IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,636,504
Granted Patent B2
US 11,636,504 · App. 17/585,526 · Granted Apr 25, 2023

Systems and methods for collaborative offer generation

Inventors: Tony Ventrice (Palo Alto, CA); Michael Montero (Palo Alto, CA); Jamie Rapperport (Palo Alto, CA)
Assignee: Eversight, Inc.
G06Q30/0206G06Q30/0211G06Q30/0255G06Q30/0271
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,636,504
App. No.
17/585,526
Granted
Apr 25, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for a collaborative offer portal is provided. A proposed offer is received from a manufacturer, including an offer structure and a number of consumers they wish to target. Transaction logs of a retailer are accessed to determine an audience for the offer by calculating a return on investment (ROI) for the customer base using the retailer's records given the offer type. The consumers are then grouped by their ROI distribution, and the ROI for the deal is calculated based upon the offer size in light of this distribution. From the offer ROI a discount percentage to be paid by the retailer versus the merchant can be created. The retailer may then choose to accept the offer for deployment.

Claims (28)

1. A computerized method for offer democratization, the method comprising:

calculating a return on investment (ROI) function by aggregating consumers by descending value for each consumer and using a number of consumers targeted by offer, wherein the value for each consumer is calculated using shopper weights and transaction log data, and wherein the shopper weights are retailer specific;

determining a desired ROI;

generating the offer based upon the desired ROI and the ROI function; and

presenting the offer in a marketplace for review and acceptance by a plurality of retailers.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the value for each consumer is further calculated using transaction logs, product data, and prior offers.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the value for each consumer is a predicted value based upon the offer structure.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the value for each consumer is associated with actual transaction log data.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aggregating includes bucketizing consumers by their value.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the average value for the consumers for each bucket are multiplied by the number of consumers in the bucket to generate an ROI value for the bucket.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the desired ROI is compared against the ROI value for the bucket, to determine how many buckets of consumers to extend the offer to.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising calculating a percentage of cost that a manufacturer pays of the offer based upon the desired ROI.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the percentage is linearly correlated with the ROI.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing the offer structure for winning variables using transaction log data.

11. A computer program product stored on non-transitory computer memory, which when executed by a computer system performs the steps of:

calculating a return on investment (ROI) function by aggregating consumers by descending value for each consumer and using a number of consumers targeted by offer, wherein the value for each consumer is calculated using shopper weights and transaction log data, and wherein the shopper weights are retailer specific;

determining a desired ROI;

generating the offer based upon the desired ROI and the ROI function; and

presenting the offer in a marketplace for review and acceptance by a plurality of retailers.

12. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the value for each consumer is further calculated using transaction logs, product data, and prior offers.

13. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein the value for each consumer is a predicted value based upon the offer structure.

14. The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein the value for each consumer is associated with actual transaction log data.

15. The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the aggregating includes bucketizing consumers by their value.

16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the average value for the consumers for each bucket are multiplied by the number of consumers in the bucket to generate an ROI value for the bucket.

17. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the desired ROI is compared against the ROI value for the bucket, to determine how many buckets of consumers to extend the offer to.

18. The computer program product of claim 11 , further comprising calculating a percentage of cost that a manufacturer pays of the offer based upon the desired ROI.

19. The computer program product of claim 18 , wherein the percentage is linearly correlated with the ROI.

20. The computer program product of claim 11 , further comprising optimizing the offer structure for winning variables using transaction log data.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2023
From: EVERSIGHT, INC.
To: MAPLEBEAR INC. (DBA INSTACART)
Reel/Frame 063529/0881 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2022
From: VENTRICE, TONY; MONTERO, MICHAEL; RAPPERPORT, JAMIE
To: EVERSIGHT, INC.
Reel/Frame 059737/0994 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 16216997 · Dec 11, 2018
Continuation In Part 16120178 · Aug 31, 2018
Continuation 15990005 · May 25, 2018
Continuation In Part 14209851 · Mar 13, 2014
Provisional Application 62576742 · Oct 25, 2017
Provisional Application 62553133 · Sep 1, 2017
Provisional Application 61780630 · Mar 13, 2013
Related Publication 20220215415A1 · Jul 7, 2022
Cited By (1)
US 12,620,001