IP Library Granted Patent US 12,272,462
Granted Patent B2
US 12,272,462 · App. 17/745,983 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

System and methods for transitioning patient care from signal based monitoring to risk based monitoring

Inventors: Dimitar V. Baronov (Weston, MA); Evan J. Butler (New Haven, CT); Jesse M. Lock (Winchester, MA); Michael F. McManus (Pembroke, MA)
Assignee: Etiometry Inc.
G16H50/30G16H50/20G16H50/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,272,462
App. No.
17/745,983
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A risk-based patient monitoring system for critical care patients combines data from multiple sources to assess the current and the future risks to the patient, thereby enabling providers to review a current patient risk profile and to continuously track a clinical trajectory. A physiology observer module in the system utilizes multiple measurements to estimate Probability Density Functions (PDF) of a number of Internal State Variables (ISVs) that describe a components of the physiology relevant to the patient treatment and condition. A clinical trajectory interpreter module in the system utilizes the estimated PDFs of ISVs to identify under which probable patient states the patient can be currently categorized and assign a probability value that the patient will be in each of the identified states. The combination of patient states and their probabilities is defined as the clinical risk to the patient.

Claims (54)

1. A risk-based monitoring system for transforming measured data of a patient into hidden internal state data that is not directly measurable with sensors, the hidden internal state being monitored by the system, the system comprising:

a processor;

a memory coupled to the processor;

a display operably coupled to the processor;

a data reception module, the data reception module having a set of inputs for a plurality of sensors, the plurality of sensors being couplable to the patient, wherein the plurality of sensors provide, to the data reception module, data associated with a corresponding plurality of internal state variables m s , S=1, . . . , n, over a series of time steps t k , K=0, 1, . . . Z, each internal state variable m s characterizing a parameter physiologically relevant to at least one of a treatment and a condition of the patient;

a physiology observer module, in communication with the data reception module, the physiology observer module configured to

update, via a first and second computer processes, the data provided by the sensors to the data reception module, wherein:

the first computer process generates a conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables m s at time t k , the conditional likelihood kernel comprising a set of probability density functions, each such probability density function being for a distinct internal state variable m s at time t k ; and

the second computer process generates posterior predicted conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k given the conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables at time t k and a predicted conditional probability density function of each of the internal state variables for time t k ; and

a clinical trajectory interpreter module, in communication with the physiology observer module, configured to determine, based on the generated posterior predicted conditional probability density functions of the internal state variables m s at time step t k , a set of possible states of a hidden internal state variable; and

a user interaction module configured to:

generate, for display on the display device, a plurality of graphical indicators, each of the plurality of graphical indicators corresponding to one of the states of the set of possible states of the hidden internal state variable, each of the plurality of graphical indicators graphically identifying the probability that the hidden internal state variable is in a corresponding state at a given point in a range of time.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the user interaction module is further configured to:

generate for display, on the display device, a clinical trajectory of the patient based on the conditional probability density function of the hidden internal state variable over at least some of the series of time steps.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the physiology observer module compares a newly received measurement associated with an internal state variable m s at time t k with a predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements given previously received measurements, and does not generate a conditional probability density function for the associated internal state variable m s , if the newly received measurement is not within the predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements for the associated internal state variable m s .

4. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a timeline controller configured to allow a user to dynamically select a plurality of points in time over the series of time steps t k , the graphical indicators changing dynamically in response to a specification by the user of one of the plurality of points in time to display the evolution of the hidden internal state variable.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the physiology observer module is further configured to generate, at time step t k , a predicted conditional probability density function for each of the internal state variables m s for time t k+1 based on the posterior predicted probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k .

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the conditional probability density functions for the time step t k+1 are generated using the posterior conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables ms from a preceding time step t k , using the formula:

P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| M ( t k ))=∫ ISVs∈ISV P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| ISVs ( t k )) P ( ISVs ( t k )| M ( t k )) dISVs.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the second computer process generates posterior predicted conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k given the conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables at time tk and a predicted conditional probability density function of each of the internal state variables for time t k using Bayes theorem.

8. A method of transforming measured data of a patient into hidden internal state data which is not directly measurable with sensors, the method comprising:

providing a plurality of sensors, the plurality of sensors being configured to be physically attachable with the patient;

attaching the plurality of sensors to the patient;

substantially continuously acquiring, by a computer, from the plurality of sensors connected with the patient, physiological data associated with a corresponding plurality of internal state variables m s , S=1, . . . n, over a series of time steps t k , K=0, 1, . . . Z;

generating, by the computer, a conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables m s at time t k , the conditional likelihood kernel comprising a set of probability density functions of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k , each of the internal state variables describing a parameter physiologically relevant to at least one of a treatment and a condition of said patient at time step t k ;

generating, with the computer, posterior predicted conditional probability density functions for the plurality of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k given the conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables m s at time t k and predicted probability density functions of each of the internal state variables m s for time step t k ; and

identifying, with the computer, from the generated posterior predicted conditional probability density functions of the internal state variables ms at time step t k , a set of possible states of a hidden internal state variable;

generating a probability value associated with the hidden internal state; and

generating, for display on a graphical user interface, a clinical trajectory of the patient, the user interface being configured to display the probability of the hidden internal state variable as function of a plurality of time steps.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the probability value associated with the hidden internal state variable indicates risk that the patient's oxygen delivery is inadequate and the patient may be in a state of shock.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

comparing a newly received measurement associated with an internal state variable m s at time t k with a predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements given previously received measurements, and not generating a conditional probability density function for the associated internal state variable m s , if the newly received measurement is not within the predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements for the associated internal state variable m s .

11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

providing, for display on a graphical user interface, a timeline controller configured to allow a user to dynamically select a plurality of points in time over the series of time steps t k , the graphical indicators changing dynamically in response to a specification by the user of one of the plurality of points in time to display the evolution of the internal state variable.

12. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

generating, at time step t k , a predicted conditional probability density function for each of the internal state variables m s for time t k+1 based on the posterior predicted probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k .

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the conditional probability density functions for the time step t k+1 are generated using the posterior conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s from a preceding time step t k , using the formula:

P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| M ( t k ))=∫ ISVs∈ISV P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| ISVs ( t k )) P ( ISVs ( t k )| M ( t k )) dISVs.

14. A computer program product for use on a computer system for transforming measured data of a patient into hidden internal state variable data, which hidden internal state variable data is not directly measurable with sensors, the computer program product comprising a tangible, non-transitory computer readable medium having computer-readable program code thereon, the computer-readable program code comprising:

program code for causing the computer to receive, from a plurality of sensors coupled to a patient, data associated with a corresponding plurality of internal state variables m s , S=1, . . . , n, over a series of time steps t k , K=0, 1, . . . . Z, each internal state variable m s characterizing a parameter physiologically relevant to at least one of a treatment and a condition of the patient;

program code for causing the computer to update, via a first and second computer processes, the data provided by the sensors to the data reception module, wherein:

the first computer process generates a conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables m s at time t k , the conditional likelihood kernel comprising a set of probability density functions, each such probability density function being for a distinct internal state variable m s at time t k ; and

the second computer process generates posterior predicted conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k given the conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables at time t k and a predicted conditional probability density function of each of the internal state variables for time t k ;

program code for causing the computer to determine, based on the generated posterior predicted conditional probability density functions of the internal state variables m s at time step t k , a set of possible states of a hidden internal state variable; and

program code for causing the computer to generate, for display on a display device, a plurality of graphical indicators, each of the plurality of graphical indicators corresponding to one of the states of the set of possible states of the hidden internal state variable, each of the plurality of graphical indicators graphically identifying the probability that the hidden internal state variable is in a corresponding state at a given point in a range of time.

15. The computer program product of claim 14 , further comprising program code for causing the computer to generate, for display on the display device, a clinical trajectory of the patient based on the conditional probability density function of the hidden internal state variable over at least some of the series of time steps.

16. The computer program product of claim 14 , wherein the program code for causing the computer to update the data provided by the sensors includes:

program code for causing the computer to generate to compare a newly received measurement associated with an internal state variable m s at time t k with a predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements given previously received measurements, and to not generate a conditional probability density function for the associated internal state variable m s , if the newly received measurement is not within the predetermined predicted likelihood of probable measurements for the associated internal state variable m s .

17. The computer program product of claim 14 , further comprising program code for causing the computer to display a timeline controller configured to allow a user to dynamically select a plurality of points in time over the series of time steps t k , the graphical indicators changing dynamically in response to a specification by the user of one of the plurality of points in time to display the evolution of the hidden internal state variable.

18. The computer program product of claim 14 , further comprising program code for causing the computer to generate, at time step t k , a predicted conditional probability density function for each of the internal state variables m s for time t k+1 based on the posterior predicted probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k .

19. The computer program product of claim 18 , wherein the conditional probability density functions for the time step t k+1 are generated using the posterior conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s from a preceding time step t k , using the formula:

P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| M ( t k ))=∫ ISVs∈ISV P ( ISVs ( t k+1 )| ISVs ( t k )) P ( ISVs ( t k )| M ( t k )) dISVs.

20. The computer program product of claim 14 , wherein the second computer process generates posterior predicted conditional probability density functions for each of the internal state variables m s for the time step t k given the conditional likelihood kernel for the internal state variables at time t k and a predicted conditional probability density function of each of the internal state variables for time t k using Bayes theorem.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2025
From: ETIOMETRY INC.
To: ESCALATE CAPITAL V, LP
Reel/Frame 071974/0584 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2022
From: BARONOV, DIMITAR V.; BUTLER, EVAN J.; LOCK, JESSE M.; MCMANUS, MICHAEL F.
To: ETIOMETRY INC.
Reel/Frame 060232/0333 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation 17064248 · Oct 6, 2020
Continuation 16113486 · Aug 27, 2018
Continuation 14727696 · Jun 1, 2015
Continuation 13826441 · Mar 14, 2013
Continuation In Part 13689029 · Nov 29, 2012
Continuation In Part 13328411 · Dec 16, 2011
Provisional Application 61774274 · Mar 7, 2013
Provisional Application 61727820 · Nov 19, 2012
Provisional Application 61699492 · Sep 11, 2012
Provisional Application 61684241 · Aug 17, 2012
Provisional Application 61620144 · Apr 4, 2012
Provisional Application 61614846 · Mar 23, 2012
Provisional Application 61614861 · Mar 23, 2012
Related Publication 20220310266A1 · Sep 29, 2022
References Cited (106)
US 5595181A · Hubbard · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6067466A · Selker et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7149756B1 · Schmitt et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7590550B2 · Schoenberg · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 10062456B2 · Baronov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10490309B1 · McNair · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20020035315A1 · Ali et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077863A1 · Rutledge et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020099686A1 · Schwartz et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030050568A1 · Green et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030065535A1 · Karlov · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030233250A1 · Joffe et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040064357A1 · Hunter et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040078232A1 · Troiani · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040097460A1 · Ivey et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040158132A1 · Zaleski · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040199332A1 · Iliff · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040230105A1 · Geva et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050010444A1 · Iliff · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050240444A1 · Wooten et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060064396A1 · Wei et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060167722A1 · MRF Struys et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060265249A1 · Follis et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060289020A1 · Tabak et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070010723A1 · Uutela et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070031902A1 · Pestano et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070055552A1 · St. Clair et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070185391A1 · Morgan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070239043A1 · Patel et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070239409A1 · Alan · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070260285A1 · Libbus et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080147763A1 · Levin · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080172214A1 · Col et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080208631A1 · Morita et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080228531A1 · Kenedy et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080235057A1 · Weidenhaupt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080300449A1 · Gerber et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090125333A1 · Heywood et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090300417A1 · Bonissone et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100057490A1 · Kocis et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100070300A1 · Anderson et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100198101A1 · Song et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100205138A1 · Zhang et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100324437A1 · Freeman · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110004071A1 · Faiola et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110010197A1 · Schoenberg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110112380A1 · Robinson · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110119212A1 · De Bruin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110125046A1 · Burton et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276342A1 · Kazmierczak · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110306845A1 · Osorio · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120022336A1 · Teixeira · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120123232A1 · Najarian et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120130743A1 · Gotthardt et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130054264A1 · Baronov et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130185096A1 · Giusti et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130231949A1 · Baronov et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130253348A1 · Tremper · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130317378A1 · Krivitski et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140046683A1 · Michelson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140352697A1 · Lee et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150006088A1 · Eshelman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150347704A1 · Baronov et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170281051A1 · Evans et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180169335A1 · Baronov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180344919A1 · Jones et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210090742A1 · Baronov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210104328A1 · Baronov et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220293279A1 · Baronov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 765134B1 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 3499513A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013536971A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
RU 2345705C2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
RU 2442531C2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 199909887A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2008036212A2 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
WO 2009103156A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012033771A2 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011156587A3 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Rose, Cedric, “A Dynamic Bayesian Network for Handling Uncertainty in a Decision Support System Adapted to the Monitoring of Patients Treated by Hemodialysis,” HAL Open Science, Oct. 21, 2005 (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
Barnea et al., Balancing the Circulation: Theoretic Optimization of Pulmonary/Systemic Flow Ratio in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, JACC vol. 24, No. 5, Nov. 1, 1994, pp. 1376-1381. (Year: 1994), 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Checchia et. al., The Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Perspective on Hemodynamic Monitoring of Oxygen Transport Balance, Pediat. Crit. Care Med. 2011, vol. 12, No. 14 (Suppl), pp. S69-S71. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in European Patent Application No. 13764131.2, 14 pages, dated Sep. 29, 2016. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Supplemental Search Report—Application No. EP 137641131, 10 pages, dated Oct. 21, 2015. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report for Application No. 20187516.8 issued Nov. 26, 2020 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ghanayem et al., Home Monitoring of Infants After Stage One Palliation for Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome, Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Annual of the Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 7, 2004: pp. 32-3… [cited by applicant]
Harle et al, Information Visualization for Chronic Disease Risk Assessment, AI & Health, IEEE Computer Society, Nov./Dec. 2012, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority; Authorized Officer: M. Smirnov, International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/ US2013/031512, dated Jul. 11, 2013, together with the Written Opinion of the Internationa… [cited by applicant]
International Searching Authority; International Search Report—International Application No. PCT/ US2020/052903, dated Dec. 23, 2020, together with the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Patent Office, Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-503307, 6 pages with translation, dated Feb. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Leach et al., The pulmonary physician in critical care c 2: Oxygen delivery and consumption in the critically ill, Thorax 2002; 57:170-177 (Year: 2002). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., Profiles of hemodynamics and oxygen transport derived by using continuous measured oxygen consumption after the Norwood, procedure, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery—vol. 133, No. 2 (2007) (Y… [cited by applicant]
McMahon et al., “Comparison of non-invasive and invasive blood pressure in aeromedical care,” Anaesthesia 2012, 67, pp. 1343-1347. [cited by applicant]
Moons et al., Limitations of Sensitivity, Specificity, Likelihood Ratio, and Bayes' Theorem in Assessing Diagnostic Probabilities: A Clinic Example, Epidemiology, vol. 8, No. 1, dated Jan. 1997, pp. 12-17. [cited by applicant]
Moss et al., Heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents: including the fetus and young adult, seventh edition, vol. 2, 2008, 37 pages (Year: 2008). [cited by applicant]
Mussatto, Kathleen, Management of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome integrating research in Nursing practice, Critical Care Nurse, Jan. 2005, 17 pages (Year: 2005). [cited by applicant]
Parati et al., “Comparison of Finger and Intra-arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring at Rest and During Laboratory Testing,” Jun. 1989, Hypertension, vol. 13, No. 6, Part 1, pp. 647-655. [cited by applicant]
Rose, Cedric “A Dynamic Bayesian Network for Handling Uncertainty in a Decision Support System Adapted to the Monitoring of Patients Treated by Hemodialysis,” Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Too… [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office—Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/535,149, filed Nov. 6, 2014, dated Jul. 28, 2017, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action, dated Nov. 12, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,441, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-final Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2013, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,441, 59 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, dated Apr. 10, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/328,411, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, dated Jul. 14, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,441, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action, dated Jun. 6, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/689,029, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, dated May 12, 2014, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,441, 45 pages. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office; Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board—Decision on Appeal—Affirmed, dated Oct. 20, 2017, pertaining to U.S. Appl. No. 13/826,441, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]