IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,380,354
Granted Patent B1
US 12,380,354 · App. 17/810,186 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Determination of characteristics of a molecule by controlling coupling strengths between qubits of a quantum device during a series of measurements

Inventors: Alex Retzker (Pasadena, CA); Yotam Vaknin (Pasadena, CA)
Assignee: Amazon Technologies, Inc.
G06N10/40G01N24/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,380,354
App. No.
17/810,186
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B1
Abstract

A system and method for modeling one or more characteristics of a molecule using a quantum device implemented on quantum hardware is disclosed. Through control, via modulation, of coupling strengths between qubits on the quantum device and a comparison to an experimentally-measured nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, J-coupling values may be deduced. These J-coupling values may then be used to recover the molecular structure of the given molecule. The control of coupling strengths may take place through an iterative process until convergence to the one or more characteristics is reached. In some embodiments, such a process may be implemented as part of a quantum computing service. In such cases, the quantum hardware may be local to the quantum computing service, or may be outsourced to a quantum hardware provider.

Claims (68)

1. A system, comprising:

one or more computing devices configured to:

receive a nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum corresponding to a given molecule; and

generate instructions for modeling characteristics of the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum on a quantum device implemented using quantum hardware, the quantum device comprising:

two or more qubits coupled together with respective coupling strengths;

the one or more computing devices further configured to:

tune the respective coupling strengths, wherein to tune comprises:

control, via modulation, the coupling strengths for a given set of one or more measurements;

compare results of the given set of one or more measurements to the received nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum;

adjust at least one of the coupling strengths; and

iteratively perform one or more additional controls, one or more additional comparisons, and one or more additional adjustments until convergence of current given results to the one or more characteristics of the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum; and

provide, responsive to the convergence of the current given results to the one or more characteristics of the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, the current given results.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the coupling strengths for the given set of the one or more measurements are controlled via the modulation of respective operating frequencies of the two or more qubits.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the respective operating frequencies for at least two of the two or more qubits are different.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein:

the one or more computing devices are implemented as part of a quantum computing service of a provider network, the one or more computing devices further configured to:

receive, via an interface of the quantum computing service, the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum generated by or on behalf of a customer of the quantum computing service;

provide, to a quantum hardware provider, instructions for implementing the quantum device using quantum hardware of the quantum hardware provider, wherein the instructions for implementing the quantum device are based at least in part on the instructions for modeling the characteristics of the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum on the quantum device;

coordinate, responsive to the quantum device being implemented using the quantum hardware of the quantum hardware provider, the tuning of the respective coupling strengths, wherein:

responsive to the convergence of the current given results to the one or more characteristics of the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum, the current given results are provided to the customer.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the quantum hardware provider is external to the provider network.

6. A system, comprising:

quantum hardware configured to implement a quantum device based on instructions for modeling characteristics of information for a given molecule, wherein the quantum device comprises two or more qubits coupled together with respective coupling strengths;

one or more computing devices configured to:

receive the information corresponding to the given molecule; and

generate the instructions for modeling the characteristics of the received information on the quantum device; and

tune the respective coupling strengths until convergence of iterated results to the one or more characteristics of the received information, wherein to tune comprises:

control, via modulation, the coupling strengths for a given set of one or more measurements;

compare results of the given set of one or more measurements to the received information;

adjust at least one of the coupling strengths; and

iteratively perform one or more additional controls, one or more additional comparisons, and one or more additional adjustments until the convergence; and

provide, responsive to the convergence of the iterated results to the one or more characteristics of the received information, the iterated results.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the two or more qubits coupled together are respectively connected to one another via a common connection point.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the two or more qubits are two or more tunable qubits and the coupling strengths are controlled via the modulation of respective operating frequencies of the two or more tunable qubits.

9. The system of claim 7 , further comprising two or more respective tunable couplers coupled with respective ones of the two or more qubits, wherein the coupling strengths are controlled, at least in part, via the two or more tunable couplers.

10. The system of claim 7 , further comprising two or more respective superconducting quantum interference devices coupled with respective ones of the two or more qubits, wherein the coupling strengths are controlled, at least in part, via the two or more superconducting quantum interference devices.

11. The system of claim 6 , wherein the two or more qubits coupled together are respectively connected to one another via respective harmonic oscillators.

12. The system of claim 6 , wherein:

the one or more computing devices and the quantum hardware are implemented as part of a quantum computing service of a provider network, the one or more computing devices further configured to:

receive, via an interface of the quantum computing service, the information generated on behalf of a customer of the quantum computing service, wherein the received information comprises an experimentally-measured nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum;

provide, responsive to the generation of the instructions for modeling the characteristics of the received information on the quantum device, the instructions to the quantum hardware;

coordinate, responsive to the quantum device being implemented using the quantum hardware, the tuning of the respective coupling strengths, wherein:

responsive to the convergence of the current given results to the one or more characteristics of the received information, the iterated results are provided to the customer.

13. The system of claim 6 , wherein the comparison of the results of the given set of the one or more measurements to the received information comprises:

reproduction of at least one or more characteristics of a modeled nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum generated using the results; and

comparison of the at least one or more characteristics to the received information, wherein the received information comprises an experimentally-measured nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum corresponding to the given molecule.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the comparison of the at least one or more reproduced characteristics is used to determine that the convergence has been reached.

15. The system of claim 6 , wherein the generation of the instructions for modeling the one or more characteristics of the molecule on the quantum device comprises:

mapping a number of qubits of the two or more qubits coupled together to respective atoms of the molecule, wherein:

the received information comprises a molecular structure of the molecule;

the molecular structure is used to determine the number of qubits; and

the respective atoms of the molecule correspond to a subset of total atoms of the molecule.

16. A method, comprising:

receiving information corresponding to a given molecule;

generating instructions for modeling one or more characteristics of the given molecule on a quantum device, implemented using quantum hardware, wherein the quantum device comprises qubits coupled together with respective coupling strengths; and

tuning the respective coupling strengths until convergence of iterated results to the one or more characteristics of the received information, wherein tuning comprises:

controlling, via modulation, the coupling strengths for a given set of one or more measurements;

comparing results of the given set of one or more measurements to the received information;

adjusting at least one of the coupling strengths; and

iteratively performing, at least once, said controlling, said comparing, and said adjusting until the convergence of the iterated results to the one or more characteristics of the received information; and

providing, responsive to the convergence of the iterated results to the one or more characteristics of the received information, the iterated results.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein said generating the instructions for modeling the one or more characteristics of the molecule on a quantum device comprises:

determining, via the received information, a number of qubits of the qubits coupled together required to model the one or more characteristics of the given molecule on the quantum device, wherein the received information comprises a molecular structure of the given molecule.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein said generating the instructions for modeling the one or more characteristics of the molecule on a quantum device further comprises:

mapping the number of qubits to respective atoms of the given molecule, wherein the respective atoms represent a subset of total atoms of the molecule.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein said comparing the results of the given set of the one or more measurements to the received information comprises:

reproducing a modeled nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum via the results and comparing the modeled nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum to the received information, wherein the received information comprises an experimentally-measured nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum corresponding to the given molecule.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the iterated results are used to determine one or more characteristics about J-coupling of the given molecule.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 18, 2022
From: RETZKER, ALEX; VAKNIN, YOTAM
To: AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 060532/0186 →
References Cited (27)
US 10101423B2 · Devience et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20070080341A1 · Macready · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20120319684A1 · Gambetta · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20200349326A1 · King · 2020 [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/491,140, filed Sep. 30, 2021, Jeffrey Paul Heckey, et al. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,674, filed Nov. 27, 2019, Jeffrey Paul Heckey. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,698, filed Nov. 27, 2019, Derek Bolt. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,732, filed Nov. 27, 209, Jeffrey Paul Heckey. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,737, filed Nov. 27, 2019, Christopher Kasprowicz. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/525,723, filed Nov. 12, 2021, Milan Kmeta. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/525,716, filed Nov. 12, 2021, Milan Kmeta. [cited by applicant]
H. Hogben, M. Krzystyniak, G. Charnock, P. Hore, and I. Kuprov, “Spinach—A software library for simulation of spin dynamics in large spin systems,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 208, pp. 179-194 (2011). [cited by applicant]
P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, “A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits,” Applied Physics Reviews 6, 021318 (2019), pp. 1-59. [cited by applicant]
F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. Brandao, D. A. Buell, et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor”, Nature 574, pp. 505-510, (2… [cited by applicant]
Y. Sung, L. Ding, J. Braumuller, A. Vepsalainen, B. Kannan, M. Kjaergaard, A. Greene, G. O. Samach, C. McNally, D. Kim, et al., “Realization of High-Fidelity CZ and ZZ-Free iSWAP Gates with a Tunable Coupler”, Physical … [cited by applicant]
M. Gong, S. Wang, C. Zha, M.- C. Chen, H.-L. Huang, Y. Wu, Q. Zhu, Y. Zhao, S. Li, S. Guo, et al., “Quantum walks on a programmable two-dimensional 62-qubit superconducting processor”, Science 372, pp. 948-952 (2021); h… [cited by applicant]
P. Jurcevic, A. Javadi-Abhari, L. S. Bishop, I. Lauer, D. F. Bogorin, M. Brink, L. Capelluto, O. Gunluk, T. Itoko, N. Kanazawa, et al., “Demonstration of quantum vol. 64 on a superconducting quantum computing system”, I… [cited by applicant]
Y. Lu, S. Chakram, N. Leung, N. Earnest, R. K. Naik, Z. Huang, p. Groszkowski, E. Kapit, J. Koch, and D. I. Schuster, “Universal Stabilization of a Parametrically Coupled Qubit”, Physical Review Letters 119, 150502 (201… [cited by applicant]
N. Didier, E. A. Sete, J. Combes, and M. P. da Silva, “AC Flux Sweet Spots in Parametrically Modulated Superconducting Qubits,” Physical Review Applied 12, 054015 (2019); arxiv.org/abs/1807.01310, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
A. Petrescu, C. L. Calonnec, C. Leroux, A. Di Paolo, P. Mundada, S. Sussman, A. Vrajitoarea, A. A. Houck, and A. Blais, “Accurate methods for the analysis of strong-drive effects in parametric gates”, arXiv preprint arX… [cited by applicant]
S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, “Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states”, Physical Review Letters vol. 72, issued 22, pp. 3439-3443, (1994 American Physical Society). [cited by applicant]
S. Pang and N. Jordan, “Optimal adaptive control for quantum metrology with time-dependent Hamiltonians”, Nature Communications 8, Article No. 14695, (2017), pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
S. Schmitt, T. Gefen, D. Louzon, C. Osterkamp, N. Staudenmaier, J. Lang, M. Markham, A. Retzker, L. P. McGuinness, and F. Jelezko, “Optimal frequency measurements with quantum probes”, npj Quantum Information 7, Article… [cited by applicant]
T. Gefen, F. Jelezko, and A. Retzker, “Control methods for improved Fisher information with quantum sensing”, Physical Review A 96, 032310 (2017), arxiv.org/pdf/1702.07408.pdf, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
P. Klukowski, M. J. Walczak, A. Gonczarek, J. Boudet, and G. Wider, “Computer vision-based automated peak picking applied to protein NMR spectra”, Bioinformatics, vol. 31, Issue 18, Sep. 15, 2015, pp. 2981-2988. [cited by applicant]
P. Klukowski, M. Augoff, M. Zieba, M. Drwal, A. Gonczarek, and M. J. Walczak, “NMRNet: a deep learning approach to automated peak picking of protein NMR spectra”, Bioinformatics, vol. 34, Issue 15, Aug. 1, 2018, pp. 259… [cited by applicant]
G. Waldherr, J. Beck, P. Neumann, R. Said, M. Nitsche, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, J. Twamley, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, “High-dynamic-range magnetometry with a single nuclear spin in diamond”, Nature nanotechnology 7,… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,505,367