IP Library Granted Patent US 12,227,825
Granted Patent B2
US 12,227,825 · App. 17/371,455 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Stainless steel powders for additive manufacturing

Inventors: Ricardo Komai (Evanston, IL); Abhinav Saboo (Evanston, IL); Marie Thomas (Evanston, IL); Dana Frankel (Evanston, IL)
Assignee: QUESTEK INNOVATIONS LLC
C22C38/48B22F9/08B22F10/28B33Y10/00B33Y70/00C21D9/0068C22C38/42B22F2301/35B33Y80/00C21D2211/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,227,825
App. No.
17/371,455
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Exemplary alloys may be particularly suited for additive manufacturing applications, and may comprise iron and one or more of: chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), carbon (C), and copper (Cu). Exemplary alloys may have a majority microstructure that is martensite.

Claims (32)

1. An as-built alloy consisting of, by weight percentage:

15.0% to 15.75% chromium;

2.90% to 5.0% nickel;

0.05% to 0.08% carbon;

2.90% to 4.50% copper;

no more than 0.01% niobium;

no more than 0.02% nitrogen;

no more than 0.04% oxygen;

no more than 0.01% tantalum,

no more than 0.1% silicon,

no more than 0.5% manganese;

no more than 0.31% titanium;

the balance of weight percent comprising iron and incidental elements and impurities; and

the as-built alloy having a hardness from 36 HRC to 40 HRC and a total elongation of no less than 10% and no greater than 16% in response to additive manufacturing using a laser power of 195 W, a scan speed of 750 mm/s, a hatch spacing of 0.1 mm, and a layer thickness of 40 μm, and without aging or solution heat treating.

2. The as-built alloy according to claim 1 , wherein a ratio of nickel to copper is no less than 1.

3. The as-built alloy according to claim 1 , consisting of, by weight percentage, 15.0% to 15.5% chromium, 2.9% to 3.9% nickel; 0.06% to 0.07% carbon, 2.9% to 3.9% copper; 0.05% to 0.25% titanium; about 0.01% nitrogen and about 0.03% oxygen.

4. The as-built alloy according to claim 1 , consisting of, by weight percentage, 15.0% to 15.5% chromium, 4.0% to 5.0% nickel; 3.5% to 4.5% copper; and less than 0.01% titanium.

5. The as-built alloy according to claim 1 , wherein the as-built alloy has been subjected to an additive manufacturing process and without aging, has a fatigue strength of 475 MPa to 525 MPa.

6. An as-built alloy consisting of, by weight percentage:

15.0% to 15.75% chromium;

2.90% to 5.0% nickel;

0.05% to 0.08% carbon;

2.90% to 4.50% copper;

no more than 0.01% niobium;

no more than 0.02% nitrogen;

no more than 0.04% oxygen;

no more than 0.01% tantalum;

no more than 0.01% silicon;

no more than 0.25% titanium;

no more than 0.1% manganese;

the balance of weight percent comprising iron and incidental elements and impurities; and

the as-built alloy, when additively manufactured using a laser power of 195 W, a scan speed of 750 mm/s, a hatch spacing of 0.1 mm, and a layer thickness of 40 μm, and without aging or solution heat treating, having a hardness from 36 HRC to 40 HRC and a total elongation of no less than 10% and no greater than 16%.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Oct 16, 2023
From: QUESTEK INNOVATIONS
To: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Reel/Frame 065231/0385 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: KOMAI, RICARDO; SABOO, ABHINAV; THOMAS, MARIE; FRANKEL, DANA
To: QUESTEK INNOVATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 057068/0714 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63077231 · Sep 11, 2020
Related Publication 20220081745A1 · Mar 17, 2022
References Cited (26)
US 20030049153A1 · Martin · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20090047165A1 · Syvanen · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20160333450A1 · Ikeda · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180119239A1 · Tuffile · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190160595A1 · Narayanan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138543A1 · Maskrot · 2021 [cited by examiner]
EP 1992709A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 3121306A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP S63171857A · 1988 [cited by applicant]
JP H10102105A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015189981A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017025392A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018178144A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 8704731A1 · 1987 [cited by applicant]
WO 01031076A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021123894A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Ghosh et al., “Kinetics of F.C.C.→B.C.C. Heterogeneous Martensitic Nucleation—I. The Critical Driving Force for Athermal Nucleation”, Acta Metall. Mater., vol. 42, 1994, pp. 3361-3370. [cited by applicant]
Meier et al., “Critical Influences of Particle Size and Adhesion on the Powder Layer Uniformity in Metal Additive Manufacturing”, arXiv, 2018, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mindt et al., “Powder bed layer characteristics: the overseen first-order process input”, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 47, No. 8, 2016, pp. 3811-3822. [cited by applicant]
Vunnam et al., “Effect of powder chemical composition on the as-built microstructure of 17-4 PH stainless steel processed by selective laser melting”, Additive Manufacturing, vol. 30, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office Extended Search Report for Application No. 21184876.7 dated Oct. 11, 2021 (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Schaller et al., “Corrision Properties of Powder Bed Fusion Additively Manufactured 17-4 PH Stainless Steel”, Corrision, National Association of Corrision Engineers, 2017, vol. 73, No. 1, pp. 796-807. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Patent Office Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Application No. 2021114014 dated Nov. 2, 2022 (10 pages including English translation). [cited by applicant]
Pasebani et al., “Effects of atomizing media and post processing on mechanical properties of 17-4 PH stainless steel manufactured via selective laser melting,” Additive Manufacturing, 2018, 127-137. [cited by applicant]
Salama et al., “Distinct properties of tungsten austenitic stainless alloy as a potential nuclear engineering material,” Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2019, 51: 784-791. [cited by applicant]
Stainless Steel Precipitation hardening 15-5PH (Year: 2019). [cited by applicant]