IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,518,320
Granted Patent B1
US 12,518,320 · App. 17/534,272 · Granted Jan 6, 2026

Automated methods of inspection

Inventors: Michael J. Allen (San Antonio, TX); Cleburne Burgess (Fair Oaks Ranch, TX); John H. Amstutz (San Antonio, TX); Shanna Ruth Limas (San Antonio, TX); Ramon M. Lopez (San Antonio, TX)
Assignee: United Services Automobile Association (USAA)
G06Q40/08G06Q10/10G06Q40/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,518,320
App. No.
17/534,272
Granted
Jan 6, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems for providing automated methods of inspections that facilitate loss reporting and resolution are described. In some embodiments various remote evaluation tools are provided to collect information from remote locations. This information can be used to generate automated damage estimates which in turn can be used to direct the ordering of supplies, materials, and other resources. In addition, pre-damage and post-damage evaluations of an insured property may be collected using the remote evaluation tools. These evaluations can be used by adjusters (human adjusters and computer-based adjusters) to identify damage and process claims more efficiently.

Claims (56)

1 . A computer-implemented method comprising:

detecting, by a computing device, a potential event related to a property covered by an insurance policy based on a weather prediction;

activating or deactivating, by the computing device, data feeds based on a severity of a weather event indicated in the weather prediction;

acquiring, by the computing device, property data relating to the property, wherein acquiring the property data includes controlling a flight path of an unmanned aerial vehicle so as to collect video data of the property in a corresponding camera setting, wherein the flight path is updated at least based on a thermal image processed by an imagery module;

in response to detecting an event indicated by data from one or more smart devices connected to the computing device:

receiving, at an inspection engine, a loss notification indicating an expected loss associated with the property generated by an event manager;

acquiring, using one or more remote evaluation tools and data from the smart devices, property data relating to the property,

automatically generating, by the computing device, an estimated loss report based on the property data and the weather event affecting the property based at least in part on data from the data feeds.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

collecting, using the one or more remote evaluation tools, pre-event property data using the remote evaluation tools before the loss notification is received by the inspection engine; and

creating, using the pre-event property data, a property profile.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein generating the estimated loss report includes using the property profile to determine estimated losses.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the pre-event property data includes dimensions of the property, a size of a roof of the property, and a type of construction of the property.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising underwriting the insurance policy based on the pre-event property data.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining if an inspection of the property is needed to complete the estimated loss report; and

selecting, when an inspection of the property is needed, a scoper to inspect the property in person and to communicate with an adjustor remotely located from the property.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising selecting a method of inspection based on damage to the property identified by examining the property data acquired using the one or more remote evaluation tools.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the event manager monitors weather data and generates the loss notification based on the expected loss.

9 . A system comprising:

a communication module to:

connect to smart devices associated with a property covered by an insurance policy; and

in response to detecting an event indicated by data from the smart devices:

receive, via a network, a loss notification identifying one or more properties where a loss might have occurred;

a data collection module, running on one or more processors, to:

detect the potential event related to the property covered by the insurance policy based on a weather event indicated in a weather prediction,

activate or deactivate data feeds based on a severity of a weather event indicated in the weather prediction, and

collect property data about the current status of the one or more properties using remote evaluation tools and data from the smart devices, wherein collecting the property data comprises:

acquiring the property data at least in part from an electrical grid, and

acquiring the property data by controlling a flight path of an unmanned aerial vehicle so as to collect video data of the property in a corresponding camera setting, wherein the flight path is updated at least based on a thermal image processed by an imagery module;

an inspection engine to control the remote evaluation tools; and

an estimate generator to:

process the property data and produce a loss report identifying any damage to each of the one or more properties based on the status of the property and the weather event affecting the property based at least in part on data from the data feeds.

10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the data collection module also collects data regarding the one or more properties before the loss notification.

11 . The system of claim 10 , further comprising:

a profile module to create property profiles for each of the one or more properties based on the data regarding the one or more properties before the loss notification is

received; and

a database to store the property profiles.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the estimate generator accesses the property profiles and compares the data about the current status of the one or more properties with the property profile to assess damage to the one or more properties.

13 . The system of claim 9 , further comprising an assignment module to identify an adjustor based on the damage to the one or more properties identified in the loss report.

14 . The system of claim 9 , wherein the remote evaluation tools include smart sensors within the property, cameras, and weather sensors.

15 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause a machine to:

detect a potential event related to a property covered by an insurance policy based on a weather event indicated in a weather prediction;

activate or deactivate data feeds based on a severity of a weather event indicated the weather prediction; and

collect pre-event property data relating to the property covered by the insurance policy;

in response to detecting an event indicated by data from the smart devices:

receive a loss notification identifying the property covered by the insurance policy;

acquire, using one or more remote evaluation tools and data from the smart devices, current property data relating to the property, wherein acquiring the property data includes controlling a flight path of an unmanned aerial vehicle so as to collect video data of the property in a corresponding camera setting, wherein the flight path is updated at least based on a thermal image processed by an imagery module; and

automatically generate an estimated loss report identifying damage to the property that would result in payout from the insurance policy, wherein the estimated loss report is based on the pre-event property data, the current property data, and the weather event affecting the property based at least in part on data from the data feeds.

16 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 containing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors further cause the machine to underwrite the insurance policy based on the pre-event property data.

17 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 containing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors further cause the machine to:

determine if an inspection of the property is needed to complete the estimated loss report; and

select, when an inspection of the property is needed, a scoper to inspect the property in person and communicate with an adjustor remotely located from the property.

18 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 containing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors further cause the machine to select the adjustor based on damage to the property identified by examining the current property data acquired using the one or more remote evaluation tools.

19 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 containing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors further cause the machine to communicate with an event manager that monitors weather data and generates the loss notification based on an expected loss.

20 . The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 containing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors further cause the machine to reserve a set of resources.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2022
From: ALLEN, MICHAEL J.; BURGESS, CLEBURNE; AMSTUTZ, JOHN H.; LIMAS, SHANNA RUTH; LOPEZ, RAMON M
To: UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
Reel/Frame 060421/0734 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16442356 · Jun 14, 2019
Continuation 14275640 · May 12, 2014
Provisional Application 61822211 · May 10, 2013
References Cited (40)
US 4766539A · Fox · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 6021397A · Jones et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7949548B2 · Mathai et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7966203B1 · Pietrzak · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8229768B1 · Hopkins, III · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8229769B1 · Hopkins, III · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8280633B1 · Eldering · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8346578B1 · Hopkins, III et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8401896B2 · Wargin · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8756085B1 · Plummer · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 9505494B1 · Marlow · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 10373256B1 · Allen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10410289B1 · Tofte · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20010042785A1 · Walker et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20030040934A1 · Skidmore et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040117302A1 · Weichert et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040239550A1 · Daly, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060259234A1 · Flynn et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070063866A1 · Webb · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080114655A1 · Skidmore · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080133430A1 · Horowitz · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080267487A1 · Siri · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090138290A1 · Holden · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090177500A1 · Swahn · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090265193A1 · Collins · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100235198A1 · Fini et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100245164A1 · Kauffman · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100245165A1 · Kauffman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110218825A1 · Hertenstein · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123806A1 · Schumann, Jr. et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209782A1 · Pershing et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130060710A1 · Preuss · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130216089A1 · Chen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130226624A1 · Blessman et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130253987A1 · Hamann · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150278761A1 · Hamann · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CA 2429767A1 · 2004 [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/442,356, filed Jun. 14, 2019, Automated Methods of Inspection. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 14/275,640 now U.S. Pat. No. 10,373,256, filed May 12, 2014 Aug. 6, 2019, Automated Methods of Inspection. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/822,211, filed May 10, 2013, Automated Methods of Inspection. [cited by applicant]