IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,393,886
Granted Patent B2
US 12,393,886 · App. 17/789,882 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Power management of a hybrid power plant

Inventors: Roberto Carlos Barrenechea Gruber (Madrid, ES); Patxi Mendizabal Abasolo (Cordovilla, ES); Pedro Maria Zudaire Latienda (Ororbia, ES)
Assignee: Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Innovation & Technology S.L.
G06Q10/04G06Q50/06H02J3/004H02J3/381H02J2300/20Y02B70/30Y02E10/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,393,886
App. No.
17/789,882
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of power management of a hybrid power plant includes at least one type of renewable power generation equipment and an energy storage system, including: before a first dispatching time range: using first forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, and in particular hybrid plant status and plant parameters, to derive a first power generation schedule defining power generation in the first dispatching time range; at a dispatch point in time within the first dispatching time range: using second forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, and in particular plant status and plant parameters, to derive a second power generation schedule defining power generation in a second dispatching time range; and calculating an optimal power injection value for the dispatch point in time based on the first power generation schedule and the second power generation schedule taking into account at least one constraint.

Claims (51)

1. A method of power management of a hybrid power plant using a processor and having at least one type of renewable power generation equipment and an energy storage system for storing power for a utility grid, comprising:

before a first dispatching time range: to derive, using first forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, a first power generation schedule defining power generation in the first dispatching time range;

at a dispatch point in time within the first dispatching time range: using second forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, comprising plant status and/or plant parameters, to derive a second power generation schedule defining power generation in a second dispatching time range;

calculating an optimal power injection value for the dispatch point in time based on the first power generation schedule and the second power generation schedule taking into account at least one constraint, wherein the first power generation schedule and the second power generation schedule determines an amount of hybrid plant power output communicated to a point of common connection to which the at least one power generation equipment and the energy storage system is connected; and

injecting the hybrid plant power output produced by the at least one type of renewable power generation equipment and stored by the energy storage system into the utility grid at the point of common connection according to the optimal power injection value.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the constraint comprises a power threshold, wherein the optimal power injection value is calculated such that a deviation between the optimal power injection value and a power value according to the first generation schedule is below the power threshold,

wherein the power threshold is a relative power threshold, defining a maximally allowable deviation.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein calculating the optimal power injection value comprises finding an extreme of an objective function subject to the constraint.

4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the objective function and/or the at least one constraint is designed to achieve at least one of:

a deviation mitigation, thereby applying capacity firming;

a technical optimization, thereby applying capacity firming;

an economic optimization, thereby applying energy arbitrage and/or time shifting, wherein price differences at different time ranges and/or for different types of energy are exploited for profit maximization.

5. The method according to claim 3 ,

calculating the optimal power injection value is performed using a model including the objective function,

wherein the model is composed of continuous variables with a linear characteristic;

wherein the objective function of the model and a set of linear constraints define a convex solution space including the optimal power injection value,

wherein the optimal power injection value is an extreme of the convex solution space.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the constraint comprises at least one of the following:

at least one hybrid plant requirement;

at least one hybrid plant maximum power injection capability;

a charging and/or discharging capability of the storage system;

an allowed charging and/or discharging level of the storage system.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the first power generation schedule and the second power generation schedule overlap in time or do not overlap in time.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optimal power injection value is calculated further considering actual energy production capability and/or actual energy price and/or actual hybrid plant status.

9. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the first and/or second dispatching time range has a duration of between 1 hours and 48 hours; and/or

wherein the optimal power injection value for subsequent dispatch points in time is calculated every 5 min to 60 min repetitively.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the forecasts of energy production capability and/or energy price are obtained from an external source and/or include forecasts regarding at least one of:

power due to wind;

power due to sun irradiance;

power due to tidal;

plant power;

energy price of wind energy;

energy price of solar energy;

energy price of tidal energy;

energy price of any type of energy;

any other energy generation or consumption.

11. The method according to claim 1 ,

wherein the first and/or the second power generation schedule is derived such as to maximize plant power output and/or to minimize usage of the energy stored in the storage system and/or to maximize profit of selling the generated energy; and/or

wherein the hybrid plant comprises at least one wind and/or at least one solar energy converting unit.

12. An arrangement for power management of a hybrid power plant comprising at least one type of renewable power generation equipment and an energy storage system, the arrangement comprising a processor adapted:

before a first dispatching time range: to derive, using first forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, a first power generation schedule defining power generation in the first dispatching time range;

at a dispatch point in time within the first dispatching time range: to derive, using second forecasts of energy production capability and energy price, comprising plant status and/or plant parameters, a second power generation schedule defining power generation in a second dispatching time range; and

to calculate an optimal power injection value for the dispatch point in time based on the first power generation schedule and the second power generation schedule taking into account at least one constraint,

wherein the arrangement is adapted to carry out or control the method according to claim 1 .

13. A hybrid power plant system, comprising:

at least one type of renewable power generation equipment;

an energy storage system; and

the arrangement according to claim 12 .

14. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one hybrid power plant comprises a wind park.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one solar energy converting unit comprises a solar park and/or tidal energy converting equipment.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2023
From: BARRENECHEA GRUBER, ROBERTO CARLOS
To: ALTRAN INNOVATION, S.L.
Reel/Frame 063293/0582 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2023
From: MENDIZABAL ABASOLO, PATXI; ZUDAIRE LATIENDA, PEDRO MARIA
To: SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY S.L.
Reel/Frame 063293/0602 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 11, 2023
From: ALTRAN INNOVATION, S.L.
To: SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY S.L.
Reel/Frame 063293/0621 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 20380001 · Jan 13, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230073358A1 · Mar 9, 2023
References Cited (26)
US 20110231028A1 · Ozog · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110307109A1 · Sri-Jayantha · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130190938A1 · Zadeh · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140142779A1 · Stoettrup · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140316592A1 · Haj-Maharsi et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150278968A1 · Steven · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150381089A1 · Tarnowski et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190052088A1 · Johansson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210336443A1 · Møller · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220255323A1 · Mendizabal Abasolo · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 102184475A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
CN 103827482A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104969436A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 107332286A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108028543A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108039736A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 2733810B1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
EP 3823125A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
KR 20200100626A · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO 2013106941A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017201427A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Searching Authority mailed Feb. 19, 2021 corresponding to PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2020/085059 filed Dec. 8, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chinmay Kumar Nayak, Manas Ranjan Nayak: “Technoeconomic analysis of a grid-connected PV and battery energy storage system considering time of use pricing”; Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences;… [cited by applicant]
Mauricio B. C. Salles, Junling Huang, Michael J. Aziz and William W. Hogan: “Potential Arbitrage Revenue of Energy Storage Systems in PJM”; Energies 2017, 10, 1100; doi:10.3390/en10081100; www.mdpi.com/journal/energies;… [cited by applicant]
Xian Guoand, Dr. Cameron A. MacKenzie: “Optimal Bidding Strategy for GENCO with Green Power in Day-ahead Electricity Market”; Jan. 5, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Charles Quann: Thesis “Renewables Firming Using Grid-Scale Battery Storage in a Real-Time Pricing Market”; In partial fulfillment of the requirements, For the degree of Master of Science, Colorado State University, Fort… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,692,842