IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,259,514
Granted Patent B2
US 12,259,514 · App. 17/804,907 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Diagenesis-calibrated rock quality (DCRQ) determination

Inventors: Mohd Azizi Ibrahim (Dhahran, SA); Mohammed Fuad Alzayer (Al Qatif, SA); Layal Nour Alhussain (Dammam, SA); Faisal Naif Al-Enezi (Dhahran, SA)
Assignee: Saudi Arabian Oil Company
G01V20/00G01V2200/16
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,259,514
App. No.
17/804,907
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods include a computer-implemented method for determining relative productivity. A thorium-uranium ratio for a region of interest is determined by a diagenesis-calibrated rock quality (DCRQ) system using exploration and production (E&P) data. A percentage of siltstone in a lithology matrix for the region of interest is determined using the E&P data. A difference between a neutron porosity and a sandstone density porosity for the region of interest is determined using the E&P data. A rock testability index for the region of interest is determined. Relative productivity for the region of interest is determined using i) the thorium-uranium ratio, ii) the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix, iii) the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and iv) the rock testability index. Drilling parameters for use in upcoming drilling operations for wells in the region of interest are determined using the relative productivity.

Claims (53)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

determining, by a diagenesis-calibrated rock quality (DCRQ) system using exploration and production (E&P) data, a thorium-uranium ratio for a region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a percentage of siltstone in a lithology matrix for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a difference between a neutron porosity and a sandstone density porosity for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a rock testability index for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system, using a petrophysical model, a relative productivity for the region of interest, the petrophysical model combining i) the thorium-uranium ratio, ii) the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix, iii) the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and iv) and the rock testability index, the petrophysical model generating the relative productivity for the region of interest as a comparisons of productive reservoir layers of a reservoir, the relative productivity being proportional with the thorium-uranium ratio, the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and the rock testability index, the relative productivity being inversely proportional with the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix;

determining, using the relative productivity, drilling parameters for use in upcoming drilling operations for wells in the region of interest; and

executing drilling operations for wells in the region of interest using the drilling parameters.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

performing a quality assurance/quality check (QA/QC) on the E&P data in the E&P database to ensure consistency and accuracy.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

retrieving the E&P data from a centralized E&P database based on the region of interest identified by the DCRQ system.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the relative productivity for the region of interest is determined by using an independent petrophysical modeling and integration application.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the relative productivity is based on: i) static core permeability data, ii) tight reservoir diagenesis project data, and iii) dynamic formation testing data.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the drilling parameters for use in the upcoming drilling operations comprise well trajectory.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

verifying an independent petrophysical model and model parameters based on a production rate.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a user interface for user selection of one or more parameters for finding regions of interest for calibrating drilling and production data.

9. A non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions executable by a computer system to perform operations comprising:

determining, by a diagenesis-calibrated rock quality (DCRQ) system using exploration and production (E&P) data, a thorium-uranium ratio for a region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a percentage of siltstone in a lithology matrix for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a difference between a neutron porosity and a sandstone density porosity for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a rock testability index for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system, using a petrophysical model, a relative productivity for the region of interest, the petrophysical model combining i) the thorium-uranium ratio, ii) the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix, iii) the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and iv) and the rock testability index, the petrophysical model generating the relative productivity for the region of interest as a comparisons of productive reservoir layers of a reservoir, the relative productivity being proportional with the thorium-uranium ratio, the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and the rock testability index, the relative productivity being inversely proportional with the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix;

determining, using the relative productivity, drilling parameters for use in upcoming drilling operations for wells in the region of interest; and

executing drilling operations for wells in the region of interest using the drilling parameters.

10. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , the operations further comprising:

performing a quality assurance/quality check (QA/QC) on the E&P data in the E&P database to ensure consistency and accuracy.

11. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , the operations further comprising:

retrieving the E&P data from a centralized E&P database based on the region of interest identified by the DCRQ system.

12. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the relative productivity for the region of interest is determined by using an independent petrophysical modeling and integration application.

13. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein determining the relative productivity is based on: i) static core permeability data, ii) tight reservoir diagenesis project data, and iii) dynamic formation testing data.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the drilling parameters for use in the upcoming drilling operations comprise well trajectory.

15. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , the operations further comprising:

verifying an independent petrophysical model and model parameters based on a production rate.

16. The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of claim 9 , the operations further comprising:

providing a user interface for user selection of one or more parameters for finding regions of interest for calibrating drilling and production data.

17. A computer-implemented system, comprising:

one or more processors; and

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to the one or more processors and storing programming instructions for execution by the one or more processors, the programming instructions instructing the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

determining, by a diagenesis-calibrated rock quality (DCRQ) system using exploration and production (E&P) data, a thorium-uranium ratio for a region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a percentage of siltstone in a lithology matrix for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a difference between a neutron porosity and a sandstone density porosity for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system using the E&P data, a rock testability index for the region of interest;

determining, by the DCRQ system, using a petrophysical model, a relative productivity for the region of interest, the petrophysical model combining i) the thorium-uranium ratio, ii) the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix, iii) the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and iv) and the rock testability index, the petrophysical model generating the relative productivity for the region of interest as a comparisons of productive reservoir layers of a reservoir, the relative productivity being proportional with the thorium-uranium ratio, the difference between the neutron porosity and the sandstone density porosity, and the rock testability index, the relative productivity being inversely proportional with the percentage of siltstone in the lithology matrix;

determining, using the relative productivity, drilling parameters for use in upcoming drilling operations for wells in the region of interest; and

executing drilling operations for wells in the region of interest using the drilling parameters.

18. The computer-implemented system of claim 17 , the operations further comprising:

performing a quality assurance/quality check (QA/QC) on the E&P data in the E&P database to ensure consistency and accuracy.

19. The computer-implemented system of claim 17 , the operations further comprising:

retrieving the E&P data from a centralized E&P database based on the region of interest identified by the DCRQ system.

20. The computer-implemented system of claim 17 , wherein determining the relative productivity for the region of interest includes using an independent petrophysical modeling and integration application.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2022
From: IBRAHIM, MOHD AZIZI; ALZAYER, MOHAMMED FUAD; ALHUSSAIN, LAYAL NOUR; AL-ENEZI, FAISAL NAIF
To: SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 060097/0361 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230393302A1 · Dec 7, 2023
References Cited (6)
US 10400590B1 · Aldred · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10890066B1 · Ibrahim · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20180202264A1 · Sarduy · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 105467465A · 2015 [cited by examiner]
CN 107165621A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
Ma, M., M. Zeybek, and Fikri J. Kuchuk. “Integration of static and dynamic data for enhanced reservoir characterization, geological modeling and well performance studies.” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?… [cited by examiner]