IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,544,197
Granted Patent B2
US 12,544,197 · App. 17/428,355 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Computer implemented methods for defining a dental restoration

Inventors: Florin-Nicolae Cofar (Dumbravita, RO); Eric Van Dooren (Wilrijk, BE); Mihai Simonia (Timisoara, RO); Cristian Diaconescu (Timisoara, RO); Radu-Florin Sarghe (Timisoara, RO); Cristian-Florin Marta (Timisoara, RO)
Assignee: SMILECLOUD SRL
A61C9/0053A61C9/004A61C13/0004G06F30/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,544,197
App. No.
17/428,355
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer implemented method ( 1000 ) of characterising a tooth by analysing at least one digital representation of said tooth in its clinical environment, comprising: a) determining a parameter indicative for the position of the tooth in a mouth; b) determining a limited set of parameters for describing the tooth in a clinical environment, comprising parameters indicative of a size and shape of the tooth, and parameters for describing adjacent papilla's. Computer implemented method ( 1100 ) for adding teeth to a database. Computer implemented method ( 1200 ) for determining a matching score between teeth. Computer implemented method ( 1300 ) of searching a database to find matching teeth. Computer implemented method for allowing a user to design or define a dental restoration, and producing a 3D file for producing the dental restoration. Computer program product for any of these computer implemented methods. A digital database.

Claims (52)

1 . A computer implemented method of building a digital library of teeth, the method comprising:

(a) capturing or generating or providing at least one digital representation of said tooth in its clinical environment;

(b) characterizing, by the computer, said tooth in its clinical environment by utilizing a limited set of parameters, wherein characterizing said tooth in its clinical environment comprises:

determining a position parameter indicative for a unique position of the tooth in a mouth; and

determining at least two parameters for describing a size of said tooth; and

determining at least one parameter for describing a first papilla height; and

determining at least one parameter for describing a second papilla height; and

determining at least two parameters for describing a shape or a perceived shape of the tooth; and

(c) adding the at least one digital representation and adding the limited set of parameters to said digital library leading to the digital library to be searchable in a fast and efficient manner.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (b) comprises characterizing said tooth in its clinical environment by utilizing at least 6 parameters and at most 20 parameters.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least two parameters for describing the shape or perceived shape of the tooth comprise one or more of the following:

at least two parameters for describing a single transition line;

at least three parameters for describing one transition curve;

at least four parameters for describing two transition lines;

at least five parameters for describing one transition line and one transition curve; and

at least six parameters for describing two transition curves.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (a) comprises capturing or generating a 2D frontal picture or a 3D facial scan comprising an image of said tooth and at least a portion of a gingiva above said tooth, and a portion of a left neighbouring papilla, and a portion of a right neighbouring papilla.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein (b) further comprises:

determining at least one parameter for describing a first embrasure; and

determining at least one parameter for describing a second embrasure.

6 . A computer implemented method of searching, by a computer, in a digital database of teeth, and of automatically retrieving from the database by the computer, a limited set of candidate teeth that matches a digital representation of a particular tooth in its clinical environment, the method comprising:

(a) obtaining or determining a first limited set of parameters that characterize the existing tooth or the envisioned tooth, wherein the first limited set of parameters are chosen such that they allow for calculating a matching score in a fast and efficient manner;

(b) creating a list or an array of objects, each object containing at least a pointer or a reference to items of the database, and a matching score;

for at least a subset of the digital teeth stored in the digital library, performing:

(c) retrieving, by the computer, a second limited set of parameters of the tooth selected from the digital database;

(d) determining, by the computer, a matching score based on the first limited set of parameters and the second limited set of parameters by quantitatively comparing the determined first limited set of parameters that characterize the existing tooth or the envisioned tooth with the retrieved second limited set of parameters of the tooth selected from the digital database to determine a degree of similarity between the existing tooth or the envisioned tooth and the tooth selected from the digital database; and

(e) updating said list or array so as to keep pointers or references to the candidate teeth having a highest score; and

(f) providing the list or array with pointers or a references to matching teeth, and their matching score leading to a reduction in time required for planning a dental treatment.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein (a) comprises characterizing said tooth in its clinical environment by utilizing at least 6 parameters and at most 20 parameters.

8 . The method of claim 6 , wherein (a) comprises:

determining a position parameter indicative for a unique position of the tooth in a mouth; and

determining at least two parameters for describing a size of said tooth; and

determining at least one parameter for describing a first papilla height; and

determining at least one parameter for describing a second papilla height; and

determining at least two parameters for describing a shape or a perceived shape of the tooth.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the at least two parameters for describing the shape or perceived shape of the tooth comprise one or more of the following:

at least two parameters for describing a single transition line;

at least three parameters for describing one transition curve;

at least four parameters for describing two transition lines;

at least five parameters for describing one transition line and one transition curve; and

at least six parameters for describing two transition curves.

10 . The method of claim 6 , wherein (d) comprises calculating the matching score based on differences or deviations between corresponding parameters from the first limited set of parameters and the second limited set of parameters.

11 . A computer implemented method of generating a dental design, the method comprising:

(a) providing at least one digital representation of at least one tooth in an oral space of a patient;

(b) showing a plurality of visual objects to characterise said at least one tooth in said oral space;

(c) determining a limited set of parameters corresponding to said visual objects;

(d) searching and retrieving a limited number of candidate matching teeth from a digital library of teeth based on said characteristics, using the method of claim 6 ; and

(e) providing a 3D-file of at least one selected matching tooth.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving input from a user to adjust or modify one or more of said visual objects.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving input from a user to select another matching tooth from the limited set of candidate matching teeth.

14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising providing a photo-realistic 2D image of the patient with an overlay of the selected matching tooth.

15 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising producing at least one physical object based on said 3D file.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2021
From: COFAR, FLORIN-NICOLAE; VAN DOOREN, ERIC; SIMONIA, MIHAI; DIACONESCU, CRISTIAN; SARGHE, RADU-FLORIN; MARTA, CRISTIAN-FLORIN
To: SMILECLOUD SRL
Reel/Frame 057296/0820 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 19155845 · Feb 6, 2019 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220117708A1 · Apr 21, 2022
References Cited (17)
US 20090148816A1 · Marshall et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100145898A1 · Malfliet · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20130060532A1 · Clausen · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130108988A1 · Simoncic · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130282351A1 · Tank · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150056576A1 · Nikolskiy · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150111177A1 · Fisker · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170319293A1 · Fisker · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180204332A1 · Salah · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180263732A1 · Pokotilov · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20230390031A1 · Marshall · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 3639787A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
JP 4614517B2 · 2011 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2016054744A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
Sesemann “Appropriate Line Angles to Optimize Smile Design Restorations”, Journal of Cosmetic Dentistry Fall 2017 vol. 33 No. 3 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report, issued Apr. 15, 2020, pertaining to PCT/EP2020/052638, filed Feb. 3, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion, issued Apr. 15, 2020, pertaining to PCT/EP2020/052638, filed Feb. 3, 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]