IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,245,972
Granted Patent B2
US 12,245,972 · App. 17/325,168 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

System and methods for customizing an intraocular lens using a wavefront aberrometer

Inventors: Daniel R. Neal (Tijeras, NM); R. James Copland (Albuquerque, NM); Xifeng Xiao (Albuquerque, NM); Alan Blair (Albuquerque, NM)
Assignee: WaveFront Dynamics, Inc.
A61F9/00804A61B3/0025A61B3/0041A61B3/101A61B3/1015A61B3/102A61B3/103A61B3/107A61B3/158A61F2009/0087A61F2009/00872A61F2009/0088A61F2009/00882
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,245,972
App. No.
17/325,168
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for correcting vision in an eye that uses a wavefront-customized phakic or pseudophakic Intraocular Lens (IOL), the method comprising: (1) measuring wavefront aberrations of the eye; (2) designing a wavefront-customized correction profile for an IOL; (3) creating a customized IOL with the customized correction profile; and (4) implanting the customized IOL in the eye, without having to remove the natural lens. Alternatively, an uncorrected IOL is implanted first, followed by scanning a femtosecond laser spot across the implanted IOL to locally change the Index of Refraction of the IOL material and create an in-situ customized IOL.

Claims (78)

1. A method for correcting higher-order aberrations in an eye that uses a wavefront-customized phakic or pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL), comprising the following steps, in the order presented:

(1) measuring one or more higher-order aberrations of a bare eye with a wavefront aberrometer;

(2) designing a 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile for an IOL based on measured results from the wavefront aberrometer in step (1);

(3) fabricating a 3-D customized IOL that incorporates the 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile;

(4) implanting the 3-D wavefront-customized IOL into the eye; and

(5) adding one or more fiducial marks onto the IOL in step (3) that act as location features to aid in the proper alignment of the IOL.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

step (5) leaving a natural crystalline lens in place after step (4).

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein fabricating the 3-D customized IOL in step (3) comprises using a precision lathe machine with a diamond tool bit that has a fast Z-axis stage.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein fabricating the 3-D customized IOL in step (3) comprises locally changing the index of refraction of the IOL's material with a low-energy, high repetition rate, scanned, pulsed femtosecond laser beam before the IOL or a contact lens is implanted in the patient's eye in step (4).

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein fabricating the 3-D customized IOL in step (3) comprises locally changing the index of refraction of the IOL's material with a low-energy, high repetition rate, scanned, pulsed femtosecond laser beam after the IOL or a contact lens has been implanted in the patient's eye in step (4).

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, before the IOL is implanted, using a femtosecond laser to create diffractive fiducial marks comprising a plurality of uniformly-spaced holes or lines that scatter light preferentially more strongly for certain incident angles and color combinations.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (3) comprises using a non-axisymmetric, 3-D manufacturing technique selected from the group consisting of: 3-D selective curing of a liquid material, 3-D additive printing, 3-D adaptive molding, 3-D light-adjusted material fabrication, and combinations thereof.

8. A method of using an optical eye tracking instrument for dynamically measuring eye parameters, and for using a 3-D wavefront-customized phakic or pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL) for correcting a person's vision, comprising the following steps, in the order presented:

(1) measuring wavefront aberrations of a bare eye with a wavefront aberrometer;

(2) implanting an uncorrected IOL into the eye;

(3) determining a final position of the implanted, uncorrected IOL by optically measuring one or more fiducial marks located on the IOL;

(4) designing a 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile for the implanted IOL; and

(5) modifying in-vivo the un-corrected IOL with the 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile after the IOL has been implanted in the eye.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein step (3) comprises using stereo triangulation to determine a Z-axis position of the IOL by comparing an on-axis iris image taken by an on-axis iris imaging camera to an off-axis iris image taken by an off-axis iris imaging camera.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein step (5) further comprises locally changing an index of refraction of the IOL's material by using a scanning femtosecond laser to locally modify the index of refraction of the IOL.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising performing the following step in-between steps (3) and (4), comprising: re-measuring one or more wavefront aberrations of the eye after the uncorrected IOL has been implanted in the eye.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the eye tracking instrument comprises a first off-axis light source, LED 1 , that emits light at a first wavelength, and a second off-axis light source, LED 2 , that emits light at a second wavelength, that is measurably different than the first wavelength.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising determining the XY mis-position and tip/tilt mis-rotation of an implanted IOL by using dark field imaging with a pair of off-axis illumination sources to measure a position and a size of the eye's sulcus and ciliary body.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising using software subtraction of two adjacent iris images (from a sequence of captured images) to generate a dark field image of the eye, by comparing a pair of alternating images captured when either one illumination light source is ON, while the other (opposing) light source is OFF.

15. A method for correcting higher-order aberrations in an eye that uses a wavefront-customized phakic or pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL), comprising the following steps, in the order presented:

(1) measuring one or more higher-order aberrations of a bare eye with a wavefront aberrometer;

(2) designing a 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile for an IOL based on measured results from the wavefront aberrometer in step (1);

(3) fabricating a 3-D customized IOL that incorporates the 3-D wavefront-customized correction profile;

(4) implanting the 3-D wavefront-customized IOL into the eye; and

(5) using Purkinje reflection images to determine XY mis-alignment and tip/tilt mis-rotation of the implanted IOL.

16. A method for correcting aberrations in an eye that uses a wavefront-customized phakic or pseudophakic intraocular lens (IOL), comprising the following steps, in the order listed:

(1) designing and fabricating a phakic or pseudophakic intraocular lens that corrects for a base refraction of the eye;

(2) implanting the intraocular lens in the eye;

(3) measuring wavefront aberrations of the eye including the implanted lens;

(4) modifying in-vivo the aberrations of the implanted intraocular lens; and

(5) using fiducial marks to locate an IOL's XY position relative to the eye during step (4).

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein step (4) comprises using a laser index writing technique to modify the aberrations of the IOL.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the laser index writing technique comprises using a low-energy femtosecond laser system.

19. The method of claim 17 , further comprising controlling the laser index writing technique by monitoring the position of the IOL during the procedure.

20. The method of claim 16 , further comprising using Purkinje reflections from the IOL to measure tip/tilt angles of the IOL relative to the eye during step (4).

21. The method of claim 16 , further comprising using a light-adjustable-lens modification technique during step (4).

22. An optical instrument used for improving a person's vision, comprising a combined aberrometer, corneal topographer, and iris imaging camera, wherein the optical instrument comprises three paths:

(1) an on-axis iris imaging path;

(2) a wavefront sensor path; and

(3) a fixation target path;

wherein the on-axis iris imaging path #1 comprises:

(a) a plurality of off-axis illumination sources arranged to directly illuminate an eye;

(b) a quarter wave plate (QWP);

(c) a pair of beam splitters;

(d) a pair of lenses, LENS 1 and LENS 2 , configured as a telecentric teleobjective in the iris imaging path;

(e) a telecentric stop (TSA) disposed in-between LENS 1 and LENS 2 ; and

(f) an on-axis iris imaging camera; and

wherein the wavefront sensor path #2 comprises:

(i) a wavefront sensor camera;

(ii) a collimated light source;

(iii) a polarizing beam splitting cube;

(iv) a third lens; and

(v) a Range Limiting Aperture (RLA); and

wherein the fixation target path #3 comprises a micro-video-display fixation target.

23. An optical instrument for tracking and treating an eye in-vivo comprising:

(a) a femtosecond laser system for delivering low energy pulses to an eye;

(b) an eye interface system for fixing the eye; and

(c) a tracking system for determining and monitoring one or more positions and tilts of an IOL;

wherein the tracking system comprises:

(a) an off-axis iris imaging camera with optical image relay lens;

(b) an on-axis iris imaging system; and

(c) a plurality of illumination light sources disposed around a periphery of the on-axis iris imaging system; and

wherein the one or more positions and tilts of the IOL are determined by comparing and analyzing images captured from both the on-axis iris imaging system and the off-axis iris imaging camera.

24. The optical instrument of claim 23 , wherein the eye interface system comprises a suction ring attached to a transparent window, with saline water filling a volume defined by the suction ring, the window, and a periphery of the eye being examined.

25. The optical instrument of claim 23 , comprising optical means for dynamically tracking fiducials on an IOL with both the on-axis iris imaging system and the off-axis iris imaging camera.

26. The optical instrument of claim 23 ; wherein the femtosecond laser is introduced through a dichroic beamsplitter.

27. The optical instrument of claim 23 , wherein the tracking system comprises a dark field mask (DFM) that has a central obscuration optic that blocks light travelling along a central zone of a main optical path.

28. The optical instrument of claim 23 , wherein the tracking system further comprises a small motor for switching the optical instrument between a telecentric stop and a dark field mask (DFM).

29. The optical instrument of claim 23 , wherein the tracking system further comprises a programmable spatial light modulator (SLM) optical component to enhance fiducial imaging.

30. The optical instrument of claim 23 , wherein the tracking system further comprises a wavelength multiplexed mask (WMM) optical component that:

(1) passes a first wavelength and blocks a second wavelength through a central circular zone of the WMM mask; and that

(2) blocks the first wavelength and passes the second wavelength in an annular zone of the WMM mask.

Assignments (8)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS, INC. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 56318 FRAME: 780. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: BLAIR, ALAN
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 070663/0415 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 56318 FRAME: 651. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: XIAO, XIFENG
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 071196/0718 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 56318 FRAME: 490. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT . Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: NEAL, DANIEL R.
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 071309/0809 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 56318 FRAME: 433. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT . Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: COPLAND, R. JAMES
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 071309/0847 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2021
From: NEAL, DANIEL R
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS
Reel/Frame 056318/0490 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2021
From: BLAIR, ALAN
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS
Reel/Frame 056318/0780 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2021
From: XIAO, XIFENG
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS
Reel/Frame 056318/0651 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded May 21, 2021
From: COPLAND, R. JAMES
To: WAVEFRONT DYNAMICS
Reel/Frame 056318/0433 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 63085391 · Sep 30, 2020
Provisional Application 63027428 · May 20, 2020
Related Publication 20210267799A1 · Sep 2, 2021
References Cited (62)
US 5430509A · Kobayashi · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5777719A · Williams · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5949521A · Williams · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6086204A · Magnante · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6095651A · Williams · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6299311B1 · Williams · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6379008B1 · Chataeu · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6499843B1 · Cox · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6511180B2 · Guirao · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6550917B1 · Neal · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6554425B1 · Roffman · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6634750B2 · Neal · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6655803B1 · Rubenstein · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6830712B1 · Roffman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6848790B1 · Dick · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7044944B2 · Campin · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7530691B1 · Davis · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7699467B2 · Dick · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7967440B1 · Copland · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7976163B2 · Campbell · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7980699B2 · Neal · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8197064B2 · Copland · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8260024B2 · Farrer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8292952B2 · Bille · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8512320B1 · Knox · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8568627B2 · Bille · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9022570B2 · Applegate · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9023257B2 · Sahler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9107746B2 · Sahler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9186242B2 · Sahler · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9192292B2 · Bille · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9307901B1 · Linhardt · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9545340B1 · Knox · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10201276B2 · Neal · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10485655B2 · Pinto · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10492680B2 · Farrer · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10506923B2 · Neal · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10555669B2 · Pulaski · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10682056B2 · Neal · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10849493B2 · Copland · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10849495B2 · Pulaski · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030210378A1 · Riza · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20080001320A1 · Knox · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080165324A1 · Lindacher · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090287306A1 · Smith · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110230751A1 · Kersting · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130310816A1 · Rathjen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20180243082A1 · Zheleznyak · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190343683A1 · Zheleznyak · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200107953A1 · Adler · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO1999027334 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO04072709 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010019885 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
C. Kraff, R. Maloney, and S. Coleman, “Clinical and patient reported outcomes after wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia using a high definition Hartmann Shack Aberrometer”, ASCRS 23_2018. [cited by applicant]
L. Zheleznyak, “First demonstration of human visual performance through refractive-index modified ophthalmic devices written in hydrogels,” IOVS vol. 58(8) 1274-1274, (2017). [cited by applicant]
G. Gandara-Montano, “Optical bench testing of gradient-index Fresnel lenses written with femtosecond laser induced refractive index change,” IOVS vol. 58(8), 1275-1275], (2017). [cited by applicant]
Blanton, US “Meta-analysis of six excimer laser platforms for safety and efficacy in myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis,” Ophthalmic Review vol. 8, Issue 1 Spring 2015. [cited by applicant]
Moussa, “Visual aberrometric photic patient satisfaction LASIK w high resolution aberrometer,” Opth-10-2489, (2016). [cited by applicant]
E. Manche, “Wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided LASIK: One-year results of a contralateral eye study,” ASCRS 26 2018. [cited by applicant]
B. Alqattan, A.K. Yetisen, H Butt, “Direct Laser Writing of Nanophotonic Structures on Contact Lenses”, ACS Nano 2018, 12, 5030-5040. [cited by applicant]
X. He, et. al, Relative position of the central hole after EVO-ICL implantation for moderate to high myopia; BMC Ophthalmology (2020) 20:305. [cited by applicant]
S.C. Schallhorn et al., Wavefront-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Use of a New Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer in Patients with Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism, Journal of Ophthalmology vol. 2015, Article … [cited by applicant]