Tank seal inspection
Various embodiments generally relate to robotics and more specifically to tank seal inspections. In some embodiments, the robotic inspection device comprising a power supply, a body, a drive system, a camera, a navigational system, and/or one or more sensors. The drive system may include one or more surface engaging drivers to propel the robotic inspection device along a surface of a tank. The camera can be housed within the body to capture images and/or video of a seal. The navigational system can compute a route (or receive commands that route) and send commands to the drive system to navigate the robotic inspection device along the surface of the tank allowing the camera to capture the images or video of the seal. Some embodiments may use an artificial intelligence or machine learning engine to review the images or video of the seal and identify potential problems.
1. A method of operating a robotic inspection device, the method comprising:
receiving, from an external source, an inspection signal requesting the robotic inspection device inspect a seal between a floating lid and a wall of a tank;
activating a magnetic coupling between the robotic inspection device and the wall of the tank;
navigating the robotic inspection device so that a camera within the robotic inspection device can view the seal;
recording, using the camera, images or video of the seal as the robotic inspection device traverses the wall of the tank; and
transmitting the images or video of the seal to an external computing device that creates a three-dimensional model of the seal.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising analyzing, using an artificial intelligence, machine learning engine, or supervisory controller, the images or video of the seal recorded by the camera.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inspection signal includes parameters representing tank dimensions, selected inspection routines, identified areas of interest, areas to avoid, communication channel information, location/tank information, external weather conditions, maximum inspection times, or waypoints.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising lowering, using a hydraulic lift, the robotic inspection device into an initial position within the tank.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the robotic inspection device operates in a set of states including a setup state, an inspection state, and a failsafe state.
6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:
monitoring for a failure in a primary power supply providing power to the robotic inspection device; and
transitioning, upon detection of the failure in the primary power supply, a current state of operation of the robotic inspection device to a failsafe state that activate the magnetic coupling between the robotic inspection device and the wall of the tank.