IP Library Granted Patent US 12,662,174
Granted Patent B2
US 12,662,174 · App. 17/699,924 · Granted Jun 23, 2026

System and method for identifying a compromised or damaged section of a conductive body extending along a route

Inventors: Derek Kevin Woo (Melbourne, FL); Alexander Sotelo (Long Beach, CA); Chris Schuchmann (Melbourne, FL); Timothy Brown (Erie, PA); Brian Staton (Palm Bay, FL)
Assignee: Transportation IP Holdings, LLC
B61L23/044B61K9/10B61L3/10B61L15/0018B61L15/0027B61L15/0062B61L23/042B61L27/20B61L25/025B61L27/40B61L2201/00B61L2205/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,662,174
App. No.
17/699,924
Granted
Jun 23, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An examining system includes one or more application devices onboard a vehicle system. The application devices may electrically conduct an examination signal into one or more conductive bodies extending along a route and may include a catenary, a third rail, and/or a cable. The examining system may include one or more detection units that may be disposed onboard the vehicle system and that may monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies in response to the examination signal being conducted into the one or more conductive bodies. The examining system may include an identification unit that may examine the one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies monitored by the one or more detection units to identify a compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies.

Claims (35)

1 . A system, comprising:

one or more application devices configured to be disposed onboard a vehicle system traveling along a route, the one or more application devices configured to be coupled with one or more conductive bodies extending along the route during movement of the vehicle system along the route, the one or more application devices configured to electrically conduct an examination signal into the one or more conductive bodies, and the examination signal configured to circulate through a closed loop positioned within a length of the vehicle system, the closed loop formed by the vehicle system and the one or more conductive bodies, and the length defined by a single grouping of one or more mechanically coupled vehicles of the vehicle system;

one or more detection units configured to be disposed onboard the vehicle system and to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies in response to the examination signal being conducted into the one or more conductive bodies; and

an identification unit configured to examine the one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies monitored by the one or more detection units to identify a compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies, the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies positioned within the length of the vehicle system.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more application devices include a first application device and a second application device disposed at spaced apart locations along a length of the vehicle system.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detection units include a first detection unit and a second detection unit disposed at spaced apart locations along a length of the vehicle system.

4 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more application devices are configured to electrically conduct the examination signal into the one or more conductive bodies with a unique identifier included in the examination signal.

5 . The system of claim 4 , wherein the unique identifier includes at least one of a frequency, a modulation, or an embedded signature.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the identification unit is configured to identify the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies responsive to the one or more electrical characteristics indicating no conduction of the examination signal through the one or more conductive bodies.

7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the identification unit is configured to identify the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies based on detection of an electrical short connected with the one or more conductive bodies.

8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a catenary extending along the route.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a third rail extending along the route.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a cable extending along the route.

11 . A method, comprising:

electrically conducting an examination signal into one or more conductive bodies from onboard a vehicle system as the vehicle system traverses a pathway, the examination signal configured to circulate through a closed loop positioned within a length of the vehicle system, the closed loop formed by the vehicle system and the one or more conductive bodies, and the length defined by a single grouping of one or more mechanically coupled vehicles of the vehicle system;

monitoring one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies via the examination signal; and

determining a compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies based on the examination signal, the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies positioned within the length of the vehicle system.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the examination signal is electrically conducted into or received from the one or more conductive bodies at spaced apart locations along the length of the vehicle system.

13 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the examination signal is electrically conducted into the one or more conductive bodies with a unique identifier included in the examination signal, and wherein the unique identifier includes at least one of a frequency, a modulation, or an embedded signature.

14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising obtaining a location of the vehicle system based on the determination of the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies.

15 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining the one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the one or more electrical characteristics include no conduction of the examination signal through the one or more conductive bodies.

17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the one or more electrical characteristics include one or more of an increased electrical resistance, a decreased electrical resistance, a drop in voltage, a spike in voltage, or intermittent conductivity.

18 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies is determined based at least in part by detecting an electrical short connected with the one or more conductive bodies.

19 . A system, comprising:

one or more detection units configured to be disposed onboard a vehicle system and to couple with one or more conductive bodies that extend along a route while the vehicle system is moving along the route, the one or more detection units configured to monitor a closed loop positioned within a length of the vehicle system to monitor one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies during movement of the vehicle system, the closed loop formed by the vehicle system and the one or more conductive bodies, and the length defined by a single grouping of one or more mechanically coupled vehicles of the vehicle system; and

an identification unit configured to examine the one or more electrical characteristics of the one or more conductive bodies monitored by the one or more detection units to identify a compromised section of the one or more conductive bodies during movement of the vehicle system, the compromised or damaged section of the one or more conductive bodies positioned within the length of the vehicle system.

20 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more detection units include a first detection unit and a second detection unit disposed at spaced apart locations along a length of the vehicle system.

21 . The system of claim 19 , further comprising one or more application devices configured to electrically conduct an examination signal into the one or more conductive bodies with a unique identifier included in the examination signal, the one or more detection units configured to measure the one or more electrical characteristics responsive to the one or more application devices conducting the examination signal into the one or more conductive bodies.

22 . The system of claim 21 , wherein the one or more application devices are a pantograph.

23 . The system of claim 21 , further comprising a controller configured to determine, based at least in part on the one or more electrical characteristics, if the one or more conductive bodies are compromised, if the one or more application devices are compromised, or if the one or more application devices are decoupled from the one or more conductive bodies.

24 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the identification unit is configured to identify the compromised section of the one or more conductive bodies based on detection of an electrical short connected with the one or more conductive bodies.

25 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a catenary extending along the route.

26 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a third rail extending along the route.

27 . The system of claim 19 , wherein the one or more conductive bodies includes a cable extending along the route.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2022
From: WOO, DEREK KEVIN; SCHUCHMANN, CHRIS; BROWN, TIMOTHY; STATON, BRIAN
To: TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 060031/0579 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation In Part 16882149 · May 22, 2020
Continuation 15717207 · Sep 27, 2017
Continuation In Part 15148570 · May 6, 2016
Continuation In Part 14527246 · Oct 29, 2014
Continuation In Part 14016310 · Sep 3, 2013
Continuation In Part 14221624 · Mar 21, 2014
Continuation PCTUS2013054300 · Aug 9, 2013
Provisional Application 62425887 · Nov 23, 2016
Provisional Application 62161626 · May 14, 2015
Provisional Application 61729188 · Nov 21, 2012
Provisional Application 61681843 · Aug 10, 2012
Provisional Application 61860469 · Jul 31, 2013
Provisional Application 61860496 · Jul 31, 2013
Related Publication 20220204061A1 · Jun 30, 2022
References Cited (188)
US 2059160A · Wintsch et al. · 1936 [cited by applicant]
US 2628335A · Drake et al. · 1953 [cited by applicant]
US 3016464A · Bailey et al. · 1962 [cited by applicant]
US 3137756A · Gunther et al. · 1964 [cited by applicant]
US 3393600A · Bess et al. · 1968 [cited by applicant]
US 3517307A · Hronik et al. · 1970 [cited by applicant]
US 3562419A · Stewart et al. · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 3589815A · Hosterman · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 3594912A · Sauterel · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 3604359A · Doorley et al. · 1971 [cited by applicant]
US 3633010A · Svetlichny · 1972 [cited by applicant]
US 3696243A · Risely · 1972 [cited by applicant]
US 3821558A · Mansfield · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3821932A · Theurer et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3828440A · Plasser et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3850390A · Geiger et al. · 1974 [cited by applicant]
US 3864039A · Wilmarth · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3870952A · Sibley · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3875865A · Plasser et al. · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3896665A · Goel · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3924461A · Stover · 1975 [cited by applicant]
US 3937068A · Joy · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 3960005A · Vezina · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 3962908A · Joy · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 3987989A · Geiger · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 3995560A · Mackintosh · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4005601A · Botello · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4022408A · Staples · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4040738A · Wagner · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4044594A · Davidson et al. · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 4069590A · Effinger · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4100795A · Panetti · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4117463A · Norton · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4117529A · Ehrlich et al. · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4143553A · Hendricks et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4145018A · Muratore et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4155176A · Goel et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4165648A · Pagano · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4173073A · Fukazawa et al. · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4174636A · Pagano · 1979 [cited by applicant]
US 4181278A · Pascoe · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4181430A · Ando et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4198164A · Cantor · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4207569A · Meyer · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4222275A · Marshall et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4229978A · Marshall et al. · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4235112A · Kaiser · 1980 [cited by applicant]
US 4259018A · Poirier · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4288855A · Panelli · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4306694A · Kuhn · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4383448A · Fujimoto et al. · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4389033A · Hardman · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4391134A · Hansmann et al. · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4417466A · Panelli · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4417522A · Bock et al. · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4429576A · Norris · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4430615A · Calvert · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4886226A · Frielinghaus · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5188038A · Shanley · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5459663A · Franke · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5462244A · Van Der Hoek et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5623244A · Cooper · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5627508A · Cooper et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5713540A · Gerszberg et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5743495A · Kenneth et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5786750A · Cooper · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5867404A · Bryan · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5956664A · Bryan · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6044698A · Bryan · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6064428A · Trosino · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6195020B1 · Brodeur, Sr. et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6262573B1 · Wojnarowski · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6424150B2 · Kwun · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6533223B1 · Ireland · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6553838B2 · Amini · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6742392B2 · Gilmore et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7036774B2 · Hickenlooper et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7188009B2 · Hawthorne · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7389694B1 · Hay et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7938008B2 · Owens et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8160832B2 · Luo et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8264330B2 · Yeldell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8305567B2 · Hesser et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8682514B2 · Falk · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8888052B2 · Baldwin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9108640B2 · Dean · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9162691B2 · Polivka et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20010019263A1 · Kwun et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20010045495A1 · Olson et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020065610A1 · Clark et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020065629A1 · Clark · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020099507A1 · Clark et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020113170A1 · Grappone · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020148931A1 · Anderson · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030020469A1 · Earnest et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030038216A1 · Holgate · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030070492A1 · Buttle et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030128030A1 · Hintze et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030142297A1 · Casagrande · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040069909A1 · Kane et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040095135A1 · Carr et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040105608A1 · Sloman · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050076716A1 · Turner · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060017911A1 · Villar et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060076461A1 · DeRose et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060098843A1 · Chew · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070000744A1 · Craig · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070132463A1 · Anderson · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070145982A1 · Anderson et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070163352A1 · Bardenshtein et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070217670A1 · Bar-Am · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233335A1 · Kumar et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080105791A1 · Karg · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080142645A1 · Tomlinson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080201089A1 · Carr et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080296441A1 · Andarawis et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090132179A1 · Fu et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090193899A1 · Panetta et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090266166A1 · Pagano · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090266167A1 · Pagano · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090282923A1 · Havira · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090320603A1 · Crocker et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100207620A1 · Gies · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312493A1 · Chen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110006167A1 · Tolmei · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110043199A1 · Crocker · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110199607A1 · Kanellopoulos et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110216996A1 · Rogers · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110233293A1 · Kral et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110255077A1 · Rogers · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276203A1 · Hase · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110284699A1 · Cooper · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110284700A1 · Brand · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120217351A1 · Chadwick et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120319850A1 · Welch · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130015298A1 · Cooper et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130062474A1 · Baldwin et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130284859A1 · Polivka et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130334373A1 · Malone, Jr. et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140129154A1 · Cooper et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140138493A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140156123A1 · Cooper et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140207317A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140277824A1 · Kernwein et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150053827A1 · Noffsinger et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160107664A1 · Kull · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200055401A1 · Sun · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200101989A1 · Dick · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200302592A1 · Ebersohn · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220011196A1 · Santamato · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220185431A1 · Torre · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 101351373A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 102556118 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
DE 19826764A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
DE 102010026433A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 1600351A1 · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002294609A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 1001194609A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 1998058829A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
WO 0009377 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
WO 0230729 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 02060738 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014193610A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action issued in connection with related CN Application No. 201380071077.1 on Feb. 6, 2016—English Translation. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT/US2013/071237 dated Feb. 27, 2014. [cited by applicant]
http://www.progressiverailroading.com/mow/article/Maintenance-of-Way-Track-inspection, “Maintenance of Way: Track inspection technology”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Rose, J.L.; Avioli, M.J.; Song, W.J., “Application and potential of guided wave rail inspection”, Insight vol. 44, No. 6., Jun. 2002, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Sperry Rail Service, Sperry B-Scan Dual Rail Inspection System, For superior technology, training, and reporting, the solution is Sperry, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Hocking, Rail Inspection, The Eddy Current Solution, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Innotrack, Project No. TIP5-CT-2006-031415, 43 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Aharoni, R.; Glikman, Eli; “A Novel high-speed rail inspection system”, ScanMaster Systems (IRT) Ltd., Oct. 2002, vol. 7, No. 10, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Popov, Ing. Alexandr; “Automated Ultrasonic Inspection of Rails”, Starmans Electronics, s.r.o., Prague, CZ, www.starmans.net, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Dick et al., “Multivariate Statistical Model For Predicting Occurrence And Location Of Broken Rails”. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1825(1), pp. 48-55, 2003. [cited by applicant]
Hou et al., “A Rail Damage Detection And Measurement System Using Neural Networks”, Computational Intelligence or Measurement Systems and Applications, pp. 4-9, Jul. 14-16, 2004. [cited by applicant]
Brawner et al., “Magnetometer Sensor Feasibility for Railroad and Highway Equipment Detection”, Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis Programs, HSR Idea Program Final Report; pp. 1-27, Jun. 24, 2006. [cited by applicant]
Schafer II, D. H. “Effect of Train Length On Railroad Accidents and A Quantitative Analysis of Factors Affecting Broken Rails”. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 2008. [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Fault Detection And Diagnosis For Railway Track Circuits Using Neuro-Fuzzy Systems”, ScienceDirect Control Engineering Practice, pp. 585-596, May 2008. [cited by applicant]
Ho et al., “Signature Analysis On Wheel-Rail Interaction For Rail Defect Detection”, Railway Condition Monitoring, J008 4th IET International Conference On, pp. 1-6, Jun. 18-20, 2008. [cited by applicant]
Patra et al., “Availability Analysis Of Railway Track Circuit”, Proceedings Of The Institution Of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal Of Rail And Rapid Transit, vol. 224 No. 3, pp. 169-177, May 1, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Kun-Peng et al., “Design Of Transmission System Of Real-Time Broken Rail Detection”, Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, Jan. 2013. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., “Train Detection By Magnetic Field Sensing”, Sensors and Materials, Issue No. 6, vol. 25, Feb. 4, pp. 423-436, 2013. [cited by applicant]
WO Invitation to pay Additional Fees dated (PCT/US2013/053124) Apr. 2, 2014. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding PCT/US2013/053124 dated Jul. 4, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Maldonado et al., “Autonomous Broken Rail Detection Technology For Use On Revenue Service Trains”, U.S. Department of transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Dec. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Turner, Steven; “Feasibility of Locomotive-Mounted Broken Rail Detection”, Final Report for High-Speed Rail IDEA Project 38; IDEA, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies; Jun. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Shanthini, M.; “Electromagnetic System for Railroad Track Crack Detection”, British Journal of Science, vol. 4, Feb. 2012. [cited by applicant]
Dick, C., et al.; “Predicting the Occurrence of Broken Rails: A Quantitative Approach”, Abstract. [cited by applicant]
http://ridgetopgroup.actonsoftware.com/acton/rif/2522; Ridgetop Group Announces New Products for Rail Safety Improvements; May 18, 2015; Ridgetop Group Inc. [cited by applicant]