IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,345,645
Granted Patent B2
US 12,345,645 · App. 17/680,978 · Granted Jul 1, 2025

Sensor plant and method for identifying stressors in crops based on characteristics of sensor plants

Inventors: Shely Aronov (San Francisco, CA); Roderick Kumimoto (San Francisco, CA); Nicholas Koshnick (San Francisco, CA); Ari Kornfeld (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: InnerPlant, Inc.
G01N21/6486A01G7/00A01G25/16G01N21/6456G06T7/0012G06V10/225B64G1/1021B64G1/1028B64U2101/30B64U2101/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,345,645
App. No.
17/680,978
Granted
Jul 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

One variation of a method for identifying stressors in crops based on fluorescence of sensor plants includes: accessing a set of spectral images of a sensor plant sown in a crop, the sensor plant of a sensor plant type including a set of promoters and a set of reporters configured to signal a set of stressors present at the sensor plant, the set of promoters and set of reporters forming a set of promoter-reporter pairs; accessing a reporter model linking characteristics extracted from the set of spectral images of the sensor plant to the set of stressors based on signals generated by the set of promoter-reporter pairs in the sensor plant type; and identifying a first stressor, in the set of stressors, present at the sensor plant based on the reporter model and characteristics extracted from the set of spectral images.

Claims (40)

1. A method for identifying stressors in crops based on fluorescence of sensor plants comprising: accessing one or more images of at least one sensor plant in an agricultural environment, wherein the one or more images depict a set of downwelling light spectra and a set of upwelling light spectra corresponding to solar radiation, and the at least one sensor plant have been genetically modified to include a promoter-reporter pair-configured to express a fluorescent signal indicating presence of a stressor selected from a microbial, nematode, fungal, insect, or environmental stressor, the promoter-reporter pair comprising: a promoter gene configured to selectively express based on presence of the stressor; and a reporter gene-paired to the promoter gene and configured to express, to produce the fluorescent signal, responsive to expression of the promoter gene; accessing a reporter model linking solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the one or more images of sensor plants to the presence of the stressor, based on fluorescent signals expressed by the at least one sensor plant;

and interpreting presence of the stressor at the at least one sensor plant based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the one or more images,

comprising extracting a solar-induced fluorescence measurement in a reporter fluorescent light spectrum associated with the fluorescent signal; and interpreting presence of the stressor at the at least one sensor plant based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurement, wherein the solar induced fluorescence measurements are associated with one or more wavelengths.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the promoter-reporter pair is configured to express the fluorescent signal indicating presence of a microbial stressor.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor plant has been genetically modified to include a second promoter-reporter pair configured to express a second fluorescent signal indicating presence of a second stressor, the second promoter-reporter pair comprising:

a second promoter gene, configured to selectively express based on presence of the second stressor; and

a second reporter gene paired to the second promoter gene and configured to express, to produce the second fluorescent signal, responsive to expression of the second promoter gene.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising, interpreting presence of the second stressor at the at least one sensor plant based on the reporter model and fluorescence measurements extracted from the one or more images.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the second stressor is selected from a microbial, nematode, fungal, insect, or environmental stressor.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein accessing the one or more images of the at least one sensor plant comprises:

accessing an upwelling light spectrum representing upwelling light, comprising reflectance and fluorescence; and

extracting features in the upwelling light spectrum corresponding to the fluorescent signal produced by the reporter gene.

7. The method of claim 6 :

wherein extracting features in the upwelling light spectrum comprises identifying wavelengths or a wavelength band corresponding to one or more Telluric Lines-depicted in the upwelling light spectrum.

8. The method of claim 6 :

wherein extracting features in the upwelling light spectrum comprises identifying wavelengths or a wavelength band corresponding to one or more Fraunhofer Lines depicted in the upwelling light spectrum.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein interpreting presence of the stressor at the at least one sensor plant based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurement comprises:

estimating a nominal upwelling light spectrum, representing reflectance and fluorescence of the at least one sensor plant absent the stressor, based on the downwelling light spectrum;

extracting a nominal solar-induced fluorescence measurement in the nominal upwelling light spectrum;

characterizing a difference between the solar-induced fluorescence measurement and the nominal solar-induced fluorescence measurement; and

in response to the difference exceeding a threshold difference, predicting presence of the stressor at the at least one sensor plant.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein accessing the one or more images of the at least one sensor plant comprises accessing images captured by an imaging system comprising a satellite.

11. A method for identifying stressors in crops based on fluorescence of sensor plants comprising: accessing images of one or more sensor plants in an agricultural environment, the sensor plants having been genetically modified to selectively express a fluorescent signal based on presence of a stressor selected from a microbial, nematode, fungal, insect, or environmental stressor, the images comprising: a first image depicting a downwelling light spectrum corresponding to solar radiation; and a second image depicting an upwelling light spectrum; accessing a reporter model linking solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from downwelling light spectra and upwelling light spectra to presence of the stressor based on fluorescent signals generated by the one or more sensor plants; and interpreting presence of the stressor at the one or more sensor plants based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the first image and the second image, comprising extracting a solar-induced fluorescence measurement in a reporter fluorescent light spectrum associated with the fluorescent signal; and interpreting presence of the stressor at the one or more sensor plants based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurement,

wherein the solar induced fluorescence measurements are associated with one or more wavelengths.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the one or more sensor plants have been genetically modified to include a promoter-reporter pair-configured to selectively express the fluorescent signal representing presence of the stressor, the promoter-reporter pair comprising:

a promoter gene configured to selectively express based on presence of the stressor; and

a reporter gene, paired to the promoter gene, configured to express, to produce the fluorescent signal, responsive to expression of the promoter gene.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more sensor plants comprise a second promoter-reporter pair configured to express a second fluorescent signal representing presence of a second stressor, the second promoter-reporter pair comprising:

a second promoter gene, configured to selectively express based on presence of the second stressor; and

a second reporter gene paired to the second promoter gene, configured to express, to produce the second fluorescent signal, responsive to expression of the second promoter gene.

14. The method of claim 11 :

wherein accessing the reporter model further comprises linking solar-induced fluorescence measurements, corresponding to wavelengths extracted from downwelling light spectra and upwelling light spectra, to presence of the stressor in the one or more sensor plants based on fluorescent signals generated by the one or more sensor plants; and

wherein interpreting presence of the stressor further comprises interpreting presence of the stressor based on the reporter model and solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the first image and the second image.

15. The method of claim 11 :

wherein interpreting presence of the stressor further comprises predicting presence of a magnitude of the stressor based on the reporter model and solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the first image and the second image; and

further comprising, in response to the magnitude of the stressor exceeding a threshold magnitude:

generating a notification indicating presence of the stressor at the one or more sensor plants in the agricultural environment; and

transmitting the notification to a user associated with the agricultural environment.

16. The method of claim 1 : wherein the one or more images comprises: a first image of the at least one sensor plant depicting a downwelling light spectrum corresponding to solar radiation, captured by an optical spectrometer; and a second image of the at least one sensor plant depicting an upwelling light spectrum captured by the optical spectrometer, the upwelling light spectrum comprising a summation of a reflected light spectrum and a fluorescent light spectrum; and wherein interpreting presence of the stressor based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the one or more images comprises:

estimating the reporter fluorescent light spectrum for the at least one sensor plant based on the downwelling light spectrum and the upwelling light spectrum; and interpreting presence of the stressor at the at least one sensor plant based on the reporter model and the solar-induced fluorescence measurements extracted from the reporter fluorescent light spectrum.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2024
From: ARONOV, SHELY; KUMIMOTO, RODERICK; KOSHNICK, NICHOLAS; KORNFELD, ARI
To: INNERPLANT, INC.
Reel/Frame 068228/0643 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2022
From: ARONOV, SHELY; KUMIMOTO, RODERICK; KOSHNICK, NICHOLAS; KORNFELD, ARI
To: INNERPLANT, INC.
Reel/Frame 059104/0660 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 17479965 · Sep 20, 2021
Continuation 16721830 · Dec 19, 2019
Provisional Application 62894676 · Aug 30, 2019
Provisional Application 62864401 · Jun 20, 2019
Provisional Application 62782130 · Dec 19, 2018
Related Publication 20220178829A1 · Jun 9, 2022
References Cited (42)
US 7715013B2 · Glaser · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 10354189B2 · Volkov · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10986827B2 · Aronov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20030138812A1 · Downs · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20050072935A1 · Lussier · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20080047039A1 · Hinchey · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20100111369A1 · Lussier · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245473A1 · Mycek · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130266221A1 · Kaneko · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140007293A1 · Stewart et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140059722A1 · Krichevsky · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150027040A1 · Redden · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160069743A1 · McQuilkin et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170030877A1 · Miresmailli · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170131254A1 · Shriver et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075545A1 · Richt · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180259496A1 · McPeek · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180348186A1 · Benfey · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190003972A1 · Gu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190108413A1 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200302338A1 · Carroll · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220151215A1 · Aronov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 102721651A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
CN 105473998A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106796145A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 109788748A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Liew et al. “Signature Optical Cues: Emerging Technologies for Monitoring Plant Health” Sensors 2008, 8, 3205-3239; DOI: 10.3390/s8053205—Provided in Parent Application (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Priego et al. “Detection of Water Stress in Orchard Trees With a High-Resolution Spectrometer Through Chlorophyll Fluorescence In-Filling of the O2—A Band”, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 43, N… [cited by examiner]
Grützneret.al “Engineering Betalain Biosynthesis in Tomato for High Level Betanin Production in Fruits”, Frontiers in Plant Science, (2022) vol. 12. [cited by applicant]
Amy Lowe et al, “Hyperspectral image analysis techniques for the detection and classification of the early onset of plant disease and stress”, Plant Methods, GB, (Dec. 1, 2017), vol. 13, No. 1. [cited by applicant]
ESSR received in EP Application No. 19900184.3 dated Sep. 2, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/479,965 dated Jan. 31, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Harris et al., Betalain production is possible in anthocyaninproducingplant species given the presence ofDOPA—dioxygenase and L-DOPA, (2012), 12:34. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report Received in PCT/US20/39001 dated Sep. 4, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Kim Song-Lim et al, “Data management for plant phenomics”, Journal of Plant Biology, Botanical Society of Korea, Seoul, KR, vol. 60, No. 4, doi:10.1007/S12374-017-0027-X, ISSN 1226-9239, (Aug. 8, 2017), pp. 285-297. [cited by applicant]
Newton A C et al, “Relationship between canopy reflectance and yield loss due to disease in barley”, Annals of Applied Biology, Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, GB, (Mar. 16, 2005), vol. 145, No. 1. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/217,840 dated Sep. 21, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance received in U.S. Appl. No. 17/479,965 dated Mar. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action received in Chinese Patent Application No. 202080054171.6 dated Jun. 5, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Pasquale Tripodi et al, “Sensing Technologies for Precision Phenotyping in Vegetable Crops: Current Status and Future Challenges”, Agronomy, (Apr. 22, 2018), vol. 8, No. 4. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office action received in CN App. No. 20198009562.4 dated Dec. 21, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Liew et al., Signature Optical Cues: Emerging Technologies for Monitoring Plant Health, Sensors 2008, 8, 3205-3239. [cited by applicant]