Error monitors for collective and cyclic sticks
In an embodiment, a rotorcraft includes a control element; a first detent sensor connected to the control element, the first detent sensor being operable to generate detent slip rate data indicating movement of the control element and detent state data indicating pilot control of the control element; a first trim motor connected to the control element and operable to generate trim rate data; and an FCC in signal communication with the first detent sensor and the first trim motor, the FCC including an error monitor operable to compare the detent slip rate data with the trim rate data and determine whether the first detent sensor is functional or defective, operable to provide a first flight management function when the first detent sensor is determined to be functional, and operable to provide a second flight management function when the first detent sensor is determined to be defective.
1. A rotorcraft comprising:
a control element;
a first detent sensor connected to the control element, wherein the first detent sensor is operable to generate detent slip rate data indicating movement of the control element and detent state data indicating pilot control of the control element;
a first trim motor connected to the control element, wherein the first trim motor is operable to generate trim rate data; and
a flight control computer (FCC) in signal communication with the first detent sensor and the first trim motor, wherein the FCC is operable to compare the detent slip rate data with the trim rate data and determine whether the first detent sensor is functional or defective, wherein the FCC is further operable to generate trim command data and detect whether the trim rate data is initiated by, and in agreement with, the trim command data and determine whether the first trim motor is functional or defective, wherein the FCC is further operable to provide a first flight management function when the first detent sensor is determined to be functional, and wherein the FCC is further operable to provide a second flight management function when the first detent sensor is determined to be defective.
2. The rotorcraft of claim 1 , wherein the FCC is further operable to compare the detent state data with the detent slip rate data and the trim rate data to determine whether the first detent sensor is functional or defective.
3. The rotorcraft of claim 2 , wherein the FCC is further operable to provide the first flight management function when the first trim motor is determined to be functional, and wherein the FCC is further operable to provide the second flight management function when the first trim motor is determined to be defective.
4. The rotorcraft of claim 2 , wherein the FCC is further operable to compare the detent state data with the trim rate data and the trim command data to determine whether the first trim motor is functional or defective.
5. The rotorcraft of claim 1 , wherein the second flight management function turns off outer loop augmentation.
6. A flight control computer (FCC) for a rotorcraft comprising:
a processor; and
a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a program to be executed by the processor, the program including instructions for monitoring a functionality of a first detent sensor connected to a first control element, the instructions for monitoring the functionality including instructions for:
receiving detent slip rate data from the first detent sensor indicating pilot commands to the first control element;
receiving trim rate data from a trim motor connected to the first control element;
comparing the trim rate data to the detent slip rate data;
increasing an error count in response to the first control element being in an in-detent state and the detent slip rate data being in conflict with the trim rate data;
determining a functionality status of the first detent sensor according to the detent slip rate data and the trim rate data, wherein the first detent sensor is determined to be non-functional in response to the error count being equal to or greater than a threshold value; and
providing a first flight management function in response to the first detent sensor being determined to be functional, and providing a second flight management function in response to the first detent sensor being determined to be non-functional.
7. The FCC of claim 6 , wherein the instructions for monitoring the functionality further include instructions for receiving detent state data from the first detent sensor indicating whether the first control element is in the in-detent state or an out-of-detent state.
8. The FCC of claim 7 , wherein the instructions for monitoring the functionality further comprise decreasing the error count when the detent state data indicates the first control element is in the in-detent state and the detent slip rate data is in agreement with the trim rate data.
9. The FCC of claim 7 , wherein the first detent sensor is determined to be functional in response to the error count being less than the threshold value.
10. The FCC of claim 6 , wherein the instructions for monitoring the functionality further include instructions for:
comparing the trim rate data to the detent slip rate data; and
determining a functionality status of the trim motor according to the comparison of the trim rate data to the detent slip rate data.
11. The FCC of claim 6 , wherein the first flight management function provides inner loop flight augmentation, rate loop flight augmentation, and outer loop flight augmentation, and wherein the second flight management function turns off the outer loop flight augmentation.
12. A method for operating a rotorcraft comprising:
receiving control element rate data from a first detent sensor indicating pilot commands to a first control element, wherein the first detent sensor is connected to the first control element;
receiving trim rate data from a trim motor connected to the first control element;
comparing the trim rate data to the control element rate data;
increasing an error count in response to the first control element being in an in-detent state and the trim rate data being in disagreement with the control element rate data;
determining a functionality status of the first detent sensor according to the control element rate data and the trim rate data, wherein the functionality status of the first detent sensor is determined to be non-functional in response to the error count being equal to or greater than a threshold value; and
providing a first flight management function in response to the first detent sensor being determined to be functional, and providing a second flight management function in response to the first detent sensor being determined to be non-functional.
13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising receiving detent state data from the first detent sensor indicating whether the first control element is in the in-detent state or an out-of-detent state.
14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising decreasing the error count when the detent state data indicates the first control element is in the in-detent state and the trim rate data is in agreement with the control element rate data.
15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the functionality status of the first detent sensor is determined to be functional when the error count is less than the threshold value.
16. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:
comparing the trim rate data to the control element rate data;
determining a functionality status of the trim motor according to the trim rate data and the control element rate data; and
providing the first flight management function in response to the trim motor being determined to be functional, and providing the second flight management function in response to the trim motor being determined to be non-functional.