IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,256,974
Granted Patent B2
US 12,256,974 · App. 17/359,812 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Systems and methods for controlling arcing

Inventors: Robert H. Wham (Boulder, CO); William D. Faulkner (Boulder, CO); Donald L. Tonn (Superior, CO)
Assignee: Covidien LP
A61B18/1233A61B18/1206A61B2018/00642A61B2018/00666A61B2018/00678A61B2018/00702A61B2018/00708A61B2018/00827A61B2018/00875A61B2018/00892A61B2018/1213
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,256,974
App. No.
17/359,812
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to electrosurgical systems and methods for controlling electrical treatment energy in connection with electrical arcs. A method in accordance with the present disclosure includes providing electrical treatment energy to an instrument based on an indicated electrical energy level, accessing voltage signal values over time relating to voltage of the electrical treatment energy and/or current signal values over time relating to current of the electrical treatment energy, determining whether an arc generated by the instrument is an arc to be maintained or an arc to be extinguished based on a threshold value and at least one of the voltage signal values or the current signal values, and controlling the electrical treatment energy based on determining that the arc is an arc to be extinguished.

Claims (55)

1. An electrosurgical system for delivering electrosurgical energy to treat tissue the electrosurgical system comprising:

a an electrosurgical generator configured to supply electrosurgical energy;

an electrosurgical instrument coupled to the electrosurgical generator and configured to deliver the electrosurgical energy to the tissue; and

a processor and a memory having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to:

deliver the electrosurgical energy to the electrosurgical instrument coupled to the electrosurgical generator at an indicated energy level for treating the tissue;

determine a change in a peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over time;

determine a normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage; and

control delivery of the electrosurgical energy to extinguish an arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument based on:

a comparison of an impedance of the arc to an impedance threshold value stored in the memory; and

a comparison of the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage to a voltage threshold value stored in the memory.

2. The electrosurgical system according to claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to control delivery of the electrosurgical energy to extinguish the arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument based on:

the impedance of the arc being less than the impedance threshold value; and

the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage being greater than the voltage threshold value.

3. The electrosurgical system according to claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to determine the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage as a ratio of a change in the peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over an RMS voltage of the electrosurgical energy.

4. The electrosurgical system according to claim 1 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 1350 ohms.

5. The electrosurgical system according to claim 1 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 3000 ohms.

6. The electrosurgical system according to claim 1 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to:

decrease delivery of the electrosurgical energy from the indicated energy level to a decreased energy level based on:

the impedance of the arc being less than the impedance threshold value; and

the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage being greater than the voltage threshold value;

hold the delivery of the electrosurgical energy at the decreased energy level for a predetermined period of time to extinguish the arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument; and

increase delivery of the electrosurgical energy to the indicated energy level following the predetermined period of time.

7. An electrosurgical generator for delivering electrosurgical energy to an electrosurgical instrument, the electrosurgical generator comprising:

a processor; and

a memory having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to:

deliver the electrosurgical energy to the electrosurgical instrument coupled to the electrosurgical generator at an indicated energy level for treating tissue;

determine at least a change in a peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over time; determine a normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage; and

control delivery of the electrosurgical energy to extinguish an arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument based on:

a comparison of an impedance of the arc to an impedance threshold value stored in the memory; and

a comparison of the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy to a voltage threshold value stored in the memory.

8. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to control delivery of the electrosurgical energy to extinguish the arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument based on:

the impedance of the arc being less than the impedance threshold value; and

the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage being greater than the voltage threshold value.

9. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to determine the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage as a ratio of the change in the peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over an RMS voltage of the electrosurgical energy.

10. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 7 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 1350 ohms.

11. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 7 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 3000 ohms.

12. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 7 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to:

decrease delivery of the electrosurgical energy from the indicated energy level to a decreased energy level based on:

the impedance of the arc being less than the impedance threshold value; and

the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage being greater than the voltage threshold value;

hold the delivery of the electrosurgical energy at the decreased energy level for a predetermined period of time to extinguish the arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument; and

increase delivery of the electrosurgical energy to the indicated energy level following the predetermined period of time.

13. An electrosurgical generator for delivering electrosurgical energy to an electrosurgical instrument, the electrosurgical generator comprising:

a processor; and

a memory having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to:

deliver the electrosurgical energy to the electrosurgical instrument coupled to the electrosurgical generator at an indicated energy level for treating tissue;

determine a change in a peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over time; determine a normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage; and

decrease delivery of the electrosurgical energy from the indicated energy level to a decreased energy level based on:

an impedance of an arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument being less than an impedance threshold value stored in the memory; and

the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy being greater than a voltage threshold value stored in the memory;

hold the delivery of the electrosurgical energy at the decreased energy level for a predetermined period of time to extinguish the arc generated by the electrosurgical instrument; and

increase delivery of the electrosurgical energy to the indicated energy level following the predetermined period of time.

14. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 13 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, cause the electrosurgical generator to determine the normalized nonzero change in the peak-to-peak voltage as a ratio of the change in the peak-to-peak voltage of the electrosurgical energy over an RMS voltage of the electrosurgical energy.

15. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 13 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 1350 ohms.

16. The electrosurgical generator according to claim 13 , wherein the impedance threshold value is 3000 ohms.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2021
From: WHAM, ROBERT H.; FAULKNER, WILLIAM D.; TONN, DONALD L.
To: COVIDIEN LP
Reel/Frame 056684/0434 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 15900377 · Feb 20, 2018
Related Publication 20210322085A1 · Oct 21, 2021
References Cited (36)
US 4114623A · Meinke et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 5370645A · Klicek et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5730719A · Edwards · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5766165A · Gentelia et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6093186A · Goble · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7651492B2 · Wham · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8165666B1 · Briggs · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9498275B2 · Wham et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 11045247B2 · Wham et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20050119646A1 · Scholl · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20070250052A1 · Wham · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090270849A1 · Truckai · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20120083779A1 · Hosier · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120101413A1 · Beetel · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120271304A1 · Werner · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140236142A1 · Ward · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140276749A1 · Johnson · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140276753A1 · Wham · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160022349A1 · Woloszko et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038216A1 · Woo et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160113702A1 · Keller · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160310202A1 · Wham · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170090507A1 · Wiener · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170202607A1 · Shelton, IV et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180076725A1 · Xue · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 204542358U · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 206080681U · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 2042116A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2649956A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009082707A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
Australian Examination Report issued in corresponding Appl. No. AU 2019200636 dated Jun. 21, 2019 (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Canadian Office Action issued in corresponding Appl. No. CA 3,031,744 dated Dec. 10, 2019 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Appl. No. JP 2019-027261, together with English language translation, dated Jan. 10, 2020 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding Appl. No. EP 19157938.2 dated Jul. 3, 2019 (7 pages). [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action issued in corresponding Appl. No. JP 2019-027261 dated Aug. 27, 2020 (3 pages) together with English language translation (4 pages). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Appl. No. 2019-027261 (2 pages) dated Feb. 19, 2021, together with English language translation (4 pages). [cited by applicant]