IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,545,262
Granted Patent B2
US 12,545,262 · App. 17/708,294 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

System and method for predicting driver situational awareness

Inventors: Teruhisa Misu (San Jose, CA); Kumar Akash (Milpitas, CA)
Assignee: Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
B60W40/08B60W60/0051B60W2540/225B60W2540/229B60W2554/404B60W2554/406
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,545,262
App. No.
17/708,294
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for predicting a driver's situational awareness that includes receiving driving scene data associated with a driving scene of an ego vehicle and eye gaze data to track a driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to the driving scene. The system and method also include analyzing the eye gaze data and determining an eye gaze fixation value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene and analyzing the driving scene data and determining a situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene that is based on a salience, effort, expectancy, and a cost value associated with each of the objects within the driving scene. The system and method further include communicating control signals to electronically control at least one component based on the situational awareness probability value and the eye gaze fixation value.

Claims (35)

1 . A computer-implemented method for predicting a driver's situational awareness comprising:

receiving driving scene data associated with a driving scene of an ego vehicle and eye gaze data to track a driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to the driving scene;

analyzing the eye gaze data and determining an eye gaze fixation value for each and every object that is located within the driving scene based on an eye gaze fixation time for each of the objects within the driving scene, wherein determining the eye gaze fixation value includes establishing a global range of eye gaze fixation times for all objects within the driving scene, the global range comprising a global minimum and maximum fixation time across the objects present in the driving scene, computing the eye gaze fixation value for each of the objects within the driving scene by scaling that object's eye gaze fixation time with respect to the global range, and assigning a zero eye gaze fixation value to each object in the driving scene that is not intersected by the driver's gaze, thereby ensuring that all objects are represented in the comparative analysis;

analyzing the driving scene data and determining a situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene that is based on a salience, effort, expectancy, and a cost value associated with each of the objects within the driving scene; and

communicating control signals to electronically control at least one component of the ego vehicle based on the situational awareness probability value and the eye gaze fixation value associated with each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the eye gaze data and determining the eye gaze fixation value includes extracting eye gaze coordinates from the eye gaze data and analyzing the driving scene data and the eye gaze coordinates that are associated with matching time steps to identify a correspondence between various portions of the driving scene and the driver's eye gaze behavior.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein analyzing the eye gaze data and determining the eye gaze fixation value includes analyzing time coordinates associated with the eye gaze fixation time of the driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to different portions of the driving scene and labeling each object with the eye gaze fixation time of the driver's eye gaze behavior that are included within respective different portions of the driving scene, wherein the eye gaze fixation value is determined as a numerical value that pertains to a labeled eye gaze fixation time with respect to each object, and

the eye gaze fixation value and the situational awareness probability value are aggregated to process a driver object awareness value which pertains to the driver's eye gaze fixation time and a predicted level of situational awareness that the driver of the ego vehicle has with respect to each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein analyzing the driving scene data and determining the situational awareness probability value includes analyzing the driving scene data at a respective timeframe at which eye gaze fixations of the driver have been captured to extract object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene include at least one of: object contrast, object movement, object relevance, object priority, object size, and object proximity.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining a salience level that is related to the salience associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the salience level pertains to at least one of: a likelihood that each object captures an attention of the driver of the ego vehicle and a product of object contrast of each object against a background of the driving scene.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining an expectancy level that is related to the expectancy associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the expectancy level pertains to at least one of: a respective position of each object as compared to a respective position of the ego vehicle and a product of an eye gaze fixation of the driver of the ego vehicle at a particular point in time with respect to each object.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining an effort level that is related to the effort associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the effort level pertains to at least one of: a level of effort that is involved with respect to the driver of the ego vehicle attending to various objects that are located within the driving scene and an object density of the driving scene.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining the cost value associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the cost value is representative of cost of missing information associated with each object that is based on at least one of: a classification of each object and a potential likelihood of overlap between a projected path of each respective object and a projected path of the ego vehicle.

10 . A system for predicting a driver's situational awareness comprising:

a memory storing instructions when executed by a processor cause the processor to:

receive driving scene data associated with a driving scene of an ego vehicle and eye gaze data to track a driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to the driving scene;

analyze the eye gaze data and determining an eye gaze fixation value for each and every object that is located within the driving scene based on an eye gaze fixation time for each of the objects within the driving scene, wherein determining the eye gaze fixation value includes establishing a global range of eye gaze fixation times for all objects within the driving scene, the global range comprising a global minimum and maximum fixation time across the objects present in the driving scene, computing the eye gaze fixation value for each of the objects within the driving scene by scaling that object's eye gaze fixation time with respect to the global range, and assigning a zero eye gaze fixation value to each object in the driving scene that is not intersected by the driver's gaze, thereby ensuring that all objects are represented in the comparative analysis;

analyze the driving scene data and determining a situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene that is based on a salience, effort, expectancy, and a cost value associated with each of the objects within the driving scene; and

communicate control signals to electronically control at least one component of the ego vehicle based on the situational awareness probability value and the eye gaze fixation value associated with each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.

11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein analyzing the eye gaze data and determining the eye gaze fixation value includes extracting eye gaze coordinates from the eye gaze data and analyzing the driving scene data and the eye gaze coordinates that are associated with matching time steps to identify a correspondence between various portions of the driving scene and the driver's eye gaze behavior.

12 . The system of claim 11 , wherein analyzing the eye gaze data and determining the eye gaze fixation value includes analyzing time coordinates associated with the eye gaze fixation time of the driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to different portions of the driving scene and labeling each object with the eye gaze fixation time of the driver's eye gaze behavior that are included within respective different portions of the driving scene, wherein the eye gaze fixation value is determined as a numerical value that pertains to a labeled eye gaze fixation time with respect to each object, and

the eye gaze fixation value and the situational awareness probability value are aggregated to process a driver object awareness value which pertains to the driver's eye gaze fixation time and a predicted level of situational awareness that the driver of the ego vehicle has with respect to each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.

13 . The system of claim 10 , wherein analyzing the driving scene data and determining the situational awareness probability value includes analyzing the driving scene data at a respective timeframe at which eye gaze fixations of the driver have been captured to extract object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene.

14 . The system of claim 13 , wherein the object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene include at least one of: object contrast, object movement, object relevance, object priority, object size, and object proximity.

15 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining a salience level that is related to the salience associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the salience level pertains to at least one of: a likelihood that each object captures an attention of the driver of the ego vehicle and a product of object contrast of each object against a background of the driving scene.

16 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining an expectancy level that is related to the expectancy associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the expectancy level pertains to at least one of: a respective position of each object as compared to a respective position of the ego vehicle and a product of an eye gaze fixation of the driver of the ego vehicle at a particular point in time with respect to each object.

17 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining an effort level that is related to the effort associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the effort level pertains to at least one of: a level of effort that is involved with respect to the driver of the ego vehicle attending to various objects that are located within the driving scene and an object density of the driving scene.

18 . The system of claim 14 , wherein determining the situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene includes determining the cost value associated with each of the objects based on an analysis of the object property-based features, wherein the cost value is representative of cost of missing information associated with each object that is based on at least one of: a classification of each object and a potential likelihood of overlap between a projected path of each respective object and a projected path of the ego vehicle.

19 . A non-transitory computer readable storage medium storing instructions that when executed by a computer, which includes a processor performs a method, the method comprising:

receiving driving scene data associated with a driving scene of an ego vehicle and eye gaze data to track a driver's eye gaze behavior with respect to the driving scene;

analyzing the eye gaze data and determining an eye gaze fixation value for each and every object that is located within the driving scene that is based on an eye gaze fixation time for each of the objects within the driving scene, wherein determining the eye gaze fixation value includes establishing a global range of eye gaze fixation times for all objects within the driving scene, the global range comprising a global minimum and maximum fixation time across the objects present in the driving scene, computing the eye gaze fixation value for each of the objects within the driving scene by scaling that object's eye gaze fixation time with respect to the global range, and assigning a zero eye gaze fixation value to each object in the driving scene that is not intersected by the driver's gaze, thereby ensuring that all objects are represented in the comparative analysis;

analyzing the driving scene data and determining a situational awareness probability value associated with each object that is located within the driving scene that is based on a salience, effort, expectancy, and a cost value associated with each of the objects within the driving scene; and

communicating control signals to electronically control at least one component of the ego vehicle based on the situational awareness probability value and the eye gaze fixation value associated with each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.

20 . The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 19 , wherein analyzing the driving scene data and determining the situational awareness probability value includes analyzing the driving scene data at a respective timeframe at which eye gaze fixations of the driver have been captured to extract object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene, wherein the object property-based features associated with each object located within the driving scene include at least one of: object contrast, object movement, object relevance, object priority, object size, and object proximity.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2022
From: MISU, TERUHISA; AKASH, KUMAR
To: HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 059441/0037 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63309178 · Feb 11, 2022
Related Publication 20230256973A1 · Aug 17, 2023
References Cited (28)
US 20210053586A1 · Domeyer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220032938A1 · Liu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220155857A1 · Lee · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220206575A1 · Zhao · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220327840A1 · Ambeck-Madsen · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230133891A1 · Lu · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Feuerstack, A model-driven tool for getting insights into car drivers' monitoring behavior, Jun. 1, 2017 (Year: 2017). [cited by examiner]
John R Anderson, Daniel Bothell, Michael D Byrne, Scott Douglass, Christian Lebiere, and Yulin Qin. 2004. An Integrated theory of the mind. Psychological review 111, 4 (2004), 1036. [cited by applicant]
John R Anderson, Michael Matessa, and Christian Lebiere. 1997. ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention. Human-Computer Interaction 12, 4 (1997), 439-462. [cited by applicant]
Shi Cao, Yulin Qin, Lei Zhao, and Mowei Shen. 2015. Modeling the development of vehicle lateral control skills in a cognitive architecture. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 32 (2015), 1-1… [cited by applicant]
Arindam Das and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2010. Proactive interference in location learning: A new closed-form approximation. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on cognitive modeling. Citeseer, 37-42. [cited by applicant]
Mica R Endsley. 1995. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human factors 37, 1 (1995), 32-64. [cited by applicant]
Mica R Endsley. 2017. Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In Situational awareness. Routledge, 129-156. [cited by applicant]
Mica R Endsley. 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct objective measures of situation awareness: a comparison of SAGAT and SPAM. Human factors 63, 1 (2021), 124-150. [cited by applicant]
Brian F Gore, Becky L Hooey, Christopher D Wickens, and Shelly Scott-Nash. 2009. A computational implementation of a human attention guiding mechanism in MIDAS v5. In International conference on digital human modeling. … [cited by applicant]
William J Horrey, Christopher D Wickens, and Kyle P Consalus. 2006. Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12, 2 (2006),… [cited by applicant]
Robert JK Jacob and Keith S Karn. 2003. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Ready to deliver the promises. In The mind's eye. Elsevier, 573-605. [cited by applicant]
Zhenji Lu, Xander Coster, and Joost De Winter. 2017. How much time do drivers need to obtain situation awareness? A laboratory-based study of automated driving. Applied ergonomics 60 (2017), 293-304. [cited by applicant]
Jason S McCarley, Christopher D Wickens, Juliana Goh, and William J Horrey. 2002. A computational model of attention/situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 4… [cited by applicant]
Umair Rehman, Shi Cao, and Carolyn MacGregor. 2019. Using an Integrated Cognitive Architecture to Model the Effect of Environmental Complexity on Drivers' Situation Awareness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Erg… [cited by applicant]
Dario D Salvucci. 2006. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human factors 48, 2 (2006), 362-380. [cited by applicant]
Chris R Sims and Wayne D Gray. 2004. Episodic versus Semantic Memory: An Exploration of Models of Memory Decay in the Serial Attention Paradigm. In ICCM. 279-284. [cited by applicant]
Christopher D Wickens, Juliana Goh, John Helleberg, William J Horrey, and Donald A Talleur. 2003. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology. Human factors 45, 3 (2003), 360-380. [cited by applicant]
Steven Yantis. 1993. Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2, 5 (1993), 156-161. [cited by applicant]
Haibei Zhu, Teruhisa Misu, Sujitha Martin, Xingwei Wu, and Kumar Akash. 2021. Improving Driver Situation Awareness Prediction using Human Visual Sensory and Memory Mechanism. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on… [cited by applicant]
Hyungil Kim and Joseph L Gabbard. 2019. Assessing distraction potential of augmented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers. Human factors (2019), 0018720819844845. [cited by applicant]
Hyungil Kim, Sujitha Martin, Ashish Tawari, Teruhisa Misu, and Joseph L Gabbard. 2020. Toward Real-Time Estimation of Driver Situation Awareness: An Eye-tracking Approach based on Moving Objects of Interest. In 2020 IEE… [cited by applicant]
Richard M Taylor. 2017. Situational awareness rating technique (SART): The development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In Situational awareness. Routledge, 111-128. [cited by applicant]