IP Library Granted Patent US 12,521,057
Granted Patent B2
US 12,521,057 · App. 17/496,879 · Granted Jan 13, 2026

Methods and systems for assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis

Inventors: Ashvin Bashyam (Austin, TX); Christopher Frangieh (Cambridge, MA); Michael J. Cima (Winchester, MA)
Assignee: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A61B5/4244G01R33/50G01R33/56341
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,521,057
App. No.
17/496,879
Granted
Jan 13, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in a patient's liver include (i) measuring a diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal of the liver, or portion thereof; and determining a fibrosis content of the liver or portion thereof based on the measured diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal, or (ii) measuring a relaxometry signal of the liver, or portion thereof; and determining a fat content of the liver or portion thereof based on the measured relaxometry signal. A system for such non-invasive sensing includes a static magnetic field source; RF transmitter coils connected to a pulse sequence generator; RF receiver coils configured to detect a magnetic field generated within liver tissues; and a signal acquisition and processor system configured to acquire signals from the RF receiver coils and perform a relaxation time (T2) relaxometry measurement, wherein the RF transmitter coils and pulse sequence generator are configured to apply a varying magnetic field to the liver tissues.

Claims (33)

1 . A method for staging liver fibrosis in a patient, the method comprising:

measuring, using one or more RF coils and a processor, a depth-resolved diffusion-weighted, multicomponent T2 relaxometry signal of the liver or a portion thereof; and

determining a fibrosis grade of the liver or portion thereof based on the measured diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal, which signal correlates with true fibrosis and differs among liver fibrosis grades.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising diagnosing, based at least in part on the fibrosis grade, at least one of: liver cirrhosis, hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, or cholangitis, in the patient.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the measuring comprises use of one or more permanent magnets configured to enable a single-sided NMR measurement.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the one or more permanent magnets comprise a unilateral linear Halbach array of permanent magnets.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient is a human.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising diagnosing, based at least in part on the fibrosis grade, at least one of: nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in the patient.

7 . A system for non-invasive staging of liver fibrosis in a patient, the system comprising:

one or more magnets configured to provide a static magnetic field source;

one or more RF transmitter coils connected to a pulse sequence generator, wherein the one or more RF transmitter coils and the pulse sequence generator are configured to apply a varying magnetic field to liver tissues of the patient;

one or more RF receiver coils configured to detect a magnetic field generated within the liver of the patient; and

a signal acquisition and processor system configured to acquire signals from the one or more RF receiver coils and perform a relaxation time (T2) relaxometry measurement,

wherein the signal acquisition and processor system is configured to:

use a CPMG pulse sequence to produce MR signals;

decompose the MR signals to identify constituent relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes; and

use the relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes to determine the fibrosis grade of the liver of the patient.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the static magnetic field source is a magnetic field that is uniform, optionally uniform to within 1% field uniformity.

9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the RF transmitter coils have a frequency range from 1 MHz to 50 MHz.

10 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the RF transmitter coils have a frequency range from 100 kHz to 20 MHz.

11 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the use of the relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes to determine the fibrosis grade of the liver of the patient comprises determining the difference in amplitude of an extracellular fluid component at a short and a long echo time.

12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more magnets comprise a unilateral linear Halbach array of permanent magnets.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the fibrosis grade is based on an amplitude of the measured diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal.

14 . A method for non-invasively staging liver fibrosis in human patient, the method comprising:

measuring a diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal of the liver or a portion thereof; and

determining the fibrosis grade of the liver or portion thereof based on the measured diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal,

wherein a portable magnetic resonance sensor generates a CPMG pulse sequence to produce MR signals, the MR signals are decomposed to identify constituent relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes, and the fibrosis grade of the liver is directly determined using the relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes.

15 . A method comprising:

applying a varying magnetic field to liver tissues of a human patient;

measuring a diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal of the liver; and

using the measured diffusion-weighted relaxometry signal from the liver to differentiate among fibrosis grades and between NAFLD and NASH in the patient,

wherein MR signals are decomposed to identify constituent relaxation times and their corresponding amplitudes, and differences in amplitude of an extracellular fluid component in the liver tissues at short and long echo times are determined.

16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein the amplitudes are associated with an extracellular fluid component at a short and long echo time.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Dec 13, 2023
From: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 065987/0511 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 8, 2021
From: BASHYAM, ASHVIN; FRANGIEH, CHRISTOPHER; CIMA, MICHAEL J.
To: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 057737/0838 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63089798 · Oct 9, 2020
Related Publication 20220110580A1 · Apr 14, 2022
References Cited (58)
US 10162031B2 · Tunnicliffee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10228432B2 · Piechnik · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10261157B2 · Sutton · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10575771B2 · Banerjee · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10845446B2 · Reeder · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20070080685A1 · Bydder · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20110028828A1 · Daye · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110182815A1 · Daich · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120003160A1 · Wolf · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120019245A1 · Reddy · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140213887A1 · Reddy · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140232403A1 · Perkins · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150168322A1 · Alocilja · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150309137A1 · Bydder · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160120438A1 · Cima et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160139224A1 · Assif · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170030986A1 · James · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170074952A1 · Kantzas · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170176549A1 · Krapf · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170261584A1 · James · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170325710A1 · Ryan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180220949A1 · Prado · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180306879A1 · Bashyam et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190076080A1 · Prado · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200253501A1 · Stadtler · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210088614A1 · Grimm · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210248741A1 · Kannengiesser · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210364590A1 · Roldán-Alzate · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220218221A1 · Cima · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220287635A1 · Prado · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220414972A1 · Rohrer · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230148948A1 · Prado · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230168324A1 · Gao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230168325A1 · Gao · 2023 [cited by examiner]
DE 102015226160A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020219924A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Karlsson; “Non-Invasive Characterization of Liver Disease by Multimodal Quantitative Magnetic Resonance”; Linköping University Medical Dissertations No. 1722, ISBN 978-91-7929-942-2, ISSN 0345-0082; 2019, pp. 1-77. [cited by examiner]
Manuel Romero-Gomez; “NAFLD and NASH Biomarkers in Detection, Diagnosis and Monitoring”; ISBN 978-3-030-37172-2 ISBN 978-3-030-37173-9 (eBook); 2020; pp. 1-236. [cited by examiner]
Xiaoke Wang; “Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers for Diffuse Liver Disease”: Technical Development and Validation; University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2019; pp. 1-136. [cited by examiner]
Guimaraes et al.; “T2 relaxation time is related to liver fibrosis severity”; © Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery; Quant Imaging Med Surg 2016;6(2):103-114. [cited by examiner]
Cassinotto et al.; “MR relaxometry in chronic liver diseases: Comparison of T1 mapping, T2 mapping, and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing cirrhosis diagnosis and severity”; vol. 84, Issue 8, Aug. 2015, pp. 1459-1… [cited by examiner]
Ayse et al.; “Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis”; DOI 10.1007/s00330-011-2295-z; Eur Radiol (2012) 22:682-687 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Leonie et al.; “Liver Fibrosis Quantification by Magnetic Resonance Imaging”; Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging vol. 26, No. 6, Dec. 2017 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
Laurence et al.; “Assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in liver fibrosis”; Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 25:122-128 (2007) © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 122 122-128 (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
M. Freiman et al.; “Multi-class SVM model for fMRI-based classification and grading of liver fibrosis”; Article in Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering ⋅ Mar. 2010 (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Hanyu et al.; “ Liver fibrosis staging with diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis”; Springer Science+ Business Media New York; Abdom Radiol (2017) 42:490-501; DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0913-6 (… [cited by examiner]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/054104 mailed Jan. 27, 2022 (15 pages). [cited by applicant]
Bashyam, A. et al., “Dehydration Assessment via a Non-Invasive, Miniature, Portable Magnetic Resonance Sensor using Multicomponent T2 Relaxometry” Magn. Reson. Med., 2019, 1-37. [cited by applicant]
Strauss, S. et al. “Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability in the Sonographic Assessment of Fatty Liver”, American J. Roentgenology, 2007, 189(6): W320-W323. [cited by applicant]
Liang, W. et al., “Establishment of a General NAFLD Scoring System for Rodent Models and Comparison to Human Liver Pathology,” PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(12): 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Shen, J. et al., “Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis by Combined Serum Biomarkers”, J. Hepatology, 2012, 56(6), 1363-1370. [cited by applicant]
Krawczyk, K. et al. “Adipohormones as Prognostic Markers in Patients with Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis”, J. Physiology Pharmacology, 2009, 60(3), 71-75. [cited by applicant]
Loomba, R. et al., “Magnetic Resonance Elastography Predicts Advanced Fibrosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Prospective Study,” Hepatology, 2014, 60(6): 1920-1928. [cited by applicant]
Akkaya, H. E., et al., “Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Basic Principles, Technique, and Clinical Applications in the Liver”, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 2018, 24(6): 328-335. [cited by applicant]
Nakamura, A. et al., “Lessons from Mouse Models of High-Fat Diet-Induced NAFLD”, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2013, 14(11): 21240-21257. [cited by applicant]
Bashyam et al., “Portable Single-Side MR: Multicomponent T2 Relaxometry and Depth Profiling with a Unilateral Linear Halbach Sensor”, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2018, 30 (1). [cited by applicant]
Araujo et al., “New Insights on Human Skeletal Muscle Tissue Compartments Revealed by In vivo T2 NMR Relaxometry”, Biophysical Journal, 2014, 106(10): 2267-2274. [cited by applicant]
Ababneh et al., “Biexponential Parameterization of Diffusion and T2 Relaxation Decay Curves in a Rat Edema Model: Decay Curve Components and Water Compartments”, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005, 54(3): 524-531. [cited by applicant]