IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,299,172
Granted Patent B2
US 12,299,172 · App. 17/755,463 · Granted May 13, 2025

Methods and apparatus for protecting patient information during characterization of a specimen in an automated diagnostic analysis system

Inventors: Venkatesh NarasimhaMurthy (Hillsborough, NJ); Vivek Singh (Princeton, NJ); Yao-Jen Chang (Princeton, NJ); Benjamin S. Pollack (Jersey City, NJ); Ankur Kapoor (Plainsboro, NJ); Rayal Raj Prasad Nalam Venkat (Princeton, NJ)
Assignee: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc.
G06F21/6254G06T5/77G06T7/0004G06T11/60G06T2207/20081G06T2207/20084
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,299,172
App. No.
17/755,463
Granted
May 13, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of characterizing a specimen and specimen container to be analyzed in an automated diagnostic analysis system. The method can provide a segmentation determination and/or an HILN determination (hemolysis, icterus, lipemia, or normal) of the specimen while protecting patient information. The method includes capturing an image of a specimen container via an image capture device, identifying a label affixed to the specimen container in the captured image via an anonymization network, and editing the captured image via the anonymization network to mask some or all information present in the label so that it is removed from the captured image. Quality check modules and systems configured to carry out the method are also described, as are other aspects.

Claims (34)

1. A method of characterizing a specimen in an automated diagnostic analysis system, comprising:

capturing an image of a specimen container with an image capture device;

identifying a label affixed to the specimen container in the image with an anonymization network, wherein the anonymization network is a pre-trained network trained, with training images, to identify labels on specimen containers; and

editing the image with the anonymization network to mask the label such that information present in the label is removed from the image to produce an edited image, wherein information present in the label is removed by altering pixel data within the image.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network is part of a quality check module.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting the edited image for a segmentation or an HILN determination of the specimen in the specimen container with an HILN network of a quality check module.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network comprises a general adversarial network.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network comprises a variational auto encoder.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network is configured to inpaint the label in the image of the specimen and the specimen container in order to erase all barcodes and printed text on the label and form an inpainted label in the edited image.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the inpainted label appears as a white label in the edited image.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein a segmentation convolutional neural network (SCNN) receives as input one or more edited images from the anonymization network.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising training the anonymization network in a training phase prior to any characterization.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the editing of the image with the anonymization network preserves imaged fluid characteristics of the specimen in the edited image.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein captured images containing labels with patient information are not permanently stored in order to protect patient information.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information is patient information.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the editing of the image with the anonymization network removes all information present on the label.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising capturing images of the specimen container from other viewpoints.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network is configured to inpaint the label in the image in order to mask all barcodes on the label.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the anonymization network is configured to inpaint the label in the image in order to mask all printed text on the label.

17. A method of characterizing a specimen container in an automated diagnostic analysis system, comprising:

capturing an image of the specimen container, the image including fluid characteristics of a specimen within the specimen container;

identifying in the image a label affixed to the specimen container;

editing the image with an anonymization network to mask the label such that some or all printed information present on the label is removed from the image to form an edited image, wherein information present in the label is removed by altering pixel data representing the label and wherein pixel data representing imaged fluid characteristics of the specimen is preserved;

storing the edited image; and

employing a characterization network to access the stored image and characterize at least one imaged fluid characteristic of the specimen, wherein the characterization network is trained to identify one or more fluid characteristics of the specimen within the image.

18. A quality check module of an automated diagnostic analysis system, comprising:

a plurality of image capture devices arranged around an imaging location configured to capture multiple images from multiple viewpoints of a specimen container; and

a computer coupled to the plurality of image capture devices, the computer configured and operative via programming instructions to:

input a captured image taken by one of the plurality of image capture devices to an anonymization network executing on the computer, the captured image depicting at least the specimen container and a label affixed to the specimen container,

identify in the captured image the label affixed to the specimen container via the anonymization network, wherein the anonymization network is a pre-trained network trained, with training images, to identify labels on specimen containers; and

edit the captured image to produce an edited image via the anonymization network to mask the identified label such that information present in the label is removed from the captured image, wherein information present in the label is removed by altering pixel data within the image.

19. The quality check module of claim 18 , wherein the computer is further configured and operative via the programming instructions to:

output the edited image for segmentation or an interferent determination of a specimen in the specimen container via an HILN network executing on the computer.

20. The quality check module of claim 19 , wherein the computer is further configured and operative via the programming instructions to display the edited image with the information on the label being removed from the captured image.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2024
From: NARASIMHAMURTHY, VENKATESH; SINGH, VIVEK; CHANG, YAO-JEN; KAPOOR, ANKUR; NALAM VENKAT, RAYAL RAJ PRASAD
To: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 069324/0539 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2024
From: POLLACK, BENJAMIN S.
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Reel/Frame 069324/0768 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2024
From: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC.
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Reel/Frame 069325/0298 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62929062 · Oct 31, 2019
Related Publication 20240169093A1 · May 23, 2024
References Cited (59)
US 5876926A · Beecham · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 9322761B2 · Miller · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9739783B1 · Kumar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10198832B2 · De Fauw et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20080195326A1 · Munzer et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20160078196A1 · Malbon, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160245833A1 · Lefebvre · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364771A1 · Pinheiro et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170372193A1 · Mailhe · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180045654A1 · Park et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180129900A1 · Kiraly · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190271714A1 · Kluckner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200151498A1 · Sun et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210064927A1 · Kluckner et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133971A1 · Ma et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210164965A1 · Ma et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210334972A1 · NarasimhaMurthy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 105825509A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106372390A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106408562A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108596166A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3018482A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP WO2002039341A · 2004 [cited by examiner]
JP WO2002039341A1 · 2004 [cited by examiner]
JP 2009093538A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016048530A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019500100A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016112377A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017102827A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017106645A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017132168A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017132169A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018009405A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018039380A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018081617A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018089938A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018105062A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018188023A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018191287A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019002521A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019097327A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019102043A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018142764A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018225448A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2021 (12 Pages). [cited by applicant]
Tsui et al. Automatie Selective Removal of Embedded Patient Information From Image Content of DICOM Files. Apr. 30, 2012 (Apr. 30, 2012). [retrieved on Dec. 20, 2020]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: https://www.ajro… [cited by applicant]
Kushida et al. Strategies for de-identification and anonymization of electronic health record data for use in multicenter research studies. May 6, 2019 (May 6, 2019). [retrieved on Dec. 20, 2020]. Retrieved from the Int… [cited by applicant]
Snyder et al. Effectiveness of Barcoding for Reducing Patient Specimen and Laboratory Testing Identification Errors: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Jul. 29, 2015 (Jul. 29, 2015… [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., Image Inpainting for Irregular Holes Using Partial Convolutions. Dec. 15, 2018 (Dec. 15, 2018). arXiv: 1804.07723v2 [cs.CV], pp. 1-23. [cited by applicant]
Extended EP Search Report dated Nov. 17, 2022 of corresponding European Application No. 20880819.6, 4 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Clete A. Kushida et al: “Strategies for De-identification and Anonymization 0f Electronic Health Record Data for Use in Multicenter Research Studies:”, Medical Care, vol. 50, Jul. 1, 2012 (Jul. 1, 2012), pp. S82-S101, X… [cited by applicant]
Vimal Kumar Kasagani: “Optical quantification of hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia in human serum”, Jan. 1, 2013 (Jan. 1, 2013), XP055530750, ISBN: 978-1-303-65004-8, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: http://cdmbuntu.lib.… [cited by applicant]
Goodfellow, Ian, et al. “Generative adversarial nets.” Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014) pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Hideki, Aso et al. “Deep Representation Learning by Multi-Layer Neural Networks”; The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence; Year: Jul. 2013, vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 649-659. [cited by applicant]
Huang, Gao, et al. “Densely connected convolutional networks”, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017. pp. 4700-4708. [cited by applicant]
Jégou, Simon, et al. “The one hundred layers tiramisu: Fully convolutional densenets for semantic segmentation.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Lecun, Yann et al. “Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition” Proceedings of the IEEE, New York, US, vol. 86, No. 11, Nov. 1, 1998, pp. 2278-2323, 1998 // ISSN: 0018-9219, DOI: 10.1109/5.726791. [cited by applicant]
Ren, Shaoqing et al: “Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks”; IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence; vol. 39, No. 6, Sep. 13, 2015; pp. 1137-1149; XP0554… [cited by applicant]
Shah Urmil et al: “A Review of Deep Learning Models for Computer Vision”, 2018 IEEE PUNECON, IEEE, Nov. 30, 2018 (Nov. 30, 2018), pp. 1-6, XP033568970, DOI: 10.1109/PUNECON.2018.8745417. [cited by applicant]