IP Library Granted Patent US 12,327,625
Granted Patent B2
US 12,327,625 · App. 17/822,989 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Systems and methods to process electronic images to identify tumor subclones and relationships among subclones

Inventor: Christopher Kanan (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Paige.AI, Inc.
G16H30/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,327,625
App. No.
17/822,989
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for detecting tumor subclones may include receiving one or more digital images into a digital storage device, the one or more digital images including images of a tumor of a patient, detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient, extracting one or more visual features from each detected neoplasm, determining a hierarchy dendrogram based on the detected one or more neoplasms and the extracted one or more visual features for each detected neoplasm, determining one or more leaf nodes based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram, and determining whether there are two or more neoplasms among the detected one or more neoplasms that originated independently.

Claims (22)

1. A computer-implemented method for detecting tumor subclones, the method comprising: receiving one or more digital images into a digital storage device, the one or more digital images including images of a tumor of a patient; detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient; extracting one or more visual features from each detected neoplasm; determining a hierarchy dendrogram based on the detected one or more neoplasms and the extracted one or more visual features for each of the detected one or more neoplasms; determining one or more leaf nodes based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram; determining, based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram, whether there are two or more neoplasms among the detected one or more neoplasms that originated independently; and displaying and/or storing the determined two or more neoplasms.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a spatial location for each neoplasm or a determined neoplasm region, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is further based on the determined spatial location.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising using hierarchical clustering on the extracted one or more visual features, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is based on the hierarchical clustering.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a similarity of each extracted visual feature to each other extracted visual feature.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein determining the similarity includes applying a trained similarity metric system on all pair-wise combinations of the one or more extracted visual features.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a score for each detected neoplasm, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is further based on the determined score for each detected neoplasm.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein determining the score includes applying a trained scoring system.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the score corresponds to an outcome or treatment response.

9. The method of claim 6 , further comprising using hierarchical clustering on the determined score for each detected neoplasm, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is further based on the hierarchical clustering.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising dividing each received digital image into sub-regions, and determining which sub-regions among the divided sub-regions include a neoplasm.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a type for each detected neoplasm.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient is performed using a trained machine learning model.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising outputting the hierarchy dendrogram on a display.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising determining that two or more neoplasms among the detected one or more neoplasms originated independently, wherein the output hierarchy dendrogram is color coded based on the determined two or more neoplasms that originated independently.

15. A system for detecting tumor subclones, the system comprising: a data storage device storing instructions for detecting tumor subclones in an electronic storage medium; and a processor configured to execute the instructions to perform a method including: receiving one or more digital images into a digital storage device, the one or more digital images including images of a tumor of a patient; detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient; extracting one or more visual features from each detected neoplasm; determining a hierarchy dendrogram based on the detected one or more neoplasms and the extracted one or more visual features for each of the detected one or more neoplasms; determining one or more leaf nodes based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram; determining, based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram, whether there are two or more neoplasms among the detected one or more neoplasms that originated independently; and displaying and/or storing the determined two or more neoplasms.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the system is further configured for:

using hierarchical clustering on the extracted one or more visual features, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is based on the hierarchical clustering.

17. The system of claim 15 , wherein detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient is performed using a trained machine learning model.

18. A non-transitory machine-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computing system, causes the computing system to perform a method for detecting tumor subclones, the method including: receiving one or more digital images into a digital storage device, the one or more digital images including images of a tumor of a patient; detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient; extracting one or more visual features from each of the detected one or more neoplasms; determining a hierarchy dendrogram based on the detected one or more neoplasms and the extracted one or more visual features for each detected neoplasm; determining one or more leaf nodes based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram; determining, based on the determined hierarchy dendrogram, whether there are two or more neoplasms among the detected one or more neoplasms that originated independently; and displaying and/or storing the determined two or more neoplasms.

19. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 18 , the method further comprising:

using hierarchical clustering on the extracted one or more visual features, wherein determining the hierarchy dendrogram is based on the hierarchical clustering.

20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 18 , wherein detecting one or more neoplasms in the one or more received digital images for each patient is performed using a trained machine learning model.

Assignments (3)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2026
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 075589/0752 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2025
From: PAIGE.AI, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 073216/0876 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2022
From: KANAN, CHRISTOPHER
To: PAIGE.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 060937/0418 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63261578 · Sep 24, 2021
Related Publication 20230116379A1 · Apr 13, 2023
References Cited (13)
US 11182900B2 · Dogdas et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11308616B2 · Lentini et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20170091527A1 · Sarachan et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20190147592A1 · Yu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210279870A1 · Barnes et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220051047A1 · Kanan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors,” Wikipedia, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Response_evaluation_criteria_in_solid_tumors (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
“Tumour heterogeneity” Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tumour_heterogeneity (18 pages). [cited by applicant]
Ramón y Cajal, S. et al., “Clinical implications of intratumor heterogeneity: challenges and opportunities.” Journal of Molecular Medicine 98.2, 161-177 (2020). [cited by applicant]
Rubert, D. “Distance and Similarity Measures in Comparative Genomics.” Diss. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 2019 (116 pages). [cited by applicant]
Xie, X., Guan, J. & Zhou, S. “Similarity evaluation of DNA sequences based on frequent patterns and entropy.” BMC Genomics 16 (Suppl 3), S5 (2015) (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Zhao, C., Wang, Z. “GOGO: An improved algorithm to measure the semantic similarity between gene ontology terms.” Scientific Reports 8, 15107 (2018) (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Mahrooghy, Majid, et al. “Pharmacokinetic tumor heterogeneity as a prognostic biomarker for classifying breast cancer recurrence risk.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 62.6, Jun. 1, 2015, pp. 1585-1594. [cited by applicant]