IP Library Granted Patent US 12,553,329
Granted Patent B2
US 12,553,329 · App. 17/698,925 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Automated decline curve and production analysis using automated production segmentation, empirical modeling, and artificial intelligence

Inventors: Uchenna Odi (Houston, TX); Karri Srinivasa Reddy (Dhahran, SA); Cenk Temizel (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
E21B44/00E21B2200/20E21B2200/22
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,553,329
App. No.
17/698,925
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for automated decline curve and production analysis using automated production segmentation, empirical modeling, and artificial intelligence. The method includes segmenting historical production data based on a change in a central tendency of a selected segmentation parameter to generate segmented production data. The method also includes forecasting future production data from a last production segment to a terminal decline rate according to a fitted empirical model, a trained artificial intelligence model, or any combinations thereof. The method includes forecasting exponential production data to an economic limit. Further, the method includes calculating an estimated ultimate recovery by summing the historical production data, future production data, and the exponential production data.

Claims (32)

1 . A computer-implemented method for automated decline curve and production analysis, the method comprising:

segmenting upscaled historical production data of a well within a reservoir system, wherein the historical production data is less than a day of sampling frequency, to generate segmented production data based on a change in a segmentation parameter, wherein upscaled historical production data is automatically segmented when a change in a maximum central tendency of windowed historical production data is outside of a flagged segmentation parameter change;

forecasting future production data from a last production segment to a terminal decline rate according to a fitted empirical model, a trained artificial intelligence model, or any combinations thereof using the segmented production data;

forecasting exponential production data to an economic limit using the segmented production data;

calculating an estimated ultimate recovery of the well by summing the historical production data, future production data, and the exponential production data; and

detecting anomalies in production at the reservoir production system automatically, wherein production anomalies correspond to changes in the reservoir system that occur in the estimated ultimate recovery of the well.

2 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the segmentation parameter is a well head pressure of the well.

3 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the fitted empirical model is fit to the segmented production data by minimizing a difference between the segmented production data and predicted output of the fitted empirical model.

4 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the trained artificial intelligence model is trained to predict a production decline of the well over time.

5 . The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the exponential production data is forecast by an exponential model when the well reaches a terminal decline rate.

6 . An apparatus comprising a non-transitory, computer readable, storage medium that stores instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

segmenting upscaled historical production data of a well within a reservoir system, wherein the historical production data is less than a day of sampling frequency, to generate segmented production data based on a change in a segmentation parameter, wherein upscaled historical production data is automatically segmented when a change in a maximum central tendency of windowed historical production data is outside of a flagged segmentation parameter change;

forecasting future production data from a last production segment to a terminal decline rate according to a fitted empirical model, a trained artificial intelligence model, or any combinations thereof using the segmented production data;

forecasting exponential production data to an economic limit using the segmented production data;

calculating an estimated ultimate recovery of the well by summing the historical production data, future production data, and the exponential production data; and

detecting anomalies in production at the reservoir production system automatically, wherein production anomalies correspond to changes in the reservoir system that occur in the estimated ultimate recovery of the well.

7 . The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the segmentation parameter is a well head pressure of the well.

8 . The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the empirical model is fit to the segmented production data by minimizing a difference between the segmented production data and predicted output of the fitted empirical model.

9 . The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the trained artificial intelligence model is trained to predict a production decline of the well over time.

10 . The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the exponential production data is forecast by an exponential model when the well reaches a terminal decline rate.

11 . A system, comprising:

one or more memory modules;

one or more hardware processors communicably coupled to the one or more memory modules, the one or more hardware processors configured to execute instructions stored on the one or more memory models to perform operations comprising:

segmenting upscaled historical production data of a well within a reservoir system, wherein the historical production data is less than a day of sampling frequency, to generate segmented production data based on a change in a segmentation parameter, wherein upscaled historical production data is automatically segmented when a change in a maximum central tendency of windowed historical production data is outside of a flagged segmentation parameter change;

forecasting future production data from a last production segment to a terminal decline rate according to a fitted empirical model, a trained artificial intelligence model, or any combinations thereof using the segmented production data;

forecasting exponential production data to an economic limit using the segmented production data;

calculating an estimated ultimate recovery of the well by summing the historical production data, future production data, and the exponential production data; and

detecting anomalies in production at the reservoir production system automatically, wherein production anomalies correspond to changes in the reservoir system that occur in the estimated ultimate recovery of the well.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the segmentation parameter is a well head pressure of the well.

13 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the empirical model is fit to the segmented production data by minimizing a difference between the segmented production data and predicted output of the fitted empirical model.

14 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the trained artificial intelligence model is trained to predict a production decline of the well over time.

15 . The system of claim 11 , wherein the exponential production data is forecast by an exponential model when the well reaches a terminal decline rate.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2022
From: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060065/0727 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2022
From: SAUDI ARAMCO UPSTREAM TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060065/0776 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2022
From: ODI, UCHENNA
To: ARAMCO SERVICES COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059341/0186 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 22, 2022
From: REDDY, KARRI SRINIVASA; TEMIZEL, CENK
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 059341/0250 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230296011A1 · Sep 21, 2023
References Cited (210)
US 4113011A · Bernard et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4665981A · Hayatdavoudi · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4676313A · Rinaldi · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4828032A · Teletzke et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5794316A · Anscher · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5854991A · Gupta et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6691037B1 · Poe et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7082993B2 · Ayoub et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7134492B2 · Willberg et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7472748B2 · Gdanski et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7716028B2 · Montaron et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7777606B2 · Akbar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7819181B2 · Entov et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7937222B2 · Donadille et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8162049B2 · Rose · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8275593B2 · Zhao · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8498852B2 · Xu et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8606524B2 · Soliman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8731889B2 · Du et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8803077B2 · Schmidt · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9075038B2 · Tumiatti et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9187984B2 · Usadi et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9470086B2 · Khalid et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9710766B2 · Saleri et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9732592B2 · Carvajal et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9778627B2 · Stoettrup et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9901868B2 · Salu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9910938B2 · Morales German et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9934295B2 · Sarferaz · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9940414B2 · Ortiz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9946974B2 · Burch et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9957783B2 · Gonzales et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 9994118B2 · Williams et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10012056B1 · Lapierre · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10012748B2 · Gupta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10079317B2 · Gonatas · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10087722B2 · Lecerf et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10125586B2 · Balan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10175360B2 · Zweigle et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10240098B2 · Randhava et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10254432B2 · Cuevas et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10260319B2 · Sarduy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10267132B2 · Hoeink · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10288041B2 · Williams · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10301918B2 · Weng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10324230B2 · Kuchuk et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10355486B2 · Pflaum et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10360783B2 · Maher et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10378324B2 · Conn et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10378344B2 · Al-Dosary et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10380524B1 · Raymond et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10409925B1 · Hoff · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10415354B2 · Chidiac et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10418595B2 · Li · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10436940B2 · Maucec et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10443359B2 · DeValve et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10445669B2 · Wessling et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10450841B2 · Fulford · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10495589B2 · Kwak et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10508520B2 · Saleri et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10508532B1 · Mondal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10519759B2 · Klie · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10526890B2 · Batmaz et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10534961B2 · Rostand et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10541374B2 · Li · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10563493B2 · Ganguly et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10599747B1 · Hoff · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10614414B1 · Raymond · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10634815B1 · Lapierre · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10655442B2 · Lecerf et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10665796B2 · Li · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10670753B2 · De Matos Ravanelli et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10718208B2 · Chorn · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10738599B2 · Babin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10740512B2 · Hoff · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10760416B2 · Weng et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10788604B2 · Garcia-Teijeiro et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10804702B2 · Claessens et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10859725B2 · Dupont et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030071988A1 · Smith et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20070179767A1 · Cullick et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070272407A1 · Lehman et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080091396A1 · Kennon et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090020284A1 · Graf et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090065253A1 · Suarez-Rivera et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090164188A1 · Habashy et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100198570A1 · Sarma et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100256964A1 · Lee et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100300684A1 · Kotsonis et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110042083A1 · Sierra et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120016649A1 · Thambynayagam et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239363A1 · Durrani et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120318500A1 · Urbancic et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130087328A1 · Maida, Jr. et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130096899A1 · Usadi et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130231910A1 · Kumar et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130332132A1 · Mongalvy et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140067353A1 · Shelley et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140083687A1 · Poe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172382A1 · Andrews et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140180658A1 · Rossi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297235A1 · Arora et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370934A1 · Pride et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160042272A1 · Mohaghegh · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160138371A1 · Loaiza et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160282881A1 · Filippov et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160356125A1 · Bello et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170045636A1 · Ma et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170074770A1 · Fourno et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170075001A1 · McColpin et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170145793A1 · Ounes · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170191348A1 · Al-Thawad et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180230782A1 · Pankaj et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190219558A1 · Villar De Andrade E Silva et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190249534A1 · Hoeink et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190292881A1 · Zhang et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190332960A1 · Zheng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190339709A1 · Tay · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200174149A1 · Thiruvenkatanathan · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200257932A1 · Roberts · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210087925A1 · Heidari · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210095563A1 · Gupta · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210124087A1 · Liu et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210349226A1 · Alwehaibi · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210375248A1 · Bonada · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210397994A1 · Cerrahoglu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220049589A1 · Kibodeaux et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CA 2856274 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO199850680 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2001080043 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006059057 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014144917 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015016932 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015167935 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017041074 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019217131 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019221717A1 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020040829 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020112141 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Tadjer et al., “Machine Learning Based Decline Curve Analysis for Short Term Oil Production Forecast”, 2021, Department of Energy, Energy Exploration and Exploitation, Vo. 39(5), 1747-1769. [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/328,735, filed May 24, 2021, Aly et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/546,495, filed Dec. 9, 2021, Basri et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/577,463, filed Jan. 18, 2022, Temizel. [cited by applicant]
Alcorn et al., “An Integrated Carbon-Dioxide-Foam Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Pilot Program With Combined Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in an Onshore Texas Heterogeneous Carbonate Field,” SPE Reservoir Engineering,… [cited by applicant]
Ali et al., “Constraining Interwell Water Flood Imaging with Geology and Petrophysics: An Example from the Middle East,” SPE 120558, Paper presented at the 2009 SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Bahrain, Ma… [cited by applicant]
Alkhatib et al., “Robust Quantification of Uncertainty in Heterogeneity for Chemical EOR Processes: Applying the Multi-Level Monte Carlo Method,” Paper presented at the SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Bah… [cited by applicant]
Anderson et al., “Petroleum Analytics Learning Machine to Forecast Production in the Wet Gas Marcellus Shale,” URTeC 2426612, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC), Fueled by SPE, AAPG, SEG, presented a… [cited by applicant]
Anderson et al., “Probabilistic Forecasting of Unconventional Resources Using Rate Transient Analysis: Case Studies,” SPE 155737, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Americas Unconventional Resources … [cited by applicant]
Anderson, “Wettability literature survey—Part 2: Wettability measurement,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, 38(11):, Nov. 1986, 1246-1262, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Artun et al., “Characterizing reservoir connectivity and forecasting waterflood performance using data-driven and reduced-physics models,” SPE Western Regional Meeting, May 2016, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Asquith, “Reservoir Producibility Index (RPI) from NMR Logs and The Analysis of Tight Oil Reservoirs,” URTeC 2673849, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC), Fueled by SPE, AAPG, SEG, presented at the Un… [cited by applicant]
Cao et al., “Data Driven Production Forecasting Using Machine Learning,” SPE 180984-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposi… [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Prediction of Sweet Spots in Shale Reservoir Based on Geophysical Well Logging and 3D Seismic Data,” Energy Exploration and Exploitation, Mar. 2017, 35:2 (147-171), 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chou et al., “CO2 Foam Field Trial at North Ward-Estes,” SPE 24643, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference, Washington, D.C. 1992, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Clarkson and Williams-Kovacs, “Modeling Two-Phase Flowback of Multifractured Horizontal Wells Completed in Shale,” SPE 162593, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Canada Unconventional Resources C… [cited by applicant]
Clarkson et al., “Integration of microseismic and other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis: A tight gas study,” Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 3, No. 2, Mar. 25, 2011, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Creemer et al., “Efficient Use Of High Frequency Data Through Production Data Management System Implementation,” SPE Intelligent Energy International, Ultrecht, The Netherlands, Mar. 27-29, 2021; SPE 150214, Jan. 2012, … [cited by applicant]
Giles, “Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation,” Operations Research, 56(3), May-Jun. 2008, 607-617, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hafidz Arief et al., “Real Time Reservoir Fluid Log from Advanced Mud Gas Data,” SPE Annual Technical Conference & Exhibition, Oct. 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Heller et al., “Testing CO2-Foam for Mobility Control at Rock Creek,” SPE 14519, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Eastern Regional Meeting, Morgantown, West Virginia … [cited by applicant]
Henry et al., “Field Test of Foam to Reduce CO2 Cycling,” SPE 35402, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers/Department of Energy Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, … [cited by applicant]
Hoefner and Evans, “CO2 Foam: Results from Four Developmental Field Trials,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, Nov. 1995, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ihsenergy.ca [online], “Harmony Enterprise Software, 2020.2,” retrieved from URL <https://www.ihsenergy.ca/support/documentation_ca/Harmony_Enterprise/2020_2/content/html_files/start_here.htm>, Oct. 13, 2020, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al., “Evaluating Producible Hydrocarbons and Reservoir Quality in Organic Shae Reservoirs using Nuclear Resonance (NMR) Factor analysis,” SPE 175893-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SP… [cited by applicant]
Jonas et al., “Evaluation of a CO2 Foam Field Trial: Rangely Weber Sand Unit,” SPE 20468, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical Conference, New Orleans, L… [cited by applicant]
Kamari et al., “Effects of rock pore sizes on the PVT properties of oil and gas-condensates in shale and tight reservoirs,” Petroleum, Jan. 10, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kausik et al., “Novel Reservoir Quality Indices for Tight Oil,” SPE 178622-MS, URTeC 2154859, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC), Fueled by SPE, AAPG, SEG, prese… [cited by applicant]
Kunz et al., “The GERG-2008 Wide-Range Equation of State for Natural Gases and Other Mixtures: An Expansion of GERG-2004,” J. Chem. Eng. Data 57 : pp. 3032-3091, 2004, 60 pages. [cited by applicant]
Lemmon et al., “NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties—REFPROP,” Version 9.1, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Standard Reference Data Program, Gaither… [cited by applicant]
Lertliangchai et al., “A Comparative Analysis of the Prediction of Gas Condensate Dew Point Pressure Using Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, UAE, Sep. 21-23, 2… [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A Comparative Study of the Probabilistic-Collocation and Experimental-Design Methods for Petroleum-Reservoir Uncertainty Quantification,” SPE Journal, 16(2), Jun. 2011, 429-439, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liang et al., “Crosswell Electromagnetic Inversion Constrained by the Fluid-Flow Simulator,” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, Sep. 19-22, 2010, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Mahmoud et al., “Practical Application of Type Curve Analysis to the Interpretation of Multi-Stage Fractured Horizontal Well Data,” SPE-175931, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventio… [cited by applicant]
Marsala et al., “3D inversion practice for crosswell electromagnetic surveys in horizontal wells in Saudi Arabia,” 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, 2015, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Marsala et al., “Crosswell electromagnetic induction between two widely spaced horizontal wells: Coiled-tubing conveyed data collection and 3D inversion from a carbonate reservoir in Saudi Arabia,” 85th Annual Internati… [cited by applicant]
Marsala et al., “Crosswell Electromagnetic Tomography: from Resistivity Mapping to Interwell Fluid Distribution,” Paper presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference in Kuala Lumpur (IPTC 12229), 2008; … [cited by applicant]
Marsala et al., “First Borehole to Surface Electromagnetic Survey in KSA: Reservoir Mapping and Monitoring at a New Scale,” Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (SPE-146348), Denver, Col… [cited by applicant]
Marsala et al., “Fluid Distribution Inter-Well Mapping in Multiple Reservoirs by Innovative Borehole to Surface Electromagnetic: Survey Design and Field Acquisition,” Paper presented at the International Petroleum Techn… [cited by applicant]
Martin et al., “CO2-Foam Field Test at the East Vacuum Grayburg/San Andreas Unit,” SPE Reservoir Engineering, Nov. 1995, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Microchip.com [online], “Harmony Enterprise Software V2,” available on or before 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.microchip.com/en-us/tools-resources/configure/mplab-harmony/version-2>, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Monger et al., “The Phase Behavior of CO2-Appalachian Oil Systems,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 1981, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Odi et al., “Decline Curve Analysis in Unconventional Reservoirs Using a Variable Power Law Model: A Barnett Shale Example,” Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Jul. 2019, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Odi et al., “Experimental Investigation of Wet Gas Dew Point Pressure Change With Carbon Dioxide Concentration,” Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Nov. 2012, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Odi, “Optimal Process Design for Coupled CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Gas Recovery in Carbonate Reservoirs,” Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Texas A&M University, Dec. 2013, 241 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ogunyomi et al., “An Approach to Modeling Production Decline in Unconventional Reservoirs,” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, Aug. 2017, 8(3):871-886, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Patil et al., “CO2 Foam Field Pilot Test in Sandstone Reservoir: Complete Analysis of Foam Pilot Response,” SPE 190312, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Improved Oil … [cited by applicant]
Patzek et al., “Gas production in the Barnett shale obeys a simple scaling theory,” PNAS, Dec. 2013, 110:49 (19731-19736), 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Piper et al., “Compressibility Factors for Naturally Occurring Petroleum Gases,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Oct. 1993, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Potsch et al., “A Novel Graphical Method for Determining Dewpoint Pressures of Gas Condensates,” European Petroleum Conference, Oct. 1996, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sanders et al., “Implementation of a CO2 Foam Pilot Study in the SACROC Field: Performance Evaluation,” SPE 160016, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Society of Petroleum Engineers Annual Technical … [cited by applicant]
Sayarpour et al., “Field applications of capacitance-resistance models in waterfloods,” SPE Res Eval & Eng., 12(6):, 2009, 853-864, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Shyeh et al., “Examples of Right-Time Decisions from High Frequency Data,” SPE Intelligent Energy Conference and Exhibition, Feb. 2008, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Siddiqui et al., “Stability and Texture of CO2/N2Foam in Sandstone” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 534, May 24, 2017, 26-37, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sivaraman et al., “Acoustic Dew Point and Bubble Point Detector for Gas Condensates and Reservoir Fluids,” Annual Technical Meeting, Jun. 1997, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Solbakken, “Experimental Studies of N2- and CO2-Foam Properties in Relation to Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bergen, 2015, 353 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stephenson et al., “Mobility control experience in the Joffre Viking miscible CO2 flood.” SPE Reservoir Engineering 8.03, Aug. 1993, 183-188, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Szabries et al. “Foam Analysis at Elevated Pressures for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications” Energy & Fuels, vol. 33, No. 5, May 16, 2019, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tatang et al., “An efficient method for parametric uncertainty analysis of numerical geophysical models,” Journal of Geophysical Research, vol. 102, No. D18, Sep. 27, 1997; pp. 21,925-21,932, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Temizel et al., “Improving oil-rate estimate in capacitance/resistance modeling using the Y-function method for reservoirs under waterfloor,” SPE Res Eval & Eng, 22(3):, Mar. 2019, 1161-1171, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ter Heege et al., “Sweet Spot Identification in Underexplored Shales Using Multidisciplinary Reservoir Characterization and Key Performance Indicators: Example of the Posidonia Shale Formation in he Netherlands,” Journa… [cited by applicant]
Valko et al., “Reservoir oil bubblepoint pressures revisited; solution gas-oil ratios and surface gas specific gravities,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Mar. 2003, 37(3-4):153-169, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wagner et al, “International Equations for the Saturation Properties of Ordinary Water Substance. Revised According to the International Temperature Scale of 1990,” Addendum to J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 16, 893 (1987), J… [cited by applicant]
Whitson et al., “Khuff Gas Condensate Development,” International Petroleum Technology Conference, Nov. 2005, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wikistat, “Neural networks and introduction to deep learning,” 2017, retrieved from URL <https://www.math.univ-toulouse.fr/˜besse/Wikistat/pdf/st-m-hdstat-rnn-deep-learning.pdf>, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wilt et al., “Monitoring a Water Flood of Moderate Saturation Changes with Crosswell Electromagnetics (EM): A Case Study from Dom Joao Brazil,” Paper presented at the SEG Las Vegas 2012 Annual Meeting, 2012, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Xue et al., “Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression: Application to Permeability Estimation from Well Logs,” SPE Form. Eval., Jun. 1997, 12(02):85-93, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Gas Oil Ratio Based on Advanced Mud Gas Data,” 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Jun. 2019, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al., “Reservoir Fluid Data Acquisition Using Advanced Mud Logging Gas in Shale Reservoirs,” SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Jul. 2019, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zeng et al., “Role of Gas Type on Foam Transport in Porous Media,” Langmuir, 32, Jun. 2016, 6239-6245, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
SAIP Examination Report in SAIP Appln. No. 123441415, mailed on Mar. 23, 2025, 11 pages, with English Translation. [cited by applicant]