IP Library Granted Patent US 12,496,583
Granted Patent B2
US 12,496,583 · App. 17/506,853 · Granted Dec 16, 2025

Microfluidic trap

Inventors: Jason E. Butler (Gainesville, FL); Anthony J. Ladd (Gainesville, FL); Mert Arca (Hillsboro, OR)
Assignee: University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc.
B01L3/502761B01L3/502715B01L3/50273C12Q1/6806C12Q1/6816G01N1/4077B01L2200/0668B01L2300/0838B01L2300/16B01L2400/0421B01L2400/0487G01N27/447
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,496,583
App. No.
17/506,853
Granted
Dec 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided herein are microfluidic devices that can be configured to generate an electrophoretic flow that is in opposition to a fluid flow through a microcapillary of a microfluidic device provided herein. Also provided herein are methods that include adding an amount of particle to the inlet area of the microfluidic device as provided herein, generating a first fluid flow through the microcapillary of the microfluidic device provided herein; and applying a uniform electric field to the microfluidic device, where the uniform electric field generates an electrophoretic flow that is in opposition to the fluid flow.

Claims (42)

1 . A method comprising:

adding particles to a microfluidic device, wherein the microfluidic device comprises an inlet area, wherein the inlet area has an entry region, and wherein the particles are added to the inlet area;

an outlet area, where the outlet area has an exit region; and

a single microcapillary, wherein the single microcapillary is fluidly coupled to the entry region of the inlet area and the exit region of the outlet area;

generating a first fluid flow through the single microcapillary of the microfluidic device with a first fluid flow generator; and

applying a uniform electric field to the microfluidic device, where the uniform electric field generates an electrophoretic flow that is in opposition to the first fluid flow;

tuning the uniform electric field, the first fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the first fluid flow, such that a plurality of the particles present in the single microcapillary migrate to a wall of the single microcapillary and subsequently migrate against the first fluid flow to a stagnation point at the entry region of the inlet area.

2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising concentrating the plurality of the particles at the stagnation point.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the particles are charged particles.

4 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising the step of quantitating the amount of the plurality of particles concentrated at the stagnation point.

5 . The method of claim 2 , further comprising the step of collecting the plurality of particles concentrated at the stagnation point.

6 . The method of claim 5 , collecting is performed by applying a second fluid flow to the stagnation point that is not parallel to the first fluid flow.

7 . The method of claim 6 , wherein the second fluid flow is about perpendicular to the first fluid flow.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of particles comprises at least DNA, and further comprising the step of separating the DNA from at least one other particle of the plurality of particles via tuning the uniform electric field, the first fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the first fluid flow.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the single microcapillary further comprises a neutral coating on one or more walls of the single microcapillary.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein tuning the uniform electric field, the first fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the first fluid flow, such that the plurality of the particles present in the single microcapillary migrate to a wall of the single microcapillary and subsequently migrate against the first fluid flow to the stagnation point comprises altering the magnitude and relative direction of the first fluid flow and electric field to trap particles along the wall.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein applying the uniform electric field to the microfluidic device comprises applying an axial electric field to the fluid.

12 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the microfluidic device has one or more step-changes in cross-sectional area in one or more areas across a length of the device.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first fluid flow generator is configured to generate a fluid flow through the single microcapillary at a flow velocity of 0 μm/s to 3000 μm/s.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the inlet area, the outlet area, and the single microcapillary are formed from a single structure using laser etching.

15 . A method comprising:

adding particles to a microfluidic device, wherein the microfluidic device comprises an inlet area, wherein the inlet area has an entry region, wherein the particles are added to the inlet area;

an outlet area, where the outlet area has an exit region; and

a single microcapillary coated with a charge-neutral compound or charge-neutral polymer, wherein the single microcapillary is fluidly coupled to the entry region of the inlet area and the exit region of the outlet area, wherein the inlet area, the outlet area, and the single microcapillary are formed from a single structure using laser etching, and wherein the microfluidic device has one or more step-changes in cross-sectional area in one or more areas across a length of the device;

generating a fluid flow through the single microcapillary of the microfluidic device with a fluid flow generator; and

applying a uniform electric field to the microfluidic device, where the uniform electric field generates an electrophoretic flow that is in opposition to the fluid flow;

tuning the uniform electric field, the fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the fluid flow, such that a plurality of the particles present in the single microcapillary migrate to a wall of the single microcapillary and subsequently migrate against the fluid flow to a stagnation point, wherein the stagnation point is located at the entry region of the inlet area.

16 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising concentrating the plurality of the particles at the stagnation point.

17 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising the step of quantitating the amount of the plurality of particles concentrated at the stagnation point.

18 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising the step of collecting the plurality of particles concentrated at the stagnation point.

19 . The method of claim 15 , wherein tuning the uniform electric field, the fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the fluid flow, such that the plurality of the particles present in the single microcapillary migrate to a wall of the single microcapillary and subsequently migrate against the fluid flow to the stagnation point comprises altering the magnitude and relative direction of the fluid flow and electric field to trap particles along the wall.

20 . A method comprising:

adding particles to a microfluidic device, wherein the microfluidic device consists of

an inlet area having an entry region;

an outlet area having an exit region;

a single microcapillary coated with a charge-neutral compound or charge-neutral polymer, where the microcapillary is fluidly coupled to the entry region of the inlet area and the exit region of the outlet area, and wherein the inlet area, the outlet area, and the single microcapillary are formed from a single structure using laser etching;

a fluid flow generator configured to generate a fluid flow through the microcapillary;

an electric current generator configured to generate an electrophoretic flow through the microcapillary, where the electrophoretic flow is in opposition to the fluid flow, and where the electrophoretic flow is tuned to the fluid flow such that one or more types of particles present in the microcapillary migrate to a wall of the microcapillary

and subsequently migrate against the fluid flow to a stagnation region, and wherein the microfluidic device has one or more step-changes in cross-sectional area in one or more areas across a length of the device;

generating a fluid flow through the microcapillary of the microfluidic device with the fluid flow generator; and

applying a uniform electric field to the microfluidic device with the electric current generator, where the uniform electric field generates an electrophoretic flow that is in opposition to the fluid flow;

tuning the uniform electric field, the fluid flow, or the uniform electric field and the fluid flow, such that one or more of the particles present in the microcapillary migrate to a wall of the microcapillary and subsequently migrate against the fluid flow to a stagnation point in the microcapillary.

Assignments (2)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded May 15, 2025
From: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
To: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 071275/0484 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2021
From: BUTLER, JASON E.; LADD, ANTHONY J.; ARCA, MERT
To: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.
Reel/Frame 058500/0239 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15746319
Provisional Application 62195137 · Jul 21, 2015
Related Publication 20220040698A1 · Feb 10, 2022
References Cited (114)
US 20040147043A1 · Boer et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050224350A1 · Sibbett · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070026413A1 · Toner · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070026421A1 · Sundberg · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070235335A1 · Strand · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080087546A1 · Strand · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090098541A1 · Southern · 2009 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for PCT/US16/43356 of Oct. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Lettieri, et al., A novel microfluidic concept for bioanalysis using freely moving beads trapped in recirculating flows, Lab on a Chip, 2003, 3, 34-39. [cited by applicant]
Jellema, et al., Charge-based particle separation in microfluidic devices using combined hydrodynamic and electrokinetic effects, Lab on a Chip, 2009, 9, 1914-1925. [cited by applicant]
Lettieri, et al., in Micro Total Analysis Systems 2003, ed. M. A. Northrup, K. F. Jensen and D. J. Harrison, Transducers Research Foundation Inc., Squaw Valley, California, USA, 2003, pp. 737-740. [cited by applicant]
Salentijn, et al., DNA Purification in Continuous Nanoliter Flows Using Flow-Induced Electrokinetic Trapping: Influence of lonic Strength and Chip Conditioning, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Miniat… [cited by applicant]
Takamura, et al., in Micro Total Analysis Systems, ed. Y. Baba, S. Shoji and A. Van den Berg, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Nara, Japan, 2002, pp. 317-319. [cited by applicant]
Tomizawa, et al., Trapping probability analysis of a DNA trap using electric and hydrodrag force fields in tapered microchannels, Physical Review E 79, 051902, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Lin, et al., Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2011, 10, 481-511. [cited by applicant]
Han, et al., Science, 2000, 288, 1026-1029. [cited by applicant]
Martel, et al. Scientific reports, 2015, 5, 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Ugaz, et al., Microfluidic Technologies for Miniaturized AnalysisSystems, Springer US, 2007, pp. 393-438. [cited by applicant]
Shendruk, et al., Curr. Op. Coll. Inter. Sci., 2012,17, 74-82. [cited by applicant]
Movy, Rev. Mod. Phys., 2000, 72, 813-872. [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al., Science, 1997, 276, 2016-2021. [cited by applicant]
Smith, et al., Science, 1998, 281, 1335-1340. [cited by applicant]
Shaqfeh, et al., J. Non-Newton. Fluid, 2005, 130, 1-28. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 5978-5984. [cited by applicant]
Jendrejack, et al., J. Chem. Phys, 2003, 119, 1165-1173. [cited by applicant]
Jendrejack, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003, 91, 038102. [cited by applicant]
Jendrejack, et al., The Journal of Chemical Physics, 2004, 120, 2513-2529. [cited by applicant]
Ma, et al., Phys. Fluids., 2005, 17, 083103. [cited by applicant]
Stone, et al., Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 2004, 36, 381-411. [cited by applicant]
Stroock, et al., Science, 2002, 295, 647-651. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of, 2000, 9,190-197. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, et al., Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2005,15, R1. [cited by applicant]
Zheng, et al., Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 4536-4547. [cited by applicant]
Zheng, et al., Anal. Chem., 2003, 75, 3675-3680. [cited by applicant]
Arca, et al., Soft Matter, 2015, 11, 4375-4382. [cited by applicant]
Wang, et al., Analytical Chemistry, 2005, 77, 4293-4299. [cited by applicant]
Usta, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2007, 98, 098301. [cited by applicant]
Rekre, et al., Phys. Rev. E, 2010, 82, 050803. [cited by applicant]
Butler, et al., Phys. Fluids, 2007, 19, 113101. [cited by applicant]
Leong, et al., Industrial Laser Solutions, 2004, 19, 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Yeung, Dynamics of single biomolecules in free solution. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 55:97-126, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Hernandez-Ortiz, et al., Cross-stream-line migration in confined flowing polymer solutions: Theory and simulation. Phys. Fluids, 18:123101, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Usta, et al., Flow-induced migration of polymers in dilute solution. Phys. Fluids, 18:031703, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Fang, et al., DNA configurations and concentration in shearing flow near a glass surface in a microchannel. J. Rheol., 49:127-138, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Saintillan, et al., Effect of flexibility on the shear-induced migration of short-chain polymers in parabolic channel flow. J. Fluid Mech., 557:297-306, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Fair, et al., Electrophoresis of dumbbell-like colloidal particles. Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 16:663-679, 1990. [cited by applicant]
Solomentsev, et al., Electrophoresis of slender particles. J. Fluid Mech., 279:197-215, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Barrat, et al., Theory of polyelectrolyte solutions. Adv. Chem. Phys., 94:1-66, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Manning, Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions.7. Electrophoretic mobility and conductance. J. Phys. Chem., 85:1506-1515, 1981. [cited by applicant]
Stellwagen, et al., Electrophoresis of DNA in agarose gels, polyacrylamide gels and infree solution. Electrophoresis, 30:S188-S195, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Allison, et al., A commentary on the screened-Oseen, counterioncondensationformalism of polyion electrophoresis. Biophys. J., 78:121-124, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Long, et al., Simultaneous action of electric fields and nonelectric forces on a polyelectrolyte: motion and deformation. Phys. Rev. Lett., 76:3858-3861, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Long, et al., A note on the screening of hydrodynamic interactions, in electrophoresis, and in porous media. Eur. Phys. J. E, 4:29-32, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., Electrophoresis and sedimentation of charged fibers. J. Coll. Int. Sci., 180:466-477, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Han, et al., Orientation distribution and electrophoretic motions of rodlike particles in a capillary. J. Coll. Int. Sci., 177:132-142, 1996. [cited by applicant]
Teles, et al., Trends in DNA biosensors. Talanta, 77:606-623, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Chopra, et al., Brownian dynamics simulations of isolated polymer molecules in shear flow near adsorbing and nonadsorbing surfaces. J. Rheol., 46:831862, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, et al., PCR microfluidic devices for DNA amplification. Biotechnol. Adv., 24:243284, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Hashimoto, et al., Polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction/hybridization assays using flow-through microfluidic devices for the detection of low-abundant DNA point mutations. Biosens. Bioelectron., 21:1915-1… [cited by applicant]
Guan, et al., Generating highly ordered DNA nanostrand arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102:18321-18325, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Felgner, et al., Nonviral strategies for gene therapy. Sci. Am., 276:102107, 1997. [cited by applicant]
Chan, et al., Adsorption and surface diffusion of DNA oligonucleotides at liquid/solid interfaces. Langmuir, 13:320-329, 1997. [cited by applicant]
Lee, et al., Evidence for spin coating electrostatic self-assembly of polyelectrolytes. Langmuir, 19:75927596, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Hoda, et al., Kinetic theory of polyelectrolyte adsorption in shear flow. J. Rheol., 51:799-820, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Hoda, et al., Brownian dynamics simulations of polyelectrolyte adsorption in shear flow: Effects of solvent quality and charge patterning. J. Chem. Phys., 128:164907, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Singh, et al., Application of molecular identification tools for Lactobacillus, with a focus on discrimination between closely related species: A review. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 42:448-457, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Bernardeau, et al., Safety assessment of dairy microorganisms: The Lactobacillus genus. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 126:278-285, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Karger, et al., DNA sequencing by CE. Electrophoresis, 30:S196-S202, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Slater, et al., DNA gel electrophoresis: The reptation models(s). Electrophoresis, 30:S181-S187, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Volkmuth, et al., DNA electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays. Nature, 358:600-602, 1992. [cited by applicant]
Han, et al., Separation of long DNA molecules in a microfabricated entropic trap array. Science, 288:1026-1029, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Doyle, et al., Self-assembled magnetic matrices for DNA separation chips. Science, 295:2237-2237, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Tseng, et al., Nanoparticle-filled capillary electrophoresis for the separation of long DNA molecules in the presence of hydrodynamic and electrokinetic forces. Electrophoresis, 26:3069-3075, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Zheng, et al., Counting single DNA molecules in a capillary with radial focusing. Aust. J. Chem., 56:149-153, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Jendrejack, et al., Stochastic simulations of DNA in flow: Dynamics and the effects of hydrodynamic interactions. J. Chem. Phys., 116:7752-7759, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Hsieh, et al., Modeling hydrodynamic interaction in Brownian dynamics: simulations of extensional flow of dilute solutions of DNA and polystyrene. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 113:147-191, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Fixman, et al., Simulation of polymer dynamics. I. General theory. J. Chem. Phys., 69:1527-1537, 1978. [cited by applicant]
Grassia, et al., Computer simulations of Brownian motion of complex systems. J. Fluid Mech., 282:373-403, 1995. [cited by applicant]
Kekre, et al., Comparison of lattice-Boltzmann and Brownian-dynamics simulations of polymer migration in confined flows. Phys. Rev. E, 82:011802, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Staben, et al., Motion of a particle between two parallel plane walls in low-Reynolds-No. Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids, 15:1711-1733, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Liron, et al., Stokes flow for a Stokeslet between two parallel flat plates. J. Eng. Math., 10:287-303, 1976. [cited by applicant]
Swan, et al., Simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles near a No. slip boundary. Phys. Fluids, 19:113306, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Ennis, et al., Electrophoretic mobility of a semi-dilute suspension of sphericalparticles with thick double layers and low zeta potentials. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 185:157-173, 1997. [cited by applicant]
Manning, Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions.I. Colligative properties. J. Chem. Phys., 51:924, 1969. [cited by applicant]
Doyle, et al., Dynamics of a tethered polymer in shear flow.Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:4769-4772, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Chou, et al., Sorting biomolecules with microdevices. Electrophoresis, 21:81-90, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Kishino, et al., Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles. Nature, 334:74-76, 1988. [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al., Relaxation of a single DNA molecule observed by optical microscopy. Science, 264:822-826, 1994. [cited by applicant]
Hur, et al., Dynamics of dilute and semidilute DNA solutions in the start-up of shear flow. J. Rheol., 45:421-450, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Wong, et al., Deformation of DNA molecules by hydrodynamic focusing. J. Fluid Mech., 497:55-65, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Lyon, et al., A dual-beam optical microscope for obsrvation and cleavage of single DNA molecules. Anal. Chem., 70:1743-1748, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Sia, et al., Microfluidic devices fabricated in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for biological studies. Electrophoresis, 24:3563-3576, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Silvera-Batista, et al., Long-term improvements to photoluminescence and dispersion stability by flowing SDS-SWNT suspensions through microfluidic channels. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131:12721-12728, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Liao, et al., Conformation dependence of DNA electrophoretic mobility in a converging channel. Electrophoresis, 31:2813-2821, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Nkodo, et al., Diffusion coefficient of DNA molecules during free solution electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 22:2424-2432, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Borrego, et al., Graduation rates, grade-point average, and changes of major of female and minority students entering engineering. 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Hipel, et al., The internationalization of engineering education—a tale of two countries. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics—Pt C: App. & Rev., 33:137, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Jackson, Globalization, internationalization, and short-term stays abroad. Int. J. Intercultural Rel., 32:349, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Hayward, Internationalization of US Higher Education. American Council ofEducation preliminary status report, 2000. [cited by applicant]
Dilli, et al., A new pedagogy in electrical and computer engineering: An experimental and conceptual approach. Frontiers in Education Conference I, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Leifer, An active learning design project for a junior-level kinematics and dynamicsclass. Frontiers in Education Conference I, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Matsubara, et al., Development of virtual learning environment for discovery learning in school education. Systems and Computers in Japan, 33:61, 2002. [cited by applicant]
Tai, et al., Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312:1143-1144, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Ladd, et al., A symplectic integration method for elastic filaments. J. Chem. Phys., 130:124909, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Ladd, et al., Comparison of the static and dynamic properties of a semiflexible polymer using lattice-Boltzmann and Brownian-dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. E, 80:036704, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Misra, et al., Mechanics of Vorticella contraction. Biophys. J., 98:2923-2932, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Dickinson, et al., Models for actin polymerization motors. J. Math. Biol., 58:81-103,2009. [cited by applicant]
Dickinson, et al., Nematode sperm motility: Nonpolar filament polymerizationmediated by end-tracking motors. Biophys. J., 92:622-631, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Dickinson, et al., Diffusion rate limitations in actin-based propulsionof hard and deformable particles. Biophys. J., 91:1548-1563, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Liu, et al., Visualizing the strain field in semiflexible polymer networks: Strain fluctuations and nonlinear rheology of f-actin gels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:198304, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Brangwynne, et al., Bending dynamics of fluctuating biopolymers probed by automated high-resolution filament tracking. Biophys. J., 93:346-359, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Lin, et al., Viscoelastic properties of microtubule networks. Macromolecules, 40:7714-7720, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Brangwynne, et al., Force fluctuations and polymerization dynamics of intracellular microtubules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104:16128-16133, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Brangwynne, et al., Nonequilibrium microtubule fluctuations in a model cytoskeleton. Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:118104, 2008. [cited by applicant]