Systems and methods for classifying electronic activities based on sender and recipient information
The system and methods described herein can classify electronic activities based on sender and recipient information. The system can determine a relationship between a sender of an electronic activity and at least one recipient of the electronic activity using a sender node profile and a recipient node profile. The system can assign a tag to the electronic activity based on the relationship between the sender and one or more recipients of the electronic activity. The system can process the electronic activity based on the assigned tag.
1. A method comprising:
maintaining, by one or more processors, a plurality of node profiles corresponding to a plurality of unique entities, each node profile including a plurality of fields, each field of the plurality of fields including one or more value data structures, each value data structure of one or more value data structures including a value and one or more entries corresponding to respective one or more data points that include the value of the value data structure, each entry corresponding to a data point identifying a source of the data point and a timestamp associated with the data point;
accessing, by the one or more processors, a plurality of electronic activities transmitted or received via electronic accounts associated with one or more data source providers, the one or more processors configured to update the plurality of node profiles using the plurality of electronic activities;
identifying, by the one or more processors, an electronic activity of the plurality of electronic activities to process, wherein the electronic activity is an electronic mail;
identifying, by the one or more processors, a node profile of the plurality of node profiles corresponding to a sender or a recipient of the electronic activity;
identifying, by the one or more processors, from the electronic activity, one or more values corresponding to one or more fields of the node profile;
updating, by the one or more processors, the node profile by adding, for each value of the one or more values of a respective field corresponding to one of a first name, a last name, a company name, or a title, in a value data structure corresponding to the value, an entry identifying the electronic activity that includes the value and a timestamp corresponding to the electronic activity;
determining, by the one or more processors, a relationship between a sender of the electronic activity and at least one recipient of one or more recipients of the electronic activity using the node profiles of the sender and the at least one recipient included in the plurality of node profiles;
assigning, by the one or more processors, a tag to the electronic activity based on the relationship between the sender and the one or more recipients; and
processing, by the one or more processors, the electronic activity based on the assigned tag.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
identifying, by the one or more processors, a data source provider of the electronic activity;
identifying, by the one or more processors, a system of record of the data source provider; and
selecting, by the one or more processors, one or more candidate record objects of the system of record with which to match the electronic activity based on the tag assigned to the electronic activity.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tag assigned based on the relationship between the sender and the at least one recipient is a first tag and further comprising assigning, by the one or more processors, a second tag based on one of i) information included in a first node profile of the sender of the electronic activity or a second node profile of the at least one recipient, or ii) information included in a signature block of the sender or the recipient.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
computing, by the one or more processors, for each value, a confidence score based on one or more electronic activities identified as entries of the value data structure corresponding to the value and their corresponding timestamps.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, by the one or more processors, that a system of record of a data source provider of the electronic activity identifies a first record object corresponding to a first entity;
determining, by the one or more processors, that one or more recipients of the electronic activity correspond to the first entity; and
assigning, by the one or more processors, a second tag to the electronic activity responsive to determining that the sender or one or more recipients of the electronic activity correspond to the first entity associated with the first record object, the second tag indicating that the electronic activity is a candidate for matching to a record object of the system of record.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, by the one or more processors, that the sender of the electronic activity belongs to an entity corresponding to a data source provider;
predicting, by the one or more processors, an amount of time the sender spent to draft the electronic activity based on a number of characters included in the electronic activity; and
assigning, by the one or more processors, a second tag to the electronic activity based on the predicted amount of time.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein predicting, by the one or more processors, the amount of time the sender spent to draft contents of the electronic activity is further based on a relationship between the sender and the one or more recipients of the electronic activity.
8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising determining, by the one or more processors, that the electronic activity is not to be classified as a blast electronic activity responsive to determining that no other previous or subsequent electronic activities sent by the sender within a predetermined time window satisfy a match condition with the electronic activity.
9. The method of claim 6 , wherein predicting, by the one or more processors, the amount of time the sender spent to draft contents of the electronic activity is further based on a language complexity algorithm.
10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
parsing, by the one or more processors, the electronic activity to determine whether to match the electronic activity to one or more record objects of a system of record corresponding to a data source provider; and
assigning, by the one or more processors, a tag indicating to match the electronic activity responsive to determining to match the electronic activity to at least one record object of the one or more record objects.
11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
assigning, by the one or more processors, a confidence score of the tag based on data included in the electronic activity;
identifying, by the one or more processors, a second electronic activity to process, the second electronic activity determined to be linked to a first node profile and a second node profile, the second electronic activity transmitted subsequent to a first electronic activity;
parsing, by the one or more processors, contents of the second electronic activity; and
updating, by the one or more processors, the confidence score of the tag assigned to the first electronic activity responsive to parsing the contents of the second electronic activity.
12. A system configured for managing an electronic activity, the system comprising:
one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions to:
maintain a plurality of node profiles corresponding to a plurality of unique entities, each node profile including a plurality of fields, each field of the plurality of fields including one or more value data structures, each value data structure of one or more value data structures including a value and one or more entries corresponding to respective one or more data points that include the value of the value data structure, each entry corresponding to a data point identifying a source of the data point and a timestamp associated with the data point;
access a plurality of electronic activities transmitted or received via electronic accounts associated with one or more data source providers, the one or more processors configured to update the plurality of node profiles using the plurality of electronic activities;
identify an electronic activity of the plurality of electronic activities to process, wherein the electronic activity is an electronic mail;
identify a node profile of the plurality of node profiles corresponding to a sender or a recipient of the electronic activity;
identify, from the electronic activity, one or more values corresponding to one or more fields of the node profile;
update the node profile by adding, for each value of the one or more values of a respective field corresponding to one of a first name, a last name, a company name, or a title, in a value data structure corresponding to the value, an entry identifying the electronic activity that includes the value and a timestamp corresponding to the electronic activity;
determine a relationship between a sender of the electronic activity and at least one recipient of one or more recipients of the electronic activity using the node profiles of the sender and the at least one recipient included in the plurality of node profiles;
assign a tag to the electronic activity based on the relationship between the sender and the one or more recipients; and
process the electronic activity based on the assigned tag.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more hardware processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to:
identify a data source provider of the electronic activity;
identify a system of record of the data source provider;
select one or more candidate record objects of the system of record with which to match the electronic activity based on the tag assigned to the electronic activity.
14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the tag assigned based on the relationship between the sender and the at least one recipient is a first tag and further comprising assigning a second tag based on one of information included in a first node profile of the sender of the electronic activity or a second node profile of the at least one recipient, or information included in a signature block of the sender or the recipient.
15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the information included in the first node profile of the sender of the electronic activity or the second node profile of the at least one recipient includes a value of a field corresponding to a title of the sender or the at least one recipient.
16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more hardware processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to:
determine that a system of record of a data source provider of the electronic activity identifies a first record object corresponding to a first entity;
determine that one or more recipients of the electronic activity correspond to the first entity;
assign a second tag to the electronic activity responsive to determining that the sender or one or more recipients of the electronic activity correspond to the first entity associated with the first record object, the second tag indicating that the electronic activity is a candidate for matching to a record object of the system of record.
17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the one or more hardware processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to:
determine that the sender of the electronic activity belongs to an entity corresponding to a data source provider;
predict an amount of time the sender spent to draft the electronic activity based on a number of characters included in the electronic activity;
assign a second tag to the electronic activity based on the predicted amount of time.
18. The system of claim 17 , wherein predicting the amount of time the sender spent to draft contents of the electronic activity is further based on a relationship between the sender and the one or more recipients of the electronic activity.
19. The system of claim 17 , wherein the one or more hardware processors are further configured by machine-readable instructions to determine that the electronic activity is not to be classified as a blast electronic activity responsive to determining that no other previous or subsequent electronic activities sent by the sender within a predetermined time window satisfy a match condition with the electronic activity.
20. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions embodied thereon, the instructions being executable by one or more processors to perform a method for managing an electronic activity, the method comprising:
maintaining a plurality of node profiles corresponding to a plurality of unique entities, each node profile including a plurality of fields, each field of the plurality of fields including one or more value data structures, each value data structure of one or more value data structures including a value and one or more entries corresponding to respective one or more data points that include the value of the value data structure, each entry corresponding to a data point identifying a source of the data point and a timestamp associated with the data point;
accessing a plurality of electronic activities transmitted or received via electronic accounts associated with one or more data source providers, the one or more processors configured to update the plurality of node profiles using the plurality of electronic activities;
identifying an electronic activity of the plurality of electronic activities to process, wherein the electronic activity is an electronic mail;
identifying a node profile of the plurality of node profiles corresponding to a sender or a recipient of the electronic activity;
identifying, from the electronic activity, one or more values corresponding to one or more fields of the node profile;
updating the node profile by adding, for each value of the one or more values of a respective field corresponding to one of a first name, a last name, a company name, or a title, in a value data structure corresponding to the value, an entry identifying the electronic activity that includes the value and a timestamp corresponding to the electronic activity;
determining a relationship between a sender of the electronic activity and at least one recipient of one or more recipients of the electronic activity using the node profiles of the sender and the at least one recipient included in the plurality of node profiles;
assigning a tag to the electronic activity based on the relationship between the sender and the one or more recipients; and
processing the electronic activity based on the assigned tag.