IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,642,784
Granted Patent B2
US 12,642,784 · App. 17/629,321 · Granted Jun 2, 2026

ANAVEX2-73 for the treatment of genetic neurodevelopmental disorders

Inventors: Christopher U. Missling (New York, NY); Alani Selvey (New York, NY)
Assignee: ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
A61K31/341A61P25/28
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,642,784
App. No.
17/629,321
Granted
Jun 2, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention provides methods for treating a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder such as Rett syndrome, comprising administering to a subject in need thereof a liquid oral dosage formulation comprising a therapeutically effective amount of ANAVEX2-73.

Claims (38)

1 . A method for treating Rett Syndrome in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising:

(a) evaluating the subject for the occurrence and/or severity of a symptom of Rett Syndrome consisting of repetitive hand movements, the evaluating comprising obtaining a baseline Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) score and/or a baseline Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score;

(b) daily administering to the subject a dosage formulation comprising a therapeutically effective amount of tetrahydro-N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenyl-3-furanmethanamine hydrochloride (ANAVEX2-73) for a period of at least about 1 week, wherein the dosage formulation is selected from a liquid oral dosage formulation, a topical formulation, a transmucosal formulation, a transdermal formulation, a buccal formulation, a sublingual formulation and a parenteral formulation;

(c) re-evaluating the subject for the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom evaluated in (a), the re-evaluating comprising obtaining a post-administration RSBQ score and/or a post-administration CGI-I score; and

(d) modifying the dosage of ANAVEX2-73 administered to the subject based upon the re-evaluations in (c), wherein

(i) improvement in the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and/or based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score indicates maintaining or reducing the amount of ANAVEX2-73 administered to the subject; and

(ii) absence of improvement in the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and/or based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score indicates increasing the dosage of ANAVEX2-73.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is about 55 mg or less.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 40 mg.

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 20 mg.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 10 mg.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 5 mg.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 2 mg.

8 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the dosage formulation comprises ANAVEX2-73 at a concentration of about 0.2 mg/ml to about 8 mg/ml.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the amount of ANAVEX2-73 is from about 0.2 mg to about 55 mg.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the dosage formulation further comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the dosage formulation is a topical formulation, a transmucosal formulation, a transdermal formulation, a buccal formulation, a sublingual formulation or a parenteral formulation, comprising about 0.2 mg to about 55 mg of ANAVEX2-73.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the dosage formulation is administered in at least one dose of the liquid dosage formulation, at least once daily.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the dosage formulation is a liquid oral dosage formulation comprising about 0.2 mg to about 55 mg of ANAVEX2-73, and at least one of a preservative and a flavoring agent.

14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the dosage formulation is administered to the subject for a period of at least about 30 days.

15 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the modifying in step (d) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score.

16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the modifying in step (d) is based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score.

17 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the modifying in step (d) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score.

18 . A method for treating Rett Syndrome in a subject in need thereof, the method comprising:

(a) evaluating the subject for the occurrence and/or severity of a symptom of Rett Syndrome consisting of repetitive hand movements, the evaluating comprising obtaining a baseline Rett Syndrome Behavior Questionnaire (RSBQ) score and/or a baseline Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score;

(b) measuring the level of plasma glutamate in the subject to determine a baseline plasma glutamate level in the subject;

(c) daily administering to the subject a dosage formulation comprising a therapeutically effective amount of tetrahydro-N,N-dimethyl-2,2-diphenyl-3-furanmethanamine hydrochloride (ANAVEX2-73) for a period of at least about 1 week, wherein the dosage formulation is selected from a liquid oral dosage formulation, a topical formulation, a transmucosal formulation, a transdermal formulation, a buccal formulation, a sublingual formulation and a parenteral formulation;

(d) re-evaluating the subject for the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom evaluated in (a), the re-evaluating comprising obtaining a post-administration RSBQ score and/or a post-administration CGI-I score; and/or re-measuring the level of plasma glutamate in the subject to determine a second glutamate level and comparing the second glutamate level to the baseline glutamate level; and

(e) modifying the dosage of ANAVEX2-73 administered to the subject based upon the re-evaluation and re-measuring in (d), wherein

(i) improvement in the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and/or based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score and/or (C) a second glutamate level less than the baseline glutamate level indicates maintaining or reducing the amount of ANAVEX2-73 administered to the subject; and

(ii) absence of improvement in the occurrence and/or severity of the symptom based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and/or (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score and/or (C) a second glutamate level about the same or higher than the baseline glutamate level indicates optionally increasing the dosage of ANAVEX2-73.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score.

20 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score.

21 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (C) a second glutamate level less than the baseline glutamate level.

22 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score.

23 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and (C) a second glutamate level less than the baseline glutamate level.

24 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score and (C) a second glutamate level less than the baseline glutamate level.

25 . The method of claim 18 , wherein the modifying in step (e) is based upon (A) a comparison of the baseline RSBQ score and the post-administration RSBQ score and (B) a comparison of the baseline CGI-I score and the post-administration CGI-I score and (C) a second glutamate level less than the baseline glutamate level.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2022
From: MISSLING, CHRISTOPHER U.; SELVEY, ALANI
To: ANAVEX LIFE SCIENCES CORP.
Reel/Frame 061843/0578 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62877074 · Jul 22, 2019
Related Publication 20220249427A1 · Aug 11, 2022
References Cited (23)
US 9750746B2 · Vamvakides et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10507196B2 · Missling · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10888543B2 · Missling · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11446275B2 · Missling · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11839600B2 · Missling · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20190022052A1 · Missling · 2019 [cited by applicant]
GR 1008233B · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 1997030983A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017132127A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018022848A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Berry-Kravis et al., “Drug development for neurodevelopmental disorders: lessons learned from fragile X syndrome”, 2018, Nature Reviews, 17, pp. 280-298 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Homberg et al., “Improving treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders: recommendations based on preclinical studies”, 2015, Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery, 11, pp. 11-25 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Evers et al., “Autism: Chapter 6: Excitotoxicity in Austism”, 2008, Humana Press, pp. 133-145 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Busner et al., “The Clinical Global Impressions Scale: Applying a Research Tool in Clinical Practice”, 2007, Psychiatry, pp. 29-37 (Year: 2007). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Oct. 16, 2020 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2020/043007. [cited by applicant]
Anavex Life Sciences Corp., “ANAVEX2-73 Study in Patients With Rett Syndrome (AVATAR),” May 8, 2019, 8 pages, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03941444 on Jul. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Rebowe N., et al., “Anavex 2-73 as a Potential Treatment for Rett Syndrome and Other Pediatric or Infantile Disorders with Seizure Pathology,” Jun. 22-24, 2016, pp. 1-30, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://s3.ama… [cited by applicant]
Supplementary European Search Report for European Patent Application 20844208.7 dated Jul. 27, 2022, 2 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 20844208.7, mailed on Feb. 16, 2024, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dy M.E., et al., “Defining Hand Stereotypies in Rett Syndrome: A Movement Disorders Perspective,” Pediatric neurology, vol. 75, 2017, pp. 91-95. [cited by applicant]
Rossignol D.A., “Novel and Emerging Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorders: A systematic review,” Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, Nov. 2009, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 213-236. [cited by applicant]
Zafarullah, M, et al., “Molecular Biomarkers in Fragile X Syndrome,” Brain Sci., 2019, vol. 9(5), 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Reyes, S.T., et al., “Effects of the sigma-1 receptor agonist blarcamesine in a murine model of fragile X syndrome: neurobehavioral phenotypes and receptor occupancy,” Sci Rep, 2021, vol. 11, 17150. [cited by applicant]