IP Library Granted Patent US 12,357,341
Granted Patent B2
US 12,357,341 · App. 17/491,512 · Granted Jul 15, 2025

Cutting instrument with improved surface topography

Inventors: Clifford Spiro (Phoenix, AZ); Timothy Tobin (Phoenix, AZ); Eric Coats (Phoenix, AZ); William Fender (Phoenix, AZ)
Assignee: PLANATOME, LLC
A61B17/3211B24B37/042A61B2017/00526A61B2017/00849
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,357,341
App. No.
17/491,512
Granted
Jul 15, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments for an improved cutting instrument defining one or more angularly-oriented cutting fasciae having uniform cutting surfaces with reduced surface topography are disclosed.

Claims (50)

1. A cutting instrument, comprising:

a blade body having two opposing faces and a cutting wedge comprising:

a leading edge; and

one or more cutting fasciae extending from at least one of the two opposing faces and defining at least a portion of the leading edge, wherein the one or more cutting fasciae have a surface roughness comprising:

a measured arithmetic mean height (S a ) of 150 nm or less with a standard deviation of 30 nm or less across a measurement area of 16,641 square microns on at least a portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; and

one or more of: (1) a measured maximum height (S t ) of 1.5 μm or less with a standard deviation of 0.4 μm or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; or (2) a measured arithmetic mean peak curvature (S pc ) of 150 mm −1 or less with a standard deviation of 30 mm −1 or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae.

2. The cutting instrument of claim 1 , wherein the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material.

3. The cutting instrument of claim 2 , wherein the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process.

4. The cutting instrument of claim 2 , wherein the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge.

5. The cutting instrument of claim 1 , wherein the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

6. The cutting instrument of claim 1 , wherein:

the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material;

the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process;

the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge; and

the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

7. A cutting instrument, comprising:

a blade body having two opposing faces and a cutting wedge comprising:

a leading edge; and

one or more cutting fasciae extending from at least one of the two opposing faces and defining at least a portion of the leading edge, wherein the one or more cutting fasciae have a surface roughness comprising:

a measured dale void volume (V vv ) of 0.02 μm 3 /μm 2 or less with a standard deviation of 0.005 μm 3 /μm 2 or less across a measurement area of 16,641 square microns on at least a portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; and

one or more of: (1) a measured maximum height (S t ) of 1.5 μm or less with a standard deviation of 0.4 μm or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; or (2) a measured arithmetic mean peak curvature (S pc ) of 150 mm −1 or less with a standard deviation of 30 mm −1 or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae.

8. The cutting instrument of claim 7 , wherein the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material.

9. The cutting instrument of claim 8 , wherein the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process.

10. The cutting instrument of claim 8 , wherein the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge.

11. The cutting instrument of claim 7 , wherein the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

12. The cutting instrument of claim 7 , wherein:

the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material;

the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process;

the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge; and

the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

13. A cutting instrument, comprising:

a blade body having two opposing faces and a cutting wedge comprising:

a leading edge; and

one or more cutting fasciae extending from at least one of the two opposing faces and defining at least a portion of the leading edge, wherein the one or more cutting fasciae have a surface roughness comprising:

a measured arithmetic mean height (S a ) of 150 nm or less with a standard deviation of 30 nm or less across a measurement area of 16,641 square microns on at least a portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; and

a measured dale void volume (V vv ) of 0.02 μm 3 /μm 2 or less with a standard deviation of 0.005 μm 3 /μm 2 or less across the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae.

14. The cutting instrument of claim 13 , wherein the one or more cutting fasciae have the surface roughness further comprising:

one or more of: (1) a measured maximum height (S t ) of 1.5 μm or less with a standard deviation of 0.4 μm or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; or (2) a measured arithmetic mean peak curvature (S pc ) of 150 mm −1 or less with a standard deviation of 30 mm −1 or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae.

15. The cutting instrument of claim 13 , wherein the one or more cutting fasciae have the surface roughness further comprising:

a measured maximum height (S t ) of 1.5 μm or less with a standard deviation of 0.4 μm or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae; and

a measured arithmetic mean peak curvature (S pc ) of 150 mm −1 or less with a standard deviation of 30 mm −1 or less within the measurement area of 16,641 square microns on the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae.

16. The cutting instrument of claim 13 , wherein the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material.

17. The cutting instrument of claim 16 , wherein the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process.

18. The cutting instrument of claim 16 , wherein the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge.

19. The cutting instrument of claim 13 , wherein the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

20. The cutting instrument of claim 13 , wherein:

the surface roughness is formed into the one or more cutting fasciae using a process that removes material;

the process that removes the material comprises a chemical-mechanical polishing (CMP) process;

the process that removes the material uses a polishing pad that does not extend from one of the two opposing faces to beyond the leading edge; and

the at least the portion of the one or more cutting fasciae comprises at least 50% of the one or more cutting fasciae.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Sep 12, 2024
From: ENTREPIX MEDICAL, LLC
To: PLANATOME, LLC
Reel/Frame 068946/0959 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2022
From: SPIRO, CLIFFORD L.; COATS, ERIC E.; TOBIN, TIMOTHY; FENDER, WILLIAM
To: ENTREPIX MEDICAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 061500/0922 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63085952 · Sep 30, 2020
Related Publication 20220096114A1 · Mar 31, 2022
References Cited (29)
US 4926309A · Wu · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 4980021A · Kitamura · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 5230833A · Romberger · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 6379858B1 · Perry · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7037175B1 · Spiro · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 11224921B2 · Sasaki · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11592770B2 · Shimada · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020106978A1 · Michaud · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030148716A1 · Lyons, III · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060084367A1 · Spiro · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20090113726A1 · Ducros · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090208250A1 · Mitsumori · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100023041A1 · Satake · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100087845A1 · Spiro · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110232108A1 · Ochiai · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120222315A1 · Buchtmann · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20150158268A1 · Koike · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160068449A1 · Tsukihara · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160115624A1 · Pels · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180292768A1 · Imase · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20200230705A1 · Sasaki · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210162718A1 · Huang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220299920A1 · Shimada · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 106965044 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011217949 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006044466 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinon for corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US21/053045 Jan. 20, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chen, H., et al., “Highly Polished Scalpel Blades Reduce Incisional Wound Scar Variability in Duroc Pigs,” Open Access Journal of Surgery, vol. 12, Issue 2, ISSN: 2476-1346, 10 pgs, Oct. 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Prescher, H., et al., “Scalpel Edge Roughness Affects Post-Transection Peripheral Nerve Regeneration,” Surgery Open Science 4 (2021) 1-6, Nov. 18, 2020. [cited by applicant]