IP Library Granted Patent US 12,448,292
Granted Patent B2
US 12,448,292 · App. 17/595,624 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

Spark plasma sintering methods for fabricating dense graphite

Inventors: Howard T. Hartman (Idaho Falls, ID); Benjamin D. Coryell (Idaho Falls, ID); Jeffery A. Aguiar (Salt Lake City, UT); Colleen V. Shelton-Davis (Pocatello, ID); Erik P. Luther (Los Alamos, NM)
Assignees: Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC; Triad National Security, LLC
C01B32/21C04B35/522C04B35/645G21C3/62B28B3/086C01P2002/74C01P2004/03C01P2004/04C01P2006/10C04B2235/425C04B2235/6021C04B2235/656C04B2235/666C04B2235/77
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,448,292
App. No.
17/595,624
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments of the disclosure provide methods using spark plasma sintering (SPS) at moderate temperatures and moderate pressures to fabricate high-density graphite material. The moderate temperatures may be temperatures not exceeding about 1200° C. The moderate pressures may be pressures not exceeding about 300 MPa. The high density exhibited by the resulting, sintered, high-density graphite material may be greater than about 1.75 g/cm 3 (e.g., greater than about 2.0 g/cm 3 ).

Claims (30)

1. A method for fabricating a high-density graphite material, the method comprising subject a raw material comprising graphite to an electrical current, a temperature not exceeding 1200° C., and a pressure not exceeding about 300 MPa to sinter the raw material into a high-density graphite material having a carbon content of greater than about 95 atomic percent and exhibiting a density of greater than 2.0 g/cm 3 .

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting the raw material to comprise the graphite in powder form.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting the raw material to comprise graphite in natural flake form.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising fabricating the high-density graphite material to define a graphite structure with a greatest outer dimension of at least 5 mm.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising fabricating the high-density graphite material to define a graphite structure with a greatest outer dimension of at least 50 mm.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to the subjecting, providing a die defining an opening and inserting the raw material in the opening of the die.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, prior to the subjecting, compacting the raw material.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, before the subjecting:

disposing, within an opening defined in a die, the raw material;

at least partially inserting inserts into the opening, the raw material disposed between opposing surfaces of the inserts; and

axially compressing the raw material between the opposing surfaces of the inserts.

9. The method of claim 8 :

further comprising disposing, within the opening defined in the die, an other structure adjacent the raw material,

wherein at least partially inserting inserts into the opening comprises:

at least partially inserting, into the opening, one of the inserts above the raw material and the other structure; and

at least partially inserting, into the opening, an other of the inserts below the raw material and the other structure, and

wherein axially compressing the raw material comprises axially compressing the raw material and the other structure between the opposing surfaces of the inserts.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, prior to disposing the other structure adjacent the raw material, providing the other structure to comprise a sintered material.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein disposing, within the opening defined in the die, the other structure adjacent the raw material comprises disposing the other structure and the raw material to be wholly received within the opening in the die.

12. The method of claim 1 :

further comprising, before the subjecting:

disposing, within an opening defined in a die, the raw material between opposing surfaces of two structures, the opposing surfaces received within the opening; and

axially compressing the raw material between the opposing surfaces of the two structures,

wherein subjecting the raw material comprising graphite to the electrical current, the temperature not exceeding 1200° C., and the pressure not exceeding about 300 MPa sinters the raw material into the high-density graphite material to bond the two structures via the high-density graphite material.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting the raw material to comprise graphite and at least one metal material.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising selecting the at least one metal material to comprise one or more of zirconium (Zr), nickel (Ni), iron (Fe), or chromium (Cr).

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing the raw material to comprise the graphite and at least one oxide material.

16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising selecting the at least one oxide material to comprise at least one of uranium or plutonium.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein subjecting a raw material comprising graphite to an electrical current comprises subjecting the raw material to an electric current of from about 500 amperes to about 10,000 amperes.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein subjecting a raw material comprising graphite to an electrical current comprises subjecting the raw material to an applied electrical field of from about 4 V/cm to about 20 V/cm.

Assignments (1)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded May 23, 2022
From: BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE/IDAHO NAT'L LAB
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 059979/0007 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62850344 · May 20, 2019
Related Publication 20220081304A1 · Mar 17, 2022
References Cited (51)
US 4101453A · Orford et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4490828A · Fukuhara et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4847021A · Montgomery et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5882570A · Hayward · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 7078006B2 · Okubo et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8048515B2 · Nishiwaki et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20040188883A1 · Barron et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20150221398A1 · Subhash et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170369381A1 · Chu et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190288133A1 · Noyes · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190322056A1 · Noyes · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 106927832A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
CN 108706984A · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 109133965A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 109133966A · 2019 [cited by examiner]
CN 108046774B · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 1876249A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 2147985A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 2213756A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 1994190731A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009001613A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018504340A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020080025092B1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006103798A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009051094A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009066082A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012165208A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020236921A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Rubinkovskii et al. Production of Aluminum-Graphite Composite by Spark Plasma Sintering. Glass and Ceramics, vol. 76,. Nos. 1-2 (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Allabergenov et al. Fabrication of copper-graphite composites by spark plasma sintering and its characterization. Ceramic Transactions 232:151-161 (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-569043, dated Nov. 22, 2022, 8 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Bagin, “Critical Technology Assessment: Fine Grain, High Density Graphite,” U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Office of Technology Evaluation, (Apr. 2010), 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Borrell et al., “High Density carbon materials obtained at relatively low temperature by spark plasma sintering of carbon nanofibers” Int. J. Mat. Res., vol. 101(1), Jan. 2010, pp. 112-116. [cited by applicant]
Ge, “Processing of Uranium Dioxide Nuclear Fuel Pellets Using Spark Plasma Sintering”, A dissertation presented to the graduate school of University of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree o… [cited by applicant]
Hausner, “Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy”, vol. 3, Development and Future Prospects, Nuclear Applications, (1966) 68 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2020/033781, mailed Oct. 1, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2020/033781, mailed Oct. 1, 2020, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ironman et al., “Exploration of Viability of Spark Plasma Sintering for Commercial Fabrication of Nuclear Fuel Pellets,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 200, (Nov. 2017), pp. 144-158. [cited by applicant]
Maniere et al., “Spark Plasma Sintering and Complex Shapes: The Deformed Interfaces Approach”, Powder Technology, vol. 320, (Oct. 2017), pp. 340-345. [cited by applicant]
POCO Graphite an Entegris Company, “Properties and Characteristics of Graphite”, For industrial applications, (Jan. 2015), 42 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Second Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-569043, dated Mar. 29, 2023, 9 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
European Extended Search Report and Opinion for European Application No. 20810560.1, dated May 31, 2023, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Fourth Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-569043, dated Jan. 12, 2024, 5 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Application No. 2021-569043, dated Oct. 19, 2023, 4 pages with English translation. [cited by applicant]
[Online] “Resources, Education, Graphite 101, Structural Description”, Asbury Carbons, 2025. Retrieved on Apr. 11, 2025 from the Internet: <URL: https://www.asbury.com/resources/education/graphite-101/structural-descrip… [cited by applicant]
[Online] “What are Carbon Nanotubes? Uses, Properties and Structure”, Ossila Enabling Science, 2009. Retrieved on Apr. 11, 2025 from the Internet: <URL: https://www.ossila.com/pages/what-are-carbon-nanotubes>, (8 pages). [cited by applicant]
Berger et al., EELS Analysis of Vacuum Arc-Deposited Diamond-Like Films, Philosophical Magazine Letters, vol. 57, Issue 6, (1988), pp. 285-290. [cited by applicant]
Egerton, R.F., “Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy, in: In the Electron Microscope”, 2nd Ed, Plenum Press, 1996, Chapters 4 & 5, 157 pages. [cited by applicant]
Garvie et al., Carbonaceous Materials in the Acid Residue from the Orgueil Carbonaceous Chondrite Meteorite, Meteoritics & Planetary Science vol. 41, No. 4, (2006), pp. 633-642. [cited by applicant]
Garvie, Laurence A. J., Surface Electronic States of Meteoritic Nanodiamonds, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, vol. 41, No. 5, (2006), pp. 667-672. [cited by applicant]
Ponsonnet et al., EELs Analysis of Hydrogenated Diamond-Like Carbon Films, Thin Solid Films, vol. 319, (1998), pp. 97-100. [cited by applicant]