IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,186,047
Granted Patent B2
US 12,186,047 · App. 17/403,378 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

Compliant mechanisms having inverted tool members

Inventors: Jason Dearden (Provo, UT); Jordan Tanner (Cypress, TX); Clayton Grames (East Palo Alto, CA); Bryce Edmondson (Provo, UT); Brian D. Jensen (Orem, UT); Spencer P. Magleby (Provo, UT); Larry L. Howell (Orem, UT)
Assignee: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
A61B34/71A61B17/29A61B34/30B25J9/1045B25J15/0233A61B2017/2902A61B2017/2937A61B2017/2939A61B2034/305
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,186,047
App. No.
17/403,378
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The embodiments described herein can be used in a variety of grasping, cutting, and manipulating operations. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes a shaft, a tool member, and a flexure. The shaft has a distal end portion and a proximal end portion, and defines a longitudinal axis. The distal end portion includes a ground portion. The tool member has an engagement portion and an actuation portion. The engagement portion is disposed distally from the actuation portion, and can exert an engagement force on a target structure. The actuation portion receives an actuation force. The flexure has a first end portion coupled to the ground portion of the shaft, and a second end portion coupled to the tool member. The flexure is configured to deform elastically when the actuation force is exerted on the actuation portion of the tool member such that the tool member rotates relative to the shaft.

Claims (39)

1. An apparatus, comprising:

a shaft comprising a distal end portion, a proximal end portion, and a longitudinal axis defined between the distal end portion and the proximal end portion, the distal end portion of the shaft comprising a ground portion;

a tool member comprising an engagement portion and an actuation portion, the engagement portion being configured to exert an engagement force on a target structure, the actuation portion being configured to receive an actuation force at an attachment point; and

a flexure being coupled to the ground portion of the shaft and the tool member, the flexure being configured to deform elastically when the actuation force is exerted on the actuation portion of the tool member such that the tool member rotates relative to the shaft about a pivot axis; and

an actuation cable coupled to the actuation portion of the tool member,

the entire flexure being between the engagement portion of the tool member and a proximal-most surface of the actuation portion of the tool member.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the actuation portion of the tool member is configured such that the attachment point is spaced apart from the pivot axis in a direction normal to the longitudinal axis by a moment distance, the moment distance varying by less than ten percent through an angular range of motion of the tool member, and the angular range of motion is at least ±45 degrees from the longitudinal axis.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the actuation portion of the tool member is configured such that the attachment point is spaced apart from the pivot axis in a direction normal to the longitudinal axis by a moment distance, the moment distance varying by less than ten percent through an angular range of motion of the tool member, and the angular range of motion is at least ±75 degrees from the longitudinal axis.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the tool member is coupled to the shaft such that the ground portion of the shaft is between the engagement portion of the tool member and a proximal-most surface of the actuation portion of the tool member.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein:

the actuation portion comprises a spool and the actuation cable is routed around the spool;

the attachment point being tangent to a circular portion of the spool; and

the engagement portion, the actuation portion, and the spool being formed as a monolithic piece.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the tool member includes the engagement portion, the actuation portion, and the spool, and the tool member is a monolithic piece.

7. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the circular portion defines an axis of rotation of the spool coaxial with the pivot axis.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the engagement portion of the tool member includes an engagement surface defining an engagement plane that intersects the pivot axis.

9. An apparatus, comprising:

a shaft comprising a distal end portion, a proximal end portion, and a longitudinal axis defined between the distal end portion and the proximal end portion, the distal end portion of the shaft comprising a ground portion;

a tool member comprising an engagement portion and an actuation portion, the engagement portion being configured to exert an engagement force on a target structure, the actuation portion being configured to receive an actuation force at an attachment point; and

a flexure between the ground portion of the shaft and the actuation portion of the tool member, a distal end portion of the flexure terminating at the ground portion of the shaft, the flexure being configured to deform elastically when the actuation force is exerted on the actuation portion of the tool member such that the tool member rotates relative to the shaft about a pivot axis,

the actuation portion of the tool member being configured such that the attachment point is spaced apart from the pivot axis in a direction normal to the longitudinal axis by a moment distance, the moment distance varying by less than ten percent through an angular range of motion of the tool member.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the angular range of motion is at least ±45 degrees from the longitudinal axis.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the angular range of motion is at least ±75 degrees from the longitudinal axis.

12. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the flexure is between the engagement portion of the tool member and a proximal-most surface of the actuation portion of the tool member.

13. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the tool member is coupled to the shaft such that the ground portion of the shaft is between the engagement portion of the tool member and a proximal-most surface of the actuation portion of the tool member.

14. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein:

the actuation portion comprises a spool and an actuation cable routed around the spool;

the spool comprises a circular portion; and

the flexure is within the circular portion.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein:

the attachment point is tangent to the circular portion of the spool.

16. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the engagement portion of the tool member, the actuation portion of the tool member and the spool are formed as a monolithic piece.

17. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the circular portion defines an axis of rotation of the spool coaxial with the pivot axis.

18. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the engagement portion of the tool member includes an engagement surface defining an engagement plane that intersects the pivot axis.

19. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein:

the tool member is a first tool member, the engagement portion is a first engagement portion, the actuation force exerted on the actuation portion of the first tool member is a first actuation force, the engagement force exerted on the target structure is a first engagement force, and the flexure is a first flexure,

the apparatus further comprises a second tool member and a second flexure;

the second tool member comprises a second engagement portion and a second actuation portion, the second engagement portion of the second tool member being configured to exert a second engagement force on the target structure between the first engagement portion of the first tool member and the second engagement portion of the second tool member, and the second actuation portion of the second tool member being configured to receive a second actuation force; and

the second flexure being between the ground portion of the shaft and the tool member, the second flexure being configured to deform elastically when the second actuation force is exerted on the second actuation portion of the second tool member such that the second tool member rotates relative to the shaft.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2021
From: DEARDEN, JASON; TANNER, JORDAN; GRAMES, CLAYTON; EDMONDSON, BRYCE; JENSEN, BRIAN D.; MAGLEBY, SPENCER P.; HOWELL, LARRY L.
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 057195/0157 →
Continuity (4)
Division 16096985
Provisional Application 62364469 · Jul 20, 2016
Provisional Application 62329556 · Apr 29, 2016
Related Publication 20210369371A1 · Dec 2, 2021
References Cited (72)
US 3140614A · James et al. · 1964 [cited by applicant]
US 3482466A · Orlich et al. · 1969 [cited by applicant]
US 4165745A · Heifetz · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4540211A · Masserang · 1985 [cited by applicant]
US 5318589A · Lichtman · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5496317A · Goble et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5575805A · Li · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5899914A · Zirps et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5964780A · Balazs · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6215081B1 · Jensen et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6322312B1 · Sundar · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6368290B1 · Baska · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6491626B1 · Stone et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7320700B2 · Cooper et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8245595B2 · Milenkovic · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8308801B2 · Halverson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8323297B2 · Hinman et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8597280B2 · Cooper et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8708593B2 · Stratton et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8911471B2 · Spivey et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8945174B2 · Blumenkranz et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 11123145B2 · Dearden et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20010041893A1 · Bartel · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020111621A1 · Wallace et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050119527A1 · Banik et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060184198A1 · Bales et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060190034A1 · Nishizawa et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070208375A1 · Nishizawa et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090198272A1 · Kerver et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090209960A1 · Chojin · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100152574A1 · Erdman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100160735A1 · Bakos et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100160940A1 · Lutze et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110152879A1 · Williams · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276085A1 · Krzyzanowski et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301599A1 · Roy et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130046317A1 · Blumenkranz · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150157355A1 · Price et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160000423A1 · Shields et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160015428A1 · Bowden et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160022365A1 · Jensen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160045096A1 · Kappel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160051274A1 · Howell et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160287279A1 · Bovay et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170042562A1 · Moody et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180333164A1 · Arata et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190290375A1 · Dearden et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200008827A1 · Dearden et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200085415A1 · Dearden et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 2626684Y · 2004 [cited by applicant]
DE 19537320A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
EP 1151723A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010078520A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010081050A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015057990A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016123139A2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017189272A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018052939A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Choi D.Y., et al., “Flexure-Based Manipulator for Active Handheld Microsurgical Instrument,” Proceedings of the IEEE 27th Annual Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Sep. 2005, pp. 5085-5088. [cited by applicant]
Doria M., et al., “Design of an Underactuated Compliant Gripper for Surgery Using Nitinol,” Journal of Medical Devices, Mar. 2009, vol. 3 (1), Abstract, p. 011007, ASME. [cited by applicant]
Edmondson B.J., et al., “Oriceps: Origami-Inspired Forceps,” ASME 2013 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems, Sep. 16-18, 2013, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17790117 mailed on Oct. 31, 2019, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Guerinot A.E., et al., “Compliant Joint Design Principles for High Compressive Load Situations,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, Jul. 2005, vol. 127 (4), pp.… [cited by applicant]
Halverson P.A., “Multi-stable Compliant Rolling-contact Elements,” Brigham Young University, May 3, 2007, 61 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/028043, mailed on Jul. 25, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kota S. et al., “Design and Application of Compliant Mechanisms for Surgical Tools,” Technical Briefs, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Nov. 2005, vol. 127, pp. 981-989, ASME. [cited by applicant]
Lassooij J., et al., “A Statically Balanced and Bi-stable Compliant End Effector Combined with a Laparoscopic 2DoF Robotic Arm,” Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2012, vol. 3, pp. 85-93. [cited by applicant]
Mertmann M., et al., “Grippers for the Micro Assembly Containing Shape Memory Actuators and Sensors,” Le Journal de Physique IV France 7 (1997), Conference C5, Supplement of Journal de Physique III of Nov. 1997, Pages C… [cited by applicant]
Ramu G., et al., “A Flexure-based Deployable Stereo Vision Mechanism and Temperature and Force Sensors for Laparoscopic Tools,” 14th National Conference on Machines and Mechanisms (NaCoMM09), Dec. 17-18, 2009, NaCoMM-20… [cited by applicant]
Sahai R., et al., “Semi-Automated Micro Assembly for Rapid Prototyping of a One DOF Surgical Wrist,” International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003), Oct. 27-31, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 1882-1888, IEEE. [cited by applicant]
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zubir M.N.M., et al., “Development of a novel flexure based microgripper for precision manipulation of micro-objects,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT 2009). 2009, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]