IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,306,610
Granted Patent B2
US 12,306,610 · App. 17/683,097 · Granted May 20, 2025

Job parsing in robot fleet resource configuration

Inventors: Charles H. Cella (Pembroke, MA); Brad Kell (Seattle, WA); Teymour S. El-Tahry (Detroit, MI); Andrew Cardno (San Diego, CA); Leon Fortin, Jr. (Providence, RI)
Assignee: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
G06Q20/14B25J9/163B25J9/1653B25J9/1661B25J9/1671B25J9/1682B25J9/1697B29C64/386B29C64/393B33Y10/00B33Y50/00B33Y50/02G02B3/14G02B26/00G05B13/0265G05B13/042G05B17/02G05B19/402G05B19/4099G05D1/0027G05D1/0297G06F30/27G06N20/00G06N20/20G06Q10/06311G06Q10/0633G06T7/70H04L9/3239H04L9/50H04L63/1441G05B2219/32015G05B2219/40113G05B2219/49023G06F2113/10G06Q10/06G06Q10/0631G06Q10/063114G06Q10/06313G06Q10/06316G06Q10/0831G06Q10/0833G06Q10/087G06Q30/0201G06Q2220/00G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,306,610
App. No.
17/683,097
Filed
Feb 28, 2022
Granted
May 20, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3668
USPC
701/27
Abstract

A robot fleet management platform includes a job parsing system that applies filters to identify portions of a job request suitable for robot automation. Based on the identified portions and a first fleet objective of the job request, a task system establishes tasks that define a robot type and task objective. A proxy service associates a robot of a robot fleet to each task and adaptation instructions to define how to adapt the robot fleet to perform the tasks. A workflow system generates a workflow defining a performance order of the tasks. A simulation system applies the workflow in an environment that includes digital models of the robot fleet and the tasks. The simulation is used to iteratively redefine the tasks and workflow until a second fleet objective is satisfied. A generation system generates a job execution plan in response to the simulation satisfying the first and second fleet objectives.

Claims (66)

1. A robot fleet management platform for configuring robot fleet resources, the platform comprising:

a set of processors configured to execute a set of computer-readable instructions, wherein the set of computer-readable instructions collectively implements:

a job parsing system that applies a set of filters to job content received in association with a job request to identify portions of the job request suitable for robot automation;

a task definition system that establishes a set of robot tasks, wherein:

each of the set of robot tasks defines a type of robot operating unit and a task objective, and

the set of robot tasks is based on the portions of the job request that are suitable for robot automation and meet a first fleet objective of a set of fleet objectives corresponding to the job request;

a fleet configuration proxy service that processes the set of robot tasks and additional job content relating to the job request to produce a fleet resource configuration data structure for the job request that defines a set of task associations and a set of robot adaptation instructions, wherein:

each task association associates at least one robot operating unit of a robot fleet to a respective robot task of the set of robot tasks, and

the set of robot adaptation instructions defines a manner by which one or more robot operating units of the robot fleet are to be adapted to perform respective robot tasks;

a fleet intelligence layer that activates a set of intelligence services to produce at least one recommended robot task and associated contextual information that facilitates robot operating unit selection and task ordering in a workflow of the set of robot tasks;

a job workflow system that generates a workflow that defines an order of performance of the set of robot tasks based on the fleet resource configuration data structure and the set of robot tasks;

a workflow simulation system configured to simulate performance of the job request based on the workflow and a job execution simulation environment, wherein:

the workflow simulation system applies the workflow in the job execution simulation environment,

the job execution simulation environment includes digital models of the robot operating units of the robot fleet and digital models of the set of robot tasks to produce a simulation result, and

the simulation result is used to iteratively redefine at least one of the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow until the simulation result satisfies a second fleet objective of the set of fleet objectives;

a job execution plan generator that, in response to the simulation result satisfying the set of fleet objectives, generates a job execution plan based on the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow; and

a job execution system configured to execute the job execution play by controlling the robot operation units of the robot fleet.

2. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system interacts with the fleet intelligence layer to suggest alternate robot tasks that satisfy the second fleet objective.

3. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system interacts with the fleet intelligence layer to optimize at least one of a robot type and a task objective based on the first fleet objective.

4. The robot fleet management platform of claim 3 wherein the first fleet objective includes fleet resource utilization criteria.

5. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system receives, from the fleet configuration proxy service, a particular robot type for use in performing the respective robot task.

6. The robot fleet management platform of claim 5 wherein the task definition system configures the set of robot tasks based on the particular robot type provided by the fleet configuration proxy service.

7. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system generates, for each task in the set of robot tasks, a data structure that includes a reference to a digital twin for at least one of the task and at least one robot operating unit for performing the task for use by the workflow simulation system.

8. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system generates, for each task in the set of robot tasks, (i) a data structure that identifies at least one of a type of robot and a robot operating unit for performing the task and (ii) a configuration data structure for configuring the robot operating unit to perform the task.

9. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system, for each task in the set of robot tasks, generates a data structure for each task in the set of robot tasks and stores the data structure in a library of robot tasks that is indexed by information indicative of the job request and an identifier of at least one of robot type and the robot operating unit.

10. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system matches requirements for constraints identified in the job request with robot capabilities when identifying a type of robot for meeting the respective task objective.

11. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system generates a plurality of robot tasks for a plurality of different robot types to achieve a task objective.

12. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system:

queries a library of robot tasks for candidate robot tasks that satisfy the respective task objective and

interacts with the fleet configuration proxy service to select a task from the candidate robot tasks based on the set of fleet objectives.

13. The robot fleet management platform of claim 12 wherein the set of fleet objectives includes compatibility with available robot operating units.

14. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system:

queries a library of robot tasks for candidate robot tasks that satisfy the task objective and

interacts with the fleet intelligence layer to select a robot task from the candidate robot tasks based on a suitability of the candidate robot tasks for achieving the task objective.

15. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the task definition system, when defining the set of robot tasks, references information descriptive of sensor detection packages that indicate preferred sequences of sensing tasks.

16. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the job workflow system, when defining the set of robot tasks, references information descriptive of sensor detection packages that indicate preferred sequences of sensing tasks.

17. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the job workflow system generates the workflow of robot tasks based on a dependency of a second task on a first task for meeting an objective of the second task.

18. The robot fleet management platform of claim 1 wherein the workflow simulation system operates digital twins of tasks in the set of robot tasks for determining an optimized workflow order of tasks.

19. A method of configuring robot fleet resources, the method comprising:

applying a set of filters to job content received in association with a job request to identify portions of the job request suitable for robot automation;

establishing a set of robot tasks, wherein:

each of the set of robot tasks defines a type of robot operating unit and a task objective, and

the set of robot tasks is based on the portions of the job request that are suitable for robot automation and meet a first fleet objective of a set of fleet objectives corresponding to the job request;

processing the set of robot tasks and additional job content relating to the job request to produce a fleet resource configuration data structure for the job request that defines a set of task associations and a set of robot adaptation instructions, wherein:

each task association associates at least one robot operating unit of a robot fleet to a respective robot task of the set of robot tasks, and

the set of robot adaptation instructions defines a manner by which one or more robot operating units of the robot fleet are to be adapted to perform respective robot tasks;

activating a set of intelligence services to produce at least one recommended robot task and associated contextual information that facilitates robot operating unit selection and task ordering in a workflow of the set of robot tasks;

generating a workflow that defines an order of performance of the set of robot tasks based on the fleet resource configuration data structure and the set of robot tasks;

simulating performance of the job request based on the workflow and a job execution simulation environment that includes digital models of the robot operating units of the robot fleet and digital models of the set of robot tasks to produce a simulation result, wherein the simulation result is used to iteratively redefine at least one of the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow until the simulation result satisfies a second fleet objective of the set of fleet objectives;

in response to the simulation result satisfying the set of fleet objectives, generating a job execution plan based on the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow; and

executing the job execution plan by controlling the robot operating units of the robot fleet.

20. The method of claim 19 further comprising generating a plurality of robot tasks for a plurality of different robot types to achieve a task objective.

21. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising processor-executable instructions including:

applying a set of filters to job content received in association with a job request to identify portions of the job request suitable for robot automation;

establishing a set of robot tasks, wherein:

each of the set of robot tasks defines a type of robot operating unit and a task objective, and

the set of robot tasks is based on the portions of the job request that are suitable for robot automation and meet a first fleet objective of a set of fleet objectives corresponding to the job request;

processing the set of robot tasks and additional job content relating to the job request to produce a fleet resource configuration data structure for the job request that defines a set of task associations and a set of robot adaptation instructions, wherein:

each task association associates at least one robot operating unit of a robot fleet to a respective robot task of the set of robot tasks, and

the set of robot adaptation instructions defines a manner by which one or more robot operating units of the robot fleet are to be adapted to perform respective robot tasks;

activating a set of intelligence services to produce at least one recommended robot task and associated contextual information that facilitates robot operating unit selection and task ordering in a workflow of the set of robot tasks;

generating a workflow that defines an order of performance of the set of robot tasks based on the fleet resource configuration data structure and the set of robot tasks;

simulating performance of the job request based on the workflow and a job execution simulation environment that includes digital models of the robot operating units of the robot fleet and digital models of the set of robot tasks to produce a simulation result, wherein the simulation result is used to iteratively redefine at least one of the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow until the simulation result satisfies a second fleet objective of the set of fleet objectives;

in response to the simulation result satisfying the set of fleet objectives, generating a job execution plan based on the set of robot tasks, the fleet resource configuration data structure, and the workflow; and

executing the job execution plan by controlling the robot operating units of the robot fleet.

22. The computer-readable medium of claim 21 wherein the instructions include generating a plurality of robot tasks for a plurality of different robot types to achieve a task objective.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2024
From: CELLA, CHARLES H.; KELL, BRAD; EL-TAHRY, TEYMOUR S.; CARDNO, ANDREW; FORTIN, LEON, JR.
To: STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019, LLC
Reel/Frame 067107/0551 →
Priority Claims (2)
IN 202111029964 · Jul 3, 2021 · national
IN 202111036187 · Aug 10, 2021 · national
Continuity (4)
Continuation PCTUS2021064233 · Dec 17, 2021
Provisional Application 63185348 · May 6, 2021
Provisional Application 63127983 · Dec 18, 2020
Related Publication 20220197306A1 · Jun 23, 2022
References Cited (177)
US 8078485B1 · Kraehmueller · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8200527B1 · Thompson · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8407078B1 · Caputo · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9656387B2 · Mian · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10310500B1 · Brady · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10766137B1 · Porter · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10792810B1 · Beckman et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10815058B2 · Wolf · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11403120B1 · Vanderzee · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11407111B2 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11526823B1 · Ben-Tsvi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040162638A1 · Solomon · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070271011A1 · Lee · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080024306A1 · Bomber · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20140365258A1 · Vestal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150073594A1 · Trujillo · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160129592A1 · Saboo · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170057081A1 · Krohne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170075944A1 · Overman · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170080566A1 · Stubbs · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170109834A1 · Shaaban · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170113348A1 · Monceaux · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170121959A1 · Kherat et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170125008A1 · Maisonnier · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170140524A1 · Karsenti · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170190119A1 · Dow · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170252924A1 · Vijayanarasimhan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170279783A1 · Milazzo · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170285585A1 · Weast et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170297200A1 · Stubbs · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170326729A1 · Gros · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170329307A1 · Castillo-Effen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170345140A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170351952A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180004202A1 · Onaga · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180043532A1 · Lection et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180089563A1 · Redding et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180096175A1 · Schmeling · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180107969A1 · Trivelpiece · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129192A1 · Murakami · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129199A1 · Gustavsson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180136633A1 · Small et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180154514A1 · Angle · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180158016A1 · Pandya · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180229744A1 · Manzari · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180307246A1 · Hodge · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180308069A1 · Starks · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180329399A1 · Neelakandan · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180361586A1 · Tan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180373238A1 · Bergan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190001573A1 · Gulbrandsen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190007269A1 · Ackley · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190021795A1 · Crawford et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190025800A1 · Goyal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190047356A1 · Ferguson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190066041A1 · Hance · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102667A1 · Bashkirov et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190105779A1 · Einav · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190138662A1 · Deutsch et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190279409A1 · Kim · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190303636A1 · Olivastri · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190324436A1 · Cella et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190340716A1 · Cella · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190369641A1 · Gillett · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392355A1 · O'Malley · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200050408A1 · Wushour · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103877A1 · Truong · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103921A1 · Voorhies · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200171671A1 · Huang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200175138A1 · Nordstrom · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200242538A1 · Whitman · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200258031A1 · Makhija · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200293822A1 · Anthony et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200306978A1 · Riek · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341452A1 · Bi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200344293A1 · Wolter · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200348662A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200368913A1 · Scott · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200380080A1 · Glunz · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200401576A1 · Yerli · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210053229A1 · Yuan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210056482A1 · Li · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210107177A1 · Giles · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210109790A1 · Yueqiang · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133670A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210138651A1 · McGregor · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210157312A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210181762A1 · Zhao · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210182996A1 · Cella · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210188430A1 · Kisiler · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210237269A1 · Hvass · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210247776A1 · Faye et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210339388A1 · Kelch · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210339399A1 · Schluntz · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210400675A1 · Lee · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220016763A1 · Chen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220029813A1 · Wakabayashi · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220036310A1 · Heinla · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220048186A1 · Sharma · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220152816A1 · Bordignon · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220187847A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220197306A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220207462A1 · Verma · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220245574A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220266445A1 · Dambman · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220269284A1 · Chen · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220308562A1 · Norman · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220317661A1 · Kaehler · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220388690A1 · Garnier · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230070378A1 · Hazan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230078448A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230083724A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230098602A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230102048A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230110941A1 · Makhija · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230123322A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230132449A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230222454A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230222531A1 · Cella · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230259878A1 · Jacquemart · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240118702A1 · Cella · 2024 [cited by applicant]
AU 2020101261A4 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 2999272A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 111159793A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 3696622A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013119942A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020092446A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020142499A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022026079A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Banziger et al., “Optimizing human-robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.7,Apr. 3, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Bilberg et al., “Digital twin driven human-robot collaborative assembly” CIRP annals 68.1, pp. 499-502, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31.2, Dec. 14, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Yao et al., “Improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled fliexible manufacturing systems with AGV based material transportation” Sensors 20.21, Nov. 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Borangiu et al., “Digital transformation of manufacturing. Industry of the future with cyber-physical production systems”, Sci. Technology 23, pp. 3-37, Jan. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Min et al., “Maching learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry”, International Journal of Information Management 49, pp. 502-519, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Lee et al., “Integration of digital twin and deep learning in cyber-physical systems: towards smart manufacturing”, IET Collaborative Intelligent Manufacturing 2(1), Mar. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Diemer, “Blockchain-Implications and Use Cases for Additive Manufacturing”, Frankfurt School Blockchain Center, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Guo et al., “A framework for personalized production based on digital twin, blockchain and additive manufacturing in the context of industry 4.0”, 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Automation Science and Engine… [cited by applicant]
Mandolla et al., “Building a digital twin for additive manufacturing through the exploitation of blockchain: A case analysis of the aircraft industry”, Computers in Industry 109, pp. 134-152, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Trouton et al., “3D opportunity for blockchain: Additive manufacturing links the digital thread”, Deloitte Insights, Nov. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Butt, “Exploring the interrelationship between additive manufacturing and Industry 4.0”, Designs 4.2, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Mukherjee et al., “A digital twin for rapid qualification of 3D printed metallic components”, Applied Materials Today 14, pp. 59-65, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Craye et al., “Biovision: a biomimetics platform for intrinsically motivated visual saliency learning”, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Penumuru et al., “Identification and classification of materials using machine vision and machine learning in the context of industry 4.0”, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Valuluru, “Simulation and Analysis of Liquid Lens Behaviour for Machine Vision Applications-CA13 (AFT)”, 2019 30th Irish Signals and Systems Conference (ISSC), IEEE, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Schwarz et al., “RGB-D object recognition and pose estimation based on pre-trained convolutional neural network features”, 2015 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (IRCA). IEEE, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion and International Search Report for international application No. PCT/US2021/064233, dated Apr. 22, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Tanwani et al., “A Fog Robotics Approach to Deep Robot Learning: Application to Object Recognition and Grasp Planning in Surface Decluttering”, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 20, 20… [cited by applicant]
Blender et al., “Managing a mobile agricultural robot swarm for a seeding task”, IECON 2016-42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Oct. 23, 2016, pp. 6879-6886. [cited by applicant]
Hoebert et al., “Cloud-Based Digital Twin for Industrial Robotics”, Industrial Applications of Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems: 9th INternational Conference, HoloMAS 2019, Linz, Austria, Aug. 26-29, 2019, pp. 105-116. [cited by applicant]
Xu et al., “Digital twin-based industrial cloud robotics: Framework, control approach and implementation”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 58, 2021, pp. 196-209. [cited by applicant]
Mourtzis, “Simulation in the design and operation of manufacturing systems: state of the art and new trends”, International Journal of Production Research, 58:7, Apr. 2, 2020, pp. 1927-1949. [cited by applicant]
Li, A mechanism for scheduling multi robot intelligent warehouse system face with dynamic demand, p. 470-473 (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Yao, improving just-in-time delivery performance of IoT-enabled flexible manufacturing systemsmaterial transportation, p. 1-6 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Wilson, “Accenture: building suply chain resilience amidst COVID-19”, Supply Chain Magazine, May 17, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Schatteman, “Supply Chain Lessons from Covid-19: Time to Refocus on Resilience”, Bain & Company, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ganeriwalla et al., “Three Paths to Advantage with Digital Supply Chains”, BCG Perspectives, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Deloitte, “Digital Technologies Drive Supply Chain Innovation”, CIO Journal , Sep. 26, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Kelly et al., “Supply chains and value webs”, Deloitte University Press, 2015. [cited by applicant]
IW Staff, “75% of Companies in ISM Virus Survey Report Supply Chain Disruptions”, Industry Week, Mar. 11, 2020. [cited by applicant]
MHI Deloitte, “8. 2019 MHI Annual Industry Report: Elevating Supply Chain Digital Consciousness”, 2019. [cited by applicant]
PwC, “PwC's COVID-19 CFO Pulse”, Jun. 2020. [cited by applicant]
CB Insights, “Supply Chain & Logistics Tech in Numbers” Powerpoint presentation; Jul. 2020. [cited by applicant]
O'Leary, “The Modern Supply Chain is Snapping”, The Atlantic, Mar. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Bukova et al., “The Position of Industry 4.0 in the Worldwide Logistics Chain”, LOGI—Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, vol. 9, No. 1, 2018, pp. 18-23. [cited by applicant]
Lin et al., “Here's how global supply chains will change after COVID-19”, World Economic Forum, May 6, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Ferrantino et al., “Understanding Supply Chain 4.0 and its potential impact on global value chains”. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “AI Set to Drive Global Supply Chain Technology Market to $440 Billion by 2023”, ABI Research, Jan. 29, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Howells, “How the network economy is revolutionizing supply chains”, World Economic Forum, Jan. 14, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Task Selection by Autonomous Mobile Robots in a Warehouse Using Deep Reinforcement Learning”, Proceedings of the 2019 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, 2019, pp. 680-689. [cited by applicant]
McKee et al., “Task-directed configuration of networked robotic agents”, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems EPFL, Lauanne Switzerland, Oct. 2022, pp. 2752-2757. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “Toward a blockchain cloud manufacturing system as a peer to peer distrubuted network platform”, Robotics and Computer Intergrated Manufacturing 54, 2018, p. 133-144. [cited by applicant]
Duan et al., “Performance evaluation for robotic mobile fulfillment systems with time-varying arrivals”, Computers & Industrial Engineering 158, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Nielsen et al., “Digital Twins and Blockchain—Proof of Concept”, Procedia CIRP, vol. 93, 2020, pp. 251-256. [cited by applicant]
Ferrer et al., “The blockchain: a new framework for robotic swarm systems”, Aug. 2, 2017. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report for EP App 21907970.4, dated Nov. 12, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Morariu Cristina et al., “Machine learning for predictive scheduling and resource allocation in large scale manufacturing systems,” Computers In Industry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 120, May 12, 2020. [cited by applicant]