IP Library Granted Patent US 12,251,565
Granted Patent B2
US 12,251,565 · App. 17/635,005 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Dynamic coordinated reset (DCR) stimulation

Inventor: Christian Hauptmann (Starnberg, DE)
Assignee: nemotec GmbH
A61N1/36175A61N1/0529A61N1/36139
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,251,565
App. No.
17/635,005
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A neurostimulator is configured to activate a set of N electrodes, which are each adapted to stimulate at least a portion of a population of neurons when activated and applied in an invasive manner, at respective onset times T 1 . . . T N throughout a cycle period T. N is an integer larger than two and the cycle period T is defined as a time period within which each of the N electrodes is activated exactly once. The onset times T 1 . . . T N are not arranged substantially uniformly throughout the cycle period T.

Claims (33)

1. A neurostimulator configured to:

activate a set of N electrodes, which are each adapted to stimulate at least a portion of a population of neurons when activated and applied in an invasive manner, at respective onset times T 1 . . . T N throughout a cycle period T, wherein N is an integer larger than two and wherein the cycle period T is defined as a time period within which each of the N electrodes is activated exactly once, and wherein the onset times T 1 . . . T N are not arranged substantially uniformly throughout the cycle period T.

2. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , being further configured to activate the set of N electrodes at the respective onset times T 1 . . . T N based at least in part on a state of at least a portion of the population of neurons, wherein the neurostimulator is configured to determine the state based at least in part on determining one or more electrodes that were activated before in the cycle period and/or based at least in part on determining one or more respective onset times at which one or more of the electrodes were activated before in the cycle period and/or based at least in part on a refractory period of at least a portion of the population of neurons.

3. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially determined by a function that is nonlinear with respect to i.

4. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein:

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T/2N·(1+(−1) i )·C, wherein −1<C<0; or

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T/2N·(1+(−1) i )·C, wherein 0<C<1.

5. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein:

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)·C, wherein 0<C<1; or

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =1/N·(i−1)·C, wherein 1<C<N/N−1.

6. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein:

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T·C, wherein C=0 for i=1 and −1/N<C<0 for i>1; or

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T·C, wherein 0<C<1/N.

7. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein:

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T·(N+1−i)·C, wherein C=0 for i=1 and − 1 /N·(N−1)<C<0 for i>1; or

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T ( 150 ) are substantially given by T i =T/N·(i−1)+T·(N+1−i)·C, wherein 0<C<1/N.

8. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein:

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T 1 =0 for i=1 and by T i =T i−1 +T/N·C N+1−i for i>1, wherein 0<C<1; or

the onset times T 1 . . . T N at which a respective i-th electrode of the N electrodes is activated in the cycle period T are substantially given by T 1 =0 for i=1 and by T i =T i−1 +T/N·C N+1−i for i>1, wherein 1<C and C N −C/C−1<N.

9. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , being configured such that, at the respective onset time, the N electrodes are respectively activated for a respective activation time each and the activation times overlap in time not at all or only in part.

10. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , being further configured to activate the set of N electrodes throughout at least two and at most one hundred consecutive cycle periods.

11. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , being further configured to activate a further set of M electrodes different from the set of N electrodes throughout at least two and at most one hundred cycle periods based at least in part on a state of the population of neurons, wherein M is an integer.

12. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , being further configured to not activate any of the electrodes for a duration corresponding to at least one cycle period and at most one hundred cycle periods in alternation with activating the electrodes throughout at least one and at most one hundred consecutive cycle periods.

13. The neurostimulator according to claim 4 , being further configured to determine C based at least in part on an intensity of symptoms resulting from synchronized neuronal brain activity.

14. The neurostimulator according to claim 13 , being further configured to determine C by carrying out stimulations using values of C that lie around an initial value of C determined based at least in part on the intensity of the symptoms.

15. The neurostimulator according to claim 1 , wherein the neurostimulator comprises stimulation leads connected to the electrodes and one or more computer processors configured by computer program code to perform the step of activating the set of N electrodes via the stimulation leads.

16. The neurostimulator according to claim 15 , further comprising the electrodes which are applied in the invasive manner in a brain.

17. The neurostimulator according to claim 15 , wherein the one or more computer processors are associated with a pulse generator which is configured to generate pulses for activating the set of N electrodes via the stimulation leads such that the onset times T 1 . . . T N are not arranged substantially uniformly throughout the cycle period T.

18. A method for neurostimulation comprising:

activating a set of N electrodes, which are each adapted to stimulate at least a portion of a population of neurons when activated and applied in an invasive manner, at respective onset times T 1 . . . T N throughout a cycle period T, wherein N is an integer larger than two and wherein the cycle period T is defined as a time period within which each of the N electrodes is activated exactly once, and wherein the onset times T 1 . . . T N are not arranged substantially uniformly throughout the cycle period T.

19. The method according to claim 18 , wherein the method is performed with the electrodes applied in the invasive manner in a brain for desynchronizing neuronal brain activity.

20. A tangible, non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions, which upon being executed by one or more computer processors of a neurostimulator, cause execution of the following steps:

activating a set of N electrodes, which are each adapted to stimulate at least a portion of a population of neurons when activated and applied in an invasive manner, at respective onset times T 1 . . . T N throughout a cycle period T, wherein N is an integer larger than two and wherein the cycle period T is defined as a time period within which each of the N electrodes is activated exactly once, and wherein the onset times T 1 . . . T N are not arranged substantially uniformly throughout the cycle period T.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 28, 2023
From: NEMOTEC UG (HAFTUNGSBESCHRAENKT)
To: NEMOTEC GMBH
Reel/Frame 062883/0642 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 14, 2022
From: HAUPTMANN, CHRISTIAN
To: NEMOTEC UG (HAFTUNGSBESCHRÄNKT)
Reel/Frame 058997/0028 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2019 005 708.2 · Aug 14, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220288396A1 · Sep 15, 2022
References Cited (27)
US 7917221B2 · Tass · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8463386B2 · Tass · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9592384B2 · Tass · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10617869B2 · Tass et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20120010680A1 · Wei · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130245713A1 · Tass · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018898A1 · Tass · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160243364A1 · Tass et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170361105A1 · Agnesi et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190151657A1 · Tyulmankov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007003565A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014115994A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Adamchic, Ilya et al; “Coordinated Reset Neuromodulation for Parkinson's Disease: Proof-of-Concept Study”; Movement Disorders; Apr. 21, 2014; pp. 1-6; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, USA. [cited by applicant]
Buhlmann, J. et al; “Modeling of a segmented electrode for desynchronizing deep brain stimulation”; Frontiers in Neuroengineering; Dec. 2011; pp. 1-8; vol. 4; Art. 15; Frontiers Media SA; Lausanne, Switzerland. [cited by applicant]
Deuschl, Guenther et al; “A Randomized Trial of Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease”; The New England Journal of Medicine; Aug. 31, 2006; pp. 896-908; vol. 355; Massachusetts Medical Society; Waltham, USA. [cited by applicant]
Hauptmann, C. et al; “External trial deep brain stimulation device for the application of desynchronizing stimulation techniques”; Journal of Neural Engineering; Oct. 16, 2009; pp. 1-12; vol. 6; IOP Publishing Ltd; Bris… [cited by applicant]
Hauptmann, Christian et al; “Therapeutic rewiring by means of desynchronizing brain stimulation”; BioSystems; Dec. 2007; pp. 173-181; vol. 89; Elsevier Ireland Ltd; Shannon, Ireland. [cited by applicant]
Kuehn, Andrea A. et al; “High-Frequency Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Suppresses Oscillatory ß Activity in Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Parallel with Improvement in Motor Performance”; The Journal of Ne… [cited by applicant]
Kuramoto, Yoshiki; “Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence”; Springer Series in Synergetics; Dec. 1984; vol. 19; ISBN: 9780486428819; Springer-Verlag; Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo; Preface and Table of content… [cited by applicant]
Little, Simon et al; “Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Advanced Parkinson Disease”; Annals of Neurology; Apr. 2013; pp. 449-457; vol. 74; No. 3; John Wiley & Sons, Inc .; Hoboken, USA. [cited by applicant]
Rosin, Boris et al; “Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Is Superior in Ameliorating Parkinsonism”; Neuron; Oct. 20, 2011; pp. 370-384; vol. 72; Elsevier Inc.; Amsterdam, Netherlands. [cited by applicant]
Tass, Peter A. et al; “Coordinated Reset Has Sustained Aftereffects in Parkinsonian Monkeys”; Annals of Neurology; Nov. 2012; pp. 816-820; vol. 72; No. 5; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, USA. [cited by applicant]
Tass, P. A. et al; “Long-lasting desynchronization in rat hippocampal slice induced by coordinated reset stimulation”; Physical Review; Jul. 2, 2009; pp. 1-4; vol. 80; The American Physical Society; Maryland, USA. [cited by applicant]
Tass, Peter A.; “A model of desynchronizing deep brain stimulation with a demand-controlled coordinated reset of neural subpopulations”; Biological Cybernetics; Jul. 2003; pp. 81-88; vol. 89; Springer-Verlag; Germany. [cited by applicant]
Tass, Peter A. et al.; “Long-term anti-kindling effects of desynchronizing brain stimulation: a theoretical study”; Biological Cybernetics; Nov. 12, 2005; pp. 58-66; vol. 94; Springer-Verlag; Germany. [cited by applicant]
Temperli, P. et al; “How do parkinsonian signs return after discontinuation of subthalamic DBS?”; Neurology; Sep. 7, 2002; pp. 78-81; vol. 60; American Academy of Neurology; Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Jing et al; “Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus Produces Long-Lasting, Dose-Dependent Motor Improvements in the 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine Non-Human Primate Model of … [cited by applicant]