IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,292,378
Granted Patent B2
US 12,292,378 · App. 17/632,526 · Granted May 6, 2025

Method for determining the composition of a multi-layer system showing a predetermined colour flip-flop effect

Inventors: Sylvia Klausnitzer (Bruckmuehl, DE); Taner Bicer (Grafing, DE); Lutz Frischmann (Ismaning, DE); Ralf Buescher (Lohmar, DE)
Assignee: hubergroup Deutschland GmbH
G01N21/4738C09D11/033C09D11/037C09D11/50G01N21/255G01N21/8422B05D5/066G01N2021/4711G01N2021/8438
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,292,378
App. No.
17/632,526
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for determining the composition of a multi-layer system showing a predetermined colour flip-flop effect, wherein the multi-layer system comprises from bottom to top a) a substrate, b) at least one first colour layer containing a colourant, which is arranged on the substrate a), c) on the at least one first colour layer an effect layer containing at least one platelet-shaped effect pigment, and d) on the effect layer c) at least one second colour layer containing a colourant, wherein each of the at least one first colour layer and of the at least one second colour layer contains a colourant being no platelet-shaped effect pigment, wherein the method comprises the following steps: i) specifying a first target value for the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the multi-layer system seen at a first observation angle, ii) specifying a second target value for the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the multi-layer system seen at a second observation angle, wherein the second observation angle is different from the first observation angle, and wherein the second target value is different from the first target value, iii) specifying a colourant system comprising at least one colourant and further comprising one effect pigment layer recipe being suitable for forming the effect layer c), iv) providing at least one empirical model of the relationship between the colour shades and/or colour brightness at least two different observation angles comprising at least the first observation angle and the second observation angle specified in step ii) of the top side of a first number of multi-layer systems, at least 90% of which comprising at least one first colour layer b) having at least one colourant as specified in step iii), at least one second colour layer d) having at least one colourant as specified in step iii) and an effect layer c) made of the effect pigment layer recipe specified in step iii), and v) determining—making use of the at least one empirical model provided in step iv)—the composition of a multi-layer system ( 10 ) having within a predetermined tolerance the first target value specified in step i) and the second target value specified in step ii), or, if none is found, specifying a new tolerance for the first target value specified in step i) and/or the second target value specified in step ii), or specifying in steps i) and ii) a new first target value and/or new the second target value, or repeating the method by specifying in step iii) a different colourant system, which preferably covers more different colourants than the colourant system used before, wherein the determination in step v) is performed by using a computer program.

Claims (30)

1. A method for making a multi-layer system showing a predetermined colour flip-flop effect, wherein the method comprises

a) providing a substrate,

b) depositing at least one first colour layer containing a colourant on the substrate a),

c) depositing on the at least one first colour layer an effect layer containing at least one platelet-shaped effect pigment, and

d) depositing on the effect layer at least one second colour layer containing a colourant,

wherein each of the at least one first colour layer and of the at least one second colour layer contains a colourant which is not a platelet-shaped effect pigment, wherein the method further comprises the following steps:

i) specifying a first target value for the colour shade, for the colour brightness or for the colour shade and the colour brightness of the top side of the multi-layer system seen at a first observation angle,

ii) specifying a second target value for the colour shade, for the colour brightness or for the colour shade and the colour brightness of the top side of the multi-layer system seen at a second observation angle, wherein the second observation angle is different from the first observation angle, and wherein the second target value is different from the first target value,

iii) specifying a colourant system comprising at least one colourant and further comprising one effect pigment layer recipe being suitable for forming the effect layer,

iv) providing at least one empirical model of the relationship between the colour shades, between the colour brightness or between the colour shade and the colour brightness at at least two different observation angles comprising at least the first observation angle and the second observation angle specified in step ii) of the top side of a first number of multi-layer system, at least 90% of which comprising at least one first colour layer having at least one colourant as specified in step iii), at least one second colour layer having at least one colourant as specified in step iii) and an effect layer made of the effect pigment layer recipe specified in step iii), and

v) determining-making use of the at least one empirical model provided in step iv)—the composition of a multi-layer system having within a predetermined tolerance the first target value specified in step i) and the second target value specified in step ii), or, if none is found, specifying α) a new tolerance for the first target value specified in step i), a new tolerance for the second target value specified in step ii) or a new tolerance for the first target value specified in step i) and for the second target value specified in step ii), or β) specifying in steps i) and ii) a new first target value, a new second target value or a new first and second target value, or γ) repeating the method by specifying in step iii) a different colourant system, wherein the determination in step v) is performed by using a computer program.

2. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the determination in step v) is performed by using a statistics program or by using a spreadsheet software as the computer program.

3. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein the determination in step v) is performed by using a statistics program for a direct calculation of experimental settings that leads within a predetermined tolerance to the desired first target value specified in step i) and the second target value specified in step ii).

4. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the determination in step v) is performed by calculating—making use of the at least one empirical model provided in step iv)—a prognosis for the values of the colour shades and/or colour brightness at at least two different observation angles comprising at least the first observation angle and the second observation angle specified in steps i) and ii) of the top side of a second number of multi-layer systems, at least 90% of which comprising at least one first colour layer having at least one colourant as specified in step iii), at least one second colour layer having at least one colourant as specified in step iii) and an effect layer made of the effect pigment layer recipe specified in step iii), wherein the second number is higher than the first number, and by searching the prognosis, whether at least one of the second number of multi-layer systems of the prognosis comprises a multi-layer system having within a predetermined tolerance the first target value specified in step i) and the second target value specified in step ii).

5. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the colour flip-flop effect is a colour shade flip-flop effect so that in step i) a first target value for a first colour shade and in step ii) a second target value for a second colour shade are specified, wherein the first and second colour shades are different from each other, wherein the delta a/b is at least 15, wherein the delta a/b is determined according to the equation delta a/b=((a[15°]−a [110°]) 2 +(b[15°]−b [110°]) 2 ) 1/2 , wherein a [15°] is the a-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at a first observation value of 15°, a[110°] is the a-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at a second observation value of 110°, b[15°] is the b-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at an observation value of 15° and b[110°] is the b-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at an observation value of 110°, wherein the measurement is performed by irradiating in a dark environment a standardized light type onto the top side of the multi-layer system at an angle of incident (β) of 45° with respect to the horizontal direction and measuring the a-values of the top side of the multi-layer system at observation values of 15° and 110° and measuring the b-values of the top side of the multi-layer system at observation values of 15° and 110°, wherein the angle of reflection of 135° with respect to the horizontal direction is defined as an observation angle of 0°, and/or wherein the colour flip-flop effect is a colour brightness flip-flop effect so that in step i) a first target value for the ratio of a-/b-value of a first colour shade and a first brightness and in step ii) the same ratio of a-/b-value and a second brightness are specified, wherein the first and second colour shades are the same or different from each other and the first and second colour brightness are different from each other, wherein the delta L is at least 10, wherein the delta L is determined according to the equation delta L=|L[15°]−L[110°]|, wherein |L[15°]−L[110°]| means the absolute difference of both values L[15°] and L[110°], wherein L[15°] is the L-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at a first observation value of 15° and L[110°] is the L-value of the top side of the multi-layer system measured at a second observation value of 110°, wherein the measurement is performed by irradiating in a dark environment a standardized light onto the multi-layer system at an angle of incidence (β) of 45° with respect to the horizontal direction and measuring the L-values of the top side of the multi-layer system at observation values of 15° and 110°, wherein the angle of reflection of 135° with respect to the horizontal direction is defined as an observation angle of 0°.

6. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein in step iii) a colourant system is specified, which comprises an effect pigment layer recipe including particles of at least one platelet-shaped effect pigment having an average length of 2 to 500 μm, an average width of 2 to 500 μm and an average thickness of at most 1 μm.

7. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein in step iii) a colourant system is specified, which comprises at least three different colourants spanning a colour space covering at least 100,000 perceptual different colour shades being generable by applying a combination of one or more of the at least three different colourants above each other.

8. The method in accordance with claim 7 , wherein in step iii) a colourant system is specified, which comprises a cyan colourant, a magenta colourant and a yellow colourant.

9. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the at least one empirical model provided in step iv) is an empirical model, which is selected from the group consisting of linear models, of second order models, and of higher order models.

10. The method in accordance with claims 1 , wherein the at least one empirical model provided in step iv) has been obtained by making use of the results of a plurality of experiments, in which the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of a plurality of multi-layer systems has been measured at least at the first observation angle and the second observation angle, wherein in the plurality of multi-layer systems the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the at least one first colour layer and the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the at least one second colour layer have been varied.

11. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the at least one empirical model provided in step iv) has been obtained by performing 50 to 5,000 experiments with different multiple-layer systems, wherein in the single experiments the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of a plurality of multi-layer systems has been measured at least at the first observation angle and the second observation angle, wherein in the plurality of multi-layer systems the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the at least one first colour layer and the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the at least one second colour layer, the coverage of the at least one first colour layer, the coverage of the at least one second colour layer and/or the coverage of the effect layer have been varied.

12. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the at least one empirical model provided in step iv) has been obtained by performing the following steps:

α) providing in step iii) a colourant system, which comprises at least three different colourants spanning a colour space covering at least 100,000 perceptual different colour shades being generable by applying a combination of one or more of the at least three different colourants above each other, and further comprising an effect pigment layer recipe,

β) generating a design of experiments using a statistics program designed for calculating at least one empirical model so as to propose a plurality of experiments, wherein in each of these experiments a specific multi-layer system is formed under specific conditions using specific application parameters for applying the layers a) to d) onto a specific substrate, wherein at least 90% of these experiments differ from all other experiments of the plurality of experiments in at least one parameter,

γ) performing the plurality of experiments proposed in step β), wherein for each of the experiments at least the colour shade and/or colour brightness of the top side of the respective multi-layer system is measured at least at a first observation angle and a second observation angle,

δ) entering the numeric values of the colour shades and/or colour brightness measured in step γ) into the statistics program,

ε) allowing the statistics program to calculate the at least one empirical models.

13. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the at least one empirical model provided in step iv) has been obtained by making use of multi-layer systems, which all do not contain any interference pigment.

14. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the determination in step v) is performed by calculating-making use of the at least one empirical model provided in step iv)—a prognosis, wherein the prognosis is calculated for more than 5,000 different multi-layer systems.

15. The method in accordance with claim 1 , wherein the determination in step v) is performed by calculating—making use of the at least one empirical model provided in step iv)—a prognosis, wherein each of the multi-layer systems of the prognosis differ from at least 80% from all other multi-layer systems of the prognosis in at least the colour shade of at least one of the at least one first colour layer, the colour shade of at least one of the at least one second colour layer, the coverage of at least one of the at least one first colour layer, the coverage of at least one of the at least one second colour layer and the coverage of the effect layer.

Assignments (6)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE EFFECTIVE DATE IN THE ASSIGNMENT FROM 07/29/2019 TO 05/09/2020 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 60881 FRAME: 172. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: BICER, TANER; FRISCHMANN, LUTZ
To: MHM HOLDING GMBH
Reel/Frame 069031/0351 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE EFFECTIVE DATE LISTE ON PAGE 7 OF THE ASSIGNMENT FROM 07/29/2019 TO 07/29/2020 AND CORRECTHE FIRST INVENTOR'S EXECUTION DATE'S YEAR FROM 2020 TO 2022 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 60881 FRAME: 287. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: KLAUSNITZER, SYLVIA; BUESCHER, RALF
To: HUBERGROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 069031/0390 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE EFFECTIVE DATE LISTED ON PAGE 5 FROM 07/29/2019 TO JULY 29, 2020 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 60881 FRAME: 370. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 24, 2024
From: MHM HOLDING GMBH
To: HUBERGROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 069031/0401 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Aug 24, 2022
From: BICER, TANER; FRISCHMANN, LUTZ
To: MHM HOLDING GMBH
Reel/Frame 060881/0172 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Aug 24, 2022
From: KLAUSNITZER, SYLVIA; BUESCHER, RALF
To: HUBERGROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 060881/0287 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Aug 24, 2022
From: MHM HOLDING GMBH
To: HUBERGROUP DEUTSCHLAND GMBH
Reel/Frame 060881/0370 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 19190181 · Aug 6, 2019 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220283085A1 · Sep 8, 2022
References Cited (16)
US 6064487A · Kettler et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7077897B2 · Brueckner et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20030223060A1 · Graf · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20150127269A1 · Bell et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150138641A1 · Delst · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20190011618A1 · Delst et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 1666094A · 2005 [cited by examiner]
CN 104114985A · 2014 [cited by examiner]
CN 105556285A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
JP 2002285094A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017128054A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Box et al., Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces (Wiley 1987, ISBN-13: 978-0471810339) pp. 10-14. [cited by applicant]
Box et al., Statistics for Experimenters—Design, Innovation and Discovery, 2nd edition (Wiley 2005, ISBN-13: 978-0471718130) pp. 235-245. [cited by applicant]
Goos et al., Optimal Design of Experiments—A Case Study Approach (Wiley 2011, ISBN-13: 978-0470744611) pp. 69, 70, 95, 135, and 136. [cited by applicant]
Skeren et al: “Design and visualization of synthetic holograms for security applications”, 9th International Symposium on Display Holography, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 415 (IOP Publishing, 2013, XP020239069)… [cited by applicant]
Tikhonravov et al: “Modern design tools and a new paradigm in optical coating design”, Applied Optics, vol. 51, No. 30 (Optical Society of America, 2012, XP001578915) pp. 7319-7332. [cited by applicant]