IP Library Granted Patent US 12,272,850
Granted Patent B2
US 12,272,850 · App. 17/740,128 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Mediated metal-sulfur flow battery for grid-scale energy storage

Inventors: Leo J. Small (Albuquerque, NM); Melissa Lynn Meyerson (Albuquerque, NM)
Assignee: National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
H01M8/188H01M4/366H01M4/381H01M4/382H01M4/62H01M4/96H01M12/08H01M4/0445
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,272,850
App. No.
17/740,128
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention is directed to a mediated metal-sulfur flow battery. This battery format that is readily scalable to grid-scale levels at low cost, while maintaining battery safety by physically separating the anode and cathode. As an example, the marriage of a redox-targeting scheme to an engineered Li solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) enables a scalable, high efficiency, membrane-less Li—S redox flow battery. Redox mediators can be sued to kick-start the initial reduction of solid S into soluble polysulfides on the cathode side and final reduction of polysulfides into solid Li 2 S, precluding the need for conductive carbons. On the anode side, a LiI and LiNO 3 pretreatment and additive strategy encourages a stable SEI and lessens capacity fade, avoiding the need for ion-selective separators.

Claims (20)

1. A mediated metal-sulfur flow battery, comprising:

a catholyte reservoir for storing an energy storage material comprising sulfur;

an electrochemical cell comprising

a metal anode, and

a cathode compartment comprising a cathode electrode and a catholyte comprising a first redox mediator and a second redox mediator, wherein the first and second redox mediators comprise metallocenes, and a salt of the anode metal ion in a solvent;

a solid-electrolyte interface on the metal anode that allows passage of metal ions while preventing passage of the first and second redox mediators; and

a pump or a gravity feed for flowing the catholyte through the catholyte reservoir and the electrochemical cell,

wherein the first redox mediator is oxidized and correspondingly reduces sulfur in the catholyte reservoir, and the oxidized first redox mediator is reduced at the cathode electrode during a discharge cycle; and wherein the second redox mediator is oxidized at the cathode electrode, and the oxidized second redox mediator is reduced and correspondingly oxidizes the reduced sulfur in the catholyte reservoir during a charge cycle.

2. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the metal anode comprises lithium.

3. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 2 , wherein the solid-electrolyte interface is preconditioned in a solution comprising lithium iodide.

4. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 2 , wherein the salt comprises bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide.

5. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 2 , wherein the catholyte further comprises lithium nitrate.

6. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the metal anode comprises sodium, potassium, magnesium, or calcium.

7. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the cathode electrode comprises porous carbon, carbon paper, or carbon felt.

8. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the first redox mediator comprises cobaltocene and the second redox mediator comprises decamethylferrocene.

9. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the concentration of each of the redox mediators in the solvent is less than 1000 mM.

10. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the concentration of each of the redox mediators in the solvent is less than 100 mM.

11. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the redox potentials of the first and second redox mediators are within 500 mV of the redox potential of sulfur.

12. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the solvent comprises a mixture of 1,3-dioxolane and dimethyl ether.

13. The mediated metal-sulfur flow battery of claim 1 , wherein the solvent comprises a glyme, ionic liquid, or carbonate-based electrolyte.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 4, 2025
From: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
To: NNSA
Reel/Frame 071312/0443 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2023
From: SMALL, LEO J.; MEYERSON, MELISSA LYNN
To: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
Reel/Frame 062530/0875 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jan 13, 2023
From: NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA, LLC
To: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Reel/Frame 062367/0032 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63224151 · Jul 21, 2021
Related Publication 20230033611A1 · Feb 2, 2023
References Cited (15)
Meini, S. et al., “The Use of Redox Mediators for Enhancing Utilization of Li [cited by applicant]
Yu, J. et al., “Redox Targeting-Based Aqueous Redox Flow Lithium Battery,” ACS Energy Letters, 2018, vol. 3, pp. 2314-2320. [cited by applicant]
Li, Z. et al., “Air-Breathing Aqueous Sulfur Flow Battery for Ultralow-Cost Long-Duration Electrical Storage,” Joule, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 306-327. [cited by applicant]
Self, E. C. et al., “Ambient Temperature Sodium Polysulfide Catholyte for Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries,” Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2021, vol. 168, 080540, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gross, M. M. and Manthiram, A., “Rechargeable Zinc-Aqueous Polysulfide Battery with a Mediator-Ion Solid Electrolyte,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2018, vol. 10, pp. 10612-10617. [cited by applicant]
Gross, M. M. and Manthiram, A., “Long-Life Polysulfide-Polyhalide Batteries with a Mediator-Ion Solid Electrolyte,” ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 3445-3451. [cited by applicant]
Yang, Y. et al., “A Membrane-Free Lithium/Polysulfide Semi-Liquid Battery for Large-Scale Energy Storage,” Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 1552-1558. [cited by applicant]
Meyerson, M. L. et al., “Recent Developments in Dendrite-Free Lithium-Metal Deposition through Tailoring of Micro- and Nanoscale Artificial Coatings,” ACS Nano, 2021, vol. 15, pp. 29-46. [cited by applicant]
Meyerson, M. L. et al., “The Effect of Local Lithium Surface Chemistry and Topography on Solid Electrolyte Interphase Composition and Dendrite Nucleation,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, vol. 7, pp. 14882-14894. [cited by applicant]
Wang, Y. et al., “High-Capacity Lithium Sulfur Battery and Beyond: A Review of Metal Anode Protection Layers and Perspective of Solid-State Electrolytes,” Journal of Materials Science, 2018, vol. 54, pp. 3671-3693. [cited by applicant]
Rodriguez, R. et al., “Separator-Free and Concentrated LiNO [cited by applicant]
Wu, F. et al., “Lithium Iodide as a Promising Electrolyte Additive for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Mechanisms of Performance Enhancement,” Advanced Materials, 2015, vol. 27, pp. 101-108. [cited by applicant]
Li, J. et al., “The Application of Redox Targeting Principles to the Design of Rechargeable Li-S Flow Batteries,” Advanced Energy Materials, 2015, vol. 5, 1501808, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li, J. et al., “Combined Mediator and Electrochemical Charging and Discharging of Redox Targeting Lithium-Sulfur Flow Batteries,” Materials Today Energy, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 15-21. [cited by applicant]
Zhang. S. et al., “Recent Progress in Polysulfide Redox-Flow Batteries,” Batteries & Supercaps, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 627-637. [cited by applicant]