Generation of an asset management evaluation regarding a system aspect of a system
A method includes determining a system aspect of a system for asset management evaluation. The method further includes determining at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect. The method further includes determining at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect. The method further includes obtaining asset management data regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint. The method further includes calculating an asset management rating as a measure of system asset management maturity for the system aspect based on the asset management data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric.
1. A method comprises:
determining, by an analysis system that includes one or more computing entities, a system aspect of a system for asset management evaluation;
determining, by the analysis system, an asset management evaluation category of a plurality of categories for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
determining, by the analysis system, at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
obtaining, by the analysis system, asset management data regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint, wherein the asset management data regarding the system aspect is further in accordance with the asset management evaluation category;
calculating, by the analysis system, an asset management rating as a measure of system asset management maturity for the system aspect based on the asset management data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric;
rendering the asset management rating on a display device of a user interface;
evaluating, via an analysis modeling model that operates via artificial intelligence, stored data and stored analytics associated with the system for asset management evaluation; and
adjusting, via the analysis modeling model that operates via artificial intelligence, parameters of the system for asset management evaluation.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the system aspect comprises:
determining at least one system element of the system;
determining at least one system criteria of the system;
determining at least one system mode of the system; and
determining the system aspect based on the at least one system element, the at least one system criteria, and the at least one system mode.
3. The method of claim 2 further comprises:
a system element of the at least one system element includes an enterprise identifier, an organization identifier, a division identifier, a department identifier, a group identifier, a sub-group identifier, a device identifier, a software identifier, or an internet protocol address identifier;
a system criteria of the at least one system criteria being system guidelines, system requirements, system design, system build, or resulting system; and
a system mode of the at least one system mode being assets, system functions, or system security.
4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the at least one system element includes at least one system asset, and wherein the system mode is an asset mode.
5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one system asset includes at least one of: at least one physical asset of the system, or at least one conceptual asset of the system.
6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the at least one system asset includes at least one of: a computing entity, a computing device, a user software application, a system software application, an operating system, a software tool, a network software application, a security software application, a system monitoring software application, a hardware architectural layout, a portion of a hardware architectural layout, a software architectural layout, or a portion of a software architectural layout.
7. The method of claim 1 further comprises:
determining, by the analysis system, at least one asset management sub-category of an asset management evaluation category for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect, wherein the asset management data regarding the system aspect is further in accordance with the at least one asset management sub-category of the asset management evaluation category.
8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the at least one asset management sub-category includes at least one of: a hardware inventory sub-category, software inventory sub-category, a data flow maps sub-category, an external system cataloged sub-category, a resource prioritization sub-category, or a security roles sub-category.
9. The method of claim 1 further comprises:
an evaluation perspective of the at least one evaluation perspective being an understanding perspective, an implementation perspective, an operation perspective, or a self-analysis perspective; and
an evaluation viewpoint of the at least one evaluation viewpoint being a disclosed viewpoint, a discovered viewpoint, or a desired viewpoint.
10. The method of claim 1 further comprises:
an evaluation rating metric of the at least one evaluation rating metric being a process rating metric, a policy rating metric, a procedure rating metric, a certification rating, a documentation rating metric, or an automation rating metric.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the asset management data is based on asset information that indicates at least one of: hardware inventoried, software inventoried, data flow implementation, external systems cataloged, resource prioritization implementation, or implemented security roles.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the asset information includes at least one of: a list of networking devices, a list of security devices, a list of storage devices, a list of user applications, a list of design tools, a list of networking tools, a list of security tools, a list of servers, a list of user devices, a list of system applications, or a list of verification tools.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the asset information includes at least one of: vendor information, a serial number, a device description, a model number, a version, a generation, a purchase date, an installation date, or a service date for at least one of: the list of networking devices, the list of security devices, the list of storage devices, the list of user applications, the list of design tools, the list of networking tools, the list of security tools, the list of servers, the list of user devices, the list of system applications, or the list of verification tools.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the asset information includes the list of user devices, and wherein the list of user devices indicates, for each user device in the list of user devices, at least one of: a user ID, a user level, a user role, hardware information, an IP address, software user application information, software device application information, device use data, or maintenance data.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining the asset management data comprises:
determining data gathering parameters regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and the at least one evaluation rating metric;
identifying system elements of the system aspect based on the data gathering parameters;
obtaining asset management information from the system elements in accordance with the data gathering parameters; and
recording the asset management information from the system elements to produce the asset management data.
16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating the asset management rating comprises:
selecting and performing at least two of:
based on the asset management data and process analysis parameters, generating a process rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and process as the evaluation rating metric;
based on the asset management data and policy analysis parameters, generating a policy rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and policy as the evaluation rating metric;
based on the asset management data and documentation analysis parameters, generating a documentation rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and documentation as the evaluation rating metric;
based on the asset management data and automation analysis parameters, generating an automation rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and automation as the evaluation rating metric;
based on the asset management data and procedure analysis parameters, generating a procedure rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and procedure as the evaluation rating metric; and
based on the asset management data and certification analysis parameters, generating a certification rating for the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and certification as the evaluation rating metric; and
generating the asset management rating based on the selected and performed at least two of the process rating, the policy rating, the documentation rating, the automation rating, the procedure rating, and the certification rating.
17. The method of claim 1 further comprises at least one of:
determining, by the analysis system, a system criteria deficiency of the system aspect based on the asset management rating and the asset management data;
determining, by the analysis system, a system mode deficiency of the system aspect based on the asset management rating and the asset management data;
determining, by the analysis system, an evaluation perspective deficiency of the system aspect based on the asset management rating and the asset management data; and
determining, by the analysis system, an evaluation viewpoint deficiency of the system aspect based on the asset management rating and the asset management data.
18. The method of claim 1 further comprises:
determining, by the analysis system, a deficiency of the system aspect based on the asset management rating and the asset management data;
determining, by the analysis system, whether the deficiency is auto-correctable; and
when the deficiency is auto-correctable, auto-correcting, by the analysis system, the deficiency.
19. A non-transitory computer readable memory comprises:
a memory section for storing operational instructions that, when executed by a computing entity, cause the computing entity to:
determine a system aspect of a system for an asset management evaluation;
determine, by the analysis system, an asset management evaluation category of a plurality of categories for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
determine at least one evaluation perspective for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
determine at least one evaluation viewpoint for use in performing the asset management evaluation on the system aspect;
obtain asset management data regarding the system aspect in accordance with the at least one evaluation perspective and the at least one evaluation viewpoint, wherein the asset management data regarding the system aspect is further in accordance with the asset management evaluation category;
calculate an asset management rating as a measure of system asset management maturity for the system aspect based on the asset management data, the at least one evaluation perspective, the at least one evaluation viewpoint, and at least one evaluation rating metric;
render the asset management rating on a display device of a user interface;
evaluate, via an analysis modeling model that operates via artificial intelligence, stored data and stored analytics associated with the system for asset management evaluation; and
adjust, via the analysis modeling model that operates via artificial intelligence, parameters of the system for asset management evaluation.