IP Library › Patent Application 17435852
Patent Application
App. No. 17/435,852

QUANTITATION OF SECONDARY DEGRADATION IN UNAFFECTED JOINTS RESULTING FROM OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
17/435,852
Abstract

Various embodiments disclosed herein relate to systems and methods for assessing patients suffering from joint-degenerating conditions. A computer system ( 400 ) can receive patient data comprising kinematic data and anthropometric data from a patient monitoring system ( 100 ). The patient monitoring system ( 100 ) can include various sensors ( 102, 103 ) configured to detect the kinematic data and/or anthropometric data as the patient ( 101 ) performs some action(s), for example. The computer system ( 400 ) can create a patient-specific biomechanical simulation based on the patient data and calculate metrics based thereon. The computer system ( 400 ) can compare the metrics to historical data and accordingly determine a treatment strategy based on the comparison.

Claims (44)

1 . A computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by a computer system, patient data comprising kinematic data and anthropometric data;

creating, by the computer system, a patient-specific biomechanical simulation based on the patient data;

calculating, by the computer system, at least one of joint loading data or gait mechanics data based on the patient-specific biomechanical simulation;

comparing, by the computer system, at least one of the joint loading data or the gait mechanics data to historical data; and

determining, by the computer system, a treatment strategy based on the comparison.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the patient data is at least partially sensed via a patient monitoring system.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the patient monitoring system comprises a sensor configured to detect the kinematic data associated with a patient.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the sensor comprises at least one of an accelerometer or a piezoelectric device configured to be coupled to the patient.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the patient monitoring system comprises a camera configured to detect the kinematic data associated with a patient, the kinematic data comprising motion capture data.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating, by the computer system, a net joint damage index based on the joint loading data compared to the historical data, wherein the net joint damage index comprises a net measure of potential joint damage suffered by a patient, and wherein the determined treatment strategy is further based on the net joint damage index.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the historical data comprises a plurality of previously created biomechanical simulations of patients.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

simulating, by the computer system, a plurality of different treatment strategies using the patient-specific biomechanical simulation, wherein the determined treatment strategy is determined from the plurality of simulated different treatment strategies.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

transmitting, by the computer system, the patient-specific biomechanical simulation to at least one of a computer-assisted surgical system or a clinician computer system.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment strategy comprises a non-operative intervention.

11 . The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the non-operative intervention comprises a recommendation for at least one of physical therapy of using a brace.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment strategy comprises an operative intervention.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , wherein the operative intervention comprises a total or partial joint replacement surgery.

14 . A computer system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

receive patient data comprising kinematic data and anthropometric data;

create a patient-specific biomechanical simulation based on the patient data;

calculate at least one of joint loading data or gait mechanics data based on the patient-specific biomechanical simulation;

compare at least one of the joint loading data or the gait mechanics data to historical data; and

determine a treatment strategy based on the comparison.

15 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the patient data is at least partially sensed via a patient monitoring system to which the computer system is communicably coupled.

16 . The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the patient monitoring system comprises a sensor configured to detect the kinematic data associated with a patient.

17 . The computer system of claim 16 , wherein the sensor comprises at least one of an accelerometer or a piezoelectric device configured to be coupled to the patient.

18 . The computer system of claim 15 , wherein the patient monitoring system comprises a camera configured to detect the kinematic data associated with a patient, the kinematic data comprising motion capture data.

19 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

calculate a net joint damage index based on the joint loading data compared to the historical data, wherein the net joint damage index comprises a net measure of potential joint damage suffered by a patient, and wherein the determined treatment strategy is further based on the net joint damage index.

20 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the historical data comprises a plurality of previously created biomechanical simulations of patients.

21 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

simulate a plurality of different treatment strategies using the patient-specific biomechanical simulation, wherein the determined treatment strategy is further based on the plurality of simulated different treatment strategies.

22 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the memory further stores instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the computer system to:

transmit the patient-specific biomechanical simulation to at least one of a computer-assisted surgical system or a clinician computer system.

23 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the treatment strategy comprises a non-operative intervention.

24 . The computer system of claim 23 , wherein the non-operative intervention comprises a recommendation for at least one of physical therapy of using a brace.

25 . The computer system of claim 14 , wherein the treatment strategy comprises an operative intervention.

26 . The computer system of claim 25 , wherein the operative intervention comprises a total or partial joint replacement surgery.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2021
From: MCKINNON, BRIAN
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Reel/Frame 057399/0891 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2021
From: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
To: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.; SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG; SMITH & NEPHEW ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LIMITED
Reel/Frame 057400/0140 →