fall-off curve for the organ at risk based on the subset,

derive a dose-volume histogram for the organ at risk based on the mean dose fall-off curve and a mean distance between the target volume and the organ at risk, and

determine preferred beam orientations based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to access stored patient results associated with historical therapy plans.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

compute a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

project the dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors along a plane that is orthogonal to the normal vector; and

generate a preference matrix on the surface of a sphere based on the projected dose gradients, the preference matrix including a thermal surface map based on intersections of the projected dose gradients;

wherein the preferred beam orientations are determined based on the preference matrix.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

compute a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

construct a boundary around the target volume based on the dose gradients; and

evaluate a sensitivity of a beam orientation with respect to a target position error.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

construct the boundary based on a distance margin at each location of the normal vectors, and

wherein the distance margin is indicated by a ratio of a maximum acceptable dose uncertainty to the dose gradient along a respective normal vector of the normal vectors.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to determine a three-dimensional dose for the organ at risk using the mean dose fall-off curve.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further operable to execute the machine-readable instructions to:

compute first derivatives of the dose fall-off curves;

compute a second derivative of the mean dose fall-off curve; and

use the first derivatives and the second derivative to identify a dose gradient needed to achieve the radiation therapy plan.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable program code embodied thereon that, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform a method comprising:

generating a plurality of normal vectors that emanate from a plurality of points on a surface of a representation of a target volume and extend to a body surface;

generating a dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors based on a radiation therapy plan, to produce a plurality of dose fall-off curves;

selecting a subset of the plurality of normal vectors that traverse an organ at risk;

determining a mean dose fall-off curve for the organ at risk based on the subset;

determining a dose-volume histogram for the organ at risk based on the mean dose fall-off curve and a mean distance between the target volume and the organ at risk; and

determining preferred beam orientations based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the generating the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors comprises accessing stored patient results associated with historical therapy plans.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

projecting the dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors along a plane that is orthogonal to the normal vector; and

generating a preference matrix on the surface of a sphere based on the projected dose gradients, the preference matrix including a thermal surface map based on intersections of the projected dose gradients;

wherein the determining the preferred beam orientations is based on the preference matrix.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining a dose gradient corresponding to each of the normal vectors based on the dose fall-off curve along each of the normal vectors;

defining a boundary around the target volume based on the dose gradients; and

determining a sensitivity of a beam orientation with respect to a target position error;

wherein the boundary is defined based on a distance margin at each location of the normal vectors, wherein the distance margin is indicated by a ratio of a maximum acceptable dose uncertainty to the dose gradient along a respective normal vector of the normal vectors.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises determining a three-dimensional dose for the organ at risk using the mean dose fall-off curve.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining first derivatives of the dose fall-off curves;

determining a second derivative of the mean dose fall-off curve; and

identifying a dose gradient that achieves the radiation therapy plan using the first derivatives and the second derivative.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 25, 2023
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 064376/0286 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2021
From: NORD, JANNE; MARCOS, MARIA ISABEL CORDERO; HARTMAN, JOONA; PELTOLA, JARKKO; KUUSELA, ESA
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG.
Reel/Frame 056276/0962 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 18, 2021
From: ZANKOWSKI, COREY
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 056280/0894 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16121235 · Sep 4, 2018
Division 14850625 · Sep 10, 2015
Related Publication 20210322789A1 · Oct 21, 2021