IP Library Granted Patent US 12,476,723
Granted Patent B2
US 12,476,723 · App. 17/534,611 · Granted Nov 18, 2025

Architecture for integration of multiple networks in an air-to-ground context

Inventor: Douglas Hyslop (Vienna, VA)
Assignee: SMARTSKY NETWORKS LLC
H04B17/318H01Q1/28H01Q3/08H01Q3/24H01Q3/2605H01Q21/205H04B7/0617H04B7/0626H04B7/18504H04B7/18506H04B7/18508H04L5/22H04W16/14H04W16/28H04W36/0016H04W36/00837H04W36/302H04W84/06H04W36/085Y02D30/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,476,723
App. No.
17/534,611
Granted
Nov 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An inter-network communication controller may include processing circuitry. The processing circuitry may be configured to receive location information associated with an in-flight aircraft being tracked and provided with air-to-ground (ATG) wireless communication services by a first ATG network. The first ATG network may employ beamforming directed to the aircraft to provide the communication services. The processing circuitry may also be configured to provide the location information to a second ATG network to enable the second ATG network to utilize the location information for employing beamforming to establish wireless communication with the aircraft. The first ATG network and the second ATG network may each operate over different ranges of radio frequency (RF) spectrum.

Claims (29)

1 . An inter-network communication controller comprising processing circuitry configured to:

receive location information associated with an in-flight aircraft being provided with air-to-ground (ATG) wireless communication services by a first ATG network comprising a first set of two or more ATG base stations that share a common backhaul; and

provide the location information to a second ATG network comprising a second set of two or more ATG base stations that do not share the common backhaul of the first set of two or more ATG base stations to enable the second ATG network to utilize the location information for employing beamforming to establish wireless communication with the aircraft,

wherein the first ATG network and the second ATG network each operate over different ranges of radio frequency (RF) spectrum.

2 . The controller of claim 1 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to initiate a handover from the first ATG network to the second ATG network in response to the location information being provided to the second ATG network.

3 . The controller of claim 2 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to an indication of interference in the first ATG network reaching an interference threshold.

4 . The controller of claim 2 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to quality of service related scoring functions associated with each of the first ATG network and the second ATG network differing by a predetermined threshold.

5 . The controller of claim 2 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to performance of the first ATG network falling below a performance threshold.

6 . The controller of claim 2 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered based on a flight plan or trajectory of the aircraft indicating that the aircraft is headed to a coverage hole of the first ATG network.

7 . The controller of claim 1 , wherein the location information includes dynamic position information indicative of a future location of the aircraft at a given future time.

8 . The controller of claim 1 , wherein the first and second ATG networks each track and communicate with the aircraft simultaneously for at least a predetermined period of time after the second ATG network establishes wireless communication with the aircraft.

9 . The controller of claim 8 , wherein the first ATG network stops communicating with the aircraft after the predetermined period of time expires.

10 . The controller of claim 1 , wherein the controller is disposed at a central location accessible to base stations in each of the first and second ATG networks.

11 . The controller of claim 1 , wherein individual base stations of the first ATG network are collocated with respective individual base stations of the second ATG network, and wherein an instance of the controller is disposed at each respective site at which one of the base stations of the first ATG network is collocated with one of the base stations of the second ATG network.

12 . A system for providing inter-network communication to an in-flight aircraft including a first radio configured to communicate within a first air-to-ground (ATG) network, and a second radio configured to communicate within a second ATG network, the system comprising:

a plurality of first ATG base stations that share a common backhaul and that define the first ATG network;

a plurality of second ATG base stations that do not share the common backhaul with the first ATG base stations and that define the second ATG network; and

an inter-network communication controller comprising processing circuitry configured to:

receive location information associated with the aircraft being provided with communication services by the first ATG network, and

provide the location information to the second ATG network to enable the second ATG network to utilize the location information for employing beamforming to establish wireless communication with the aircraft,

wherein the first ATG network and the second ATG network each operate over different ranges of radio frequency (RF) spectrum.

13 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing circuitry is further configured to initiate a handover from the first ATG network to the second ATG network in response to the location information being provided to the second ATG network.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to an indication of interference in the first ATG network reaching an interference threshold.

15 . The system of claim 13 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to quality of service related scoring functions associated with each of the first ATG network and the second ATG network differing by a predetermined threshold.

16 . The system of claim 13 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered in response to performance of the first ATG network falling below a performance threshold.

17 . The system of claim 13 , wherein initiating the handover is triggered based on a flight plan or trajectory of the aircraft indicating that the aircraft is headed to a coverage hole of the first ATG network.

18 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the first and second ATG networks each track and communicate with the aircraft simultaneously for at least a predetermined period of time after the second ATG network establishes wireless communication with the aircraft.

19 . The system of claim 12 , wherein the controller is disposed at a central location accessible to both the first ATG base stations and the second ATG base stations.

20 . The system of claim 12 , wherein individual ones of the first ATG base stations are collocated with respective individual ones of the second ATG base stations, and wherein an instance of the controller is disposed at each respective site at which pairs of the first and second ATG base stations are collocated.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2023
From: SMARTSKY NETWORKS, LLC
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 063779/0317 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 8, 2022
From: HYSLOP, DOUGLAS
To: SMARTSKY NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 059191/0101 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16649363
Provisional Application 62561423 · Sep 21, 2017
Related Publication 20220086708A1 · Mar 17, 2022
References Cited (29)
US 7480278B2 · Pedersen et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7693551B2 · Ojard · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 9961664B2 · Chandwani et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10129906B2 · Rahman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20030003913A1 · Chen et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070161347A1 · Ma et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20140266896A1 · Hyslop · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140282684A1 · Keen et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150280806A1 · Jalali · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160205560A1 · Hyslop · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160286410A1 · O'Malley · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170026849A1 · Stone et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180192342A1 · Lim · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180248613A1 · Peitzer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190045406A1 · Kalathil · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200169881A1 · Linton · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210092049A1 · Faccin · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 101242327A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 2161855A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015038591A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017137632A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
E. Dinc et al., “In-Flight Broadband Connectivity: Architectures and Business Models for High Capacity Air-to-Ground Communications,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Sep. 2017, pp. 142-149, vol. 55, No. 9. [cited by applicant]
Notifications of Reason(s) for Refusal from corresponding Japanese application No. JP 2020-516569 dated Oct. 4, 2022, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Application No. PCT/US2018/051649 mailed on Nov. 30, 2018, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201880061479.6 dated Jul. 22, 2021, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
Communication from European Application No. 18793058.1 dated Oct. 13, 2021, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
Second Office Action from Chinese Application No. 201880061479.6 dated Jan. 26, 2022, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
First Examination Report from Indian Application No. 202047017008 dated Mar. 4, 2022, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]
Decision to Grant a Patent in corresponding Japanese Application No. 2020-516569 mailed Jan. 10, 2023, all pages cited in its entirety. [cited by applicant]