Hierarchical adaptive closed-loop fluid resuscitation and cardiovascular drug administration system
The present disclosure describes a closed-loop fluid resuscitation and/or cardiovascular drug administration system that uses continuous measurements and adaptive control architecture. The adaptive control architecture uses a function approximator to identify unknown dynamics and physiological parameters of a patient to compute appropriate infusion rates and to regulate the endpoint of resuscitation.
1. A method for fluid and/or cardiovascular drug administration, the method comprising:
receiving by way of a user interface at least one initial infusion rate;
receiving from a sensor hemodynamic measurements of a subject by a hierarchical control architecture system;
wherein the hierarchical control architecture system comprises:
at least one lower-level controller; and
a higher-level logic controller;
wherein the subject's hemodynamic measurements are received by the higher-level logic controller and the at least one lower-level controller;
wherein the at least one lower-level controller and the higher-level logic controller are in communication with one another; and
wherein the at least one lower-level controller has an internal dynamical system model that adapts to a dynamical system model of the subject;
initializing parameters of the internal dynamical system model of the at least one lower-level controller based at least in part on the at least one initial infusion rate such that the lower-level controller generates an infusion rate equal to the at least one initial infusion rate;
generating a new infusion rate by the lower-level controller at set time intervals based at least in part on the hemodynamic measurements and the parameters of the internal dynamical system model of the at least one lower-level controller;
notifying the user and disengaging the at least one lower-level controller if at least one infusion therapy performance criterion is violated by dropping below or exceeding a set threshold; and
administering the fluid and/or cardiovascular drug at the new infusion rate to the subject.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein violation of the at least one infusion therapy performance criterion is determined by comparing the set threshold with the difference between the hemodynamic measurements of the subject and target hemodynamic data in a set time interval.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the internal dynamical system model of the at least one lower-level controller uses a function approximator comprising a set of basis functions and a set of weights to approximate an unknown function describing distribution of the fluid and/or drug in the body of the subject.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the function approximator is a neural network with sigmoidal basis functions.
5. The method of claim 3 , wherein at least one element of the set of weights is reset to a new value if the new infusion rate falls outside the safe range.
6. The method of claim 1 :
wherein the at least one lower-level controller comprises a first lower-level controller initially engaged by the higher-level controller; and
wherein the higher-level controller automatically engages a second lower-level controller when at least one infusion therapy performance criterion, which is a patient-related infusion therapy performance criterion, is violated.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the patient-related infusion therapy performance criterion comprises improvement in hemodynamic measurements of the subject while administering one or more fluid or cardiovascular drug.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the internal dynamical system model adapts to the dynamical system model of the subject by updating the parameters of the internal dynamical system of the at least one lower-level controller based at least in part on current values of the parameters of the internal dynamical system of the at least one lower-level controller and the hemodynamic measurements of the subject.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the higher-level logic controller verifies that the new infusion rate is in a safe range specified by the user and if not the higher-level logic controller changes at least one parameter of the internal dynamical system model of the at least one lower-level controller.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hierarchical control architecture system further comprises a second lower-level controller, wherein the first lower-level controller is initially engaged through the higher-level controller, wherein the higher-level controller recommends additional engagement of the second lower-level controller when at least one of the infusion therapy performance criterion is violated.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hemodynamic measurement of the subject comprises the subject's blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume variation, urine output rate, urine output, central venous pressure, pulse pressure variation, dynamic arterial elastance, systolic pressure variation, mean arterial pressure, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, cardiac output, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, or stroke volume.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the violation of the at least one infusion therapy performance criterion is determined by:
a) comparing the rate of change of the parameters of the internal dynamical system model of the at the last one lower-level controller with the set threshold; and/or
b) observing a sustained increase in infusion rate without improvements in the subject's fluid resuscitation, hemodynamic, or cardiovascular status as measured by hemodynamic measurements.