IP Library Granted Patent US 12,559,733
Granted Patent B2
US 12,559,733 · App. 17/409,306 · Granted Feb 24, 2026

Optimization of type IV BRAF inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma

Inventors: Campbell McInnes (Irmo, SC); Chad Beneker (Columbia, SC)
Assignee: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
C12N9/12A61K38/45A61P35/00C07K7/64C12Y207/11001A61K38/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,559,733
App. No.
17/409,306
Granted
Feb 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Inhibitory peptides for modifying RAF kinase protein dimerization are described. The peptides display a binding affinity for the dimer interface of a B-Raf, allowing for modification of RAF kinase dimerization, and inhibition of tumor growth. An embodiment of the disclosure is a peptide generated by modifying SEQ ID NO: 1, which corresponds to amino acids 503-521 of B-Raf kinase, e.g., cyclization, N-terminal capping, C-terminal capping, substitution of one or more amino acid residues, etc. The peptides disclosed herein include a modification to SEQ ID NO: 1 that can improve or otherwise alter binding affinity of the peptide to the dimer interface.

Claims (28)

1 . A peptide comprising no more than 19 amino acid residues, the peptide comprising a macrocycle including 5 or more amino acid residues in the ring structure of the macrocycle, the peptide comprising one of SEQ ID NO: 50 (VKRKTRHVNILLFMEY) or SEQ ID NO: 53 (VLRKKRHVNELLFMG).

2 . The peptide of claim 1 , the peptide comprising SEQ ID NO: 50, the macrocycle ring structure consisting of the amino acid residues from the first lysine to the glutamic acid of SEQ ID NO: 50.

3 . The peptide of claim 1 consisting of SEQ ID NO: 50.

4 . The peptide of claim 1 , the peptide comprising SEQ ID NO: 53, the macrocycle ring structure consisting of the amino acid residues from the second lysine to the glutamic acid of SEQ ID NO: 53.

5 . The peptide of claim 4 consisting of SEQ ID NO: 53.

6 . The peptide of claim 1 , the peptide comprising an N-terminal capping group and/or a C-terminal capping group.

7 . The peptide of claim 1 , wherein the peptide further comprises an N-methylation of a residue.

8 . The peptide of claim 1 , the peptide further comprising an N-terminal capping group and/or a C-terminal capping group.

9 . The peptide of claim 8 , wherein the N-terminal capping group and/or the C-terminal capping group are independently selected from Structure I:

in which R 2 -R 6 are independently selected from hydrogen, carboxyl, alkyl, alkyl ester, hydroxyl, methoxy, halogen, amino, alkylamino, thiol, thioalkylether, sulfonamide, phosphate, nitro, methylamine, or boronic acid, and R 10 is C or N, and R 3 is relevant only when R 10 is C;

Structure II:

in which R1, R2, and R3 are selected from a hydrogen (H) or an alkyl group having a chain length of 1-3 carbons and n=0-3;

Structure III:

in which R1-R5 can be independently selected from a hydrogen (H) a linear or branched alkyl group having a chain length of 1-5 carbons, an amine, aminoalkyl, thiol, thioalkylether, an amide, a carboxylate, a sulfate, a sulfamide, a cyano, or a halogen, and n=0-4;

Structure IV:

in which R1-R3 can be independently selected from a hydrogen (H) a linear or branched alkyl group having a chain length of 1-5 carbons, an amine, an amide, a carboxylate, a sulfate, a sulfamide, a cyano, or a halogen; and the alkyl chain having a chain length, n=0-3, may be positioned on the phenyl ring at any position including ortho, meta, or para, relative to the alkoxy group having a chain length, m=1-5; and

Structure V:

10 . The peptide of claim 8 , wherein the N-terminal capping group is selected from the group consisting of:

11 . The peptide of claim 8 , wherein the C-terminal capping group is selected from the group consisting of:

12 . A peptide comprising no more than 19 amino acid residues, the peptide comprising a sequence of Lysine-N-methylated arginine-octyl-Glutamic Acid (K-MeR-octyl-E).

13 . The peptide of claim 12 , the amino acid residues of the peptide consisting of SEQ ID NO: 65.

14 . A peptide comprising no more than 19 amino acid residues, the peptide comprising:

a macrocycle consisting of six amino acid residues in the ring structure of the macrocycle, the peptide comprising SEQ ID NO: 61 (KRHPAELLFMG) or a sequence comprising Lysine-N-methylated arginine-D-alanine-Proline-Alanine-Glutamic Acid (K-MeR-a-PAE).

15 . The peptide of claim 14 , the amino acid residues of the peptide comprises SEQ ID NO: 61.

16 . The peptide of claim 14 , the amino acid residues of the peptide comprises K-MeR-a-PAE.

17 . The peptide of claim 14 , the peptide further comprising a linear peptide portion.

18 . The peptide of claim 17 , wherein the linear peptide portion comprises one or more of the modifications of SEQ ID NO: 1.

19 . The peptide of claim 18 , wherein the modifications comprise N-methylation of a residue of SEQ ID NO: 1.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 6, 2023
From: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 065790/0686 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 6, 2023
From: MCINNES, CAMPBELL; BENEKER, CHAD
To: UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Reel/Frame 063863/0689 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63104268 · Oct 22, 2020
Related Publication 20220127585A1 · Apr 28, 2022
References Cited (138)
US 7291601B1 · Chae et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7432260B2 · Wang et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7449544B2 · Zheleva et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7576091B2 · McInnes et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7897605B2 · Wang et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8566072B2 · McInnes et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9175357B2 · McInnes et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9328139B2 · McInnes et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9376465B2 · McInnes et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9982015B2 · McInnes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10067131B2 · McInnes et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11162083B2 · McInnes · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20030036628A1 · Zheleva et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030086929A1 · Tso et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030129656A1 · Park et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030171904A1 · Lewis et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030187220A1 · Park et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030225527A1 · Antonvsamv et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040176301A1 · Zheleva et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040229290A1 · Hellinga et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050192300A1 · Wang et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050196808A1 · Yaffe et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050264628A1 · Raggatt · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060040997A1 · McInnes et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060281687A1 · Andrews et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060293245A1 · Zheleva et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080070843A1 · Livnah et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080132484A1 · McInnes et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080167385A1 · Kontopidis et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080287439A1 · Wang et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090215805A1 · Wood et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100004141A1 · Khvorova et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120202970A1 · McInnes et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130289240A1 · McInnes et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140296484A1 · McInnes et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140316107A1 · McInnes et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160011195A1 · McInnes et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170218018A1 · McInnes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170283445A1 · McInnes et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190382738A1 · McInnes et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GB 2369823 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004067000 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005005438 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005040802 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005042565 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005052147 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005108421 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
Verdine, et al. “Stapled peptides for intracellular drug targets” Meth. Enzymol. 503, pp. 3-33 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Yudin, Chem. Sci., 2015, 6, 30-49, DOI: 10.1039/c4sc03089c. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Sharma et al., N-methylation in amino acids and peptides: Scope and limitations, Biopolymers. 109: e23110. DOI: 10.1002/bip.23110. (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Beneker, et al. “Design and Synthesis of Type IV Inhibitors of BRAF Kinase That Block Dimerization and Overcome Paradoxical MEK/ERK Activation” J. Med. Chem. 62 pp. 3886-3897. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
ACS. “Cancer Facts & Figures 2020” [cited by applicant]
ACS. “Cancer Facts & Figures 2010” [cited by applicant]
Agianian, et al. “Current Insights of BRAF Inhibitors in Cancer” [cited by applicant]
Ahlbach, et al. “Beyond Cyclosporine A: Conformation-Dependent Passive Membrane Permeabilities of Cyclic Peptide Natural Products” [cited by applicant]
Andrews, et al. “REPLACE: A strategy for iterative design of cyclin-binding groove inhibitors” [cited by applicant]
Beneker, et al. “Design and Synthesis of Type IV Inhibitors of BRAF Kinase That Block Dimerization and Overcome Paradoxical MEK/ERK Activation” [cited by applicant]
Bernal, et al. “Reactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway by a stapled p53 peptide” [cited by applicant]
Bollag, et al. “Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma” [cited by applicant]
Brummer, et al. “RAF Kinase Dimerization: Implications for Drug Discovery and Clinical Outcomes” [cited by applicant]
Brummer, et al. “Inducible gene deletion reveals different roles for B-Raf and Raf-1 in B-cell antigen receptor signaling” [cited by applicant]
Buku, et al. “Mast Cell Degranulating (MCD) Peptide Analogs with Reduced Ring Structure” [cited by applicant]
CCP4. “The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography” [cited by applicant]
Chatterjee, et al. “N-methylation of peptides and proteins: An important element for modulating biological functions” [cited by applicant]
Chatterjee, et al. “Synthesis of N-methylated cyclic peptides” [cited by applicant]
Chmielecki, et al. “Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinomas Identifies Recurrent RAF Fusions and Frequent Inactivation of DNA Repair Genes” [cited by applicant]
Chou, et al. “Prediction of β-turns” [cited by applicant]
CCP4. “The CCP4 suite: Programs for protein crystallography” [cited by applicant]
Cox, et al. “The Raf inhibitor paradox: Unexpected consequences of targeted drugs” [cited by applicant]
Diedrich, et al. “Discrete cytosolic macromolecular BRAF complexes exhibit distinct activities and composition” [cited by applicant]
Durrant, et al. “Targeting the Raf kinases in human cancer: The Raf dimer dilemma” [cited by applicant]
Eisenhardt, et al. “Phospho-proteomic analyses of B-Raf protein complexes reveal new regulatory principles” [cited by applicant]
Evans, P.R. “Data reduction” [cited by applicant]
Freeman, et al. “Effects of Raf dimerization and its inhibition on normal and disease-associated Raf signaling” [cited by applicant]
Ganz, T. “Defensins: Antimicrobial Peptides of Innate Immunity” [cited by applicant]
Garnett, et al. “Guilty as charged: B-RAF is a human oncogene” [cited by applicant]
Giordanetto, et al. “Macrocyclic drugs and clinical candidates: What can medicinal chemists learn from their properties?” [cited by applicant]
Haigis, et al. “Differential effects of oncogenic K-Ras and N-Ras on proliferation, differentiation and tumor progression in the colon” [cited by applicant]
Hatzivassiliou, et al. “RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth” [cited by applicant]
Haug, et al. “Metadherin exon 11 skipping variant enhances metastatic spread of ovarian cancer” [cited by applicant]
Heidorn, et al. “Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF” [cited by applicant]
Herr, et al. “B-Raf Inhibitors Induce Epithelial Differentiation in BRAF-Mutant Colorectal Cancer Cells” [cited by applicant]
Herr, et al. “A novel MCF-10A line allowing conditional oncogene expression in 3D culture” [cited by applicant]
Hingorani, et al. “Trp53 [cited by applicant]
Hu, et al. “Allosteric Activation of Functionally Asymmetric RAF Kinase Dimers” [cited by applicant]
Jemal, et al. “Cancer Statistics, 2010” [cited by applicant]
Kamata, et al. “BRAF inactivation drives aneuploidy by deregulating CRAF” [cited by applicant]
Kaplan, et al. “Hyperactivation of MEK-ERK1/2 signaling and resistance to apoptosis induced by the oncogenic B-RAF inhibitor, PLX4720, in mutant N-RAS melanoma cells” [cited by applicant]
Karoulia, et al. “An Integrated Model of RAF Inhibitor Action Predicts Inhibitor Activity against Oncogenic BRAF Signaling” [cited by applicant]
Köhler, et al. “Activation loop phosphorylation regulates B-Raf in vivo and transformation by B-Raf mutants” [cited by applicant]
Kontopidis, et al. “Truncation and optimisation of peptide inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 2-cyclin a through structure-guided design” [cited by applicant]
Kontopidis, et al. “Differential binding of inhibitors to active and inactive CDK2 provides insights for drug design” [cited by applicant]
Kordes, et al. “Cooperation of BRAF [cited by applicant]
Lakowicz, J.R. “Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy” [cited by applicant]
Lavoie, et al. “Regulation of RAF protein kinases in ERK signaling” [cited by applicant]
Lavoie, et al. “Inhibitors that stabilize a closed RAF kinase domain conformation induce dimerization” [cited by applicant]
Leslie, A.G.W. “Recent changes to the MOSFLM package for processing film and image plate data” [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al. “Optimization of Non-ATP Competitive CDK/Cyclin Groove Inhibitors through REPLACE-Mediated Fragment Assembly” [cited by applicant]
McInnes, C. “Ch. 12: REPLACE Strategy for generating Non-ATP competitive Inhibitors of Cell-Cycle Protein Kinases” [cited by applicant]
McInnes, et al. “Targeting subcellular localization through the polo-box domain: non-ATP competitive inhibitors recapitulate a PLK1 phenotype” [cited by applicant]
McInnes, C. “Progress in the development of Non-ATP competitive Protein Kinase Inhibitors for Oncology” [cited by applicant]
Michaloglou, et al. “BRAF [cited by applicant]
Misawa, et al. “Rapid and high-sensitivity cell-based assays of protein-protein interactions using split click beetle luciferase complementation: An approach to the study of G-protein-coupled receptors” [cited by applicant]
Nielsen, et al. “Orally Absorbed Cyclic Peptides” [cited by applicant]
Nieto, et al. “A Braf kinase-inactive mutant induces lung adenocarcinoma” [cited by applicant]
Otwinowski, et al. “Processing of x-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode” [cited by applicant]
Papaneophytou, et al. “Quantification of the effects of ionic strength, viscosity, and hydrophobicity on protein-ligand binding affinity” [cited by applicant]
Pflugrath, J. “The finer things in X-ray diffraction data collection” [cited by applicant]
Poulikakos, et al. “RAF inhibitor resistance is mediated by dimerization of aberrantly spliced BRAF [cited by applicant]
Poulikakos, et al. “RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF” [cited by applicant]
Premnath, et al. “Iterative Conversion of Cyclin Binding Groove Peptides into Druglike CDK Inhibitors with Antitumor Activity” [cited by applicant]
Qin, et al. “Identification of a novel family of BRAF [cited by applicant]
Rajakulendran, et al. “A dimerization-dependent mechanism drives RAF catalytic activation” [cited by applicant]
Röring, et al. “Distinct requirement for an intact dimer interface in wild-type, V600E and kinase-dead B-Raf signaling” [cited by applicant]
Roskoski, Jr., R. “Classification of small molecule protein kinase inhibitors based upon the structures of their drug-enzyme complexes” [cited by applicant]
Ross, et al. “The distribution of [cited by applicant]
Samatar, et al. “Targeting RAS-ERK signalling in cancer: promises and challenges” [cited by applicant]
Selt, et al. “Establishment and application of a novel patient-derived KIAA1549:BRAF-driven pediatric pilocytic astrocytoma model for preclinical drug testing” [cited by applicant]
Shaw, et al. “Kinases and pseudokinases: Lessons from RAF” [cited by applicant]
Sherr, C.J. “Cancer cell cycles” [cited by applicant]
Siegel, et al. “Cancer Statistics, 2020” [cited by applicant]
Sievert, et al. “Paradoxical activation and RAF inhibitor resistance of BRAF protein kinase fusions characterizing pediatric astrocytomas” [cited by applicant]
Sur, et al. “A panel of isogenic human cancer cells suggests a therapeutic approach for cancers with inactivated p53” [cited by applicant]
Thevakumaran, et al. “Crystal structure of a BRAF kinase domain monomer explains basis for allosteric regulation” [cited by applicant]
Thota, et al. “Trametinib in the treatment of melanoma” [cited by applicant]
Verdine, et al. “Stapled peptides for intracellular drug targets” [cited by applicant]
Villar, et al. “How proteins bind macrocycles” [cited by applicant]
Walensky, et al. “A stapled BID BH3 helix directly binds and activates BAX” [cited by applicant]
Walensky, et al. “Activation of apoptosis in vivo by a hydrocarbon-stapled BH3 helix” [cited by applicant]
Wargo, et al. “Universes Collide: Combining Immunotherapy with Targeted Therapy for Cancer” [cited by applicant]
Weinberg, et al. “The Atypical Kinase RIOK1 Promotes Tumor Growth and Invasive Behavior” [cited by applicant]
Wimmer, et al. “Partner exchange: Protein-protein interactions in the Raf pathway” [cited by applicant]
Wu, et al. “Increased BRAF heterodimerization is the common pathogenic mechanism for noonan syndrome-associated RAF1 mutants” [cited by applicant]
Yaktapour, et al. “BRAF inhibitor-associated ERK activation drives development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia” [cited by applicant]
Yang, et al. “DNA damage and homologous recombination signaling induced by thymidylate deprivation” [cited by applicant]
Yao, et al. “Tumours with class 3 BRAF mutants are sensitive to the inhibition of activated RAS” [cited by applicant]
Yao, et al. “BRAF Mutants Evade ERK-Dependent Feedback by Different Mechanisms that Determine Their Sensitivity to Pharmacologic Inhibition” [cited by applicant]
Yuan, et al. “Development of siRNA payloads to target KRAS-mutant cancer” [cited by applicant]