IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,446,850
Granted Patent B2
US 12,446,850 · App. 17/797,647 · Granted Oct 21, 2025

Ultrasound imaging device and operation method thereof

Inventors: Donggue Lee (Seoul, KR); Sangha Song (Seoul, KR); Gunwoo Lee (Seoul, KR); Hokyung Kang (Seoul, KR); Jaekwang Lee (Seoul, KR)
Assignee: SAMSUNG MEDISON CO., LTD.
A61B8/085A61B8/14A61B8/461A61B8/469A61B8/5207A61B8/5223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,446,850
App. No.
17/797,647
Granted
Oct 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided is an ultrasound imaging device and an operation method thereof. An embodiment of the present disclosure provides an ultrasound imaging device comprising: an ultrasound probe; a display unit; a memory for storing at least one instruction; and a processor for executing the at least one instruction stored in the memory, wherein the processor: image-processes an echo signal to acquire multiple ultrasound images; calculates suitability indicating, as a numerical value, whether the multiple acquired ultrasound images are suitable as input images for a diagnosis algorithm for diagnosing a lesion; displays the calculated suitability on the display unit; and determines an input ultrasound image, which is to be input into the diagnosis algorithm, among the multiple ultrasound images based on the suitability.

Claims (44)

1. An operation method of an ultrasound imaging device, comprising:

obtaining, by a processor, a plurality of ultrasound images by receiving an echo signal reflected from an object using an ultrasound probe and image-processing the received echo signal;

obtaining, by the processor, a setting value of a scan parameter of each of the plurality of ultrasound images

calculating, by the processor, suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images as an input image for a diagnostic algorithm for diagnosing a lesion based on the setting value of the scan parameter of each of the plurality of ultrasound images, wherein the diagnostic algorithm includes at least one of a hepatorenal index (HRI) algorithm, a tissue scatter distribution image (TSI) algorithm or a tissue attenuation image (TAI) algorithm, and wherein the suitability is a numerical value;

displaying, by the processor, the calculated suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images on a display of the ultrasound imaging device;

automatically freezing, by the processor, at least one ultrasound image among the plurality of ultrasound images based on the calculated suitability of the at least one ultrasound image being greater than a preset threshold;

determining, by the processor, the at least one frozen ultrasound image as an input ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images;

inputting, by the processor, the determined input ultrasound image to the diagnostic algorithm; and

measuring, by the processor, a numerical value indicating at least one of a hepatorenal index, a degree of scattering, or a degree of attenuation of the determined input ultrasound image using the diagnostic algorithm.

2. The operation method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating of the suitability further comprises calculating, by the processor, the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm based on at least one of an anatomical view or, quality.

3. The operation method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating of the suitability further comprises calculating, by the processor, the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm based on at least one of echogenicity, an anatomical view, a motion artifact, or a rate of shadows of each of the plurality of ultrasound images.

4. The operation method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating of the suitability comprises calculating, by the processor, the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm by using a pre-trained deep neural network using the plurality of ultrasound images as input data,

wherein the pre-trained deep neural network comprises an artificial neural network trained by using a plurality of previously obtained ultrasound images as input data, a numerical value of the suitability as an output value and a numerical value obtained by normalizing a magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) value or a value of a biopsy result as ground truth,

wherein the plurality of previously obtained ultrasound images, which are used as the input data for training the deep neural network, were acquired prior to obtaining the plurality of ultrasound images used as the input data for calculating the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm and stored in the memory of the ultrasound imaging device.

5. The operation method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images comprises:

receiving, by the processor, a user input for determining the input ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images based on all of the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images being equal to or less than the preset threshold.

6. The operation method of claim 1 , further comprising:

loading, by the processor, at least one ultrasound image previously captured and stored in a memory of the ultrasound imaging device;

measuring, by the processor, a similarity between the at least one loaded ultrasound image and the plurality of obtained ultrasound images; and

determining, by the processor, at least one ultrasound image of which the measured similarity is greater than a threshold preset in relation to the similarity,

wherein the calculating of the suitability comprises calculating suitability of the at least one determined ultrasound image for the diagnostic algorithm.

7. An ultrasound imaging device comprising:

an ultrasound probe configured to transmit an ultrasound signal to an object and receive an echo signal reflected from the object;

a display;

a memory storing at least one instruction; and

a processor configured to execute the at least one instruction stored in the memory,

wherein the processor is configured to:

obtain a plurality of ultrasound images by image-processing the echo signal;

obtain a setting value of a scan parameter of each of the plurality of ultrasound images:

calculate suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images as an input image for a diagnostic algorithm for diagnosing a lesion based on the setting value of the scan parameter of each of the plurality of ultrasound images, wherein the diagnostic algorithm includes at least one of a hepatorenal index (HRI) algorithm, a tissue scatter distribution image (TSI) algorithm or a tissue attenuation image (TAI) algorithm, and wherein the suitability is a numerical value;

control the display to display the calculated suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images on the display;

based on the calculated suitability of at least one ultrasound image being greater than a preset threshold, automatically freezing the at least one ultrasound image among the plurality of ultrasound images;

determine the at least one frozen ultrasound image as an input ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images;

input the determined input ultrasound image to the diagnostic algorithm; and

measure a numerical value indicating at least one of a hepatorenal index, a degree of scattering, or a degree of attenuation of the determined input ultrasound image using the diagnostic algorithm.

8. The ultrasound imaging device of claim 7 , wherein the processor is further configured to calculate the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm based on at least one of an anatomical view or, quality.

9. The ultrasound imaging device of claim 7 , wherein the processor is further configured to calculate the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm based on at least one of echogenicity, an anatomical view, a motion artifact, or a rate of shadows of each of the plurality of ultrasound images.

10. The ultrasound imaging device of claim 7 , wherein the processor is configured to calculate the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm by using a pre-trained deep neural network using the plurality of ultrasound images as input data, and

wherein the pre-trained deep neural network comprises an artificial neural network trained by using a plurality of previously obtained ultrasound images as input data, a numerical value of the suitability as an output value and a numerical value obtained by normalizing a magnetic resonance imaging derived proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) value or a value of a biopsy result as ground truth,

wherein the plurality of previously obtained ultrasound images, which are used as the input data for training the deep neural network, were acquired prior to obtaining the plurality of ultrasound images used as the input data for calculating the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images for the diagnostic algorithm and stored in the memory of the ultrasound imaging device.

11. The ultrasound imaging device of claim 7 , further comprising a user inputter including at least one of a button, a touch pad, or a control panel, and

wherein the processor is further configured to, based on all of the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images being equal to or less than the preset threshold obtain a user input for determining the input ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images through the user inputter.

12. The ultrasound imaging device of claim 7 , wherein the processor is configured to, based on all of the suitability of each of the plurality of ultrasound images being equal to or less than the preset threshold, control the display to display a user interface (UI) for receiving the user input for determining the input ultrasound image to be input to the diagnostic algorithm among the plurality of ultrasound images through the user inputter.

13. One or more non-transitory computer-readable recording media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by one or more processors individually or collectively, cause the one or more processors to perform the method of claim 1 in a computer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2022
From: LEE, DONGGUE; SONG, SANGHA; LEE, GUNWOO; KANG, HOKYUNG; LEE, JAEKWANG
To: SAMSUNG MEDISON CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 060727/0041 →
Priority Claims (1)
KR 10-2020-0034668 · Mar 20, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230058450A1 · Feb 23, 2023
References Cited (34)
US 6238342B1 · Feleppa · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 8600133B2 · Buelow et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9204860B2 · Ji et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10709425B2 · Waechter-Stehle et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10743841B2 · Kong et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11006926B2 · Labyed · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20110170755A1 · Buelow et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20150325036A1 · Lee · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160143621A1 · Parthasarathy et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170273669A1 · Schneider · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180049720A1 · Anand · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180140282A1 · Toyomura et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20220071600A1 · Canfield · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 105263420A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 110192893A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 4005856B2 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
JP 2012504449A · 2012 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016041117A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016514564A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 6066642B2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 6382633B2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 6467041B2 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019088576A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 101415667B1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020160058812A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
KR 101649725B1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued Dec. 7, 2023 for European Patent Application No. 20925242.8. [cited by applicant]
Supplementary European Search Report issued Jan. 3, 2024 for European Patent Application No. 20925242.8. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2021 issued in International Patent Application No. PCT/KR2020/018463 (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2024, issued in corresponding European Patent Application No. 20925242.8. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Dec. 4, 2024, issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-0034668 with an English translation. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2025 issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 2020800098761.2 (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Chinese Second Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2025 issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 202080098761.9 (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Korean Notice of Allowance dated Aug. 25, 2025 issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-0034668 (with English translation). [cited by applicant]