Systems and methods for voice network control and optimization
Provided is a controller for optimizing a wireless network by selectively enabling different codecs at different Radio Access Networks (“RANs”), and/or by dynamically provisioning resources to support interoperability between the selectively enabled codecs and other codecs in use elsewhere in the network. The controller may receive a request with an indication of a first codec and a second codec for establishing a session via a particular RAN. The controller may disable availability of the second codec for the session by providing a modified request that omits the second codec in response to the quality of service at the particular RAN satisfying performance criteria. The controller may selectively enable use of the second codec and provide transcoding between the first and second codecs by forwarding the request without modification to the session recipient in response to the quality of service at the particular RAN not satisfying the performance criteria.
1. A device, comprising:
one or more processors configured to:
receive a request from a first User Equipment (“UE”), the request indicating a plurality of codecs, wherein the request includes a request to communicate with a second UE;
determine a measure of reliability associated with a RAN to which the first UE is connected;
output, based on the determined measure of reliability and to the second UE, an indication that the first UE has requested to communicate with the second UE, wherein outputting the indication to the second UE includes:
indicating, to the second UE, a first and second codec, of the plurality of codecs, when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy a threshold measure of reliability, and
indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN satisfies the threshold measure of reliability; and
add, when determining that the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability, the RAN to a list of RANs that support the second codec.
2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
transcode traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability.
3. The device of claim 1 , wherein indicating the first codec and not the second codec to the second UE includes:
outputting a Session Initiation Protocol (“SIP”) message, with an offer of the first codec and without an offer of the second codec, to the second UE.
4. The device of claim 1 , wherein indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec includes modifying a list of codecs provided by the first UE in the request.
5. The device of claim 4 , wherein modifying the list of codecs provided by the first UE comprises:
removing an offer of the second codec from a P-Access-Network-Info (“PANI”) header or a Session Description Protocol (“SDP”) component of a SIP message associated with the first UE.
6. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
generate a predictive model based on a pattern between service degradation occurring at the RAN at a particular time and a particular event taking place at the same particular time; and
transcode communications, from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec during a subsequent time based on the predictive model.
7. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
transcode traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec based on the RAN being added to the list of RANs that support the second codec.
8. A non-transitory computer-readable medium, storing a plurality of processor-executable instructions to:
receive a request from a first User Equipment (“UE”), the request indicating a plurality of codecs, wherein the request includes a request to communicate with a second UE;
determine a measure of reliability associated with a RAN to which the first UE is connected;
output, based on the determined measure of reliability and to the second UE, an indication that the first UE has requested to communicate with the second UE, wherein outputting the indication to the second UE includes:
indicating, to the second UE, a first and second codec, of the plurality of codecs, when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy a threshold measure of reliability, and
indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN satisfies the threshold measure of reliability; and
add, when determining that the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability, the RAN to a list of RANs that support the second codec.
9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of processor-executable instructions further include processor-executable instructions to:
transcode traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability.
10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein indicating the first codec and not the second codec to the second UE includes:
outputting a Session Initiation Protocol (“SIP”) message, with an offer of the first codec and without an offer of the second codec, to the second UE.
11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec includes modifying a list of codecs provided by the first UE in the request.
12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein modifying the list of codecs provided by the first UE comprises:
removing an offer of the second codec from a P-Access-Network-Info (“PANI”) header or a Session Description Protocol (“SDP”) component of a SIP message associated with the first UE.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of processor-executable instructions further include processor-executable instructions to:
generate a predictive model based on a pattern between service degradation occurring at the RAN at a particular time and a particular event taking place at the same particular time; and
transcode communications, from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec during a subsequent time based on the predictive model.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the plurality of processor-executable instructions further include processor-executable instructions to:
transcode traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec based on the RAN being added to the list of RANs that support the second codec.
15. A method, comprising:
receiving a request from a first User Equipment (“UE”), the request indicating a plurality of codecs, wherein the request includes a request to communicate with a second UE;
determining a measure of reliability associated with a RAN to which the first UE is connected;
outputting, based on the determined measure of reliability and to the second UE, an indication that the first UE has requested to communicate with the second UE, wherein outputting the indication to the second UE includes:
indicating, to the second UE, a first and second codec, of the plurality of codecs, when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy a threshold measure of reliability, and
indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN satisfies the threshold measure of reliability; and
adding, when determining that the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability, the RAN to a list of RANs that support the second codec.
16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
transcoding traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec when the measure of reliability associated with the RAN does not satisfy the threshold measure of reliability.
17. The method of claim 15 , wherein indicating the first codec and not the second codec to the second UE includes:
outputting a Session Initiation Protocol (“SIP”) message, with an offer of the first codec and without an offer of the second codec, to the second UE.
18. The method of claim 15 , wherein indicating, to the second UE, the first codec and not the second codec includes removing an offer of the second codec from a P-Access-Network-Info (“PANI”) header or a Session Description Protocol (“SDP”) component of a SIP message associated with the first UE.
19. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
generating a predictive model based on a pattern between service degradation occurring at the RAN at a particular time and a particular event taking place at the same particular time; and
transcoding communications, from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec during a subsequent time based on the predictive model.
20. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
transcoding traffic, received from the first UE via the RAN, from the first codec to the second codec based on the RAN being added to the list of RANs that support the second codec.