IP Library Granted Patent US 12,338,465
Granted Patent B2
US 12,338,465 · App. 17/645,146 · Granted Jun 24, 2025

Polymerase compositions, methods of making and using same

Inventors: Peter Vander Horn (Encinitas, CA); Theo Nikiforov (Carlsbad, CA); Guobin Luo (Oceanside, CA); Mindy Landes (Carlsbad, CA); Daniel Mazur (San Diego, CA); Eileen Tozer (San Diego, CA); Tommie Lincecum (Carlsbad, CA)
Assignee: Life Technologies Corporation
C12N9/1252C12Q1/6846C12Q1/686C12Y207/07007
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,338,465
App. No.
17/645,146
Granted
Jun 24, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure provides compositions, methods, kits, systems and apparatus that are useful for nucleic acid polymerization. In particular, modified polymerases and biologically active fragment thereof are provided that allow for nucleic acid amplification. In one aspect, the disclosure relates to modified polymerases useful for nucleic acid sequencing, genotyping, copy number variation analysis, paired-end sequencing and other forms of genetic analysis. In some aspects, the disclosure relates to modified polymerases useful for the generation of nucleic acid libraries or nucleic acid templates for use in various downstream processes. In some aspects, the disclosure relates to the identification of homologous amino acid mutations that can be transferred across classes or families of polymerases to provide novel polymerases with altered catalytic properties. In some aspects, the disclosure provides modified polymerases having enhanced catalytic properties as compared to a reference polymerase.

Claims (45)

1. A composition comprising a recombinant polymerase comprising:

(a) a recombinant Bst DNA polymerase having at least 99% identity to SEQ ID NO: 20 and having at least the mutations H46R, E446Q, H572R, E220K, N234R, and D423K relative to SEQ ID NO: 1,

(b) a recombinant Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I having at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 18 and having at least the mutation D505R relative to SEQ ID NO: 18, or

(c) a recombinant Taq DNA polymerase having at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 15 or SEQ ID NO: 24 and having at least one mutation comprising D732R, E745Q, or E471K relative to SEQ ID NO: 15,

wherein the recombinant polymerases of (a), (b), and (c) comprise the respective naturally occurring amino acids in each of the DNA polymerase motifs A and C.

2. The composition of claim 1 , wherein the recombinant polymerase retains polymerase activity.

3. The composition of claim 2 , wherein the polymerase activity is selected from DNA binding activity, primer extension activity, strand displacement activity, proofreading activity, nick-initiated polymerase activity, reverse transcriptase activity or nucleotide polymerization activity.

4. The composition of claim 1 , wherein, the recombinant polymerase comprises at least 99% identity to SEQ ID NO: 20 and includes one or more amino acid mutations selected from the group consisting of N31R, N31K, D77K, D77H, D113N, D114R, D130A, D130H, D144M, D144K, L212A, V241K, V251K, D264Q, D264S, D264K, Y272R, H273R, L280R, H281A, E294S, E294F, E294G, E294K, V299K, V299H, V299F, D303R, I331Q, E325R, L335T, E336P, 1354W, 1354F, I370A, Q409R, G425R, Q428W, N429R, N429K, F448K, N457T, A462T, Y477F, D480R, D480F, D480H, D480A, D480S, D480N, D480Q, N485W, N485Y, N487H, N487W, N487F, N487I, V488R, E493Q, M495Q, W577Y and D579F.

5. The composition of claim 1 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 15 and includes one or more amino acid mutations selected from the group consisting of E471K, N485R, R492K, D513K, A675K, D732R, S739W, V740R and E745Q.

6. The composition of claim 1 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 18 and includes one or more amino acid mutations selected from the group consisting of E245K, S259R, T266K, E290K, A448K, D505R, A512W, R513R and E518Q.

7. The composition of claim 1 wherein, the recombinant polymerase comprises at least 99% identity to SEQ ID NO: 20, wherein the recombinant polymerase further comprises a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 1 selected from:

(a) H273R, H281A, H473R, Y477F, D480R, or H528A;

(b) C93 mutation;

(c) Q238 mutation;

(d) H273 mutation;

(e) H281 mutation;

(f) H473 mutation; and

(g) H528 mutation.

8. The composition of claim 7 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises any one or more mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 1 selected from the group consisting of: N31, D77, D113, D114, D130, D144, L212, V241, V251, D264, Y272, H273, L280, H281, E294, V299, D303, 1331, E325, L335, E336, 1354, 1370, Q409, G425, Q428, N429, F448, N457, A462, H473, Y477, D480, N485, N487, V488, E493, M495, H528, W577 and D579.

9. The composition of claim 8 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises any one or more mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 1 selected from the group consisting of: N31R, N31K, D77K, D77H, D113N, D114R, D130A, D130H, D144M, D144K, L212A, V241K, V251K, D264Q, D264S, D264K, Y272R, H273R, L280R, H281A, H281M, E294S, E294F, E294G, E294K, V299K, V299H, V299F, D303R, I331Q, E325R, L335T, E336P, 1354W, 1354F, 1370A, Q409R, G425R, Q428W, N429R, N429K, F448K, N457T, A462T, H473R, Y477F, D480R, D480F, D480H, D480A, D480S, D480N, D480Q, N485W, N485Y, N487H, N487W, N487F, N487I, V488R, E493Q, M495Q, H528A, H528R, H528K, W577Y and D579F.

10. The composition of claim 9 , wherein the recombinant polymerase retains polymerase activity.

11. The composition of claim 10 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises a mutation that increases dissociation time constant, increases processivity, increases accuracy, increases average read length, increases minimum read length, increases AQ20 or increase 200Q17 value as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to the recombinant polymerase.

12. The composition of claim 1 wherein, the recombinant polymerase comprises at least at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 15 or SEQ ID NO: 24, wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 15 selected from:

(a) E471K, wherein the polymerase further includes a mutation at one or more of:

N485R, R492K, D513K, A675K, D732R, S739W, V740R and E745Q;

(b) V740R, wherein the polymerase further includes a mutation at one or more of:

E471K, N485R, D513K and E745Q;

(c) an N485 mutation;

(d) an D513 mutation;

(e) an D732 mutation; and

(f) an E745 mutation.

13. The composition of claim 12 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises: (a) increased accuracy as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 15; (b) increased dissociation time constant as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 15; (c) increased minimum read length as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 15; (d) increased sequencing performance in the presence of a high ionic strength solution as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to the recombinant polymerase homologous to SEQ ID NO: 15; or (e) increased average read length as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 15.

14. The composition of claim 12 , wherein the recombinant polymerase retains polymerase activity.

15. The composition of claim 12 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises a mutation that increases dissociation time constant, increases processivity, increases accuracy, increases average read length, increases minimum read length, increases AQ20 or increase 200Q17 value as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to the recombinant polymerase.

16. The composition of claim 1 wherein, the recombinant polymerase comprises at least at least 98% identity to SEQ ID NO: 18, wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 18 selected from:

(a) E245K, wherein the polymerase further includes a mutation at one or more of: S259R, T266K, E290K, A448K, D505R, A512W, R513R and E518Q;

(b) D505R, wherein the polymerase further includes a mutation at one or more of:

E245K, S259R, T266K, E290K, A448K, A512W, R513R and E518Q;

(c) an E290 mutation

(d) an S259 mutation;

(e) an R513 mutation; and

(f) an A512 mutation.

17. The composition of claim 16 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises: (a) increased accuracy as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 18; (b) increased dissociation time constant activity as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 18; (c) increased minimum read length as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 18; (d) increased sequencing performance in the presence of high ionic strength as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to the recombinant polymerase homologous to SEQ ID NO: 18; or (e) increased average read length as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to SEQ ID NO: 18.

18. The composition of claim 16 , wherein the recombinant polymerase retains polymerase activity.

19. The composition of claim 16 , wherein the recombinant polymerase comprises a mutation that increases dissociation time constant, increases processivity, increases accuracy, increases average read length, increases minimum read length, increases AQ20 or increase 200Q17 value as compared to a reference polymerase lacking a mutation or combination of mutations relative to the recombinant polymerase.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 17, 2022
From: VANDER HORN, PETER; NIKIFOROV, THEO; LUO, GUOBIN; LANDES, MINDY; MAZUR, DANIEL; TOZER, EILEEN; LINCECUM, TOMMIE
To: LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 058673/0732 →
Continuity (10)
Continuation 16850629 · Apr 16, 2020
Continuation 15959839 · Apr 23, 2018
Division 14754203 · Jun 29, 2015
Continuation 13572488 · Aug 10, 2012
Provisional Application 61522125 · Aug 10, 2011
Provisional Application 61545434 · Oct 10, 2011
Provisional Application 61585133 · Jan 10, 2012
Provisional Application 61643844 · May 7, 2012
Provisional Application 61681593 · Aug 9, 2012
Related Publication 20220162573A1 · May 26, 2022
References Cited (163)
US 5198543A · Blanco et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5466591A · Abramson et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5576204A · Blanco et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5614365A · Tabor et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5830714A · Swaminathan et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6214557B1 · Barnes et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6265193B1 · Brandis et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6395524B2 · Loeb et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6602695B2 · Patel et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7033764B2 · Korlach et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7329492B2 · Hardin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7405281B2 · Xu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8623628B2 · Ost et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9315787B2 · Schafer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9493848B2 · Skirgaila et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9657281B2 · Vander Horn et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9976128B2 · Vander Horn et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10344268B2 · Mazur et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10633641B2 · Vander Horn · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20030180741A1 · Hogrefe et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060223067A1 · Vatta et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070020653A1 · Holliger et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070172861A1 · Hardin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070172866A1 · Hardin et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070196846A1 · Hanzel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080014609A1 · Jestin et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090026082A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090127589A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090305292A1 · Holliger et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100112645A1 · Clark et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100137143A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100197507A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100282617A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100300559A1 · Schultz et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100300895A1 · Nobile et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100301398A1 · Rothberg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110014612A1 · Hendricks et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110027833A1 · Hogrefe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110262903A1 · Davidson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110281305A1 · Bourn et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301041A1 · Davidson · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110318748A1 · Davidson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120202276A1 · Davidson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130034879A1 · Skirgaila et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130040365A1 · Vander et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140030765A1 · Schafer et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170067037A1 · Schafer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170081646A1 · Skirgaila et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 101180390A · 2008 [cited by applicant]
EP 1233061A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 1806406A2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2554665B1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 2742151B1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 3293274A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3026111B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3425045A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO1992003556A1 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9206200A1 · 1992 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9840496A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0109343A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2001090337A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002022869A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO02086088A2 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO03089637A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2005113829A2 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008034110A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008076406A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010062777A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010062779A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011014885A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011106634A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011106766A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011106770A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011106629A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2012097318A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013023176A2 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. Q5KWC1, Feb. 2005. [cited by examiner]
Wu and Beese (Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, No. 22, pp. 19758-19767, Jun. 2011). [cited by examiner]
Chen Ning, et al., “Textbook for Higher School—Enzyme Engineering”, China Light Industry Press, Jun. 30, 2011, pp. 82-83. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report and Opinion for EP Application No. 15185052.6 dated Jul. 28, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report 12179055.4, mailed Feb. 6, 2013 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for U.S. Appl. No. 17/198,055, mailed Feb. 26, 2018, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended Search Report and Opinion for EP Application No. 18173687.7 dated Oct. 22, 2018. [cited by applicant]
File History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,940, filed Aug. 2, 2012. [cited by applicant]
Gudnason, et al. “Comparison of multiple DNA dyes for real-time PCR: effects of dye concentration and sequence composition on DNA amplification and melting temperature”, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 35, No. 19 (2007), e127, … [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2012/050423 mailed Feb. 20, 2014, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ishino, Y. et al., “DNA polymerase [Thermus aquaticus]”, GenBank Database; Accession No. BAA06775.1, Jan. 26, 2008, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ishino, Y. et al., “Overproduction of Thermus Aquaticus DNA Polymerase and Its Structural Analysis by Ion-Spray Mass Spectrometry”, J Biochem, Dec. 30, 1994, vol. 116, pp. 1022-1023. [cited by applicant]
Kermekchiev, et al., “Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples”, Nucleic Acids Res, vol. 37, No. 5 (2009), e40 (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Kiefer, J. R. et al., “Crystal structure of a thermostable Bacillus DNA polymerase 1 large fragment at 2.1 A resolution”, Structure, vol. 5, Current Biology Ltd., Jan. 15, 1997, 95-108. [cited by applicant]
Kiefer, James R. et al., “Visualizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal”, Nature, vol. 391, Jan. 15, 1998, 304-307. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Top DNA Polymerase from Thermus Thermophilus HB27: Gene Cloning, Sequence Determination, and Physiochemical Properties,” Mol. Cells, 1988, 9, pp. 157-161. [cited by applicant]
Kranaster, R., “Engineered DNA polymerases in biotechnology”, ChemBioChem., vol. 11, No. 15 (2010), pp. 2077-2084. [cited by applicant]
Kranaster, R. et al., “One-step RNA pathogen detection with reverse transcriptase activity of a mutated thermostable Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase”, Biotechnology Journal, vol. 5, No. 2, 2010, 224-231. [cited by applicant]
Leconte, A.M, et al., “Directed Evolution of DNA Polymerases for Next-Generation Sequencing”, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 2010, 49, pp. 5921-5924. [cited by applicant]
Nakazato, “An Integrated ISFET Sensor Array”, Sensors, Nov. 2009, vol. 9, No. 11, ISSN:1424-8220, [online], Internet, URL, http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/9/11/8831/pdf, Nov. 2009, pp. 8831-8851. [cited by applicant]
Nath K, et al., “Effects of ethidium bromide and SYBR Green I on different polymerase chain reaction systems”, J Biochem Biophys Methods, vol. 42 (2000), pp. 15-29. [cited by applicant]
Ngo, et al., “The Protein Folding Problem and Tertiary Structure Prediction”, Merz et al. (ed .), Birkhauser Boston MA 1994, pp. 433 and 492-495. [cited by applicant]
Partial European Search Report for Application No. 17198055 , mailed Dec. 8, 2017, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial European Search Report regarding App. No. 12179055.4, mailed Nov. 2, 2012, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Partial Search Report for EP Application No. 15185052.6 dated Apr. 11, 2016. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US/2012/050423 International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 1, 2013, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/432,936, filed Jan. 14, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Ruan Hong et al., “Principles of Gene Engineering”, Zhejiang University Press, Sep. 30, 2007, p. 171. [cited by applicant]
Search Report of the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office for GB Application No. 1113430.1, dated Nov. 29, 2011. [cited by applicant]
Shen Renquan, et al., “Basic Biochemistry”, Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Aug. 30, 1980, p. 105. [cited by applicant]
Uniprot Accession No. B6VAJ4 entry version Jun. 2011 provided with form PTO-892 on Sep. 9, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/564,940 . [cited by applicant]
Zaccolo M, et al., “An approach to random mutagenesis of DNA using mixtures of triphosphate derivatives of nucleoside analogues”, J Mol Biol, vol. 255, No. 4 (1996), pp. 589-603. [cited by applicant]
Zhang Z, et al., “Direct DNA amplification from crude clinical samples using a PCR enhancer cocktail and novel mutants of Taq”, Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 12, No. 2 (2010), pp. 152-161. [cited by applicant]
Zipper H, et al., “Investigations on DNA Intercalation and Surface Binding by SYBR Green I, its structure determination and methodological implications”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, No. 12, 2004, e103, (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Altschul S.F., et al., “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool,” Journal of Molecular Biology, Oct. 5, 1990, vol. 215, No. 3, pp. 403-410. [cited by applicant]
Aslam M., et al., Bioconjugation: Protein Coupling Techniques for the Biomedical Sciences, London: Macmillan, 1998. [cited by applicant]
Ausubel F.M., et al., “Short Protocols in Molecular Biology,” A Compendium of Methods from Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, 2002, 359, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Bambara R.A., et al., On the Processive Mechanism of [cited by applicant]
Beese, Lorena S. et al., “Structure of DNA Polymerase I Klenow Fragment Bound to Duplex DNA”, Science, vol. 260, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Apr. 16, 1993, 352-355. [cited by applicant]
Blasco, Maria et al., “Phi29 DNA Polymerase Active Site”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry vol. 268, No. 22, 1993, 16763-16770. [cited by applicant]
Bonfield, J.K. et al. “The application of numerical estimates of base calling accuracy to DNA sequencing projects”, Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press, Surrey, GB, vol. 23, No. 8, 1995, pp. 1406-1410. [cited by applicant]
Camper D.V., et al., Fully Automated Protein Purification, Analytical Biochemistry, 2009, vol. 393, pp. 176-181. [cited by applicant]
Canard B., et al., “The Motif D Loop of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Is Critical for Nucleoside 5′-Triphosphate Selectivity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1999, vol. 274, No. 50, pp. 357… [cited by applicant]
Das, S.K. and Fujimura, R.K., “Processiveness of DNA Polymerases: A Comparative Study Using a Simple Procedure,” J. Biol. Chem. 254(4):1227-1232 (1979). [cited by applicant]
Dear S., et al., A Standard File Format for Data from DNA Sequencing Instruments, DNA Sequencing and Mapping, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 107-110. [cited by applicant]
Delarue, M., et al., “An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases,” Prot. Eng. 3:461-467, IRL Press at Oxford University Press (1990). [cited by applicant]
Ewing B., et al., “Base-calling Of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment,” Genome Research, Mar. 1998, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 175-185. [cited by applicant]
Ewing B., et al., “Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities,” Genome Research, Mar. 1998, vol. 8, pp. 186-194. [cited by applicant]
Hall J.D., et al., Mutations within Conserved Motifs in the 3′-5′ Exonuclease Domain of Herpes Simplex Virus DNA Polymerase, Journal of General Virology, 1995, vol. 76, pp. 2999-3008. [cited by applicant]
Henikoff, et al., “Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 89, No. 22, USA, Nov. 15, 1989, 10915-10919. [cited by applicant]
Hermanson G.T., “Bioconjugate Techniques,” Second Edition, 2008, 1233 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hippel P.H.V., et al., On the Processivity of Polymerases, Annals New York Academy of Sciences, 1994, vol. 726, pp. 118-131. [cited by applicant]
Ichida J.K., et al., High Fidelity TNA Synthesis by Therminator Polymerase, Nucleic Acids Research, Sep. 12, 2005, vol. 33, No. 16, pp. 5219-5225. [cited by applicant]
Ion Torrent: Ion Personal Genome MachineTM Performance Overview, Life Technologies Application Note, Performance Spring 2011, 5 pages. (Year: 2011). [cited by applicant]
Karlin S., et al., “Applications and Statistics for Multiple High-scoring Segments in Molecular Sequences,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993, vol. 90, pp. 5873-5877. [cited by applicant]
Kim, Y. et al., “Crystal Structure of Thermus Acquatics DNA Polymerase”, Nature, vol. 376, Aug. 17, 1995, 612-616. [cited by applicant]
Kohlstaedt, et al., “Crystal Structure at 3.5 Å Resolution of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase Complexed with an Inhibitor”, Science, vol. 256, Jun. 26, 1992, 1783-1790. [cited by applicant]
Mestas S.P., et al., A Fluorescence Polarization Based Screening Assay for Nucleic Acid Polymerase Elongation Activity, Analytical Biochemistry, 2007, vol. 365, pp. 194-200. [cited by applicant]
Minnick D.T., et al., “Discrimination against Purine-Pyrimidine Mispairs in the Polymerase Active Site of DNA polymerase I: A Structural Explanation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002, vol. 99, No. … [cited by applicant]
Nasir M.S., et al., Fluorescence Polarization: An Analytical Tool for Immunoassay and Drug Discovery, Combinational Chemistry and High Throughput Screening, 1999, vol. 2, pp. 177-190. [cited by applicant]
Needleman S.B., et al., “A General Method Applicable To The Search For Similarities In The Amino Acid Sequence Of Two Proteins,” Journal Molecular Biology, 1970, vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 443-453. [cited by applicant]
Nikiforov T.T., Fluorogenic Polymerase, Endonuclease, and Ligase Assays based on DNA Substrates Labeled with a Single Fluorophore, Analytical Biochemistry, 2011, vol. 412, pp. 229-236. [cited by applicant]
Pandey V.N., et al., Site Directed Mutagenesis of DNA polymerase I (Klenow) from [cited by applicant]
Pearson, W.R., and Lipman, D.J. “Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Comparison.” Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 85, (1988): pp. 2444-2448. [cited by applicant]
Poch, O., et al., “Identification of four conserved motifs among the RNA-dependent polymerase encoding elements,” EMBO J. 8:3867-3874, IRL Press at Oxford University Press (1989). [cited by applicant]
Pursell Z.F., et al., Regulation of B family DNA polymerase Fidelity by a Conserved Active Site Residue: Characterization of M644W, M644L and M644F Mutants of Yeast DNA polymerase, Nucleic Acids Research, Apr. 22, 2007,… [cited by applicant]
Sambrook, et al. “Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual”, 3rd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, N.Y., 2001, 2273 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sarafianos S.G., et al., “Crystal Structure of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase in Complex with a Polypurine Tract RNA:DNA,” The EMBO Journal, 2001, vol. 20, pp. 1449-1461. [cited by applicant]
Sharma P.L., et al., “Retrovirus Reverse Transcriptases Containing a Modified YXDD Motif,” Antiviral Chemistry & Chemotherapy, 2005, vol. 16, pp. 169-182. [cited by applicant]
Smith, T. F et al., “Identification of Common Molecular Subsequences”, Journal of Molecular Biology, 147, 10:, 1981, 195-197. [cited by applicant]
Smith T.F., et al., “Comparison of Biosequences,” Advances in Applied Mathematics, Academic Press Inc, 1981, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 482-489. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 60/308,863, inventor Askill; Ian N., filed Aug. 1, 2001. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/164,324, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Mar. 27, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/184,770, inventors Theo; Nikiforov et al., filed Jun. 5, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/242,771, inventors Stephen; P. Hendricks et al., filed Sep. 15, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/245,457, inventors Theo; Nikiforov et al., filed Sep. 24, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/263,974, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Nov. 24, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/289,388, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Dec. 22, 2009. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/293,616, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Jan. 8, 2010. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/293,618, inventors Stephen; P. Hendricks et al., filed Jan. 8, 2010. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/299,917, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Jan. 29, 2010. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/299,919, inventors Theo; Nikiforov et al., filed Jan. 29, 2010. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 61/307,356, inventors Joseph; Beechem et al., filed Feb. 23, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Venkatesan R.N., et al., Mutator Phenotypes Caused by Substitution at a Conserved Motif a Residue in Eukaryotic DNA Polymerase, Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006, vol. 281, No. 7, pp. 4486-4494. [cited by applicant]
Wang J., et al., Crystal Structure of a pol alpha Family Replication DNA Polymerase from Bacteriophage RB69, Cell, Jun. 27, 1997, vol. 89, pp. 1087-1099. [cited by applicant]
Wang J., et al., “Structural Basis of Asymmetry in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Reverse Transcriptase Heterodimer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994, vol. 91, pp. 7242-7246. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Y. et al., “A novel strategy to engineer DNA polymerases for enhanced processivity and improved performance in vitro”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, No. 3, Oxford University Press, Jan. 1, 2004, 1197-1207. [cited by applicant]