IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,522,755
Granted Patent B2
US 12,522,755 · App. 17/427,226 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Intrinsically reversible superglues

Inventors: Shu Yang (Blue Bell, PA); Jason Christopher Jolly (Philadelphia, PA); Gaoxiang Wu (Philadelphia, PA); Anand Jagota (Bethlehem, PA); Zhenping He (Chalfont, PA); Hyesung Cho (Philadelphia, PA)
Assignees: THe Trustees of the University of Pennyslvania; Lehigh University
C09J133/066C08J3/075C08J3/24C09J11/06C08J2333/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,522,755
App. No.
17/427,226
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An adhesive that includes a polymer network capable of conversion between two different elastic modulus states with essentially no residual stress evolved in conversion between the two different elastic modulus states, wherein the polymer network comprises either or both of (i) poly (2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel and/or a copolymers thereof, and (ii) a shape memory polymer. The technology also concerns methods of using such adhesives.

Claims (19)

1 . An adhesive, comprising:

a polymer network wherein a change in hydration of the polymer network effects conversion of the network between two different elastic modulus states with essentially no residual stress evolved in conversion between the two different elastic modulus states,

wherein said polymer network (i) comprises a shape memory polymer and (ii) optionally comprises poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel and/or a copolymer thereof,

the shape memory polymer optionally comprising one or more of bisphenol A-based epoxy crosslinked by polyether amine and decylamine, ethylvinyl acetate (EVA), polyurethane, poly (&-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly (cyclohexyl methacrylate) (PCHMA) and (ii) a shape memory polymer.

2 . The adhesive of claim 1 , wherein the adhesive comprises PHEMA hydrogel and the PHEMA is copolymerized with one or more of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly (acrylic acid), poly (methacrylic acid), poly (N, N-isopropyl acrylamide), polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA), and polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PEGDMA).

3 . The adhesive of claim 1 , wherein the hydrogel, when contacted with a substrate, substantially does not have a chemical reaction with the substrate.

4 . The adhesive of claim 1 , further comprising a cross-linker in an amount of from about 2 vol % to about 10 vol %.

5 . The adhesive of claim 4 , wherein the crosslinker is ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA).

6 . An adhesive, comprising:

a polymer network wherein a change in hydration of the polymer network effects conversion of the network between two different elastic modulus states with essentially no residual stress evolved in conversion between the two different elastic modulus states,

wherein said polymer network (i) comprises poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel and/or a copolymer thereof and (ii) optionally comprises a shape memory polymer, wherein the hydrogel's modulus increases by at least three orders of magnitude when dry versus wet.

7 . An adhesive, comprising:

a polymer network wherein a change in hydration of the polymer network effects conversion of the network between two different elastic modulus states with essentially no residual stress evolved in conversion between the two different elastic modulus states,

wherein said polymer network (i) comprises poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel and/or a copolymer thereof and (ii) optionally comprises a shape memory polymer,

wherein the hydrogel, when wet, has a Young's modulus of from 10 to 200 kPa and the hydrogel, when dry, has a modulus of 100 MPa to 10 GPa.

8 . An adhesive, comprising:

a polymer network wherein hydration or dehydration of the polymer network effects conversion of the network between two different elastic modulus states with essentially no residual stress evolved in conversion between the two different elastic modulus states,

wherein said polymer network comprises either or both of (i) poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel and/or a copolymer thereof, and (ii) a shape memory polymer, and

wherein the hydrogel, when wet, has a Young's modulus of from 10 to 200 kPa and the hydrogel, when dry, has a modulus of 100 MPa to 10 GPa.

Assignments (4)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Feb 5, 2025
From: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070115/0212 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: YANG, SHU; JOLLY, JASON CHRISTOPHER; WU, GAOXIANG
To: THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Reel/Frame 057062/0204 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: CHO, HYESUNG
To: THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Reel/Frame 057062/0255 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 3, 2021
From: JAGOTA, ANAND; HE, ZHENPING
To: LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 057062/0859 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62799784 · Feb 1, 2019
Related Publication 20220306914A1 · Sep 29, 2022
References Cited (54)
US 3748701A · De Mestral · 1973 [cited by applicant]
US 20040266965A1 · Holguin et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20090280330A1 · Xie et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20130165554A1 · Weder et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008100617A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
Bose et al., “Mechanical Properties of Ultrahigh Molecular Weight PHEMA Hydrogels Synthesized Using Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition”, Biomacromolecules vol. 11, pp. 2116-2122 (2010) (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Lin et al., “Studies on Swelling Behaviors, Mechanical Properties, Network Parameters and Thermodynamic Interaction of Water Sorption of 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate/Novolac Epoxy Vinyl Ester Resin Copolymeric Hydrogels”… [cited by examiner]
Adams G & Nosonovsky M (2000) Contact modeling—forces. Tribology international 33(5-6):431-442. [cited by applicant]
Arzt E, Gorb S, & Spolenak R (2003) From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 100(19):10603-10606. [cited by applicant]
Autumn K (2007) Gecko adhesion: Structure, function, and applications. MRS Bull. 32(6):473-478. [cited by applicant]
Autumn K, et al. (2000) Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405(6787):681-685. [cited by applicant]
Baik S, et al. (2017) A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature 546(7658):396-400. [cited by applicant]
Bartlett MD & Crosby AJ (2014) High Capacity, Easy Release Adhesives From Renewable Materials. Adv. Mater. 26(21):3405-3409. [cited by applicant]
Bartlett MD, et al. (2012) Looking Beyond Fibrillar Features to Scale Gecko-Like Adhesion. Adv. Mater. 24(8):1078-1083. [cited by applicant]
Boesel LF, Greiner C, Arzt E, & del Campo A (2010) Gecko-Inspired Surfaces: A Path to Strong and Reversible Dry Adhesives. Adv. Mater. 22(19):2125-2137. [cited by applicant]
Chen C-M, Chiang C-L, Lai C-L, Xie T, & Yang S (2013) Buckling-Based Strong Dry Adhesives Via Interlocking. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(30):3813-3823. [cited by applicant]
Chen Y-C & Yang H (2017) Octopus-inspired assembly of nanosucker arrays for dry/wet adhesion. ACS Nano 11(6):5332-5338. [cited by applicant]
Cho et al., Intrinsically reversible superglues via shape adaptation inspired by snail epiphragm, PNAS, vol. 116, No. 28, Jul. 9, 2019, pp. 13774-13779. [cited by applicant]
Cho H, et al. (2015) Multiplex lithography for multilevel multiscale architectures and its application to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Nat. Commun. 6, 8484. [cited by applicant]
Denny MW (1984) Mechanical-Properties of Pedal Mucus and Their Consequences for Gastropod Structure and Performance. Am. Zool. 24(1):23-36. [cited by applicant]
Eisenhaure J & Kim S (2014) An internally heated shape memory polymer dry adhesive. Polymers 6(8):2274-2286. [cited by applicant]
Eisenhaure JD, Xie T, Varghese S, & Kim S (2013) Microstructured shape memory polymer surfaces with reversible dry adhesion. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5(16):7714-7717. [cited by applicant]
Ge L, Sethi S, Ci L, Ajayan PM, & Dhinojwala A (2007) Carbon nanotube-based synthetic gecko tapes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104(26):10792-10795. [cited by applicant]
Giokas S, Pafilis P, & Valakos E (2005) Ecological and physiological adaptations of the land snail Albinaria caerulea (Pulmonata : Clausiliidae). J. Mollus. Stud. 71:15-23. [cited by applicant]
Glassmaker NJ, Jagota A, Hui C-Y, Noderer WL, & Chaudhury MK (2007) Biologically inspired crack trapping for enhanced adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104(26):10786-10791. [cited by applicant]
Gorb S, Varenberg M, Peressadko A, & Tuma J (2007) Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure. J R Soc Interface 4(13):271-275. [cited by applicant]
Guvendiren M, Burdick JA, & Yang S (2010) Solvent induced transition from wrinkles to creases in thin film gels with depth-wise crosslinking gradients. Soft Matter 6(22):5795-5801. [cited by applicant]
Guvendiren M, Heiney PA, & Yang S (2009) Precipitated Calcium Carbonate Hybrid Hydrogels: Structural and Mechanical Properties. Macromolecules 42(17):6606-6613. [cited by applicant]
Guvendiren M, Yang S, & Burdick JA (2009) Swelling-Induced Surface Patterns in Hydrogels with Gradient Crosslinking Density. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(19):3038-3045. [cited by applicant]
Hawkes EW, Eason EV, Christensen DL, & Cutkosky MR (2015) Human climbing with efficiently scaled gecko-inspired dry adhesives. J R Soc Interface 12(102):20140675. [cited by applicant]
Henkel Corporation, Loctite® Super Glue Professional Technical Data Sheet. Accessed Jan. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Jagota A & Hui CY (2011) Adhesion, friction, and compliance of bio-mimetic and bio-inspired structured interfaces. Mat. Sci. Eng. R. 72(12):253-292. [cited by applicant]
Jeong HE, Lee JK, Kim HN, Moon SH, & Suh KY (2009) A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 106(14):5639-5644. [cited by applicant]
Johnson K, Kendall K, & Roberts A (1971) Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324(1558):301-313. [cited by applicant]
Kim J, et al. (2017) Nonlinear frameworks for reversible and pluripotent wetting on topographic surfaces. Adv. Mater. 29(7):1605078. [cited by applicant]
Kim S & Sitti M (2006) Biologically inspired polymer microfibers with spatulate tips as repeatable fibrillar adhesives. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89(26):3. [cited by applicant]
Kim TI, Jeong HE, Suh KY, & Lee HH (2009) Stooped Nanohairs: Geometry-Controllable, Unidirectional, Reversible, and Robust Gecko-like Dry Adhesive. Adv. Mater. 21(22):2276-2281. [cited by applicant]
King DR, Bartlett MD, Gilman CA, Irschick DJ, & Crosby AJ (2014) Creating Gecko-Like Adhesives for “Real World” Surfaces. Adv. Mater. 26(25):4345-4351. [cited by applicant]
Ko H, et al. (2009) Hybrid Core-Shell Nanowire Forests as Self-Selective Chemical Connectors. Nano Lett. 9(5):2054-2058. [cited by applicant]
Kwak MK, et al. (2011) Towards the next level of bioinspired dry adhesives: new designs and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21(19):3606-3616. [cited by applicant]
Li J, et al. (2017) Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces. Science 357(6349):378-381. [cited by applicant]
Lin PC, Vajpayee S, Jagota A, Hui CY, & Yang S (2008) Mechanically tunable dry adhesive from wrinkled elastomers. Soft Matter 4(9):1830-1835. [cited by applicant]
Long R, Hui C-Y, Kim S, & Sitti M (2008) Modeling the soft backing layer thickness effect on adhesion of elastic microfiber arrays. J. Appl. Phys. 104(4):044301. [cited by applicant]
Lu G, et al. (2008) Drying enhanced adhesion of polythiophene nanotubule arrays on smooth surfaces. ACS Nano 2(11):2342-2348. [cited by applicant]
Persson BNJ (2007) Biological adhesion for locomotion on rough surfaces: Basic principles and a theorist's view. MRS Bull. 32(6):486-490. [cited by applicant]
Qu LT, Dai LM, Stone M, Xia ZH, & Wang ZL (2008) Carbon nanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off. Science 322(5899):238-242. [cited by applicant]
Saito S, et al. (2016) Light-melt adhesive based on dynamic carbon frameworks in a columnar liquid-crystal phase. Nat. Commun. 7:12094. [cited by applicant]
Sun JY, et al. (2012) Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489(7414):133-136. [cited by applicant]
Vajpayee S, Hui C-Y, & Jagota A (2008) Model-independent extraction of adhesion energy from indentation experiments. Langmuir 24(17):9401-9409. [cited by applicant]
Vajpayee S, Khare K, Yang S, Hui C-Y, & Jagota A (2011) Adhesion Selectivity Using Rippled Surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21(3):547-555. [cited by applicant]
Wirthl D, et al. (2017) Instant tough bonding of hydrogels for soft machines and electronics. Sci. Adv. 3(6):e1700053. [cited by applicant]
Xu M, Du F, Ganguli S, Roy A, & Dai LM (2016) Carbon nanotube dry adhesives with temperature-enhanced adhesion over a large temperature range. Nat. Commun. 7:13450. [cited by applicant]
Yang J, Bai R, & Suo Z (2018) Topological Adhesion of Wet Materials. Adv. Mater. 30:1800671. [cited by applicant]
Yuk H, Zhang T, Lin ST, Parada GA, & Zhao XH (2016) Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces. Nat. Mater. 15(2):190-196. [cited by applicant]