IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,139,070
Granted Patent B2
US 12,139,070 · App. 17/455,663 · Granted Nov 12, 2024

Attention assist for dynamic blind zone with driver state in the loop

Inventors: Jerome Coudre (Bailly-Romainvilliers, FR); Jerome Vermersch (Saint Mard, FR); Azziz Maroc (Paris, FR)
Assignee: Aptiv Technologies AG
B60Q9/008B60K35/00G08B7/06B60K35/28B60K2360/178B60W50/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,139,070
App. No.
17/455,663
Granted
Nov 12, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed is a method defining a driver-assistance procedure implemented by a driver-assistance system of a vehicle, the procedure including performing an environment analysis around the vehicle, identifying a potential risk around the vehicle based on the performed environment analysis, identifying a field of view of a driver, determining whether or not the identified potential risk is located in the field of view of the driver and is hidden in a blind spot area of the vehicle, when the identified potential risk is located in the field of view of the driver and the identified potential risk is hidden in the blind spot area of the vehicle, informing the driver to change a driver's position in order to be able to see the identified potential risk.

Claims (70)

1. A method comprising:

implementing, by a driver-assistance system of a vehicle, a driver-assistance procedure that includes:

performing an environment analysis around the vehicle;

identifying a potential risk around the vehicle and in a forward direction for a driver of the vehicle based on the performed environment analysis;

identifying a field of view of the driver in the forward direction;

identifying a dynamic blind spot area caused by a front pillar of the vehicle based on the field of view of the driver;

determining if the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle;

responsive to determining that the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle, informing the driver about the identified potential risk and directing the driver to change the driver's position;

responsive to informing the driver about the identified potential risk and directing the driver to change the driver's position, determining whether the driver has changed the driver's position, determining an updated field of view of the driver in the forward direction after the driver has changed the driver's position, updating the dynamic blind spot area based on the updated field of view of the driver, and determining whether the identified potential risk is hidden in the updated dynamic blind spot area;

responsive to determining that the driver has changed the driver's position and that the identified potential risk is not hidden in the updated dynamic blind spot area, implementing the driver-assistance procedure again; and

responsive to determining that the driver has not changed the driver's position or that the identified position risk is hidden in the updated dynamic blind sport area, issuing a warning to the driver with a human machine interface of the vehicle about the identified potential risk.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein issuing the warning to the driver about the identified potential risk comprises at least one of:

displaying an orange blinking warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emitting a repeated sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether a critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within a double check period, and

responsive to determining that the critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within the double check period:

informing the driver of a forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system; and

allowing the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein informing the driver of the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system comprises at least one of:

displaying a red continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emitting a continuous alert sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether a critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within a general safety period, and

responsive to determining that the critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within the general safety period:

informing the driver of a forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system; and

allowing the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein informing the driver of the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system comprises at least one of:

displaying a red continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emitting a continuous alert sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

responsive to determining that the identified potential risk is not hidden in the updated blind spot area of the vehicle, informing the driver that the identified potential risk is without immediate danger.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein issuing the warning to the driver about the identified potential risk comprises:

displaying an orange continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

9. The method of according to claim 1 , wherein determining if the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle is performed while the vehicle is moving.

10. A system comprising:

a processor configured to implement a driver-assistance procedure operating as a driver-assistance system, the driver-assistance procedure comprising operations to:

perform an environment analysis around a vehicle;

identify a potential risk around the vehicle and in a forward direction for a driver of the vehicle based on the performed environment analysis;

identify a field of view of the driver in the forward direction;

identify a dynamic blind spot area caused by a front pillar of the vehicle based on the field of view of the driver;

determine if the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle;

responsive to a determination that the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle, inform the driver about the identified potential risk and direct the driver to change the driver's position;

responsive to informing the driver about the identified potential risk and directing the driver to change the driver's position, determine whether the driver has changed the driver's position, determine an updated field of view of the driver in the forward direction after the driver has changed the driver's position, update the dynamic blind spot area based on the updated field of view of the driver, and determine whether the identified potential risk is hidden in the updated dynamic blind spot area;

responsive to determining that the driver has changed the driver's position and that the identified potential risk is not hidden in the updated dynamic blind spot area, implement the driver-assistance procedure again; and

responsive to determining that the driver has not changed the driver's position or that the identified position risk is hidden in the updated dynamic blind sport area, issue a warning to the driver with a human machine interface of the vehicle about the identified potential risk.

11. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the operation to issue the warning to the driver about the identified potential risk further comprises further operations to at least one of:

display an orange blinking warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emit a repeated sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

12. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the driver-assistance procedure further comprises the operations of:

determine whether a critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within a double check period, and

responsive to a determination that the critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within the double check period:

inform the driver of a forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system; and

allow the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the operation of inform the driver of the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system comprises at least one of:

display a red continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emit a continuous alert sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

14. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the driver-assistance procedure further comprises the operations:

determine whether a critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within a general safety period, and

responsive to at determination that the critical point of the identified potential risk will be reached within the general safety period:

inform the driver of a forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system; and

allow the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system.

15. The system according to claim 14 , wherein the operation of inform the driver of the forthcoming takeover of the driver-assistance system further comprises at least one of:

display a red continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle; or

emit a continuous alert sound in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

16. The system according to claim 10 , wherein responsive to a determination that the identified potential risk is not hidden in the updated dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle, the processor is further configured to execute an operation comprising:

inform the driver that the identified potential risk is without immediate danger.

17. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the operation of inform the driver about the identified potential risk further comprises:

display an orange continuous warning in the human machine interface of the vehicle.

18. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the operation to determine if the identified potential risk is hidden in the dynamic blind spot area of the vehicle is performed while the vehicle is moving.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
To: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066566/0173 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES (2) S.À R.L.
Reel/Frame 066746/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 11, 2024
From: APTIV MANUFACTURING MANAGEMENT SERVICES S.À R.L.
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES AG
Reel/Frame 066551/0219 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: COUDRE, JEROME; VERMERSCH, JEROME; MAROC, AZZIZ
To: APTIV TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Reel/Frame 058160/0118 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 20210810 · Nov 30, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220169176A1 · Jun 2, 2022