IP Library Granted Patent US 12,436,217
Granted Patent B2
US 12,436,217 · App. 17/411,461 · Granted Oct 7, 2025

Magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction using machine learning and motion compensation

Inventor: Marcel Dominik Nickel (Herzogenaurach, DE)
Assignee: Siemens Healthineers AG
G01R33/56509G01R33/5608G06T3/18G06T3/4046G06T7/0012G06T7/0016G06T7/0014G06T2207/10088G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,436,217
App. No.
17/411,461
Granted
Oct 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The disclosure relates to MRI reconstruction of multiple MRI measurement datasets acquired throughout a measurement time duration. Patient motion can occur during the measurement time duration. Warping operators, sometimes also referred to as motion field, are incorporated into an iterative optimization of the MRI reconstruction.

Claims (54)

1. A computer-implemented method of reconstructing a sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, comprising:

obtaining, via one or more processors, a sequence of MRI measurement datasets that have been acquired during a measurement time duration during which patient movement occurs, each respective one of MRI measurement datasets of the sequence of MRI measurement datasets being acquired using a respective under-sampling trajectory in k-space and a receiver coil array; and

performing, via the one or more processors, an iterative process to obtain a sequence of reconstructed MRI images based on the MRI measurement datasets,

wherein the iterative process comprises, for each iteration of multiple iterations of the iterative process, a regularization operation and a data-consistency operation to obtain a respective current MRI image,

wherein the data-consistency operation is based on differences between the MRI measurement datasets and synthesized MRI measurement datasets, the synthesized MRI measurement datasets being based on a k-space representation of a prior MRI image of the multiple iterations, an undersampling trajectory, and a sensitivity map associated with the receiver coil array, and

wherein an input to the regularization operation comprises, for each iteration of the multiple iterations, a concatenation of multiple prior images obtained from a previous iteration of the multiple iterations, the multiple prior images being associated with multiple motion states of the patient movement and with multiple points in time throughout the measurement time duration, the multiple prior images being warped from their respective motion states to a reference motion state.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the multiple prior images are warped to the reference motion state by applying warping operators between the multiple motion states and the reference motion state, the method further comprising:

performing, via the one or more processors, a further image reconstruction of a sequence of preliminary MRI images based on the MRI measurement datasets, and

determining, via the one or more processors, the warping operators from a sequence of motion states of the movement of the patient to and from the reference motion state based on the sequence of preliminary MRI images.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the further image reconstruction is based on representations of the MRI measurement datasets having a reduction in resolution.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the warping operators are determined based on image registrations between pairs of preliminary MRI images of the sequence of preliminary MRI images.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

for at least one iteration of the multiple iterations of the iterative process, adjusting the warping operators based on at least one of the prior image and the current image of the respective iteration.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein:

the warping operators are determined using a neural network,

the regularization operation is implemented by a further neural network, and

the neural network and the further neural network are trained end-to-end.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein:

the warping operators are determined using a neural network and based on image registrations between pairs of preliminary MRI images of the sequence of preliminary MRI images,

the regularization operation and the image registrations are implemented by a further neural network, and

the neural network and the further neural network are trained end-to-end.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein an output of the regularization operation comprises a concatenation of multiple current MRI images, the method further comprising:

un-warping each one of multiple current MRI images from the reference motion state to a respective motion state associated with the patient movement.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the regularization operation is implemented by a trained neural network, and

wherein the concatenation of the multiple prior images corresponds to a stacking of the multiple prior images along a channel dimension of the trained neural network.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the regularization operation is performed as a joint regularization to determine, via the neural network, interdependencies between the concatenation of the multiple prior images.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the regularization operation comprises one or more operations that are impacted by pixel or voxel values of two or more images from among the concatenation of the multiple prior images.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the regularization operation discriminates between MRI images and aliasing artifacts due to undersampling.

13. A computer-implemented method of reconstructing a sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images, the method comprising:

obtaining, via one or more processors, a sequence of MRI measurement datasets that have been acquired during a measurement time duration during which a patient movement occurs, each respective one of MRI measurement datasets of the sequence of MRI measurement datasets being acquired using an under-sampling trajectory in k-space and a receiver coil array; and

performing, via one or more processors, an iterative process to obtain a sequence of reconstructed MRI images based on the MRI measurement datasets,

wherein the iterative process comprises, for each iteration of multiple iterations of the iterative process, a regularization operation and a data-consistency operation to obtain a respective current MRI image,

wherein the data-consistency operation is based on differences between the MRI measurement datasets and synthesized MRI measurement datasets, the synthesized MRI measurement datasets being based on a k-space representation of a prior image of the multiple iterations, an undersampling trajectory, and a sensitivity map associated with the receiver coil array,

wherein an input to the regularization operation comprises, for each iteration of the multiple iterations, a concatenation of multiple prior images obtained from a previous iteration of the multiple iterations, the multiple prior images being associated with multiple motion states of the patient movement and with multiple points in time throughout the measurement time duration, and

wherein the regularization operation comprises, for each iteration of the multiple iterations, a first convolution of the input in spatial domain, a second convolution of the input in time domain, and a third convolution of the input in motion-state domain.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 ,

wherein the first convolution is a two-dimensional (2-D) or a three-dimensional (3-D) convolution, and

wherein the second convolution and the third convolution are one-dimensional (1-D) convolutions, respectively.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

separately training components of the regularization operation associated with the first convolution, the second convolution, and the third convolution.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 15 ,

wherein a resolution in at least one of the time domain and the motion-state domain is reduced when training the component of the regularization operation associated with the first convolution.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

increasing a spatial resolution of the current MRI images over the multiple iterations.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

increasing a temporal resolution of the current MRI images over the multiple iterations.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , further comprising:

increasing a motion-state resolution of the current MRI images over the multiple iterations.

20. A computer-readable storage medium comprising program code that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to reconstruct a sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images by:

obtaining a sequence of MRI measurement datasets that have been acquired during a measurement time duration during which patient movement occurs, MRI measurement datasets of the sequence of MRI measurement datasets being acquired using a respective under-sampling trajectory in k-space and a receiver coil array; and

performing an iterative process to obtain a sequence of reconstructed MRI images based on the MRI measurement datasets,

wherein the iterative process comprises, for each iteration of multiple iterations of the iterative process, a regularization operation and a data-consistency operation to obtain a respective current MRI image,

wherein the data-consistency operation is based on differences between the MRI measurement datasets and synthesized MRI measurement datasets, the synthesized MRI measurement datasets being based on a k-space representation of a prior MRI image of the multiple iterations, an undersampling trajectory, and a sensitivity map associated with the receiver coil array, and

wherein an input to the regularization operation comprises, for each iteration of the multiple iterations, a concatenation of multiple prior images obtained from a previous iteration of the multiple iterations, the multiple prior images being associated with multiple motion states of the patient movement and with multiple points in time throughout the measurement time duration, the multiple prior images being warped from their respective motion states to a reference motion state.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2025
From: NICKEL, MARCEL DOMINIK
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 071374/0196 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 20, 2023
From: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
Reel/Frame 066267/0346 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 102020210775.0 · Aug 26, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220065970A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (47)
US 5459401A · Kiefer · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 10884086B1 · Ersoz · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11360180B2 · Yap · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11696700B2 · Rotman · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20080054899A1 · Aksoy · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20190236817A1 · Cheng · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190257905A1 · Cheng · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200105031A1 · Cheng · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200230419A1 · Madhavan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200249301A1 · Polak · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200272905A1 · Saripalli · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220067987A1 · Nickel · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230129194A1 · Vazquez Romaguera · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Balakrishnan et al, An Unsupervised Learning Model for Deformable Medical Image Registration (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Wu et al, An_improved_total_variation_regularized_Sense_reconstruction_for_MRI_images (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Ponti et al, Everything_You_Wanted_to_Know_about_Deep_Learning_for_Computer_Vision_but_Were_Afraid_to_Ask (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
German Action dated Jun. 11, 2021, Application No. 10 2020 210 775.0. [cited by applicant]
Hansen, Michael S., et al. Retrospective reconstruction of high temporal resolution cine images from real-time MRI using iterative motion correction. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2012, 68. Jg., Nr. 3, pp. 741-750. DO… [cited by applicant]
Cordero-Grande, Lucilio, et al. Three-dimensional motion corrected sensitivity encoding reconstruction for multi-shot multi-slice MRI: application to neonatal brain imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2018, 79. Jg.… [cited by applicant]
Knoll, Florian et al., “Deep learning methods for parallel magnetic resonance image reconstruction”, Version 1. Jan. 4, 2019. S. 1-14. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.01112.pdf [abgerufen am Sep. 1, 2020].—arXiv: 1904.0… [cited by applicant]
Michael Lustig et al., Compressed Sensing MRI, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (72), Mar. 2008, pp. 72-82; 2008. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Mingli et al. “A simple fixed-point approach to in-vert a deformation field a.” Medical physics 35.1 (2008): 81-88. [cited by applicant]
Lustig, Michael; et all; “Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging”;Magnetic resonance in medicine 58.6 (2007): 1182-1195.; 2007. [cited by applicant]
Hammernik, Kerstin et al.: “Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Data”; in: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; vol. 79; pp. 3055-3071; 2018; DOI 10.1002/mrm.26977. [cited by applicant]
De Vos, B. et. al., “A Deep Learning Framework for Unsupervised Affine and Deformable Image Registration”, Medical Image Analysis, https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06130, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger, Olaf et al. “U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation” 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2015 (MICCAI 2015); pp. 234-241, Oct… [cited by applicant]
Krebs, Julian et al.: “Unsupervised Probabilistic Deformation Modeling for Robust Diffeomorphic Registration”; arXiv:1804.07172v2; 2018; 2018. [cited by applicant]
Pruessmann, Klaas P. et al., “SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 952-962, Nov. 1999 (First published: Oct. 28, 1999) //https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594 … [cited by applicant]
G. Balakrishnan, A. Zhao, M. R. Sabuncu, J. Guttag, and A. V.Dalca, “An unsupervised learning model for deformable medical image registration,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn… [cited by applicant]
Liu, Jiaming et al. “RARE: Image Reconstruction using Deep Priors Learned without Groundtruth” arXiv:1912.05854v2, May 23, 2020; 2020. [cited by applicant]
Feinberg et al. (GRASE (Gradient- and Spin-Echo) MR Imaging: A New Fast Clinical Imaging Technique, Radiology 1991; 181: 597-602). [cited by applicant]
Usman et al. (Motion Corrected Compressed Sensing for Free-Breathing Dynamic Cardiac MRI, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 70:504-516 (2013)). [cited by applicant]
Knoll et al, “Deep Learning Methods for Parallel Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction,” arXiv:1904.01112v1 [eess.SP], pp. 1-14 (2019). [cited by applicant]
De Vos et al., “A Deep Learning Framework for Unsupervised Affine and Deformable Image Registration,” Medical Image Analysis, pp. 1-20 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Krebs et al., “Unsupervised Probabilistic Deformation Modeling for Robust Diffeomorphic Registration,” arXiv:1804.07172v2 [cs.CV], pp. 1-8 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Arefeen, Y., “Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques for Improving Rapid Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Applications in Fetal Imaging,” Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in p… [cited by applicant]
Elster, A., Questions and Answers in MRI, “Grase”, URL: http://mriquestions.com/grase.html, [recherchiert/abgerufen am Jul. 6, 2021]. [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger et al., “U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” 18th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2015 (MICCAI 2015), arXiv:1505.04597v1 [… [cited by applicant]
Bustin et al., “High-dimensionality undersampled patch-based reconstruction (HD-PROST) for accelerated multi-contrast MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 81, pp. 3705-3719 (2019). [cited by applicant]
Tamir et al., “T2 Shuffling: Sharp, Multi-Contrast, Volumetric Fast Spin-Echo Imaging,” Magn Reson Med., vol. 77, pp. 180-195 (2017). [cited by applicant]
DE Office Action for German Application No. 10 2020 210 776.9, dated Sep. 3, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Lustig et al, “Sparse MRI: The Application of Compressed Sensing for Rapid MR Imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 58, pp. 1182-1195 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Lustig et al., “Compressed Sensing MRI,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 72, pp. 72-82 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Pruessmann et al., “SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 952-962 (1999). [cited by applicant]
Hammernik et al., “Learning a Variational Network for Reconstruction of Accelerated MRI Data,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; vol. 79, pp. 3055-3071 (2018). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., A simple fixed-point approach to invert a deformation fielda), Med. Phys., vol. 35, pp. 81-88 (2008). [cited by applicant]
Mar. 13, 2024 (US) Office Action—U.S. Appl. No. 17/411,527. [cited by applicant]