Gear shifting in a Skywave system
A gear shifting technique has been developed in which modulation and equalization are shifted to achieve optional performance. In one form, two or more equalizers, each associated with a demodulator and message decoder, determine if the modulation being used can be increased in complexity in order to increase the channel throughput or determine if the modulation method should be reduced in complexity in order to improve the receiver error performance. The quality metrics can based on which equalizer-demodulator-decoder is set to first detect a valid message. Other factors can be considered with this technique such as a packet-error ratio and a signal-to-noise ratio. In a financial trading system, message erasures can be favored over errored messages by limiting the number of bit or symbol corrections permitted per message to less than the maximum possible for the selected decoding schemes.
1. A method, comprising:
sending a financial instrument transaction instruction via a communication system;
wherein the communication system includes a first demodulator-equalizer unit, a second demodulator-equalizer unit, and a third demodulator-equalizer unit;
operating the first demodulator-equalizer unit at a second modulation mode;
operating the second demodulator-equalizer unit at a second modulation mode;
wherein the first modulation mode has higher complexity than the second modulation mode;
limiting a number of error corrections per message to less than a maximum possible for a selected decoding scheme;
receiving at the communication system an indicator indicating a change to the first modulation mode will provide a system benefit; and
upshifting the second demodulator-equalizer unit to the first demodulation mode.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator includes financial performance of the communication system.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
wherein the first modulation mode has higher complexity than the third modulation mode; and
upshifting the third demodulator-equalizer unit to the first demodulation mode.
4. A method, comprising:
sending a financial instrument transaction instruction via the communication system;
limiting a number of error corrections per message to less than a maximum possible for a selected decoding scheme;
receiving at a communication system an indicator indicating a change to a different modulation mode will provide a system benefit;
wherein the communication system includes two or more demodulator-equalizer units;
wherein the demodulator-equalizer units include a first demodulator-equalizer unit, a second demodulator-equalizer unit, and a third demodulator-equalizer unit; and
wherein the first demodulator-equalizer unit has an equalizer with an equalizer processing time that is shorter than the other demodulator-equalizer units.
5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising:
determining a packet error rate for the first demodulator-equalizer unit is below a minimum limit.
6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:
instructing a modulator at a remote transmitter station to change to the different modulation mode.
7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:
changing the second demodulator-equalizer unit and the third demodulator-equalizer unit to the different modulation mode; and
changing equalizer processing time of the second demodulator-equalizer unit to the short equalizer processing time of the first demodulator-equalizer unit.
8. A method, comprising:
sending a financial instrument transaction instruction via the communication system;
limiting a number of error corrections per message to less than a maximum possible for a selected decoding scheme;
receiving at a communication system an indicator indicating a change to a different modulation mode will provide a system benefit;
wherein the communication system includes two or more demodulator-equalizer units;
wherein the demodulator-equalizer units include a first demodulator-equalizer unit, a second demodulator-equalizer unit, and a third demodulator-equalizer unit; and
wherein the third demodulator-equalizer unit has a third equalizer with a long equalizer processing time that is longer than the other demodulator-equalizer units.
9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:
determining a packet error rate for the third demodulator-equalizer unit is below a minimum limit.
10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:
changing the first demodulator-equalizer unit and the second demodulator-equalizer unit to the different modulation mode; and
changing equalizer processing time of the second demodulator-equalizer unit to the long equalizer processing time of the third demodulator-equalizer unit.